Common law will finally apply to the Internet

“Silicon Valley platforms might not like being compared to ships causing oil spills, but it’s time for the digital platforms to likewise be held accountable for the harm they cause through their information pollution.”

For many of us, the dawn of the commercial use of the internet in the 1990s was a time for optimism, even utopianism. Recalling the sluggish innovation of the telephone era, when AT&T as a regulated monopoly had to get government approval to offer anything beyond a rotary-dial phone, many of us were thrilled when Congress formalized an unregulated internet, declaring in 1996 that the internet would be “unfettered by federal or state regulation.” Entrepreneurs would not have to get permission from a bureaucrat to launch a browser, website, or app.

In the enthusiasm for an open internet, we cheerleaders didn’t notice an unintended consequence when the law went beyond the benefits of permissionless innovation. The law also immunized platforms on the internet from a fundamental part of the common law. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act declared that digital platforms, unlike analog publishers such as newspapers and magazines, would not be held accountable for the content they published. This was intended to give them immunity as they removed child pornography and other harms, but it became interpreted to mean that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube could publish whatever they or their users wanted without being held to account. Centuries-old duties of care that apply to every other industry didn’t apply on the internet. They didn’t need to worry about defamation laws or other online harms they caused.

This immunity looks like it will end in 2021, marking a 25-year experiment that resulted in misinformation and hoaxes plaguing online platforms.

By now, news consumers don’t know what sources to believe in their Facebook feeds, resulting in less trust even for the most trustworthy journalism. When it comes to COVID-19 and vaccine news and information on the internet, an “infodemic” has resulted in many people saying they won’t take a COVID-19 vaccine, threatening the opportunity to defeat the virus through herd immunity. NewsGuard has identified 368 websites spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and issues regular reports on superspreaders of healthcare hoaxes on Facebook and other platforms.

Reforming Section 230 has bipartisan support in Congress, and President-elect Biden has even said he would repeal it altogether. The Trump Justice Department laid out reforms to Section 230 that would require the platforms to earn reduced immunity in exchange for showing “good faith” efforts. For the first time, the platforms would have to disclose their criteria for moderating content, show that they apply their criteria consistently — not on “deceptive or pretextual grounds” — and give publishers “timely notice describing with particularity the provider’s reasonable factual basis for the restriction of access and a meaningful opportunity to respond.”

The U.K. government would go further. British parliamentarians are brutal in their hearings as they grill Silicon Valley executives, whose inability to accept responsibility for harms make it clear that their irresponsibility is a feature of the system, not a bug. The U.K. is crafting legislation based on its Online Harms White Paper that would restore basic duties of care to the digital platforms, no longer exempting them from common law duties. For example, the platforms would have to take steps to reduce misinformation by providing their users with information about the sources of news they encounter online. Similarly, the European Commission promulgated a Code of Practice on Disinformation that requires the platforms to provide indications of the trustworthiness of sources online based on journalistic principles.

This is not the first time U.S. law had to be reformed after protecting an emerging industry by exempting it from basic obligations of the common law. In the 19th century, Congress wanted to protect the fledgling U.S. shipping industry from damage caused by accidents at sea. The Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 limited the financial liability for shipping companies from accidents they caused to the often trivial amount of the remaining value of the ship, instead of being held liable for the full extent of the damage caused. Congress eventually had to update the law to hold shippers fully accountable for the damage from oil spills caused by their negligence, no longer immunizing them from the basic duty of care under the common law.

Silicon Valley platforms might not like being compared to ships causing oil spills, but it’s time for the digital platforms to likewise be held accountable for the harm they cause through their information pollution.

L. Gordon Crovitz is co-CEO of NewsGuard and former publisher of The Wall Street Journal.

For many of us, the dawn of the commercial use of the internet in the 1990s was a time for optimism, even utopianism. Recalling the sluggish innovation of the telephone era, when AT&T as a regulated monopoly had to get government approval to offer anything beyond a rotary-dial phone, many of us were thrilled when Congress formalized an unregulated internet, declaring in 1996 that the internet would be “unfettered by federal or state regulation.” Entrepreneurs would not have to get permission from a bureaucrat to launch a browser, website, or app.

In the enthusiasm for an open internet, we cheerleaders didn’t notice an unintended consequence when the law went beyond the benefits of permissionless innovation. The law also immunized platforms on the internet from a fundamental part of the common law. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act declared that digital platforms, unlike analog publishers such as newspapers and magazines, would not be held accountable for the content they published. This was intended to give them immunity as they removed child pornography and other harms, but it became interpreted to mean that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube could publish whatever they or their users wanted without being held to account. Centuries-old duties of care that apply to every other industry didn’t apply on the internet. They didn’t need to worry about defamation laws or other online harms they caused.

This immunity looks like it will end in 2021, marking a 25-year experiment that resulted in misinformation and hoaxes plaguing online platforms.

By now, news consumers don’t know what sources to believe in their Facebook feeds, resulting in less trust even for the most trustworthy journalism. When it comes to COVID-19 and vaccine news and information on the internet, an “infodemic” has resulted in many people saying they won’t take a COVID-19 vaccine, threatening the opportunity to defeat the virus through herd immunity. NewsGuard has identified 368 websites spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and issues regular reports on superspreaders of healthcare hoaxes on Facebook and other platforms.

Reforming Section 230 has bipartisan support in Congress, and President-elect Biden has even said he would repeal it altogether. The Trump Justice Department laid out reforms to Section 230 that would require the platforms to earn reduced immunity in exchange for showing “good faith” efforts. For the first time, the platforms would have to disclose their criteria for moderating content, show that they apply their criteria consistently — not on “deceptive or pretextual grounds” — and give publishers “timely notice describing with particularity the provider’s reasonable factual basis for the restriction of access and a meaningful opportunity to respond.”

The U.K. government would go further. British parliamentarians are brutal in their hearings as they grill Silicon Valley executives, whose inability to accept responsibility for harms make it clear that their irresponsibility is a feature of the system, not a bug. The U.K. is crafting legislation based on its Online Harms White Paper that would restore basic duties of care to the digital platforms, no longer exempting them from common law duties. For example, the platforms would have to take steps to reduce misinformation by providing their users with information about the sources of news they encounter online. Similarly, the European Commission promulgated a Code of Practice on Disinformation that requires the platforms to provide indications of the trustworthiness of sources online based on journalistic principles.

This is not the first time U.S. law had to be reformed after protecting an emerging industry by exempting it from basic obligations of the common law. In the 19th century, Congress wanted to protect the fledgling U.S. shipping industry from damage caused by accidents at sea. The Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 limited the financial liability for shipping companies from accidents they caused to the often trivial amount of the remaining value of the ship, instead of being held liable for the full extent of the damage caused. Congress eventually had to update the law to hold shippers fully accountable for the damage from oil spills caused by their negligence, no longer immunizing them from the basic duty of care under the common law.

Silicon Valley platforms might not like being compared to ships causing oil spills, but it’s time for the digital platforms to likewise be held accountable for the harm they cause through their information pollution.

L. Gordon Crovitz is co-CEO of NewsGuard and former publisher of The Wall Street Journal.

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Cory Haik   Be essential

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side