The rise of radical newsroom transparency

“Going forward, executives must be prepared to justify hiring and promotion decisions not only to staff but to the broader public.”

I think journalism is about to see the rise of radical transparency within newsrooms, driven by staff members.

The past few years have seen dozens of headline-grabbing scandals involving major news outlets. Not just the #MeToo investigations at NPR, APM, NBC News, The New Republic, CBS, PBS, The New York Times, WNYC, WBUR, and Tronc, but accusations of racial discrimination and harassment at many other organizations as well.

In my work on racial justice, I hear a similar sentiment from journalists all over the country: I’m not sure this will get fixed fast enough for me. If our major news organizations do succeed in becoming equitable and inclusive, it might take years, as so few have shown any appetite for the kind of radical change necessary.

Often, in years past, complaints of a sensitive nature have been addressed behind closed doors. The decision-making process has been opaque and leaders have felt no obligation to share the details of why some team members are let go while others are retained or even promoted. Investigations into abuse, even when carried out by outside agencies, tend to find that yes, problems exist, but they’re somehow not the fault of anyone in management.

Because these issues were never addressed openly, because employees were often punished when they chose to discuss “sensitive issues” with other staff members, leaders were able to continue operating after accusations of abuse without making any substantive changes in policies or procedures.

In the past, it was very difficult to get colleagues to talk about their salaries or their experiences in their workplaces. Now, many are sharing that information without being asked. Journalists have lost patience with the lack of transparency and accountability within their leadership ranks. Many of them, especially the younger ones, are fully prepared to drive change by going public with issues of inequity, harassment, racism, and sexism.

I don’t think this is a short-lived trend; I think it’s the new norm. Going forward, executives must be prepared to justify hiring and promotion decisions not only to staff but to the broader public. What’s more, recruiting talent will become more complicated, as abusive workplaces will be identified and journalists will be warned in a much more open way about which shops they should avoid.

To enforce silence, leaders must either use a threat of punishment or have earned the benefit of the doubt from staff. In many cases, neither of those conditions apply anymore. Journalists are finding support from each other, enough to overcome the fear of retaliation, and many leaders have lost the trust of their teams. It may take years to regain that trust.

In the meantime, journalists will continue to talk to each other openly and honestly, revealing the information that has been secret for so long. For news executives, the days of hiding behind boardroom doors may be over.

I think journalism is about to see the rise of radical transparency within newsrooms, driven by staff members.

The past few years have seen dozens of headline-grabbing scandals involving major news outlets. Not just the #MeToo investigations at NPR, APM, NBC News, The New Republic, CBS, PBS, The New York Times, WNYC, WBUR, and Tronc, but accusations of racial discrimination and harassment at many other organizations as well.

In my work on racial justice, I hear a similar sentiment from journalists all over the country: I’m not sure this will get fixed fast enough for me. If our major news organizations do succeed in becoming equitable and inclusive, it might take years, as so few have shown any appetite for the kind of radical change necessary.

Often, in years past, complaints of a sensitive nature have been addressed behind closed doors. The decision-making process has been opaque and leaders have felt no obligation to share the details of why some team members are let go while others are retained or even promoted. Investigations into abuse, even when carried out by outside agencies, tend to find that yes, problems exist, but they’re somehow not the fault of anyone in management.

Because these issues were never addressed openly, because employees were often punished when they chose to discuss “sensitive issues” with other staff members, leaders were able to continue operating after accusations of abuse without making any substantive changes in policies or procedures.

In the past, it was very difficult to get colleagues to talk about their salaries or their experiences in their workplaces. Now, many are sharing that information without being asked. Journalists have lost patience with the lack of transparency and accountability within their leadership ranks. Many of them, especially the younger ones, are fully prepared to drive change by going public with issues of inequity, harassment, racism, and sexism.

I don’t think this is a short-lived trend; I think it’s the new norm. Going forward, executives must be prepared to justify hiring and promotion decisions not only to staff but to the broader public. What’s more, recruiting talent will become more complicated, as abusive workplaces will be identified and journalists will be warned in a much more open way about which shops they should avoid.

To enforce silence, leaders must either use a threat of punishment or have earned the benefit of the doubt from staff. In many cases, neither of those conditions apply anymore. Journalists are finding support from each other, enough to overcome the fear of retaliation, and many leaders have lost the trust of their teams. It may take years to regain that trust.

In the meantime, journalists will continue to talk to each other openly and honestly, revealing the information that has been secret for so long. For news executives, the days of hiding behind boardroom doors may be over.

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

J. Siguru Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Cory Haik   Be essential

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Richard Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Joshua P. Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Juleyka Lantigua   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump