It’s difficult to be optimistic about journalism in 2020, for exactly the reasons you think: media consolidation, layoffs, general financial bleakness, rampant mistrust among a hopelessly divided public, all combined with the proliferation of mis- and disinformation in a presidential election year with a man on the ballot who wants to undermine the press. Ugh.
However, as a professor, I work with the journalists of the future, so I want to find a kernel of hope — for them and for our democracy. As has been true for many years now, the best thing journalists can do is look around them and adapt instead of fighting for the status quo. And in this environment, one way to adapt is to ensure journalism is context-dependent — that part of its fundamental role is to respond to the media landscape instead of just operating in it.
Understanding that journalism is more a piece of the puzzle for audiences, rather than the dominant narrative, and that journalists’ work must be more thoughtful, relevant, and transparent will move us toward new values. I already see this reflected in my students. They have a more inherent understanding of how to function online, they fundamentally seem to care more about the effect they have on their audience, and they advocate for a better way forward. All of these are signals of the context dependence that journalism needs.
I’m not breaking news to anyone by saying that journalism’s gatekeeping role has been greatly diminished. As Tom Rosenstiel recently put it, journalists are now “annotators” of what the public knows, rather than the agenda setters. Similarly, this recent report from API advocates that journalists redefine their jobs in a landscape full of misinformation. They must take on new responsibilities and consider how their work might be misused by bad actors with free rein online to act both against people and the public good.
These ideas extend offline as well. Just as research guided API’s recommendations, it’s also guiding some news organizations to reconsider how they cover mass shootings and other high-profile tragedies. And just as operating in today’s online environment requires a rethinking of journalism’s role and practices, so does adjusting for these events. Is a shooter’s name important for journalists to know? Yes. Is it important for a name and face to be blasted to everyone from TV screens to phone lock screens? No — in fact, it’s harmful. Context matters.
In all honesty, I’m dreading 2020. I think election coverage and media manipulation are going to be worse than in 2016, not better. But there are some news organizations starting to do better on issues like mass shooting coverage, and my hope is that ideas for how journalists can be more effective annotators in the current media landscape will similarly continue to gain traction. Media coverage contributes to an ecosystem that harms people and democracies, and we can’t ignore that context any longer.
Laura Davis is an assistant professor at the University of Southern California Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
It’s difficult to be optimistic about journalism in 2020, for exactly the reasons you think: media consolidation, layoffs, general financial bleakness, rampant mistrust among a hopelessly divided public, all combined with the proliferation of mis- and disinformation in a presidential election year with a man on the ballot who wants to undermine the press. Ugh.
However, as a professor, I work with the journalists of the future, so I want to find a kernel of hope — for them and for our democracy. As has been true for many years now, the best thing journalists can do is look around them and adapt instead of fighting for the status quo. And in this environment, one way to adapt is to ensure journalism is context-dependent — that part of its fundamental role is to respond to the media landscape instead of just operating in it.
Understanding that journalism is more a piece of the puzzle for audiences, rather than the dominant narrative, and that journalists’ work must be more thoughtful, relevant, and transparent will move us toward new values. I already see this reflected in my students. They have a more inherent understanding of how to function online, they fundamentally seem to care more about the effect they have on their audience, and they advocate for a better way forward. All of these are signals of the context dependence that journalism needs.
I’m not breaking news to anyone by saying that journalism’s gatekeeping role has been greatly diminished. As Tom Rosenstiel recently put it, journalists are now “annotators” of what the public knows, rather than the agenda setters. Similarly, this recent report from API advocates that journalists redefine their jobs in a landscape full of misinformation. They must take on new responsibilities and consider how their work might be misused by bad actors with free rein online to act both against people and the public good.
These ideas extend offline as well. Just as research guided API’s recommendations, it’s also guiding some news organizations to reconsider how they cover mass shootings and other high-profile tragedies. And just as operating in today’s online environment requires a rethinking of journalism’s role and practices, so does adjusting for these events. Is a shooter’s name important for journalists to know? Yes. Is it important for a name and face to be blasted to everyone from TV screens to phone lock screens? No — in fact, it’s harmful. Context matters.
In all honesty, I’m dreading 2020. I think election coverage and media manipulation are going to be worse than in 2016, not better. But there are some news organizations starting to do better on issues like mass shooting coverage, and my hope is that ideas for how journalists can be more effective annotators in the current media landscape will similarly continue to gain traction. Media coverage contributes to an ecosystem that harms people and democracies, and we can’t ignore that context any longer.
Laura Davis is an assistant professor at the University of Southern California Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Mario García Think small (screen)
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges