For many of us, the dawn of the commercial use of the internet in the 1990s was a time for optimism, even utopianism. Recalling the sluggish innovation of the telephone era, when AT&T as a regulated monopoly had to get government approval to offer anything beyond a rotary-dial phone, many of us were thrilled when Congress formalized an unregulated internet, declaring in 1996 that the internet would be “unfettered by federal or state regulation.” Entrepreneurs would not have to get permission from a bureaucrat to launch a browser, website, or app.
In the enthusiasm for an open internet, we cheerleaders didn’t notice an unintended consequence when the law went beyond the benefits of permissionless innovation. The law also immunized platforms on the internet from a fundamental part of the common law. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act declared that digital platforms, unlike analog publishers such as newspapers and magazines, would not be held accountable for the content they published. This was intended to give them immunity as they removed child pornography and other harms, but it became interpreted to mean that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube could publish whatever they or their users wanted without being held to account. Centuries-old duties of care that apply to every other industry didn’t apply on the internet. They didn’t need to worry about defamation laws or other online harms they caused.
This immunity looks like it will end in 2021, marking a 25-year experiment that resulted in misinformation and hoaxes plaguing online platforms.
By now, news consumers don’t know what sources to believe in their Facebook feeds, resulting in less trust even for the most trustworthy journalism. When it comes to COVID-19 and vaccine news and information on the internet, an “infodemic” has resulted in many people saying they won’t take a COVID-19 vaccine, threatening the opportunity to defeat the virus through herd immunity. NewsGuard has identified 368 websites spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and issues regular reports on superspreaders of healthcare hoaxes on Facebook and other platforms.
Reforming Section 230 has bipartisan support in Congress, and President-elect Biden has even said he would repeal it altogether. The Trump Justice Department laid out reforms to Section 230 that would require the platforms to earn reduced immunity in exchange for showing “good faith” efforts. For the first time, the platforms would have to disclose their criteria for moderating content, show that they apply their criteria consistently — not on “deceptive or pretextual grounds” — and give publishers “timely notice describing with particularity the provider’s reasonable factual basis for the restriction of access and a meaningful opportunity to respond.”
The U.K. government would go further. British parliamentarians are brutal in their hearings as they grill Silicon Valley executives, whose inability to accept responsibility for harms make it clear that their irresponsibility is a feature of the system, not a bug. The U.K. is crafting legislation based on its Online Harms White Paper that would restore basic duties of care to the digital platforms, no longer exempting them from common law duties. For example, the platforms would have to take steps to reduce misinformation by providing their users with information about the sources of news they encounter online. Similarly, the European Commission promulgated a Code of Practice on Disinformation that requires the platforms to provide indications of the trustworthiness of sources online based on journalistic principles.
This is not the first time U.S. law had to be reformed after protecting an emerging industry by exempting it from basic obligations of the common law. In the 19th century, Congress wanted to protect the fledgling U.S. shipping industry from damage caused by accidents at sea. The Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 limited the financial liability for shipping companies from accidents they caused to the often trivial amount of the remaining value of the ship, instead of being held liable for the full extent of the damage caused. Congress eventually had to update the law to hold shippers fully accountable for the damage from oil spills caused by their negligence, no longer immunizing them from the basic duty of care under the common law.
Silicon Valley platforms might not like being compared to ships causing oil spills, but it’s time for the digital platforms to likewise be held accountable for the harm they cause through their information pollution.
L. Gordon Crovitz is co-CEO of NewsGuard and former publisher of The Wall Street Journal.
For many of us, the dawn of the commercial use of the internet in the 1990s was a time for optimism, even utopianism. Recalling the sluggish innovation of the telephone era, when AT&T as a regulated monopoly had to get government approval to offer anything beyond a rotary-dial phone, many of us were thrilled when Congress formalized an unregulated internet, declaring in 1996 that the internet would be “unfettered by federal or state regulation.” Entrepreneurs would not have to get permission from a bureaucrat to launch a browser, website, or app.
In the enthusiasm for an open internet, we cheerleaders didn’t notice an unintended consequence when the law went beyond the benefits of permissionless innovation. The law also immunized platforms on the internet from a fundamental part of the common law. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act declared that digital platforms, unlike analog publishers such as newspapers and magazines, would not be held accountable for the content they published. This was intended to give them immunity as they removed child pornography and other harms, but it became interpreted to mean that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube could publish whatever they or their users wanted without being held to account. Centuries-old duties of care that apply to every other industry didn’t apply on the internet. They didn’t need to worry about defamation laws or other online harms they caused.
This immunity looks like it will end in 2021, marking a 25-year experiment that resulted in misinformation and hoaxes plaguing online platforms.
By now, news consumers don’t know what sources to believe in their Facebook feeds, resulting in less trust even for the most trustworthy journalism. When it comes to COVID-19 and vaccine news and information on the internet, an “infodemic” has resulted in many people saying they won’t take a COVID-19 vaccine, threatening the opportunity to defeat the virus through herd immunity. NewsGuard has identified 368 websites spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and issues regular reports on superspreaders of healthcare hoaxes on Facebook and other platforms.
Reforming Section 230 has bipartisan support in Congress, and President-elect Biden has even said he would repeal it altogether. The Trump Justice Department laid out reforms to Section 230 that would require the platforms to earn reduced immunity in exchange for showing “good faith” efforts. For the first time, the platforms would have to disclose their criteria for moderating content, show that they apply their criteria consistently — not on “deceptive or pretextual grounds” — and give publishers “timely notice describing with particularity the provider’s reasonable factual basis for the restriction of access and a meaningful opportunity to respond.”
The U.K. government would go further. British parliamentarians are brutal in their hearings as they grill Silicon Valley executives, whose inability to accept responsibility for harms make it clear that their irresponsibility is a feature of the system, not a bug. The U.K. is crafting legislation based on its Online Harms White Paper that would restore basic duties of care to the digital platforms, no longer exempting them from common law duties. For example, the platforms would have to take steps to reduce misinformation by providing their users with information about the sources of news they encounter online. Similarly, the European Commission promulgated a Code of Practice on Disinformation that requires the platforms to provide indications of the trustworthiness of sources online based on journalistic principles.
This is not the first time U.S. law had to be reformed after protecting an emerging industry by exempting it from basic obligations of the common law. In the 19th century, Congress wanted to protect the fledgling U.S. shipping industry from damage caused by accidents at sea. The Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 limited the financial liability for shipping companies from accidents they caused to the often trivial amount of the remaining value of the ship, instead of being held liable for the full extent of the damage caused. Congress eventually had to update the law to hold shippers fully accountable for the damage from oil spills caused by their negligence, no longer immunizing them from the basic duty of care under the common law.
Silicon Valley platforms might not like being compared to ships causing oil spills, but it’s time for the digital platforms to likewise be held accountable for the harm they cause through their information pollution.
L. Gordon Crovitz is co-CEO of NewsGuard and former publisher of The Wall Street Journal.
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Don Day Business first, journalism second
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
AX Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change