20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

“In a news environment where the day’s fifth-most-important story would have been an all-hands-on-deck affair just a few years ago, news consumers have to choose what they’ll read deeply and what they’ll just be superficially aware of.”

For a business that not that long ago had basically zero data on how consumers used its products, the news industry has become obsessed with metrics. We’re seeing a bit of a swing back to the middle of the spectrum, where analytics are now just one piece of a larger puzzle, but we still haven’t mastered how to talk about the value of news alerts in our readers’ most intimate spaces: inboxes, lock screens, and desktop browsers.

With traditional email newsletters, we can look at open rates (how many subscribers opened a particular newsletter) and clickthrough rates (how many people clicked a link) to see how readers are engaging with our products. But that’s harder with breaking news email alerts, where the subject line might contain everything the reader needs to know. They act more like a push notification: It might not need to be opened for readers to appreciate it landing in their inboxes.

The value of an email send, push notification, or browser alert goes beyond its open rate, and talking about that value needs to become more mainstream in our thinking of how all of our notification products work together.

Research from 2017 divided push alerts into four categories: headline, teaser, round-up, and additional context. More than half of the alerts sent in that study were based on breaking news, and it found that the majority provided additional context that went beyond a straight headline.

In a news environment where the day’s fifth-most-important story would have been an all-hands-on-deck affair just a few years ago, news consumers have to choose what they’ll read deeply and what they’ll just be superficially aware of. The reader might not need more than what happened and a slight bit of additional context. So the fact that a push alert didn’t get opened doesn’t mean it wasn’t valuable to the reader.

Push alerts show up in spaces where the interruption is hard to ignore: your phone’s locked screen while you’re trying to fall asleep, your smartwatch while you’re in a meeting, a popup while you’re answering an email. They drain your phone’s battery. Long story short: If someone doesn’t want to receive a push alert, they’ll change their settings. An underrated metric in measuring an alert strategy’s success is simply the number of subscribers a push notification list has. Editors can also look at the lifecycle of an alert subscriber: How long do they stay subscribed? How often do they change their settings?

And now that more news organizations are adopting browser notifications, the industry has to be smarter about how all of these interruptions work together. It can be tempting to push the same alert through all available outlets (or to auto-subscribe new members into these various channels), but we have to be careful to not bombard readers on every platform.

Some newsrooms have advanced tools that allows readers to be explicit in how they want to receive different kinds of news. But for newsrooms without those resources, it can be helpful to be as strategic and thoughtful with sending notifications as you are with editing stories. Just as a story should be only as long as it is interesting, and just as every story should serve the reader in some way, we need to be judicious with our push alerts and think about how pushing on different platforms can be treated like a story package, where the components are complementary to one another.

Rachel Schallom is the deputy editor for digital at Fortune Media.

For a business that not that long ago had basically zero data on how consumers used its products, the news industry has become obsessed with metrics. We’re seeing a bit of a swing back to the middle of the spectrum, where analytics are now just one piece of a larger puzzle, but we still haven’t mastered how to talk about the value of news alerts in our readers’ most intimate spaces: inboxes, lock screens, and desktop browsers.

With traditional email newsletters, we can look at open rates (how many subscribers opened a particular newsletter) and clickthrough rates (how many people clicked a link) to see how readers are engaging with our products. But that’s harder with breaking news email alerts, where the subject line might contain everything the reader needs to know. They act more like a push notification: It might not need to be opened for readers to appreciate it landing in their inboxes.

The value of an email send, push notification, or browser alert goes beyond its open rate, and talking about that value needs to become more mainstream in our thinking of how all of our notification products work together.

Research from 2017 divided push alerts into four categories: headline, teaser, round-up, and additional context. More than half of the alerts sent in that study were based on breaking news, and it found that the majority provided additional context that went beyond a straight headline.

In a news environment where the day’s fifth-most-important story would have been an all-hands-on-deck affair just a few years ago, news consumers have to choose what they’ll read deeply and what they’ll just be superficially aware of. The reader might not need more than what happened and a slight bit of additional context. So the fact that a push alert didn’t get opened doesn’t mean it wasn’t valuable to the reader.

Push alerts show up in spaces where the interruption is hard to ignore: your phone’s locked screen while you’re trying to fall asleep, your smartwatch while you’re in a meeting, a popup while you’re answering an email. They drain your phone’s battery. Long story short: If someone doesn’t want to receive a push alert, they’ll change their settings. An underrated metric in measuring an alert strategy’s success is simply the number of subscribers a push notification list has. Editors can also look at the lifecycle of an alert subscriber: How long do they stay subscribed? How often do they change their settings?

And now that more news organizations are adopting browser notifications, the industry has to be smarter about how all of these interruptions work together. It can be tempting to push the same alert through all available outlets (or to auto-subscribe new members into these various channels), but we have to be careful to not bombard readers on every platform.

Some newsrooms have advanced tools that allows readers to be explicit in how they want to receive different kinds of news. But for newsrooms without those resources, it can be helpful to be as strategic and thoughtful with sending notifications as you are with editing stories. Just as a story should be only as long as it is interesting, and just as every story should serve the reader in some way, we need to be judicious with our push alerts and think about how pushing on different platforms can be treated like a story package, where the components are complementary to one another.

Rachel Schallom is the deputy editor for digital at Fortune Media.

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Millie Tran   Wicked

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism