The virus ups data journalism’s game

“COVID-19 has surfaced the challenges of data journalism, above all its dependence on institutional data and a lack of time, resources, expertise, or ability to scrutinize the underlying assumptions in a data set.”

Data journalism played a major role during the first wave of the global coronavirus pandemic, gaining in significance and status with its promise of evidence-driven reporting on the spread of COVID-19. Figures and charts showing daily infection rates, hospitalizations, and deaths became commonplace in reporting on COVID-19, and in discussions among citizens at home or on social media.

The numbers from public authorities and data journalism teams presented a stark picture of the devastating impact of the virus across the world. But they also risked leaving audiences with a misleading picture of how their city, region, or country was faring in the struggle against the virus.

The impact and role of data journalism must be understood in relation to the formative and largely unknown characteristics of the first wave itself. Many citizens turned into news omnivores with regards to the coronavirus, keen to learn about its spread and how to adapt to the new reality. Several months later, this tremendous interest seemed to cool down.

During the second half of 2020, many have faced a second, seemingly more devastating wave of the virus. As this second wave takes us into 2021, data journalists will have to work harder to explain the latest COVID-19 figures related in light of more widespread knowledge about the virus — including being open about the uncertainties in their reporting.

Counting cases

The epistemology of data journalism has long held the promise of being a more accurate and reliable form of reporting, using social science methods to analyze quantitative data using computers. Doing accurate and reliable data journalism on COVID-19 is challenging, and during 2021 data journalists will have to advance their practices to maintain perceptions of being credible, relevant, and worthwhile to the public.

With more citizens discussing, analyzing, and questioning health data than ever before, the expectations from journalism are higher. The challenges of reporting COVID-19 underscore key priorities for data journalism going forward — the need for caution when dealing with health data, for expertise in understanding it, and for transparency in acknowledging the limitations of it.

The pandemic has brought to the fore many of the reservations of data journalism. Perhaps the most prominent has been the need for, and access to, reliable, representative, and relevant data. Journalists have depended on data from national governments, scientific bodies, international organizations, universities, and more to report on the spread of the virus, the human cost, and the strain on hospitals.

The problem is that, as Nate Silver argued early in the pandemic, “coronavirus case counts are meaningless,” especially when it comes to international comparisons. Aside from inconsistencies in how cases are counted between countries, the data also depends heavily on the extent of testing in a given location.

Reporting accurately on the number of people who have died due to COVID-19 depends on how these deaths are counted. In some cases, the deaths are only counted if there has been a confirmed test of the virus. A further complication is whether COVID-19 is reported as the cause of death or as a contributory factor.

COVID-19 caveats and anomalies

At a time when the public is seeking clarity and certainty, reporting with all sorts of caveats about the nature of the data on COVID-19 doesn’t make for good journalism.

During the first wave, and on a daily basis, case counts and deaths dominated the headlines, presented by journalists as definitive and authoritative statements. To their credit, some news organizations, such as the BBC, Financial Times, and The New York Times, have been reporting excess mortality rates, which is widely acknowledged by health experts as a more reliable approach.

COVID-19 has surfaced the challenges of data journalism, above all its dependence on institutional data and a lack of time, resources, expertise, or ability to scrutinize the underlying assumptions in a data set.

It also presents an opportunity to do better in 2021. It’s an opportunity to be more critical about institutional data, more cautious in its reporting, and more transparent about the uncertainties of what we know. If journalists don’t identify and explain strange anomalies in the data, they’ll hear about it from the public.

Alfred Hermida is a professor at the School of Journalism, Writing, and Media of the University of British Columbia. Oscar Westlund is a professor at the Department of Journalism and Media Studies at Oslo Metropolitan University.

Data journalism played a major role during the first wave of the global coronavirus pandemic, gaining in significance and status with its promise of evidence-driven reporting on the spread of COVID-19. Figures and charts showing daily infection rates, hospitalizations, and deaths became commonplace in reporting on COVID-19, and in discussions among citizens at home or on social media.

The numbers from public authorities and data journalism teams presented a stark picture of the devastating impact of the virus across the world. But they also risked leaving audiences with a misleading picture of how their city, region, or country was faring in the struggle against the virus.

The impact and role of data journalism must be understood in relation to the formative and largely unknown characteristics of the first wave itself. Many citizens turned into news omnivores with regards to the coronavirus, keen to learn about its spread and how to adapt to the new reality. Several months later, this tremendous interest seemed to cool down.

During the second half of 2020, many have faced a second, seemingly more devastating wave of the virus. As this second wave takes us into 2021, data journalists will have to work harder to explain the latest COVID-19 figures related in light of more widespread knowledge about the virus — including being open about the uncertainties in their reporting.

Counting cases

The epistemology of data journalism has long held the promise of being a more accurate and reliable form of reporting, using social science methods to analyze quantitative data using computers. Doing accurate and reliable data journalism on COVID-19 is challenging, and during 2021 data journalists will have to advance their practices to maintain perceptions of being credible, relevant, and worthwhile to the public.

With more citizens discussing, analyzing, and questioning health data than ever before, the expectations from journalism are higher. The challenges of reporting COVID-19 underscore key priorities for data journalism going forward — the need for caution when dealing with health data, for expertise in understanding it, and for transparency in acknowledging the limitations of it.

The pandemic has brought to the fore many of the reservations of data journalism. Perhaps the most prominent has been the need for, and access to, reliable, representative, and relevant data. Journalists have depended on data from national governments, scientific bodies, international organizations, universities, and more to report on the spread of the virus, the human cost, and the strain on hospitals.

The problem is that, as Nate Silver argued early in the pandemic, “coronavirus case counts are meaningless,” especially when it comes to international comparisons. Aside from inconsistencies in how cases are counted between countries, the data also depends heavily on the extent of testing in a given location.

Reporting accurately on the number of people who have died due to COVID-19 depends on how these deaths are counted. In some cases, the deaths are only counted if there has been a confirmed test of the virus. A further complication is whether COVID-19 is reported as the cause of death or as a contributory factor.

COVID-19 caveats and anomalies

At a time when the public is seeking clarity and certainty, reporting with all sorts of caveats about the nature of the data on COVID-19 doesn’t make for good journalism.

During the first wave, and on a daily basis, case counts and deaths dominated the headlines, presented by journalists as definitive and authoritative statements. To their credit, some news organizations, such as the BBC, Financial Times, and The New York Times, have been reporting excess mortality rates, which is widely acknowledged by health experts as a more reliable approach.

COVID-19 has surfaced the challenges of data journalism, above all its dependence on institutional data and a lack of time, resources, expertise, or ability to scrutinize the underlying assumptions in a data set.

It also presents an opportunity to do better in 2021. It’s an opportunity to be more critical about institutional data, more cautious in its reporting, and more transparent about the uncertainties of what we know. If journalists don’t identify and explain strange anomalies in the data, they’ll hear about it from the public.

Alfred Hermida is a professor at the School of Journalism, Writing, and Media of the University of British Columbia. Oscar Westlund is a professor at the Department of Journalism and Media Studies at Oslo Metropolitan University.

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Cory Haik   Be essential

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?