For most American history, the quality of news that people received depended largely on where they lived and how much they were willing to pay. The internet seemed to shatter that formula, but in 2020, it will become apparent that geography and spending ability are once again separating news consumers into haves and have-nots.
More and more publishers have put up paywalls in the past few years, and in 2020, the trend seems likely to accelerate. Prior to its acquisition by GateHouse Media, Gannett was experimenting with different paywall permutations, and the merged company will face even greater pressure to drive digital subscriptions. Further consolidation of the big newspaper chains (as predicted by Ken Doctor) could result in additional efforts to juice online user revenue, considering the continuing weakness of online advertising rates. Even some digital-native sites may opt for a metered paywall — Vox Media is reportedly eyeing one following its merger with New York Media, which put up its own paywall in late 2018.
To be sure, most of these will be metered or “soft” paywalls, but free content will increasingly come with strings attached — intrusive ads that wreck the user experience, or compulsory site registration. While a small percentage of news junkies might reach for their credit card in order to avoid such hassles, the casual news consumer will probably just leave.
Even people willing to pay for news might not be able to access high-quality local coverage, depending on where they live. With more cuts on the horizon at the national newspaper chains, and with born-digital local sites unevenly distributed, metropolitan areas of similar sizes will have vastly different numbers of journalists covering their government, businesses, schools, and cultural life. Compare areas that have a robust local newspaper and a mission-driven online news outlet to areas that have neither, and you’ll find a gulf in coverage quality.
There are silver linings, however — both for those underserved regions and for those news consumers who want quality coverage but can’t afford digital subscriptions. Three of the biggest newsrooms in the country are likely to provide free online news for the foreseeable future: the Associated Press, Reuters, and National Public Radio. And the two companies often blamed for the decline of local newspapers, Google and Facebook, are finally investing serious cash into reviving local news (each has committed $300 million), after years of dismissing it as not their problem or doling out piddling sums.gt
However, the biggest divide of all among news consumers has less to do with money or geography than with interest. “News avoidance” is on the rise worldwide. In the future, the only people who consistently consume high-quality news may be the ones who really care about it (perhaps the 16 percent of Americans who currently pay for news online). Not even a presidential election year in the U.S. can change that.
Matthew Pressman is an assistant professor of journalism at Seton Hall University.
For most American history, the quality of news that people received depended largely on where they lived and how much they were willing to pay. The internet seemed to shatter that formula, but in 2020, it will become apparent that geography and spending ability are once again separating news consumers into haves and have-nots.
More and more publishers have put up paywalls in the past few years, and in 2020, the trend seems likely to accelerate. Prior to its acquisition by GateHouse Media, Gannett was experimenting with different paywall permutations, and the merged company will face even greater pressure to drive digital subscriptions. Further consolidation of the big newspaper chains (as predicted by Ken Doctor) could result in additional efforts to juice online user revenue, considering the continuing weakness of online advertising rates. Even some digital-native sites may opt for a metered paywall — Vox Media is reportedly eyeing one following its merger with New York Media, which put up its own paywall in late 2018.
To be sure, most of these will be metered or “soft” paywalls, but free content will increasingly come with strings attached — intrusive ads that wreck the user experience, or compulsory site registration. While a small percentage of news junkies might reach for their credit card in order to avoid such hassles, the casual news consumer will probably just leave.
Even people willing to pay for news might not be able to access high-quality local coverage, depending on where they live. With more cuts on the horizon at the national newspaper chains, and with born-digital local sites unevenly distributed, metropolitan areas of similar sizes will have vastly different numbers of journalists covering their government, businesses, schools, and cultural life. Compare areas that have a robust local newspaper and a mission-driven online news outlet to areas that have neither, and you’ll find a gulf in coverage quality.
There are silver linings, however — both for those underserved regions and for those news consumers who want quality coverage but can’t afford digital subscriptions. Three of the biggest newsrooms in the country are likely to provide free online news for the foreseeable future: the Associated Press, Reuters, and National Public Radio. And the two companies often blamed for the decline of local newspapers, Google and Facebook, are finally investing serious cash into reviving local news (each has committed $300 million), after years of dismissing it as not their problem or doling out piddling sums.gt
However, the biggest divide of all among news consumers has less to do with money or geography than with interest. “News avoidance” is on the rise worldwide. In the future, the only people who consistently consume high-quality news may be the ones who really care about it (perhaps the 16 percent of Americans who currently pay for news online). Not even a presidential election year in the U.S. can change that.
Matthew Pressman is an assistant professor of journalism at Seton Hall University.
Talia Stroud The work of reconnecting starts November 4
Pablo Boczkowski The day after November 4
Cory Haik We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it
Brenda P. Salinas Treating MP3 files like text
Greg Emerson News apps fall further behind
Whitney Phillips A time to question core beliefs
Sue Robinson Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments
Rachel Davis Mersey The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide
Linda Solomon Wood Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal
Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage
Kerri Hoffman Opening closed systems
Bill Adair A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song
Doris Truong The year of radical salary transparency
Carl Bialik Journalists will try running the whole shop
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Power to the people (on your audience team)
Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor Think twice before turning to Twitter
Errin Haines Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story
Richard Tofel A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges
Matt DeRienzo Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers
Joe Amditis Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table
Lucas Graves A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters
Tom Glaisyer Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful
Tonya Mosley The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline
Joanne McNeil A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)
J. Siguru Wahutu Western journalists, learn from your African peers
Jake Shapiro Podcasting gets listener relationship management
Dannagal G. Young Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart
Jim Brady We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own
Carrie Brown-Smith Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening
Stefanie Murray Charitable giving goes collaborative
Josh Schwartz Publishers move beyond the metered paywall
Heather Bryant Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving
Tamar Charney From broadcast to bespoke
Kevin D. Grant The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth
Dan Shanoff Sports media enters the Bronny era
Geneva Overholser Death to bothsidesism
Sarah Schmalbach Journalist, quantify thyself
Brian Moritz The end of “stick to sports”
Felix Salmon Spotify launches a news channel
Cindy Royal Prepare media students for skills, not job titles
Raney Aronson-Rath News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions
Sonali Prasad Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional
Peter Bale Lies get further normalized
Mariana Moura Santos The future of journalism is collaborative
Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young The promise of nonprofit journalism
Anthony Nadler Clash of Clans: Election Edition
Christa Scharfenberg It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women
Meredith Artley Stronger solidarity among news organizations
Masuma Ahuja Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful
Jeff Kofman Speed through technology
Jonas Kaiser Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists
Gordon Crovitz Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms
Sarah Marshall The year to learn about news moments
Seth C. Lewis 20 questions for 2020
Lauren Duca The rise of the journalistic influencer
Julia B. Chan We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏
S. Mitra Kalita The race to 2021
Colleen Shalby Journalists become media literacy teachers
Candis Callison Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change
Tanya Cordrey Saying no to more good ideas
Kourtney Bitterly Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation
Nicholas Jackson What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support
Nathalie Malinarich Betting on loyalty
Barbara Gray Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement
Don Day Respect the non-paying audience
Irving Washington Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job
Simon Galperin Journalism becomes more democratic
Sarah Stonbely More people start caring about news inequality
A.J. Bauer A fork in the road for conservative media
John Keefe Journalism gets hacked
Alexandra Borchardt Get out of the office and talk to people
Kathleen Searles Pay more attention to attention
Mike Caulfield Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd
Helen Havlak Platforms shine a light on original reporting
Heidi Tworek The year of positive pushback
Elizabeth Dunbar Frank talk, and then action
John Garrett It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization
Michael W. Wagner Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative
Rick Berke Incoming fire from both left and right
Jakob Moll A slow-moving tech backlash among young people
Rachel Schallom The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates
Craig Newmark Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation
Annie Rudd The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph
Meg Marco Everything happens somewhere
Logan Jaffe You don’t need fancy tools to listen
Bill Grueskin Our ethics codes get an overhaul
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks
M. Scott Havens First-party data becomes media’s most important currency
Ståle Grut OSINT journalism goes mainstream
Matthew Pressman News consumers divide into haves and have-nots
Beena Raghavendran The year of the local engagement reporter
Imaeyen Ibanga Let’s take it slow
Zizi Papacharissi A president leads, the press follows, reality fades
Alana Levinson Brand-backed media gets another look
Eric Nuzum Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show
Cristina Kim Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”
Knight Foundation Five generations of journalists, learning from each other
Nico Gendron Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z
Fiona Spruill The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves
Laura E. Davis Know the context your journalism is operating within
Margarita Noriega The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms
Steve Henn The dawning audio web
Monica Drake A renewed focus on misinformation
An Xiao Mina The Forum we wanted, the forum we got
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The business we want, not the business we had
Sara K. Baranowski A big year for little newspapers
Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech
Nushin Rashidian Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?
Victor Pickard We reclaim a public good
Mira Lowe The year of student-powered journalism
Joni Deutsch Podcasting unsilences the silent
Juleyka Lantigua A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions
Hossein Derakhshan AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris
Ben Werdmuller Use the tools of journalism to save it
Sarah Alvarez I’m ready for post-news
Francesco Zaffarano TikTok without generational prejudice
Emily Withrow The year we kill the news article
Mario García Think small (screen)
Joshua P. Darr All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse
Monique Judge The year to organize, unionize, and fight
Jasmine McNealy A call for context
Alice Antheaume Trade “politics” for “power”
Catalina Albeanu Rebuilding journalism, together
Ernie Smith The death of the industry fad
Kristen Muller The year we operationalize community engagement
Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz News coverage gets geo-fragmented