Over the past year, it’s felt like the things Americans can’t agree on are growing more and more basic and more and more numerous. This trend has been amplified by the spread of misinformation at all levels of our society. It hasn’t been stemmed by a mainstream media that’s grown bolder in calling false claims false, or by social media platforms that have taken new steps around conspiracy-theorist content. Instead, people are simply seeking out different platforms and outlets that reflect their unadulterated views — with our country growing more and more divided about reality itself in the process.
This erosion of shared, fundamental truth is likely to continue in the year ahead. It’s dangerous: As we’ve seen with the coronavirus pandemic and election results, competing and false narratives can spread like wildfire, with partisan media or conspiracists fanning the flames. In the year to come, news organizations must and will work to understand where this is happening and why, who is most at risk, and confront misinformation not just with the facts, but with compelling and credible journalism that can help create a shared picture of reality.
This an urgent challenge — perhaps the urgent challenge — for journalism today. At Frontline, we don’t have all of the answers on how to meet it. But over the last year, we have been involved in work at MIT’s Laboratory for Social Machines to map the information bubbles that stoke polarization and to help come up with solutions to bridge those divides.
One goal of the effort has been to create tools, for journalists and others, that identify stories that are trending on social media for one audience while remaining invisible to others. Only by becoming aware of competing narratives, and understanding why and where they take root, can we begin to do the sort of reporting that holds the powerful accountable while also building shared truths.
We’ve also taken part in a multi-year effort with the MIT Media Lab to turn a lens on our own social media efforts — analyzing how the language we use to describe and promote our journalism on Twitter can help or hinder our efforts to bridge online political silos. This work is still in an experimental phase. But we’re finding that by adjusting our Twitter outreach to avoid certain unintended cues — coded words and phrases that appeal mostly to audiences on the left or right — we are better able to reach people who are interested in having a conversation and being challenged.
In a massive problem for our democracy, social media algorithms often reward extremes. So by using language that is “bridging” rather than polarizing to describe our journalism, we may sacrifice overall reach. But the people we do reach are less siloed and potentially more likely to engage with our reporting, and with each other, in good faith. To us, that’s a win.
And, finally, journalistic transparency may be another way to rebuild trust with a public that’s been inundated with cries of “fake news” and that believes it’s being lied to by mainstream media outlets. The core of what Frontline does is accountability journalism, and we’re committed to holding ourselves to account as well. We’re not afraid of showing our choices as editors. In what we’ve called the Frontline Transparency Project, alongside our finished documentaries, we have published dozens of extended interviews with our sources this year, making it easy for the public to compare what we were told with how it was presented in the context of a film. We encourage people to essentially check our work and see for themselves whether we’ve been fair. We welcome the exchange around our journalism, because it’s critical that the public be able to trust us.
It’s not enough to simply call lies lies. In the year to come, Frontline will expand on our efforts to deliver reporting that brings shared truths into view. We hope other journalists and news organizations will, too. It couldn’t be any more important.
Raney Aronson-Rath is the executive producer of Frontline.
Over the past year, it’s felt like the things Americans can’t agree on are growing more and more basic and more and more numerous. This trend has been amplified by the spread of misinformation at all levels of our society. It hasn’t been stemmed by a mainstream media that’s grown bolder in calling false claims false, or by social media platforms that have taken new steps around conspiracy-theorist content. Instead, people are simply seeking out different platforms and outlets that reflect their unadulterated views — with our country growing more and more divided about reality itself in the process.
This erosion of shared, fundamental truth is likely to continue in the year ahead. It’s dangerous: As we’ve seen with the coronavirus pandemic and election results, competing and false narratives can spread like wildfire, with partisan media or conspiracists fanning the flames. In the year to come, news organizations must and will work to understand where this is happening and why, who is most at risk, and confront misinformation not just with the facts, but with compelling and credible journalism that can help create a shared picture of reality.
This an urgent challenge — perhaps the urgent challenge — for journalism today. At Frontline, we don’t have all of the answers on how to meet it. But over the last year, we have been involved in work at MIT’s Laboratory for Social Machines to map the information bubbles that stoke polarization and to help come up with solutions to bridge those divides.
One goal of the effort has been to create tools, for journalists and others, that identify stories that are trending on social media for one audience while remaining invisible to others. Only by becoming aware of competing narratives, and understanding why and where they take root, can we begin to do the sort of reporting that holds the powerful accountable while also building shared truths.
We’ve also taken part in a multi-year effort with the MIT Media Lab to turn a lens on our own social media efforts — analyzing how the language we use to describe and promote our journalism on Twitter can help or hinder our efforts to bridge online political silos. This work is still in an experimental phase. But we’re finding that by adjusting our Twitter outreach to avoid certain unintended cues — coded words and phrases that appeal mostly to audiences on the left or right — we are better able to reach people who are interested in having a conversation and being challenged.
In a massive problem for our democracy, social media algorithms often reward extremes. So by using language that is “bridging” rather than polarizing to describe our journalism, we may sacrifice overall reach. But the people we do reach are less siloed and potentially more likely to engage with our reporting, and with each other, in good faith. To us, that’s a win.
And, finally, journalistic transparency may be another way to rebuild trust with a public that’s been inundated with cries of “fake news” and that believes it’s being lied to by mainstream media outlets. The core of what Frontline does is accountability journalism, and we’re committed to holding ourselves to account as well. We’re not afraid of showing our choices as editors. In what we’ve called the Frontline Transparency Project, alongside our finished documentaries, we have published dozens of extended interviews with our sources this year, making it easy for the public to compare what we were told with how it was presented in the context of a film. We encourage people to essentially check our work and see for themselves whether we’ve been fair. We welcome the exchange around our journalism, because it’s critical that the public be able to trust us.
It’s not enough to simply call lies lies. In the year to come, Frontline will expand on our efforts to deliver reporting that brings shared truths into view. We hope other journalists and news organizations will, too. It couldn’t be any more important.
Raney Aronson-Rath is the executive producer of Frontline.
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
An Xiao Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front