20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

Think twice before turning to Twitter

“The question isn’t about social media being friend or foe, but whether we’re watching journalism’s suicide by a thousand tweets.”

It’s hard to believe, but journalism in the United States may be in a more precarious situation at the end of this decade than it was at the beginning.

Back then, a global recession had already taken half of newspapers’ advertising revenue, but by now it’s taken another half. Newsroom staffing was in steep decline, but some observers thought we might have seen the bottom, and that digital media companies promised a brighter future. But this year, like every year of the past decade, saw thousands more journalists lose their jobs, including through cuts at big digital properties like BuzzFeed and Vice.

Ten years ago, there were simmering worries about unconcerned media conglomerates producing America’s news; the end of 2019 saw hedge funds and private equity taking control of much of the daily press. And just when you thought trust in the press couldn’t get any lower, a 2019 poll finds journalism inspires even less confidence than Congress.

Perhaps, we wondered a decade ago, these newfangled social media sites will be our partners, driving traffic, revenue, and transparency, helping us save journalism. Lately, though, we wonder if social media isn’t killing journalism instead.

This switch from relief effort to incursion is, of course, not a story about social media companies — which after all have always been in it for the money. It’s about journalists and their unstudied approach to the platforms. Journalists saw Twitter simply as content, sprinkling it throughout their work without considering what that means for their own authority, despite the fact that the use of social media in stories may further undermine public trust in the news. The question isn’t about social media being friend or foe, but whether we’re watching journalism’s suicide by a thousand tweets.

Our latest research, observing how journalists use tweets in news stories, examines this question. We analyzed hundreds of U.S. political news stories referencing tweets, noting how this content was presented to readers. We found journalists simply let tweets speak for themselves, leaving journalism in a position of discovery and amplification rather than one of independent verification. In most cases, journalists passed along tweets as if they were a police report, accepting the tweeter’s words as presented. In other words, journalists have come to rely on Twitter so powerfully that they treat tweets as if they are already verified and in need of no further journalistic processing.

It’s stunning to observe the facility with which journalists vacuum up these information subsidies, even in an environment where both time and resources are scarce. The use of Twitter as an information source has come to characterize news as a product and journalism as a profession. Relying on convenient access to prominent officials via Twitter seems like an easy win, but when news stories position Twitter and the content there as a primary information resource, the true winner is Twitter. Passing along tweets as the official record grants authority and legitimacy to Twitter, not to sources, and certainly not to journalists.

In 2020, journalists must think twice before turning to Twitter. There’s a mutual dependency here: Journalists rely on Twitter for information from newsmakers, and Twitter relies on journalists to lend legitimacy to itself as a platform. This becomes a feedback loop, where as Twitter becomes embedded in journalistic routine, journalists and elites both turn to it during news events. This leads journalists to use tweets in their stories, lending their own legitimacy and interpretation, thereby increasing the likelihood that elites will use it for future information releases, the likelihood that journalists will return to receive them, and the likelihood that audiences become accustomed to seeing tweets as key aspects of news stories.

In all this, power flows from journalists to Twitter, without much in return. Journalists’ efforts to either break or reinforce this cycle during next year’s elections will set the tone for their future as an independent press.

Logan Molyneux is an assistant professor of journalism at Temple University. Shannon C. McGregor is an assistant professor of communication at the University of Utah.

It’s hard to believe, but journalism in the United States may be in a more precarious situation at the end of this decade than it was at the beginning.

Back then, a global recession had already taken half of newspapers’ advertising revenue, but by now it’s taken another half. Newsroom staffing was in steep decline, but some observers thought we might have seen the bottom, and that digital media companies promised a brighter future. But this year, like every year of the past decade, saw thousands more journalists lose their jobs, including through cuts at big digital properties like BuzzFeed and Vice.

Ten years ago, there were simmering worries about unconcerned media conglomerates producing America’s news; the end of 2019 saw hedge funds and private equity taking control of much of the daily press. And just when you thought trust in the press couldn’t get any lower, a 2019 poll finds journalism inspires even less confidence than Congress.

Perhaps, we wondered a decade ago, these newfangled social media sites will be our partners, driving traffic, revenue, and transparency, helping us save journalism. Lately, though, we wonder if social media isn’t killing journalism instead.

This switch from relief effort to incursion is, of course, not a story about social media companies — which after all have always been in it for the money. It’s about journalists and their unstudied approach to the platforms. Journalists saw Twitter simply as content, sprinkling it throughout their work without considering what that means for their own authority, despite the fact that the use of social media in stories may further undermine public trust in the news. The question isn’t about social media being friend or foe, but whether we’re watching journalism’s suicide by a thousand tweets.

Our latest research, observing how journalists use tweets in news stories, examines this question. We analyzed hundreds of U.S. political news stories referencing tweets, noting how this content was presented to readers. We found journalists simply let tweets speak for themselves, leaving journalism in a position of discovery and amplification rather than one of independent verification. In most cases, journalists passed along tweets as if they were a police report, accepting the tweeter’s words as presented. In other words, journalists have come to rely on Twitter so powerfully that they treat tweets as if they are already verified and in need of no further journalistic processing.

It’s stunning to observe the facility with which journalists vacuum up these information subsidies, even in an environment where both time and resources are scarce. The use of Twitter as an information source has come to characterize news as a product and journalism as a profession. Relying on convenient access to prominent officials via Twitter seems like an easy win, but when news stories position Twitter and the content there as a primary information resource, the true winner is Twitter. Passing along tweets as the official record grants authority and legitimacy to Twitter, not to sources, and certainly not to journalists.

In 2020, journalists must think twice before turning to Twitter. There’s a mutual dependency here: Journalists rely on Twitter for information from newsmakers, and Twitter relies on journalists to lend legitimacy to itself as a platform. This becomes a feedback loop, where as Twitter becomes embedded in journalistic routine, journalists and elites both turn to it during news events. This leads journalists to use tweets in their stories, lending their own legitimacy and interpretation, thereby increasing the likelihood that elites will use it for future information releases, the likelihood that journalists will return to receive them, and the likelihood that audiences become accustomed to seeing tweets as key aspects of news stories.

In all this, power flows from journalists to Twitter, without much in return. Journalists’ efforts to either break or reinforce this cycle during next year’s elections will set the tone for their future as an independent press.

Logan Molyneux is an assistant professor of journalism at Temple University. Shannon C. McGregor is an assistant professor of communication at the University of Utah.

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Millie Tran   Wicked

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation