Professional journalism faces a legitimacy crisis. The Trump years brought one set of problems to the foreground; the years ahead will bring others more clearly into view.
The model of professional journalism that is most familiar in the United States is not timeless. It first arose under particular conditions in the early 20th century. That’s when university programs in journalism first opened their doors and journalists started crafting professional codes. In this vision, journalists were supposed to acquire the expertise to decide what counts as news and how to report it. Their professional discretion was purported to be the key to resisting pressures from political leaders, business interests, and audiences.
This model contrasted sharply with the effusively partisan style of news that had pervaded the U.S. through most of the 19th century. Much of that era’s press fed off partisan loyalties. It relied on a shared political identity with its audience for appeal and perceived credibility, as Richard Kaplan argues in his careful and detailed portrait of the rise of journalistic objectivity and professionalism. Kaplan showed that one major factor prompting journalism’s professional transformation was a shift in American political culture. In the midst of Progressive Era reforms and Populist insurgency, party machines lost power and the intensity of partisan loyalties diminished.
While professionalism promised them greater autonomy, journalists never achieved a broad mandate to act as a critical check on popular opinions, to exercise their own political judgment, or to seriously engage socially marginalized viewpoints. Instead, Kaplan argues, the ideal of objectivity led journalists to link “their fortunes to the elite” for a “semblance of power and prestige.” Journalists largely deferred to government officials and party elites to set boundaries around what Daniel Hallin calls the “sphere of legitimate controversy.” This professional model also called on journalists to venture cautiously when hitting upon issues of elite controversy. They relied heavily on the technique of presenting “both sides” of an issue while withholding their own obvious pronouncements.
The influence of this model of professional journalism has been declining for decades. Its problems and faults have been numerous: from the narrow perspective and social exclusivity of a profession long dominated by white men to the contradictions of a technocratic approach to making news decisions unavoidably touching upon contested values.
But even with all its weaknesses, we haven’t seen an alternative model emerge that can speak across partisan and social divides. To the extent that news outlets have achieved such cross-partisan and popular legitimacy, they’re still riding off the fumes of professionalism.
This situation poses delicate challenges. During the Trump years, progressive news workers, readers, and viewers rightfully put much more pressure on news outlets to ditch the timidity of previous professional norms — calling on outlets to boldly label politicians’ lies and racist fearmongering and assert a voice in defense of democratic ideals. There’s no going back to a model of journalism that leans into bothsidesism to secure loyalties across the partisan spectrum. But in a state of dizzying polarization, journalism has little foothold on any other source of cultural authority that spans partisan and social divides.
Many of us accept that “neutrally reported” facts alone are not sufficient to counteract the threats of anti-democratic movements and demagogues trading in propaganda and manipulation. But neither is a press that speaks with moral clarity and conviction about these dangers — unless it enjoys a broad and popular perception of legitimacy.
Creating institutions and platforms capable of supporting democracy’s communicative needs under such conditions is the struggle that lies ahead.
Anthony Nadler is an associate professor of media and communication studies at Ursinus College.
Professional journalism faces a legitimacy crisis. The Trump years brought one set of problems to the foreground; the years ahead will bring others more clearly into view.
The model of professional journalism that is most familiar in the United States is not timeless. It first arose under particular conditions in the early 20th century. That’s when university programs in journalism first opened their doors and journalists started crafting professional codes. In this vision, journalists were supposed to acquire the expertise to decide what counts as news and how to report it. Their professional discretion was purported to be the key to resisting pressures from political leaders, business interests, and audiences.
This model contrasted sharply with the effusively partisan style of news that had pervaded the U.S. through most of the 19th century. Much of that era’s press fed off partisan loyalties. It relied on a shared political identity with its audience for appeal and perceived credibility, as Richard Kaplan argues in his careful and detailed portrait of the rise of journalistic objectivity and professionalism. Kaplan showed that one major factor prompting journalism’s professional transformation was a shift in American political culture. In the midst of Progressive Era reforms and Populist insurgency, party machines lost power and the intensity of partisan loyalties diminished.
While professionalism promised them greater autonomy, journalists never achieved a broad mandate to act as a critical check on popular opinions, to exercise their own political judgment, or to seriously engage socially marginalized viewpoints. Instead, Kaplan argues, the ideal of objectivity led journalists to link “their fortunes to the elite” for a “semblance of power and prestige.” Journalists largely deferred to government officials and party elites to set boundaries around what Daniel Hallin calls the “sphere of legitimate controversy.” This professional model also called on journalists to venture cautiously when hitting upon issues of elite controversy. They relied heavily on the technique of presenting “both sides” of an issue while withholding their own obvious pronouncements.
The influence of this model of professional journalism has been declining for decades. Its problems and faults have been numerous: from the narrow perspective and social exclusivity of a profession long dominated by white men to the contradictions of a technocratic approach to making news decisions unavoidably touching upon contested values.
But even with all its weaknesses, we haven’t seen an alternative model emerge that can speak across partisan and social divides. To the extent that news outlets have achieved such cross-partisan and popular legitimacy, they’re still riding off the fumes of professionalism.
This situation poses delicate challenges. During the Trump years, progressive news workers, readers, and viewers rightfully put much more pressure on news outlets to ditch the timidity of previous professional norms — calling on outlets to boldly label politicians’ lies and racist fearmongering and assert a voice in defense of democratic ideals. There’s no going back to a model of journalism that leans into bothsidesism to secure loyalties across the partisan spectrum. But in a state of dizzying polarization, journalism has little foothold on any other source of cultural authority that spans partisan and social divides.
Many of us accept that “neutrally reported” facts alone are not sufficient to counteract the threats of anti-democratic movements and demagogues trading in propaganda and manipulation. But neither is a press that speaks with moral clarity and conviction about these dangers — unless it enjoys a broad and popular perception of legitimacy.
Creating institutions and platforms capable of supporting democracy’s communicative needs under such conditions is the struggle that lies ahead.
Anthony Nadler is an associate professor of media and communication studies at Ursinus College.
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
AX Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Don Day Business first, journalism second