20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

“Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production.”

People want to pull the curtain back. They want more than the story: They want to understand who’s telling it, how it came together, and how it’s being paid for.

In dozens of conversations with people across the U.S. and world, news consumers told us they want more insight into how the news is made. Why was a headline written a certain way? Why was one story featured on the homepage and not another? Who are all of the people involved in making those decisions? Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production, whether that’s knowing that a news organization adhered to a standard of verifying specific information via multiple sources, that journalists poured over thousands of pages of documents for a particular story, or the people involved in the chain of command of decision-making.

That transparency, while at times seemingly mundane, helps people understand what the work of a modern news organization entails and contextualizes it. Most importantly, it also helps them get to know the people involved in making the content they consume, and that’s crucial when it comes to trust. People trust people more than institutions. They also now feel fairly fluent in the mechanics of marketing. Individuals have become much savvier consumers as a result of social media. We encountered person after person casually dropping marketing language into the conversations we have with them. They wonder if they’re in a certain news organization’s “target demographic.” They talk about push notifications as “clickbait.”

In a social media economy that thrives on individual personalities and opinions, people find it hard to make sense of an institution’s motivations or financial incentives. “Was that breaking news notification sent because I really needed to know that information in that moment, or because a news outlet gets paid when I click on a link?” This hint of skepticism has been expressed to us repeatedly in our in-field user research.

Highlighting individual voices within an organization makes it easier to build a relationship of trust, because people — what they stand for and their motivations — feel more easily knowable, especially due to social media. Social media has, for better or worse, given rise to an easily accessible vetting system. People can look to Twitter to see the history of a person’s shares, positions, and opinions. They can look to Instagram to see #ad to know when someone is selling something. Institutions don’t always feel as knowable or as transparent. It is far harder to make sense of an organization’s motivations or financial incentives than it is to unpack a person’s Twitter or Instagram history. People can see when someone is promoting something, sharing a funny meme, or retweeting a particular article. In looking through a person’s history, it feels easier to understand what an individual is asking of you (if anything) or how he or she wants you to engage. WIthout giving people a behind-the-scenes look into the process of how a story comes together, people largely assume that an institution’s motivations are purely financial.

In order to build trust, news organizations must let people in on the processes and people that bring stories to life.

Kourtney Bitterly is research lead for product and design discovery at The New York Times.

People want to pull the curtain back. They want more than the story: They want to understand who’s telling it, how it came together, and how it’s being paid for.

In dozens of conversations with people across the U.S. and world, news consumers told us they want more insight into how the news is made. Why was a headline written a certain way? Why was one story featured on the homepage and not another? Who are all of the people involved in making those decisions? Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production, whether that’s knowing that a news organization adhered to a standard of verifying specific information via multiple sources, that journalists poured over thousands of pages of documents for a particular story, or the people involved in the chain of command of decision-making.

That transparency, while at times seemingly mundane, helps people understand what the work of a modern news organization entails and contextualizes it. Most importantly, it also helps them get to know the people involved in making the content they consume, and that’s crucial when it comes to trust. People trust people more than institutions. They also now feel fairly fluent in the mechanics of marketing. Individuals have become much savvier consumers as a result of social media. We encountered person after person casually dropping marketing language into the conversations we have with them. They wonder if they’re in a certain news organization’s “target demographic.” They talk about push notifications as “clickbait.”

In a social media economy that thrives on individual personalities and opinions, people find it hard to make sense of an institution’s motivations or financial incentives. “Was that breaking news notification sent because I really needed to know that information in that moment, or because a news outlet gets paid when I click on a link?” This hint of skepticism has been expressed to us repeatedly in our in-field user research.

Highlighting individual voices within an organization makes it easier to build a relationship of trust, because people — what they stand for and their motivations — feel more easily knowable, especially due to social media. Social media has, for better or worse, given rise to an easily accessible vetting system. People can look to Twitter to see the history of a person’s shares, positions, and opinions. They can look to Instagram to see #ad to know when someone is selling something. Institutions don’t always feel as knowable or as transparent. It is far harder to make sense of an organization’s motivations or financial incentives than it is to unpack a person’s Twitter or Instagram history. People can see when someone is promoting something, sharing a funny meme, or retweeting a particular article. In looking through a person’s history, it feels easier to understand what an individual is asking of you (if anything) or how he or she wants you to engage. WIthout giving people a behind-the-scenes look into the process of how a story comes together, people largely assume that an institution’s motivations are purely financial.

In order to build trust, news organizations must let people in on the processes and people that bring stories to life.

Kourtney Bitterly is research lead for product and design discovery at The New York Times.

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

J. Siguru Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Juleyka Lantigua   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Millie Tran   Wicked

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Richard Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Kevin D. Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Joshua P. Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul

Marie Gilot   This is fine