20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

Our ethics codes get an overhaul

“How candid should journalists be with the people we quote, photograph, and record, knowing that a single picture or paraphrase can, thanks to Google, irrevocably change their lives?”

There are plenty of ethics codes out there for journalists. The best known in the U.S. is from the Society of Professional Journalists and is filled with useful and largely uncontroversial advice, ranging from “Seek truth and report it” to “Be accountable and transparent.” Many individual news organizations, from the Sioux Falls Argus Leader to The New York Times, have their own policies.

But 2020 ought to be the year that our ethics codes get an overhaul, as journalists face relentless business pressures, relinquish even more control over how our content is distributed and framed, and deal with the consequences of anonymity, doxing, and transparency. It’s more urgent than ever, as our country becomes increasingly polarized and as trust in the news media remains tepid.

So the next great ethics code ought to deal with the sort of situations that are arising (or becoming more urgent) in the digital age. They include:

  • How candid should journalists be with the people we quote, photograph, and record, knowing that a single picture or paraphrase can, thanks to Google, irrevocably change their lives?
  • What’s the responsibility of journalists to address the way others mischaracterize or mislabel their reporting, and how can that be done most effectively?
  • When aggregating or linking to others’ stories, what’s a journalist’s responsibility to fact-check those pieces, to examine their provenance, to evaluate the credibility of the author?
  • How much transparency do nonprofit news organizations owe their readers, revealing not just donors’ names and amounts but the nature of any discussions or promises (implicit or explicit) that preceded a gift?
  • How much anonymity do we owe our commenters, whose remarks shape the way our stories are evaluated? How do we choose which stories are open to comments and which are closed?
  • How much daylight should there be between reporters’ social media feeds and their professional profiles? Should journalists’ Twitter feeds ever reflect angles or opinions that they wouldn’t feel comfortable including in a news story?
  • What measures should we take as some journalists simultaneously produce both independent news stories and sponsored content (or other pieces that are driven largely by advertisers’ interests)?
  • As news organizations move to subscription-driven models, how much of an obligation do we retain to serve communities who can’t afford, or aren’t interested in, the journalism that we publish?

Constructing this code won’t be easy. It’ll require contributions from people who don’t usually feel empowered to take part in this discussion. It’ll need to be updated constantly, as media economics and technologies change.

And there’s a limit to the effectiveness of any ethics code. Journalism isn’t a typical profession, with a state bar or medical board that can investigate complaints and impose sanctions. A new code won’t affect some behavior any more than the old ones do, because many journalists will lack the interest or integrity to abide.

It’s possible that the most significant signal of an ethics code would be for some of our readers, viewers, and listeners. It could help guide their expectations about the journalism they consume. And it could empower them to demand more from the journalists who cover their communities.

Bill Grueskin is a professor of professional practice at Columbia Journalism School.

There are plenty of ethics codes out there for journalists. The best known in the U.S. is from the Society of Professional Journalists and is filled with useful and largely uncontroversial advice, ranging from “Seek truth and report it” to “Be accountable and transparent.” Many individual news organizations, from the Sioux Falls Argus Leader to The New York Times, have their own policies.

But 2020 ought to be the year that our ethics codes get an overhaul, as journalists face relentless business pressures, relinquish even more control over how our content is distributed and framed, and deal with the consequences of anonymity, doxing, and transparency. It’s more urgent than ever, as our country becomes increasingly polarized and as trust in the news media remains tepid.

So the next great ethics code ought to deal with the sort of situations that are arising (or becoming more urgent) in the digital age. They include:

  • How candid should journalists be with the people we quote, photograph, and record, knowing that a single picture or paraphrase can, thanks to Google, irrevocably change their lives?
  • What’s the responsibility of journalists to address the way others mischaracterize or mislabel their reporting, and how can that be done most effectively?
  • When aggregating or linking to others’ stories, what’s a journalist’s responsibility to fact-check those pieces, to examine their provenance, to evaluate the credibility of the author?
  • How much transparency do nonprofit news organizations owe their readers, revealing not just donors’ names and amounts but the nature of any discussions or promises (implicit or explicit) that preceded a gift?
  • How much anonymity do we owe our commenters, whose remarks shape the way our stories are evaluated? How do we choose which stories are open to comments and which are closed?
  • How much daylight should there be between reporters’ social media feeds and their professional profiles? Should journalists’ Twitter feeds ever reflect angles or opinions that they wouldn’t feel comfortable including in a news story?
  • What measures should we take as some journalists simultaneously produce both independent news stories and sponsored content (or other pieces that are driven largely by advertisers’ interests)?
  • As news organizations move to subscription-driven models, how much of an obligation do we retain to serve communities who can’t afford, or aren’t interested in, the journalism that we publish?

Constructing this code won’t be easy. It’ll require contributions from people who don’t usually feel empowered to take part in this discussion. It’ll need to be updated constantly, as media economics and technologies change.

And there’s a limit to the effectiveness of any ethics code. Journalism isn’t a typical profession, with a state bar or medical board that can investigate complaints and impose sanctions. A new code won’t affect some behavior any more than the old ones do, because many journalists will lack the interest or integrity to abide.

It’s possible that the most significant signal of an ethics code would be for some of our readers, viewers, and listeners. It could help guide their expectations about the journalism they consume. And it could empower them to demand more from the journalists who cover their communities.

Bill Grueskin is a professor of professional practice at Columbia Journalism School.

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Millie Tran   Wicked

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide