It’s hard to believe, but journalism in the United States may be in a more precarious situation at the end of this decade than it was at the beginning.
Back then, a global recession had already taken half of newspapers’ advertising revenue, but by now it’s taken another half. Newsroom staffing was in steep decline, but some observers thought we might have seen the bottom, and that digital media companies promised a brighter future. But this year, like every year of the past decade, saw thousands more journalists lose their jobs, including through cuts at big digital properties like BuzzFeed and Vice.
Ten years ago, there were simmering worries about unconcerned media conglomerates producing America’s news; the end of 2019 saw hedge funds and private equity taking control of much of the daily press. And just when you thought trust in the press couldn’t get any lower, a 2019 poll finds journalism inspires even less confidence than Congress.
Perhaps, we wondered a decade ago, these newfangled social media sites will be our partners, driving traffic, revenue, and transparency, helping us save journalism. Lately, though, we wonder if social media isn’t killing journalism instead.
This switch from relief effort to incursion is, of course, not a story about social media companies — which after all have always been in it for the money. It’s about journalists and their unstudied approach to the platforms. Journalists saw Twitter simply as content, sprinkling it throughout their work without considering what that means for their own authority, despite the fact that the use of social media in stories may further undermine public trust in the news. The question isn’t about social media being friend or foe, but whether we’re watching journalism’s suicide by a thousand tweets.
Our latest research, observing how journalists use tweets in news stories, examines this question. We analyzed hundreds of U.S. political news stories referencing tweets, noting how this content was presented to readers. We found journalists simply let tweets speak for themselves, leaving journalism in a position of discovery and amplification rather than one of independent verification. In most cases, journalists passed along tweets as if they were a police report, accepting the tweeter’s words as presented. In other words, journalists have come to rely on Twitter so powerfully that they treat tweets as if they are already verified and in need of no further journalistic processing.
It’s stunning to observe the facility with which journalists vacuum up these information subsidies, even in an environment where both time and resources are scarce. The use of Twitter as an information source has come to characterize news as a product and journalism as a profession. Relying on convenient access to prominent officials via Twitter seems like an easy win, but when news stories position Twitter and the content there as a primary information resource, the true winner is Twitter. Passing along tweets as the official record grants authority and legitimacy to Twitter, not to sources, and certainly not to journalists.
In 2020, journalists must think twice before turning to Twitter. There’s a mutual dependency here: Journalists rely on Twitter for information from newsmakers, and Twitter relies on journalists to lend legitimacy to itself as a platform. This becomes a feedback loop, where as Twitter becomes embedded in journalistic routine, journalists and elites both turn to it during news events. This leads journalists to use tweets in their stories, lending their own legitimacy and interpretation, thereby increasing the likelihood that elites will use it for future information releases, the likelihood that journalists will return to receive them, and the likelihood that audiences become accustomed to seeing tweets as key aspects of news stories.
In all this, power flows from journalists to Twitter, without much in return. Journalists’ efforts to either break or reinforce this cycle during next year’s elections will set the tone for their future as an independent press.
Logan Molyneux is an assistant professor of journalism at Temple University. Shannon C. McGregor is an assistant professor of communication at the University of Utah.
It’s hard to believe, but journalism in the United States may be in a more precarious situation at the end of this decade than it was at the beginning.
Back then, a global recession had already taken half of newspapers’ advertising revenue, but by now it’s taken another half. Newsroom staffing was in steep decline, but some observers thought we might have seen the bottom, and that digital media companies promised a brighter future. But this year, like every year of the past decade, saw thousands more journalists lose their jobs, including through cuts at big digital properties like BuzzFeed and Vice.
Ten years ago, there were simmering worries about unconcerned media conglomerates producing America’s news; the end of 2019 saw hedge funds and private equity taking control of much of the daily press. And just when you thought trust in the press couldn’t get any lower, a 2019 poll finds journalism inspires even less confidence than Congress.
Perhaps, we wondered a decade ago, these newfangled social media sites will be our partners, driving traffic, revenue, and transparency, helping us save journalism. Lately, though, we wonder if social media isn’t killing journalism instead.
This switch from relief effort to incursion is, of course, not a story about social media companies — which after all have always been in it for the money. It’s about journalists and their unstudied approach to the platforms. Journalists saw Twitter simply as content, sprinkling it throughout their work without considering what that means for their own authority, despite the fact that the use of social media in stories may further undermine public trust in the news. The question isn’t about social media being friend or foe, but whether we’re watching journalism’s suicide by a thousand tweets.
Our latest research, observing how journalists use tweets in news stories, examines this question. We analyzed hundreds of U.S. political news stories referencing tweets, noting how this content was presented to readers. We found journalists simply let tweets speak for themselves, leaving journalism in a position of discovery and amplification rather than one of independent verification. In most cases, journalists passed along tweets as if they were a police report, accepting the tweeter’s words as presented. In other words, journalists have come to rely on Twitter so powerfully that they treat tweets as if they are already verified and in need of no further journalistic processing.
It’s stunning to observe the facility with which journalists vacuum up these information subsidies, even in an environment where both time and resources are scarce. The use of Twitter as an information source has come to characterize news as a product and journalism as a profession. Relying on convenient access to prominent officials via Twitter seems like an easy win, but when news stories position Twitter and the content there as a primary information resource, the true winner is Twitter. Passing along tweets as the official record grants authority and legitimacy to Twitter, not to sources, and certainly not to journalists.
In 2020, journalists must think twice before turning to Twitter. There’s a mutual dependency here: Journalists rely on Twitter for information from newsmakers, and Twitter relies on journalists to lend legitimacy to itself as a platform. This becomes a feedback loop, where as Twitter becomes embedded in journalistic routine, journalists and elites both turn to it during news events. This leads journalists to use tweets in their stories, lending their own legitimacy and interpretation, thereby increasing the likelihood that elites will use it for future information releases, the likelihood that journalists will return to receive them, and the likelihood that audiences become accustomed to seeing tweets as key aspects of news stories.
In all this, power flows from journalists to Twitter, without much in return. Journalists’ efforts to either break or reinforce this cycle during next year’s elections will set the tone for their future as an independent press.
Logan Molyneux is an assistant professor of journalism at Temple University. Shannon C. McGregor is an assistant professor of communication at the University of Utah.
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Mario García Think small (screen)
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks