This coming year, 2021, is when general interest publications will finally embrace micropayments for consumers who aren’t ready to make a long-term commitment, or who only want to access one or two articles without adding another username and password to their growing list of subscriptions.
Just kidding. I don’t think that’s ever going to happen, in part because, as this Digiday article on “why micropayments for news schemes struggle to take off” explained way back in 2015, they’re “mentally taxing for users.” (For more on the problems with micropayments, see this Twitter thread.)
What’s also mentally — and financially! — taxing for users, though, is that lengthening list of subscriptions. It never stops growing. As more writers extricate themselves from the publishers that helped to create their brand in the first place, consumers are left deciding which, and how many, to follow into independence. Even if you use a password manager (or are one of the lucky few who don’t seem to need to log back into your New York account every single time you navigate to Vulture or The Cut), there are still all the monthly payments, and they add up. Just two Substack subscriptions at $5/month will cost you as much as an entire year of The New Yorker. Most of us are going to max out soon, if we haven’t already.
Writers know this. It’s a good gig if you can get it, as they say, but just as there’s only one Stephenie Meyer despite modern-day self-publishing entering middle age, there’s also only one Andrew Sullivan and one Glenn Greenwald (thankfully). And though we’d like there to be more, there’s also only one Ann Friedman, who recently wrote openly about how newsletters are “a bit of a pyramid scheme” in that “a few successful people at the top make it seem like the system works for everyone, when in fact there is no way for most folks to make it up from the bottom.” When the venture capital funding that Substack is passing on to creators in order to lure them to the platform runs dry, we’ll see how many are making enough to keep putting in the hours on their own.
Will the go-it-alone model work for many? Maybe! The team behind Substack has built something I find truly enjoyable, and I’ll celebrate any attempt to build new revenue streams for writing and reporting (though how much reporting can be done without support systems — editors, fact-checkers, copy-editors, and lawyers, oh my — remains to be seen).
But what I think you’re more likely to see, and soon, are more bundles. When writers can’t make it on their own, they’ll band together. When they want to share the responsibilities for figuring out insurance and health care and other benefits, they’ll join forces with others who want similar things. When they want to put out a weekly product but only be responsible for publishing once a month, they’ll find three friends. And it’ll be easier for potential subscribers to justify the expense of a bundle — not just more content, but a diversity of content, and voices, all for one price and under one subscription. It’ll probably look a lot like a magazine, but on the internet. Growing up, we used to call them blogs. (Unless you’re Slate, which has been calling itself a magazine for 24 years now, even though it only looks like one if you print it out at home and staple it together yourself.)
The primary difference is that these blogs, these magazines, these whatevers, will be built and guided by the individual creators for their audience, not by the executives they once reported to or their shareholders and owners. And that’s interesting. You’re unlikely to see a new brand from Condé Nast this year, which is still trying (and failing) to clean up the ongoing problems at Bon Appetit. But we’ve already seen exciting new launches like Defector, from the team that brought you Deadspin, and Brick House, a media cooperative owned by the editors of the publications that it houses.
Maybe these will live on Substack 2.0, which is almost certainly going to create its own bundling tools, and soon, despite its claims that it’s not a publisher or media company. Or they’ll live on Lede, a new publishing and subscription platform from the people behind Alley. Or they’ll look completely different from either of those things. It won’t matter much to readers, who all benefit from the great re-bundling. Or to writers, who have an opportunity here to create a more fair and equitable media industry, this time from the bottom up.
Nicholas Jackson is the director of content at Built In and former editor-in-chief of Pacific Standard.
This coming year, 2021, is when general interest publications will finally embrace micropayments for consumers who aren’t ready to make a long-term commitment, or who only want to access one or two articles without adding another username and password to their growing list of subscriptions.
Just kidding. I don’t think that’s ever going to happen, in part because, as this Digiday article on “why micropayments for news schemes struggle to take off” explained way back in 2015, they’re “mentally taxing for users.” (For more on the problems with micropayments, see this Twitter thread.)
What’s also mentally — and financially! — taxing for users, though, is that lengthening list of subscriptions. It never stops growing. As more writers extricate themselves from the publishers that helped to create their brand in the first place, consumers are left deciding which, and how many, to follow into independence. Even if you use a password manager (or are one of the lucky few who don’t seem to need to log back into your New York account every single time you navigate to Vulture or The Cut), there are still all the monthly payments, and they add up. Just two Substack subscriptions at $5/month will cost you as much as an entire year of The New Yorker. Most of us are going to max out soon, if we haven’t already.
Writers know this. It’s a good gig if you can get it, as they say, but just as there’s only one Stephenie Meyer despite modern-day self-publishing entering middle age, there’s also only one Andrew Sullivan and one Glenn Greenwald (thankfully). And though we’d like there to be more, there’s also only one Ann Friedman, who recently wrote openly about how newsletters are “a bit of a pyramid scheme” in that “a few successful people at the top make it seem like the system works for everyone, when in fact there is no way for most folks to make it up from the bottom.” When the venture capital funding that Substack is passing on to creators in order to lure them to the platform runs dry, we’ll see how many are making enough to keep putting in the hours on their own.
Will the go-it-alone model work for many? Maybe! The team behind Substack has built something I find truly enjoyable, and I’ll celebrate any attempt to build new revenue streams for writing and reporting (though how much reporting can be done without support systems — editors, fact-checkers, copy-editors, and lawyers, oh my — remains to be seen).
But what I think you’re more likely to see, and soon, are more bundles. When writers can’t make it on their own, they’ll band together. When they want to share the responsibilities for figuring out insurance and health care and other benefits, they’ll join forces with others who want similar things. When they want to put out a weekly product but only be responsible for publishing once a month, they’ll find three friends. And it’ll be easier for potential subscribers to justify the expense of a bundle — not just more content, but a diversity of content, and voices, all for one price and under one subscription. It’ll probably look a lot like a magazine, but on the internet. Growing up, we used to call them blogs. (Unless you’re Slate, which has been calling itself a magazine for 24 years now, even though it only looks like one if you print it out at home and staple it together yourself.)
The primary difference is that these blogs, these magazines, these whatevers, will be built and guided by the individual creators for their audience, not by the executives they once reported to or their shareholders and owners. And that’s interesting. You’re unlikely to see a new brand from Condé Nast this year, which is still trying (and failing) to clean up the ongoing problems at Bon Appetit. But we’ve already seen exciting new launches like Defector, from the team that brought you Deadspin, and Brick House, a media cooperative owned by the editors of the publications that it houses.
Maybe these will live on Substack 2.0, which is almost certainly going to create its own bundling tools, and soon, despite its claims that it’s not a publisher or media company. Or they’ll live on Lede, a new publishing and subscription platform from the people behind Alley. Or they’ll look completely different from either of those things. It won’t matter much to readers, who all benefit from the great re-bundling. Or to writers, who have an opportunity here to create a more fair and equitable media industry, this time from the bottom up.
Nicholas Jackson is the director of content at Built In and former editor-in-chief of Pacific Standard.
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
An Xiao Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side