20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

“Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production.”

People want to pull the curtain back. They want more than the story: They want to understand who’s telling it, how it came together, and how it’s being paid for.

In dozens of conversations with people across the U.S. and world, news consumers told us they want more insight into how the news is made. Why was a headline written a certain way? Why was one story featured on the homepage and not another? Who are all of the people involved in making those decisions? Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production, whether that’s knowing that a news organization adhered to a standard of verifying specific information via multiple sources, that journalists poured over thousands of pages of documents for a particular story, or the people involved in the chain of command of decision-making.

That transparency, while at times seemingly mundane, helps people understand what the work of a modern news organization entails and contextualizes it. Most importantly, it also helps them get to know the people involved in making the content they consume, and that’s crucial when it comes to trust. People trust people more than institutions. They also now feel fairly fluent in the mechanics of marketing. Individuals have become much savvier consumers as a result of social media. We encountered person after person casually dropping marketing language into the conversations we have with them. They wonder if they’re in a certain news organization’s “target demographic.” They talk about push notifications as “clickbait.”

In a social media economy that thrives on individual personalities and opinions, people find it hard to make sense of an institution’s motivations or financial incentives. “Was that breaking news notification sent because I really needed to know that information in that moment, or because a news outlet gets paid when I click on a link?” This hint of skepticism has been expressed to us repeatedly in our in-field user research.

Highlighting individual voices within an organization makes it easier to build a relationship of trust, because people — what they stand for and their motivations — feel more easily knowable, especially due to social media. Social media has, for better or worse, given rise to an easily accessible vetting system. People can look to Twitter to see the history of a person’s shares, positions, and opinions. They can look to Instagram to see #ad to know when someone is selling something. Institutions don’t always feel as knowable or as transparent. It is far harder to make sense of an organization’s motivations or financial incentives than it is to unpack a person’s Twitter or Instagram history. People can see when someone is promoting something, sharing a funny meme, or retweeting a particular article. In looking through a person’s history, it feels easier to understand what an individual is asking of you (if anything) or how he or she wants you to engage. WIthout giving people a behind-the-scenes look into the process of how a story comes together, people largely assume that an institution’s motivations are purely financial.

In order to build trust, news organizations must let people in on the processes and people that bring stories to life.

Kourtney Bitterly is research lead for product and design discovery at The New York Times.

People want to pull the curtain back. They want more than the story: They want to understand who’s telling it, how it came together, and how it’s being paid for.

In dozens of conversations with people across the U.S. and world, news consumers told us they want more insight into how the news is made. Why was a headline written a certain way? Why was one story featured on the homepage and not another? Who are all of the people involved in making those decisions? Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production, whether that’s knowing that a news organization adhered to a standard of verifying specific information via multiple sources, that journalists poured over thousands of pages of documents for a particular story, or the people involved in the chain of command of decision-making.

That transparency, while at times seemingly mundane, helps people understand what the work of a modern news organization entails and contextualizes it. Most importantly, it also helps them get to know the people involved in making the content they consume, and that’s crucial when it comes to trust. People trust people more than institutions. They also now feel fairly fluent in the mechanics of marketing. Individuals have become much savvier consumers as a result of social media. We encountered person after person casually dropping marketing language into the conversations we have with them. They wonder if they’re in a certain news organization’s “target demographic.” They talk about push notifications as “clickbait.”

In a social media economy that thrives on individual personalities and opinions, people find it hard to make sense of an institution’s motivations or financial incentives. “Was that breaking news notification sent because I really needed to know that information in that moment, or because a news outlet gets paid when I click on a link?” This hint of skepticism has been expressed to us repeatedly in our in-field user research.

Highlighting individual voices within an organization makes it easier to build a relationship of trust, because people — what they stand for and their motivations — feel more easily knowable, especially due to social media. Social media has, for better or worse, given rise to an easily accessible vetting system. People can look to Twitter to see the history of a person’s shares, positions, and opinions. They can look to Instagram to see #ad to know when someone is selling something. Institutions don’t always feel as knowable or as transparent. It is far harder to make sense of an organization’s motivations or financial incentives than it is to unpack a person’s Twitter or Instagram history. People can see when someone is promoting something, sharing a funny meme, or retweeting a particular article. In looking through a person’s history, it feels easier to understand what an individual is asking of you (if anything) or how he or she wants you to engage. WIthout giving people a behind-the-scenes look into the process of how a story comes together, people largely assume that an institution’s motivations are purely financial.

In order to build trust, news organizations must let people in on the processes and people that bring stories to life.

Kourtney Bitterly is research lead for product and design discovery at The New York Times.

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Millie Tran   Wicked

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Kevin D. Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context