20200
P
1
20100
R  E
2
2070
D   I   C
3
2050
T   I   O   N
4
2040
S   F   O   R   J
5
2030
O  U  R  N  A  L
6
2020
I  S  M  2  0  2  0
7

Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

“Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production.”

People want to pull the curtain back. They want more than the story: They want to understand who’s telling it, how it came together, and how it’s being paid for.

In dozens of conversations with people across the U.S. and world, news consumers told us they want more insight into how the news is made. Why was a headline written a certain way? Why was one story featured on the homepage and not another? Who are all of the people involved in making those decisions? Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production, whether that’s knowing that a news organization adhered to a standard of verifying specific information via multiple sources, that journalists poured over thousands of pages of documents for a particular story, or the people involved in the chain of command of decision-making.

That transparency, while at times seemingly mundane, helps people understand what the work of a modern news organization entails and contextualizes it. Most importantly, it also helps them get to know the people involved in making the content they consume, and that’s crucial when it comes to trust. People trust people more than institutions. They also now feel fairly fluent in the mechanics of marketing. Individuals have become much savvier consumers as a result of social media. We encountered person after person casually dropping marketing language into the conversations we have with them. They wonder if they’re in a certain news organization’s “target demographic.” They talk about push notifications as “clickbait.”

In a social media economy that thrives on individual personalities and opinions, people find it hard to make sense of an institution’s motivations or financial incentives. “Was that breaking news notification sent because I really needed to know that information in that moment, or because a news outlet gets paid when I click on a link?” This hint of skepticism has been expressed to us repeatedly in our in-field user research.

Highlighting individual voices within an organization makes it easier to build a relationship of trust, because people — what they stand for and their motivations — feel more easily knowable, especially due to social media. Social media has, for better or worse, given rise to an easily accessible vetting system. People can look to Twitter to see the history of a person’s shares, positions, and opinions. They can look to Instagram to see #ad to know when someone is selling something. Institutions don’t always feel as knowable or as transparent. It is far harder to make sense of an organization’s motivations or financial incentives than it is to unpack a person’s Twitter or Instagram history. People can see when someone is promoting something, sharing a funny meme, or retweeting a particular article. In looking through a person’s history, it feels easier to understand what an individual is asking of you (if anything) or how he or she wants you to engage. WIthout giving people a behind-the-scenes look into the process of how a story comes together, people largely assume that an institution’s motivations are purely financial.

In order to build trust, news organizations must let people in on the processes and people that bring stories to life.

Kourtney Bitterly is research lead for product and design discovery at The New York Times.

People want to pull the curtain back. They want more than the story: They want to understand who’s telling it, how it came together, and how it’s being paid for.

In dozens of conversations with people across the U.S. and world, news consumers told us they want more insight into how the news is made. Why was a headline written a certain way? Why was one story featured on the homepage and not another? Who are all of the people involved in making those decisions? Similar to the shift we’ve seen in the farm-to-table movement around food sourcing and production, people want to know what goes into news production, whether that’s knowing that a news organization adhered to a standard of verifying specific information via multiple sources, that journalists poured over thousands of pages of documents for a particular story, or the people involved in the chain of command of decision-making.

That transparency, while at times seemingly mundane, helps people understand what the work of a modern news organization entails and contextualizes it. Most importantly, it also helps them get to know the people involved in making the content they consume, and that’s crucial when it comes to trust. People trust people more than institutions. They also now feel fairly fluent in the mechanics of marketing. Individuals have become much savvier consumers as a result of social media. We encountered person after person casually dropping marketing language into the conversations we have with them. They wonder if they’re in a certain news organization’s “target demographic.” They talk about push notifications as “clickbait.”

In a social media economy that thrives on individual personalities and opinions, people find it hard to make sense of an institution’s motivations or financial incentives. “Was that breaking news notification sent because I really needed to know that information in that moment, or because a news outlet gets paid when I click on a link?” This hint of skepticism has been expressed to us repeatedly in our in-field user research.

Highlighting individual voices within an organization makes it easier to build a relationship of trust, because people — what they stand for and their motivations — feel more easily knowable, especially due to social media. Social media has, for better or worse, given rise to an easily accessible vetting system. People can look to Twitter to see the history of a person’s shares, positions, and opinions. They can look to Instagram to see #ad to know when someone is selling something. Institutions don’t always feel as knowable or as transparent. It is far harder to make sense of an organization’s motivations or financial incentives than it is to unpack a person’s Twitter or Instagram history. People can see when someone is promoting something, sharing a funny meme, or retweeting a particular article. In looking through a person’s history, it feels easier to understand what an individual is asking of you (if anything) or how he or she wants you to engage. WIthout giving people a behind-the-scenes look into the process of how a story comes together, people largely assume that an institution’s motivations are purely financial.

In order to build trust, news organizations must let people in on the processes and people that bring stories to life.

Kourtney Bitterly is research lead for product and design discovery at The New York Times.

Greg Emerson   News apps fall further behind

Cindy Royal   Prepare media students for skills, not job titles

Jonas Kaiser   Russian bots are just today’s slacktivists

Anthony Nadler   Clash of Clans: Election Edition

Brenda P. Salinas   Treating MP3 files like text

Knight Foundation   Five generations of journalists, learning from each other

Monica Drake   A renewed focus on misinformation

Kevin Douglas Grant   The free press stands against authoritarians’ attacks on truth

Masuma Ahuja   Slower, quieter, more measured and thoughtful

Mike Caulfield   Native verification tools for the blue checkmark crowd

Laura E. Davis   Know the context your journalism is operating within

Nushin Rashidian   Are platforms a bridge or a lifeline?

Irving Washington   Leadership isn’t something you learn on the job

Sarah Stonbely   More people start caring about news inequality

Victor Pickard   We reclaim a public good

Imaeyen Ibanga   Let’s take it slow

Sara K. Baranowski   A big year for little newspapers

Felix Salmon   Spotify launches a news channel

Jeremy Olshan   All journalism should be service journalism

Jakob Moll   A slow-moving tech backlash among young people

Zizi Papacharissi   A president leads, the press follows, reality fades

M. Scott Havens   First-party data becomes media’s most important currency

Joe Amditis   Collaborative journalism takes its rightful place at the table

Seth C. Lewis   20 questions for 2020

Meredith Artley   Stronger solidarity among news organizations

Heather Bryant   Some kinds of journalism aren’t worth saving

Lucas Graves   A smarter conversation about how (and why) fact-checking matters

An Xiao Mina   The Forum we wanted, the forum we got

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting finally creates another mega-hit show

Fiona Spruill   The climate crisis gets the coverage it deserves

Richard J. Tofel   A constraint of the reader-revenue model emerges

Carl Bialik   Journalists will try running the whole shop

Barbara Gray   Join local libraries on the frontlines of civic engagement

Linda Solomon Wood   Everyone in your organization, moving toward a common goal

Sue Robinson   Campaign coverage as test bed for engagement experiments

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting gets listener relationship management

Nathalie Malinarich   Betting on loyalty

Tamar Charney   From broadcast to bespoke

Sarah Schmalbach   Journalist, quantify thyself

A.J. Bauer   A fork in the road for conservative media

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Power to the people (on your audience team)

Raney Aronson-Rath   News deserts will proliferate — but so will new solutions

Joni Deutsch   Podcasting unsilences the silent

Ernie Smith   The death of the industry fad

Jeremy Gilbert and Jarrod Dicker   A call for collaboration between storytelling and tech

Pablo Boczkowski   The day after November 4

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The business we want, not the business we had

Bill Adair   A Nobel Prize, a Brad Pitt film, and a Taylor Swift song

Tonya Mosley   The neutrality vs. objectivity game ends

Cory Haik   We’re already consuming the future of news — now we have to produce it

Dan Shanoff   Sports media enters the Bronny era

Sarah Alvarez   I’m ready for post-news

Julia B. Chan   We 👏 take 👏 breaks 👏

Rick Berke   Incoming fire from both left and right

Steve Henn   The dawning audio web

Stefanie Murray   Charitable giving goes collaborative

Carrie Brown-Smith   Engaged journalism: It’s finally happening

Kerri Hoffman   Opening closed systems

Madelyn Sanfilippo and Yafit Lev-Aretz   News coverage gets geo-fragmented

Cristina Kim   Public media stops trying to serve “everybody”

S. Mitra Kalita   The race to 2021

Kourtney Bitterly   Transparency isn’t just a desire, it’s an expectation

Joanne McNeil   A return to blogs (finally? sort of?)

Mariana Moura Santos   The future of journalism is collaborative

Logan Molyneux and Shannon McGregor   Think twice before turning to Twitter

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists get left behind in the industry’s decline

Matthew Pressman   News consumers divide into haves and have-nots

Alexandra Borchardt   Get out of the office and talk to people

Logan Jaffe   You don’t need fancy tools to listen

Michael W. Wagner   Increasingly fractured, but little bit deliberative

Colleen Shalby   Journalists become media literacy teachers

Tom Glaisyer   Journalism can emerge newly vibrant and powerful

Margarita Noriega   The platforms try to figure out what to do with single-subject newsrooms

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, collaboration in a time of state attacks

Simon Galperin   Journalism becomes more democratic

Beena Raghavendran   The year of the local engagement reporter

Jeff Kofman   Speed through technology

Ståle Grut   OSINT journalism goes mainstream

Nikki Usher   All systems down

Geneva Overholser   Death to bothsidesism

Emily Withrow   The year we kill the news article

Lauren Duca   The rise of the journalistic influencer

Dannagal G. Young   Let’s disrupt the logic that’s driving Americans apart

Talia Stroud   The work of reconnecting starts November 4

Monique Judge   The year to organize, unionize, and fight

Catalina Albeanu   Rebuilding journalism, together

Heidi Tworek   The year of positive pushback

L. Gordon Crovitz   Fighting misinformation requires journalism, not secret algorithms

Matt DeRienzo   Local broadcasters begin to fill the gaps left by newspapers

Mario García   Think small (screen)

Alfred Hermida and Mary Lynn Young   The promise of nonprofit journalism

Nico Gendron   Make better products if you want to reach Gen Z

Francesco Zaffarano   TikTok without generational prejudice

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   A changing industry amps up podcasters’ ambitions

Errin Haines   Race and gender aren’t a 2020 story — they’re the story

Jennifer Brandel   A love letter from the year 2073

Kristen Muller   The year we operationalize community engagement

Alice Antheaume   Trade “politics” for “power”

Adam Thomas   The silver bullet

Marie Gilot   This is fine

Jim Brady   We’ll complain about other people living in bubbles while ignoring our own

Jasmine McNealy   A call for context

Craig Newmark   Formalizing newsrooms’ battle against disinformation

Ben Werdmuller   Use the tools of journalism to save it

Christa Scharfenberg   It’s time to make journalism a field that supports and respects women

Annie Rudd   The expanded ambiguity of the news photograph

John Keefe   Journalism gets hacked

Whitney Phillips   A time to question core beliefs

Candis Callison   Taking a cue from Indigenous journalists on climate change

Alana Levinson   Brand-backed media gets another look

Doris Truong   The year of radical salary transparency

Josh Schwartz   Publishers move beyond the metered paywall

james Wahutu   Western journalists, learn from your African peers

Rachel Davis Mersey   The business of local TV news will enter its downward slide

Helen Havlak   Platforms shine a light on original reporting

John Garrett   It’s the best time in a century to start a local news organization

Elizabeth Dunbar   Frank talk, and then action

Elizabeth Hansen and Jesse Holcomb   Local news initiatives run into a capital shortage

Sonali Prasad   Climate change storytelling gets multidimensional

Peter Bale   Lies get further normalized

Rachel Schallom   The value of push alerts goes beyond open rates

Meg Marco   Everything happens somewhere

Nicholas Jackson   What’s left of local gets comfortable with reader support

Hossein Derakhshan   AI can’t conjure up an Errol Morris

Joshua Darr   All that campaign cash will make the media’s problems worse

Tanya Cordrey   Saying no to more good ideas

Sarah Marshall   The year to learn about news moments

Don Day   Respect the non-paying audience

Brian Moritz   The end of “stick to sports”

Kathleen Searles   Pay more attention to attention

Mira Lowe   The year of student-powered journalism

Millie Tran   Wicked

Bill Grueskin   Our ethics codes get an overhaul