For many of us, the dawn of the commercial use of the internet in the 1990s was a time for optimism, even utopianism. Recalling the sluggish innovation of the telephone era, when AT&T as a regulated monopoly had to get government approval to offer anything beyond a rotary-dial phone, many of us were thrilled when Congress formalized an unregulated internet, declaring in 1996 that the internet would be “unfettered by federal or state regulation.” Entrepreneurs would not have to get permission from a bureaucrat to launch a browser, website, or app.
In the enthusiasm for an open internet, we cheerleaders didn’t notice an unintended consequence when the law went beyond the benefits of permissionless innovation. The law also immunized platforms on the internet from a fundamental part of the common law. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act declared that digital platforms, unlike analog publishers such as newspapers and magazines, would not be held accountable for the content they published. This was intended to give them immunity as they removed child pornography and other harms, but it became interpreted to mean that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube could publish whatever they or their users wanted without being held to account. Centuries-old duties of care that apply to every other industry didn’t apply on the internet. They didn’t need to worry about defamation laws or other online harms they caused.
This immunity looks like it will end in 2021, marking a 25-year experiment that resulted in misinformation and hoaxes plaguing online platforms.
By now, news consumers don’t know what sources to believe in their Facebook feeds, resulting in less trust even for the most trustworthy journalism. When it comes to COVID-19 and vaccine news and information on the internet, an “infodemic” has resulted in many people saying they won’t take a COVID-19 vaccine, threatening the opportunity to defeat the virus through herd immunity. NewsGuard has identified 368 websites spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and issues regular reports on superspreaders of healthcare hoaxes on Facebook and other platforms.
Reforming Section 230 has bipartisan support in Congress, and President-elect Biden has even said he would repeal it altogether. The Trump Justice Department laid out reforms to Section 230 that would require the platforms to earn reduced immunity in exchange for showing “good faith” efforts. For the first time, the platforms would have to disclose their criteria for moderating content, show that they apply their criteria consistently — not on “deceptive or pretextual grounds” — and give publishers “timely notice describing with particularity the provider’s reasonable factual basis for the restriction of access and a meaningful opportunity to respond.”
The U.K. government would go further. British parliamentarians are brutal in their hearings as they grill Silicon Valley executives, whose inability to accept responsibility for harms make it clear that their irresponsibility is a feature of the system, not a bug. The U.K. is crafting legislation based on its Online Harms White Paper that would restore basic duties of care to the digital platforms, no longer exempting them from common law duties. For example, the platforms would have to take steps to reduce misinformation by providing their users with information about the sources of news they encounter online. Similarly, the European Commission promulgated a Code of Practice on Disinformation that requires the platforms to provide indications of the trustworthiness of sources online based on journalistic principles.
This is not the first time U.S. law had to be reformed after protecting an emerging industry by exempting it from basic obligations of the common law. In the 19th century, Congress wanted to protect the fledgling U.S. shipping industry from damage caused by accidents at sea. The Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 limited the financial liability for shipping companies from accidents they caused to the often trivial amount of the remaining value of the ship, instead of being held liable for the full extent of the damage caused. Congress eventually had to update the law to hold shippers fully accountable for the damage from oil spills caused by their negligence, no longer immunizing them from the basic duty of care under the common law.
Silicon Valley platforms might not like being compared to ships causing oil spills, but it’s time for the digital platforms to likewise be held accountable for the harm they cause through their information pollution.
L. Gordon Crovitz is co-CEO of NewsGuard and former publisher of The Wall Street Journal.
For many of us, the dawn of the commercial use of the internet in the 1990s was a time for optimism, even utopianism. Recalling the sluggish innovation of the telephone era, when AT&T as a regulated monopoly had to get government approval to offer anything beyond a rotary-dial phone, many of us were thrilled when Congress formalized an unregulated internet, declaring in 1996 that the internet would be “unfettered by federal or state regulation.” Entrepreneurs would not have to get permission from a bureaucrat to launch a browser, website, or app.
In the enthusiasm for an open internet, we cheerleaders didn’t notice an unintended consequence when the law went beyond the benefits of permissionless innovation. The law also immunized platforms on the internet from a fundamental part of the common law. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act declared that digital platforms, unlike analog publishers such as newspapers and magazines, would not be held accountable for the content they published. This was intended to give them immunity as they removed child pornography and other harms, but it became interpreted to mean that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube could publish whatever they or their users wanted without being held to account. Centuries-old duties of care that apply to every other industry didn’t apply on the internet. They didn’t need to worry about defamation laws or other online harms they caused.
This immunity looks like it will end in 2021, marking a 25-year experiment that resulted in misinformation and hoaxes plaguing online platforms.
By now, news consumers don’t know what sources to believe in their Facebook feeds, resulting in less trust even for the most trustworthy journalism. When it comes to COVID-19 and vaccine news and information on the internet, an “infodemic” has resulted in many people saying they won’t take a COVID-19 vaccine, threatening the opportunity to defeat the virus through herd immunity. NewsGuard has identified 368 websites spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and issues regular reports on superspreaders of healthcare hoaxes on Facebook and other platforms.
Reforming Section 230 has bipartisan support in Congress, and President-elect Biden has even said he would repeal it altogether. The Trump Justice Department laid out reforms to Section 230 that would require the platforms to earn reduced immunity in exchange for showing “good faith” efforts. For the first time, the platforms would have to disclose their criteria for moderating content, show that they apply their criteria consistently — not on “deceptive or pretextual grounds” — and give publishers “timely notice describing with particularity the provider’s reasonable factual basis for the restriction of access and a meaningful opportunity to respond.”
The U.K. government would go further. British parliamentarians are brutal in their hearings as they grill Silicon Valley executives, whose inability to accept responsibility for harms make it clear that their irresponsibility is a feature of the system, not a bug. The U.K. is crafting legislation based on its Online Harms White Paper that would restore basic duties of care to the digital platforms, no longer exempting them from common law duties. For example, the platforms would have to take steps to reduce misinformation by providing their users with information about the sources of news they encounter online. Similarly, the European Commission promulgated a Code of Practice on Disinformation that requires the platforms to provide indications of the trustworthiness of sources online based on journalistic principles.
This is not the first time U.S. law had to be reformed after protecting an emerging industry by exempting it from basic obligations of the common law. In the 19th century, Congress wanted to protect the fledgling U.S. shipping industry from damage caused by accidents at sea. The Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 limited the financial liability for shipping companies from accidents they caused to the often trivial amount of the remaining value of the ship, instead of being held liable for the full extent of the damage caused. Congress eventually had to update the law to hold shippers fully accountable for the damage from oil spills caused by their negligence, no longer immunizing them from the basic duty of care under the common law.
Silicon Valley platforms might not like being compared to ships causing oil spills, but it’s time for the digital platforms to likewise be held accountable for the harm they cause through their information pollution.
L. Gordon Crovitz is co-CEO of NewsGuard and former publisher of The Wall Street Journal.
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
An Xiao Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture