Toward a wehrhafte journalism

“I hope that the past five years have taught journalists that their role is to contribute to democracy’s fortification and to defend it when necessary.”

Journalists in the United States have mostly described efforts by Donald Trump and Republicans to fight the results of the 2020 presidential election as what it is: a large-scale, shamelessly anti-democratic disinformation campaign.

Given journalists’ track record over the past five years, that could have gone differently. Instead of calling out anti-democratic behavior, they could have continued presenting the election and its aftermath as a “both sides” issue, as many did prior to the election.

I want to suggest that journalists shouldn’t commit the mistake of falling back into their pre-2016 mode of business-as-usual bothsidesism. Instead, they should base their work on democratic principles and contribute to the fortification of democracy.

Bothsidesism, or what Jay Rosen has called “the view from nowhere,” is inherently problematic. The general idea is this: Every story has more than one side, and a good journalist’s job is to present those different sides in order to tell a more complex, nuanced story.

But what sounds good in theory can prove challenging and even harmful in practice. Instead of more nuanced reporting, the view from nowhere can lead to the reduction of complexity known as “he said, she said.” In everyday political journalism, this can mean quoting both prominent Democrats and Republicans and calling it a day.

At best, this means that, instead of more voices in the news, fewer get heard. At worst, bothsidesism legitimizes illegitimate standpoints. In the context of climate change coverage, the practice of giving voice to a climate scientist as well as a climate denier has been rightfully called “balance as bias.” With an ever-radicalizing Republican Party — peddling anti-democratic voter-fraud conspiracy theories and entertaining secession fantasies, now with a QAnon supporter in their congressional ranks — presenting “both sides” as equal is not only irresponsible. It’s recklessly dangerous.

We need to rethink journalism — and, more importantly, admit that journalism built around the idea of neutrality and objectivity is inherently vulnerable to disinformation and bad faith arguments. This insight, of course, is hardly new: Stephen J. A. Ward, for example, argued for a radical rethinking of journalism ethics. And in last year’s Nieman Lab predictions, Geneva Overholser called for “death to bothsidesism.”

Indeed, the question of where journalism is heading — or, rather, should be heading — is an old one for journalism scholars. The general question in this context, then, is usually: If not objectivity and neutrality, what should journalism be built around?

Based on Rawls, Habermas, and others, the suggestion is a simple one: Build journalism around democratic values and justice.

A journalism that actually follows ethical guidelines (as opposed to, say, The New York Times’ guidelines for ethical journalism) would not only think about what voices to include but also whether including some of them is unethical. Bad-faith arguments, disinformation, and extreme speech serve no productive democratic purpose. Instead, they’re aimed at polluting the public sphere and corroding trust in the institution that is the news media.

Journalists will have to reconsider their roles, and media organizations will have to rewrite their ethical guidelines in order to put upholding democracy and promoting justice and fairness front and center. Joan Donovan and danah boyd, for example, have convincingly argued that journalists should adopt strategies such as strategic silence and strategic amplification.

This shift is especially imperative now. Donald Trump’s reign is almost over, and journalists seem eager to go back to business as usual, returning to the days when politicians and those in power could to some degree be held accountable, because they respected norms, procedure, professionalism, and public opinion. But it’s likely that those formerly in power will rediscover their opposition talking points and fake outrage (e.g., deep concern about the size of the federal debt). They’ll surface scandals old and new, block any attempts at legislating, mobilize around their supposed disenfranchisement, and present themselves as upholders of democracy. For journalists who try to return to pre-Trump normal, that will mean presenting those dangerous talking points as just another legitimate side to the story.

My hope for 2021 is that journalists resist this urge and instead guide their reporting by democratic principles that shutout anti-democratic behavior. In Germany, we sometimes argue that a democracy needs to be wehrhafte, or well-fortified. I hope that the past five years have taught journalists that their role is to contribute to democracy’s fortification and to defend it when necessary.

Jonas Kaiser is an assistant professor at Suffolk University and a faculty associate of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.

Journalists in the United States have mostly described efforts by Donald Trump and Republicans to fight the results of the 2020 presidential election as what it is: a large-scale, shamelessly anti-democratic disinformation campaign.

Given journalists’ track record over the past five years, that could have gone differently. Instead of calling out anti-democratic behavior, they could have continued presenting the election and its aftermath as a “both sides” issue, as many did prior to the election.

I want to suggest that journalists shouldn’t commit the mistake of falling back into their pre-2016 mode of business-as-usual bothsidesism. Instead, they should base their work on democratic principles and contribute to the fortification of democracy.

Bothsidesism, or what Jay Rosen has called “the view from nowhere,” is inherently problematic. The general idea is this: Every story has more than one side, and a good journalist’s job is to present those different sides in order to tell a more complex, nuanced story.

But what sounds good in theory can prove challenging and even harmful in practice. Instead of more nuanced reporting, the view from nowhere can lead to the reduction of complexity known as “he said, she said.” In everyday political journalism, this can mean quoting both prominent Democrats and Republicans and calling it a day.

At best, this means that, instead of more voices in the news, fewer get heard. At worst, bothsidesism legitimizes illegitimate standpoints. In the context of climate change coverage, the practice of giving voice to a climate scientist as well as a climate denier has been rightfully called “balance as bias.” With an ever-radicalizing Republican Party — peddling anti-democratic voter-fraud conspiracy theories and entertaining secession fantasies, now with a QAnon supporter in their congressional ranks — presenting “both sides” as equal is not only irresponsible. It’s recklessly dangerous.

We need to rethink journalism — and, more importantly, admit that journalism built around the idea of neutrality and objectivity is inherently vulnerable to disinformation and bad faith arguments. This insight, of course, is hardly new: Stephen J. A. Ward, for example, argued for a radical rethinking of journalism ethics. And in last year’s Nieman Lab predictions, Geneva Overholser called for “death to bothsidesism.”

Indeed, the question of where journalism is heading — or, rather, should be heading — is an old one for journalism scholars. The general question in this context, then, is usually: If not objectivity and neutrality, what should journalism be built around?

Based on Rawls, Habermas, and others, the suggestion is a simple one: Build journalism around democratic values and justice.

A journalism that actually follows ethical guidelines (as opposed to, say, The New York Times’ guidelines for ethical journalism) would not only think about what voices to include but also whether including some of them is unethical. Bad-faith arguments, disinformation, and extreme speech serve no productive democratic purpose. Instead, they’re aimed at polluting the public sphere and corroding trust in the institution that is the news media.

Journalists will have to reconsider their roles, and media organizations will have to rewrite their ethical guidelines in order to put upholding democracy and promoting justice and fairness front and center. Joan Donovan and danah boyd, for example, have convincingly argued that journalists should adopt strategies such as strategic silence and strategic amplification.

This shift is especially imperative now. Donald Trump’s reign is almost over, and journalists seem eager to go back to business as usual, returning to the days when politicians and those in power could to some degree be held accountable, because they respected norms, procedure, professionalism, and public opinion. But it’s likely that those formerly in power will rediscover their opposition talking points and fake outrage (e.g., deep concern about the size of the federal debt). They’ll surface scandals old and new, block any attempts at legislating, mobilize around their supposed disenfranchisement, and present themselves as upholders of democracy. For journalists who try to return to pre-Trump normal, that will mean presenting those dangerous talking points as just another legitimate side to the story.

My hope for 2021 is that journalists resist this urge and instead guide their reporting by democratic principles that shutout anti-democratic behavior. In Germany, we sometimes argue that a democracy needs to be wehrhafte, or well-fortified. I hope that the past five years have taught journalists that their role is to contribute to democracy’s fortification and to defend it when necessary.

Jonas Kaiser is an assistant professor at Suffolk University and a faculty associate of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Joshua P. Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Cory Haik   Be essential

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Richard Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Juleyka Lantigua   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

J. Siguru Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”