Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

“There’s no going back to a model of journalism that leans into bothsidesism to secure loyalties across the partisan spectrum.”

Professional journalism faces a legitimacy crisis. The Trump years brought one set of problems to the foreground; the years ahead will bring others more clearly into view.

The model of professional journalism that is most familiar in the United States is not timeless. It first arose under particular conditions in the early 20th century. That’s when university programs in journalism first opened their doors and journalists started crafting professional codes. In this vision, journalists were supposed to acquire the expertise to decide what counts as news and how to report it. Their professional discretion was purported to be the key to resisting pressures from political leaders, business interests, and audiences.

This model contrasted sharply with the effusively partisan style of news that had pervaded the U.S. through most of the 19th century. Much of that era’s press fed off partisan loyalties. It relied on a shared political identity with its audience for appeal and perceived credibility, as Richard Kaplan argues in his careful and detailed portrait of the rise of journalistic objectivity and professionalism. Kaplan showed that one major factor prompting journalism’s professional transformation was a shift in American political culture. In the midst of Progressive Era reforms and Populist insurgency, party machines lost power and the intensity of partisan loyalties diminished.

While professionalism promised them greater autonomy, journalists never achieved a broad mandate to act as a critical check on popular opinions, to exercise their own political judgment, or to seriously engage socially marginalized viewpoints. Instead, Kaplan argues, the ideal of objectivity led journalists to link “their fortunes to the elite” for a “semblance of power and prestige.” Journalists largely deferred to government officials and party elites to set boundaries around what Daniel Hallin calls the “sphere of legitimate controversy.” This professional model also called on journalists to venture cautiously when hitting upon issues of elite controversy. They relied heavily on the technique of presenting “both sides” of an issue while withholding their own obvious pronouncements.

The influence of this model of professional journalism has been declining for decades. Its problems and faults have been numerous: from the narrow perspective and social exclusivity of a profession long dominated by white men to the contradictions of a technocratic approach to making news decisions unavoidably touching upon contested values.

But even with all its weaknesses, we haven’t seen an alternative model emerge that can speak across partisan and social divides. To the extent that news outlets have achieved such cross-partisan and popular legitimacy, they’re still riding off the fumes of professionalism.

This situation poses delicate challenges. During the Trump years, progressive news workers, readers, and viewers rightfully put much more pressure on news outlets to ditch the timidity of previous professional norms — calling on outlets to boldly label politicians’ lies and racist fearmongering and assert a voice in defense of democratic ideals. There’s no going back to a model of journalism that leans into bothsidesism to secure loyalties across the partisan spectrum. But in a state of dizzying polarization, journalism has little foothold on any other source of cultural authority that spans partisan and social divides.

Many of us accept that “neutrally reported” facts alone are not sufficient to counteract the threats of anti-democratic movements and demagogues trading in propaganda and manipulation. But neither is a press that speaks with moral clarity and conviction about these dangers — unless it enjoys a broad and popular perception of legitimacy.

Creating institutions and platforms capable of supporting democracy’s communicative needs under such conditions is the struggle that lies ahead.

Anthony Nadler is an associate professor of media and communication studies at Ursinus College.

Professional journalism faces a legitimacy crisis. The Trump years brought one set of problems to the foreground; the years ahead will bring others more clearly into view.

The model of professional journalism that is most familiar in the United States is not timeless. It first arose under particular conditions in the early 20th century. That’s when university programs in journalism first opened their doors and journalists started crafting professional codes. In this vision, journalists were supposed to acquire the expertise to decide what counts as news and how to report it. Their professional discretion was purported to be the key to resisting pressures from political leaders, business interests, and audiences.

This model contrasted sharply with the effusively partisan style of news that had pervaded the U.S. through most of the 19th century. Much of that era’s press fed off partisan loyalties. It relied on a shared political identity with its audience for appeal and perceived credibility, as Richard Kaplan argues in his careful and detailed portrait of the rise of journalistic objectivity and professionalism. Kaplan showed that one major factor prompting journalism’s professional transformation was a shift in American political culture. In the midst of Progressive Era reforms and Populist insurgency, party machines lost power and the intensity of partisan loyalties diminished.

While professionalism promised them greater autonomy, journalists never achieved a broad mandate to act as a critical check on popular opinions, to exercise their own political judgment, or to seriously engage socially marginalized viewpoints. Instead, Kaplan argues, the ideal of objectivity led journalists to link “their fortunes to the elite” for a “semblance of power and prestige.” Journalists largely deferred to government officials and party elites to set boundaries around what Daniel Hallin calls the “sphere of legitimate controversy.” This professional model also called on journalists to venture cautiously when hitting upon issues of elite controversy. They relied heavily on the technique of presenting “both sides” of an issue while withholding their own obvious pronouncements.

The influence of this model of professional journalism has been declining for decades. Its problems and faults have been numerous: from the narrow perspective and social exclusivity of a profession long dominated by white men to the contradictions of a technocratic approach to making news decisions unavoidably touching upon contested values.

But even with all its weaknesses, we haven’t seen an alternative model emerge that can speak across partisan and social divides. To the extent that news outlets have achieved such cross-partisan and popular legitimacy, they’re still riding off the fumes of professionalism.

This situation poses delicate challenges. During the Trump years, progressive news workers, readers, and viewers rightfully put much more pressure on news outlets to ditch the timidity of previous professional norms — calling on outlets to boldly label politicians’ lies and racist fearmongering and assert a voice in defense of democratic ideals. There’s no going back to a model of journalism that leans into bothsidesism to secure loyalties across the partisan spectrum. But in a state of dizzying polarization, journalism has little foothold on any other source of cultural authority that spans partisan and social divides.

Many of us accept that “neutrally reported” facts alone are not sufficient to counteract the threats of anti-democratic movements and demagogues trading in propaganda and manipulation. But neither is a press that speaks with moral clarity and conviction about these dangers — unless it enjoys a broad and popular perception of legitimacy.

Creating institutions and platforms capable of supporting democracy’s communicative needs under such conditions is the struggle that lies ahead.

Anthony Nadler is an associate professor of media and communication studies at Ursinus College.

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Joshua P. Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Cory Haik   Be essential

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Juleyka Lantigua   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

J. Siguru Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Richard Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it