The rise of the journalist-influencer

“Though we like to consider ourselves distinct by dent of our craft’s supposedly elevated calling, journalists are really just creators by a different name.”

Forgive me if this sounds like a case of the hammer seeing everything come up nails, but as someone who covers the creator economy by day, I’ve noticed that the difference between influencers, creators, and journalists seems to shrink every time I look.

Reporting on not just Substack, but Patreon, Cameo, Twitch, and OnlyFans, I find myself struck more by the similarities than the distinctions between the entertainers, artists, digital professionals, influencers, and journalists who populate these platforms. Though we like to consider ourselves distinct by dent of our craft’s supposedly elevated calling, journalists are really just creators by a different name.

We all create content designed for consumption on the internet; we all cultivate a niche and then work to make ourselves indispensable to it; and we all make use of tools and platforms that turn our skill sets into revenue. Indeed, what Patreon has done for podcasters, OnlyFans for sex workers, Twitch for gamers, and Cameo for celebrities, Substack has done for writers.

And while the content might look different, the process is very much the same: Produce something valuable and charge people for access.

More than ever, it’s paywalls that do this charging, and their importance to this trend cannot be overstated. In the wake of a decimated digital advertising industry, and in the face of FAANG’s unassailable scale, creators have embraced a new(ish) method of monetization, the digital subscription. Thanks to this technology, “1,000 true fans” has been transformed from a koan into a business model. You no longer need a million views to turn a profit, just a couple dozen supporters.

This shift has revolutionized solo entrepreneurship, because subscriptions unleash the individual creator. So long as their expertise lies in some breed of digitally distributable content, these second-generation influencers can use the financial model to turn their side-hustle into a day job more easily than ever. This is as true for journalism as it is for any other field.

Substack and the other horsemen of the newsletter apocalypse have made this reality all too apparent, and in doing so have upended much of the media world. The siren song of Chris, Hamish, and Jairaj has been so irresistible that top writers have left pedigreed publications in droves to strike out alone on the platform.

The allure of bootstrapping a career in writing has even encouraged other, less naturally endowed newsletter-whisperers to give the creator economy a shot. Most of these amateur authors (yours truly included) have found only modest success on the platform, but a lucky few have managed to strike gold organically, cultivating a following through nothing more than sheer talent and an origin story that would bring a tear to Horatio Alger’s eyes.

This is bad and good for all the reasons you might imagine. It’s bad because many of the journalists finding success as creators are the same kinds of people who were finding success before: mostly white, mostly male, mostly affluent or well-connected. It’s good because the standard methods of gatekeeping no longer apply; as long as anyone can make a profit all by themselves, everyone can make a profit all by themselves.

So, given that this seems to be the emerging reality, we need to begin to prepare accordingly. What will journalism look like when its most influential practitioners prefer to go it alone? Who loses when publications are forced to vie with lone writers for eyeballs? What happens when the media unbundles so thoroughly that everyone competes with everyone for everyone’s attention?

It’s time to start asking these questions, because the foundation of the next decade of problems is being laid right now. The media can keep chasing its tail, going about the same routines and expecting different results, but perhaps it’s time to have a larger conversation about the system at a distance.

A for-profit model means everything comes at a price, including knowledge. As the people most engaged in parsing and parceling that knowledge, maybe it’s time journalists play a larger role in making sure this arrangement really works for everyone.

Mark Stenberg is a reporter for Business Insider and author of Medialyte.

Forgive me if this sounds like a case of the hammer seeing everything come up nails, but as someone who covers the creator economy by day, I’ve noticed that the difference between influencers, creators, and journalists seems to shrink every time I look.

Reporting on not just Substack, but Patreon, Cameo, Twitch, and OnlyFans, I find myself struck more by the similarities than the distinctions between the entertainers, artists, digital professionals, influencers, and journalists who populate these platforms. Though we like to consider ourselves distinct by dent of our craft’s supposedly elevated calling, journalists are really just creators by a different name.

We all create content designed for consumption on the internet; we all cultivate a niche and then work to make ourselves indispensable to it; and we all make use of tools and platforms that turn our skill sets into revenue. Indeed, what Patreon has done for podcasters, OnlyFans for sex workers, Twitch for gamers, and Cameo for celebrities, Substack has done for writers.

And while the content might look different, the process is very much the same: Produce something valuable and charge people for access.

More than ever, it’s paywalls that do this charging, and their importance to this trend cannot be overstated. In the wake of a decimated digital advertising industry, and in the face of FAANG’s unassailable scale, creators have embraced a new(ish) method of monetization, the digital subscription. Thanks to this technology, “1,000 true fans” has been transformed from a koan into a business model. You no longer need a million views to turn a profit, just a couple dozen supporters.

This shift has revolutionized solo entrepreneurship, because subscriptions unleash the individual creator. So long as their expertise lies in some breed of digitally distributable content, these second-generation influencers can use the financial model to turn their side-hustle into a day job more easily than ever. This is as true for journalism as it is for any other field.

Substack and the other horsemen of the newsletter apocalypse have made this reality all too apparent, and in doing so have upended much of the media world. The siren song of Chris, Hamish, and Jairaj has been so irresistible that top writers have left pedigreed publications in droves to strike out alone on the platform.

The allure of bootstrapping a career in writing has even encouraged other, less naturally endowed newsletter-whisperers to give the creator economy a shot. Most of these amateur authors (yours truly included) have found only modest success on the platform, but a lucky few have managed to strike gold organically, cultivating a following through nothing more than sheer talent and an origin story that would bring a tear to Horatio Alger’s eyes.

This is bad and good for all the reasons you might imagine. It’s bad because many of the journalists finding success as creators are the same kinds of people who were finding success before: mostly white, mostly male, mostly affluent or well-connected. It’s good because the standard methods of gatekeeping no longer apply; as long as anyone can make a profit all by themselves, everyone can make a profit all by themselves.

So, given that this seems to be the emerging reality, we need to begin to prepare accordingly. What will journalism look like when its most influential practitioners prefer to go it alone? Who loses when publications are forced to vie with lone writers for eyeballs? What happens when the media unbundles so thoroughly that everyone competes with everyone for everyone’s attention?

It’s time to start asking these questions, because the foundation of the next decade of problems is being laid right now. The media can keep chasing its tail, going about the same routines and expecting different results, but perhaps it’s time to have a larger conversation about the system at a distance.

A for-profit model means everything comes at a price, including knowledge. As the people most engaged in parsing and parceling that knowledge, maybe it’s time journalists play a larger role in making sure this arrangement really works for everyone.

Mark Stenberg is a reporter for Business Insider and author of Medialyte.

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Cory Haik   Be essential

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis