For a business that not that long ago had basically zero data on how consumers used its products, the news industry has become obsessed with metrics. We’re seeing a bit of a swing back to the middle of the spectrum, where analytics are now just one piece of a larger puzzle, but we still haven’t mastered how to talk about the value of news alerts in our readers’ most intimate spaces: inboxes, lock screens, and desktop browsers.
With traditional email newsletters, we can look at open rates (how many subscribers opened a particular newsletter) and clickthrough rates (how many people clicked a link) to see how readers are engaging with our products. But that’s harder with breaking news email alerts, where the subject line might contain everything the reader needs to know. They act more like a push notification: It might not need to be opened for readers to appreciate it landing in their inboxes.
The value of an email send, push notification, or browser alert goes beyond its open rate, and talking about that value needs to become more mainstream in our thinking of how all of our notification products work together.
Research from 2017 divided push alerts into four categories: headline, teaser, round-up, and additional context. More than half of the alerts sent in that study were based on breaking news, and it found that the majority provided additional context that went beyond a straight headline.
In a news environment where the day’s fifth-most-important story would have been an all-hands-on-deck affair just a few years ago, news consumers have to choose what they’ll read deeply and what they’ll just be superficially aware of. The reader might not need more than what happened and a slight bit of additional context. So the fact that a push alert didn’t get opened doesn’t mean it wasn’t valuable to the reader.
Push alerts show up in spaces where the interruption is hard to ignore: your phone’s locked screen while you’re trying to fall asleep, your smartwatch while you’re in a meeting, a popup while you’re answering an email. They drain your phone’s battery. Long story short: If someone doesn’t want to receive a push alert, they’ll change their settings. An underrated metric in measuring an alert strategy’s success is simply the number of subscribers a push notification list has. Editors can also look at the lifecycle of an alert subscriber: How long do they stay subscribed? How often do they change their settings?
And now that more news organizations are adopting browser notifications, the industry has to be smarter about how all of these interruptions work together. It can be tempting to push the same alert through all available outlets (or to auto-subscribe new members into these various channels), but we have to be careful to not bombard readers on every platform.
Some newsrooms have advanced tools that allows readers to be explicit in how they want to receive different kinds of news. But for newsrooms without those resources, it can be helpful to be as strategic and thoughtful with sending notifications as you are with editing stories. Just as a story should be only as long as it is interesting, and just as every story should serve the reader in some way, we need to be judicious with our push alerts and think about how pushing on different platforms can be treated like a story package, where the components are complementary to one another.
Rachel Schallom is the deputy editor for digital at Fortune Media.
For a business that not that long ago had basically zero data on how consumers used its products, the news industry has become obsessed with metrics. We’re seeing a bit of a swing back to the middle of the spectrum, where analytics are now just one piece of a larger puzzle, but we still haven’t mastered how to talk about the value of news alerts in our readers’ most intimate spaces: inboxes, lock screens, and desktop browsers.
With traditional email newsletters, we can look at open rates (how many subscribers opened a particular newsletter) and clickthrough rates (how many people clicked a link) to see how readers are engaging with our products. But that’s harder with breaking news email alerts, where the subject line might contain everything the reader needs to know. They act more like a push notification: It might not need to be opened for readers to appreciate it landing in their inboxes.
The value of an email send, push notification, or browser alert goes beyond its open rate, and talking about that value needs to become more mainstream in our thinking of how all of our notification products work together.
Research from 2017 divided push alerts into four categories: headline, teaser, round-up, and additional context. More than half of the alerts sent in that study were based on breaking news, and it found that the majority provided additional context that went beyond a straight headline.
In a news environment where the day’s fifth-most-important story would have been an all-hands-on-deck affair just a few years ago, news consumers have to choose what they’ll read deeply and what they’ll just be superficially aware of. The reader might not need more than what happened and a slight bit of additional context. So the fact that a push alert didn’t get opened doesn’t mean it wasn’t valuable to the reader.
Push alerts show up in spaces where the interruption is hard to ignore: your phone’s locked screen while you’re trying to fall asleep, your smartwatch while you’re in a meeting, a popup while you’re answering an email. They drain your phone’s battery. Long story short: If someone doesn’t want to receive a push alert, they’ll change their settings. An underrated metric in measuring an alert strategy’s success is simply the number of subscribers a push notification list has. Editors can also look at the lifecycle of an alert subscriber: How long do they stay subscribed? How often do they change their settings?
And now that more news organizations are adopting browser notifications, the industry has to be smarter about how all of these interruptions work together. It can be tempting to push the same alert through all available outlets (or to auto-subscribe new members into these various channels), but we have to be careful to not bombard readers on every platform.
Some newsrooms have advanced tools that allows readers to be explicit in how they want to receive different kinds of news. But for newsrooms without those resources, it can be helpful to be as strategic and thoughtful with sending notifications as you are with editing stories. Just as a story should be only as long as it is interesting, and just as every story should serve the reader in some way, we need to be judicious with our push alerts and think about how pushing on different platforms can be treated like a story package, where the components are complementary to one another.
Rachel Schallom is the deputy editor for digital at Fortune Media.
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Jeremy Olshan All journalism should be service journalism
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
AX Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Mario García Think small (screen)
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
Jennifer Brandel A love letter from the year 2073
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4