Defund the crime beat

“Let’s be honest: Crime coverage is terrible. It’s racist, classist, fear-based clickbait masking as journalism.”

Let’s be honest: Crime coverage is terrible.

It’s racist, classist, fear-based clickbait masking as journalism. It creates lasting harm for the communities that newsrooms are supposed to serve. And because it so rarely meets the public’s needs, it’s almost never newsworthy, despite what Grizzled Gary in his coffee-stained shirt says from his perch at the copy desk.

This should be the year where we finally abolish the crime beat. Study after study shows how the media’s overemphasis on crime makes people feel less safe than they really are and negatively shapes public policy around the criminal–legal system. And study after study shows that it’s racist and inhumane.

While crime coverage fails to serve the public, it does serve three powerful constituencies: white supremacy, law enforcement, and newsrooms — specifically a newsroom’s bottom line.

Let’s start with the police.

The media tend to prioritize their relationships with law enforcement over their connections with communities impacted by state violence, overpolicing, and generations of trauma and governmental neglect. That’s because police give journalists information quickly and cultivate relationships with reporters through ride-alongs and press conferences. Police do all of this to control the narrative, set the news agenda, and stoke public fear so that law-enforcement budgets keep going up.

And for decades, police have harmed Black and brown communities by manipulating the media with half-truths or outright lies.

Take this recent example: After a Philadelphia cop killed Walter Wallace Jr., police stopped a car driving through the resulting demonstrations. The driver, Rickia Young, was on her way to pick up her nephew and made a wrong turn. Police pulled Young from her seat, beat her, and ripped her two-year-old child from the car. The National Fraternal Order of Police later shared images online of a police officer clutching the 2-year-old, claiming that the child was wandering the streets during the “violent riots” and police were “protecting” the child.

What’s worse is that journalists still defer to police, even though they know that some cops are liars. TV news in particular routinely runs crime stories that feature law enforcement as the sole source of information. This approach runs counter to everything you learn in Journalism 101 — independently verify your facts, talk to multiple sources, and don’t take the word of powerful people at face value.

And yet the “crime beat” still exists. You can blame the ingrained “if it bleeds, it leads” mentality. You can blame commercial media’s grotesque business model, where speed is valued over context and there’s a desperate need to attract as many eyeballs as possible to make a buck. For every good police-accountability story, or story covering the root causes and generational pain of violence and harm, there are dozens more crime stories that inflict trauma and make a spectacle of violence, mental illness, poverty, substance abuse, and generational divestment.

We’ve seen some positive changes over the past few years. Many newsrooms no longer use mugshots; some are creating appeal processes for the public to have stories removed from news sites; others are creating advisory boards. Calls to reexamine the relationship between police and media have increased since the summer’s racial-justice uprisings and the hundreds of press freedom violations at the hands of law enforcement. But journalists must recognize that what they’ve recently experienced with police violence is what Black and brown communities experience on a daily basis.

These steps, while important, are the low-hanging fruit. The whole process of how the criminal–legal system is covered needs to be reexamined — from who sets the news agenda, to who determines what’s newsworthy, to whose voices are centered in coverage and which relationships are prioritized. We need beats that focus on communities impacted by systemic marginalization and keep people safe and healthy. And we need beats that help people navigate the criminal-legal system, access important social services, and better understand their rights.

Here in Philadelphia, Free Press, the Media, Inequality and Change Center, Movement Alliance Project, and many other community groups have launched the Shift the Narrative Project. We’re working with residents and journalists to build power within communities to transform whose stories are told in local media.

The sooner journalists acknowledge that the crime beat needs to go, the sooner we can acknowledge and repair past harms, reimagine how newsrooms approach their coverage of the criminal-legal and carceral systems, and move in solidarity with communities whose perspectives and experiences have been excluded from local news.

Tauhid Chappell is Free Press’s News Voices: Philadelphia program manager. Mike Rispoli is the director of News Voices.

Let’s be honest: Crime coverage is terrible.

It’s racist, classist, fear-based clickbait masking as journalism. It creates lasting harm for the communities that newsrooms are supposed to serve. And because it so rarely meets the public’s needs, it’s almost never newsworthy, despite what Grizzled Gary in his coffee-stained shirt says from his perch at the copy desk.

This should be the year where we finally abolish the crime beat. Study after study shows how the media’s overemphasis on crime makes people feel less safe than they really are and negatively shapes public policy around the criminal–legal system. And study after study shows that it’s racist and inhumane.

While crime coverage fails to serve the public, it does serve three powerful constituencies: white supremacy, law enforcement, and newsrooms — specifically a newsroom’s bottom line.

Let’s start with the police.

The media tend to prioritize their relationships with law enforcement over their connections with communities impacted by state violence, overpolicing, and generations of trauma and governmental neglect. That’s because police give journalists information quickly and cultivate relationships with reporters through ride-alongs and press conferences. Police do all of this to control the narrative, set the news agenda, and stoke public fear so that law-enforcement budgets keep going up.

And for decades, police have harmed Black and brown communities by manipulating the media with half-truths or outright lies.

Take this recent example: After a Philadelphia cop killed Walter Wallace Jr., police stopped a car driving through the resulting demonstrations. The driver, Rickia Young, was on her way to pick up her nephew and made a wrong turn. Police pulled Young from her seat, beat her, and ripped her two-year-old child from the car. The National Fraternal Order of Police later shared images online of a police officer clutching the 2-year-old, claiming that the child was wandering the streets during the “violent riots” and police were “protecting” the child.

What’s worse is that journalists still defer to police, even though they know that some cops are liars. TV news in particular routinely runs crime stories that feature law enforcement as the sole source of information. This approach runs counter to everything you learn in Journalism 101 — independently verify your facts, talk to multiple sources, and don’t take the word of powerful people at face value.

And yet the “crime beat” still exists. You can blame the ingrained “if it bleeds, it leads” mentality. You can blame commercial media’s grotesque business model, where speed is valued over context and there’s a desperate need to attract as many eyeballs as possible to make a buck. For every good police-accountability story, or story covering the root causes and generational pain of violence and harm, there are dozens more crime stories that inflict trauma and make a spectacle of violence, mental illness, poverty, substance abuse, and generational divestment.

We’ve seen some positive changes over the past few years. Many newsrooms no longer use mugshots; some are creating appeal processes for the public to have stories removed from news sites; others are creating advisory boards. Calls to reexamine the relationship between police and media have increased since the summer’s racial-justice uprisings and the hundreds of press freedom violations at the hands of law enforcement. But journalists must recognize that what they’ve recently experienced with police violence is what Black and brown communities experience on a daily basis.

These steps, while important, are the low-hanging fruit. The whole process of how the criminal–legal system is covered needs to be reexamined — from who sets the news agenda, to who determines what’s newsworthy, to whose voices are centered in coverage and which relationships are prioritized. We need beats that focus on communities impacted by systemic marginalization and keep people safe and healthy. And we need beats that help people navigate the criminal-legal system, access important social services, and better understand their rights.

Here in Philadelphia, Free Press, the Media, Inequality and Change Center, Movement Alliance Project, and many other community groups have launched the Shift the Narrative Project. We’re working with residents and journalists to build power within communities to transform whose stories are told in local media.

The sooner journalists acknowledge that the crime beat needs to go, the sooner we can acknowledge and repair past harms, reimagine how newsrooms approach their coverage of the criminal-legal and carceral systems, and move in solidarity with communities whose perspectives and experiences have been excluded from local news.

Tauhid Chappell is Free Press’s News Voices: Philadelphia program manager. Mike Rispoli is the director of News Voices.

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Richard Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

AX Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Cory Haik   Be essential

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

J. Siguru Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Juleyka Lantigua   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Nik Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Joshua P. Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context