Defund the crime beat

“Let’s be honest: Crime coverage is terrible. It’s racist, classist, fear-based clickbait masking as journalism.”

Let’s be honest: Crime coverage is terrible.

It’s racist, classist, fear-based clickbait masking as journalism. It creates lasting harm for the communities that newsrooms are supposed to serve. And because it so rarely meets the public’s needs, it’s almost never newsworthy, despite what Grizzled Gary in his coffee-stained shirt says from his perch at the copy desk.

This should be the year where we finally abolish the crime beat. Study after study shows how the media’s overemphasis on crime makes people feel less safe than they really are and negatively shapes public policy around the criminal–legal system. And study after study shows that it’s racist and inhumane.

While crime coverage fails to serve the public, it does serve three powerful constituencies: white supremacy, law enforcement, and newsrooms — specifically a newsroom’s bottom line.

Let’s start with the police.

The media tend to prioritize their relationships with law enforcement over their connections with communities impacted by state violence, overpolicing, and generations of trauma and governmental neglect. That’s because police give journalists information quickly and cultivate relationships with reporters through ride-alongs and press conferences. Police do all of this to control the narrative, set the news agenda, and stoke public fear so that law-enforcement budgets keep going up.

And for decades, police have harmed Black and brown communities by manipulating the media with half-truths or outright lies.

Take this recent example: After a Philadelphia cop killed Walter Wallace Jr., police stopped a car driving through the resulting demonstrations. The driver, Rickia Young, was on her way to pick up her nephew and made a wrong turn. Police pulled Young from her seat, beat her, and ripped her two-year-old child from the car. The National Fraternal Order of Police later shared images online of a police officer clutching the 2-year-old, claiming that the child was wandering the streets during the “violent riots” and police were “protecting” the child.

What’s worse is that journalists still defer to police, even though they know that some cops are liars. TV news in particular routinely runs crime stories that feature law enforcement as the sole source of information. This approach runs counter to everything you learn in Journalism 101 — independently verify your facts, talk to multiple sources, and don’t take the word of powerful people at face value.

And yet the “crime beat” still exists. You can blame the ingrained “if it bleeds, it leads” mentality. You can blame commercial media’s grotesque business model, where speed is valued over context and there’s a desperate need to attract as many eyeballs as possible to make a buck. For every good police-accountability story, or story covering the root causes and generational pain of violence and harm, there are dozens more crime stories that inflict trauma and make a spectacle of violence, mental illness, poverty, substance abuse, and generational divestment.

We’ve seen some positive changes over the past few years. Many newsrooms no longer use mugshots; some are creating appeal processes for the public to have stories removed from news sites; others are creating advisory boards. Calls to reexamine the relationship between police and media have increased since the summer’s racial-justice uprisings and the hundreds of press freedom violations at the hands of law enforcement. But journalists must recognize that what they’ve recently experienced with police violence is what Black and brown communities experience on a daily basis.

These steps, while important, are the low-hanging fruit. The whole process of how the criminal–legal system is covered needs to be reexamined — from who sets the news agenda, to who determines what’s newsworthy, to whose voices are centered in coverage and which relationships are prioritized. We need beats that focus on communities impacted by systemic marginalization and keep people safe and healthy. And we need beats that help people navigate the criminal-legal system, access important social services, and better understand their rights.

Here in Philadelphia, Free Press, the Media, Inequality and Change Center, Movement Alliance Project, and many other community groups have launched the Shift the Narrative Project. We’re working with residents and journalists to build power within communities to transform whose stories are told in local media.

The sooner journalists acknowledge that the crime beat needs to go, the sooner we can acknowledge and repair past harms, reimagine how newsrooms approach their coverage of the criminal-legal and carceral systems, and move in solidarity with communities whose perspectives and experiences have been excluded from local news.

Tauhid Chappell is Free Press’s News Voices: Philadelphia program manager. Mike Rispoli is the director of News Voices.

Let’s be honest: Crime coverage is terrible.

It’s racist, classist, fear-based clickbait masking as journalism. It creates lasting harm for the communities that newsrooms are supposed to serve. And because it so rarely meets the public’s needs, it’s almost never newsworthy, despite what Grizzled Gary in his coffee-stained shirt says from his perch at the copy desk.

This should be the year where we finally abolish the crime beat. Study after study shows how the media’s overemphasis on crime makes people feel less safe than they really are and negatively shapes public policy around the criminal–legal system. And study after study shows that it’s racist and inhumane.

While crime coverage fails to serve the public, it does serve three powerful constituencies: white supremacy, law enforcement, and newsrooms — specifically a newsroom’s bottom line.

Let’s start with the police.

The media tend to prioritize their relationships with law enforcement over their connections with communities impacted by state violence, overpolicing, and generations of trauma and governmental neglect. That’s because police give journalists information quickly and cultivate relationships with reporters through ride-alongs and press conferences. Police do all of this to control the narrative, set the news agenda, and stoke public fear so that law-enforcement budgets keep going up.

And for decades, police have harmed Black and brown communities by manipulating the media with half-truths or outright lies.

Take this recent example: After a Philadelphia cop killed Walter Wallace Jr., police stopped a car driving through the resulting demonstrations. The driver, Rickia Young, was on her way to pick up her nephew and made a wrong turn. Police pulled Young from her seat, beat her, and ripped her two-year-old child from the car. The National Fraternal Order of Police later shared images online of a police officer clutching the 2-year-old, claiming that the child was wandering the streets during the “violent riots” and police were “protecting” the child.

What’s worse is that journalists still defer to police, even though they know that some cops are liars. TV news in particular routinely runs crime stories that feature law enforcement as the sole source of information. This approach runs counter to everything you learn in Journalism 101 — independently verify your facts, talk to multiple sources, and don’t take the word of powerful people at face value.

And yet the “crime beat” still exists. You can blame the ingrained “if it bleeds, it leads” mentality. You can blame commercial media’s grotesque business model, where speed is valued over context and there’s a desperate need to attract as many eyeballs as possible to make a buck. For every good police-accountability story, or story covering the root causes and generational pain of violence and harm, there are dozens more crime stories that inflict trauma and make a spectacle of violence, mental illness, poverty, substance abuse, and generational divestment.

We’ve seen some positive changes over the past few years. Many newsrooms no longer use mugshots; some are creating appeal processes for the public to have stories removed from news sites; others are creating advisory boards. Calls to reexamine the relationship between police and media have increased since the summer’s racial-justice uprisings and the hundreds of press freedom violations at the hands of law enforcement. But journalists must recognize that what they’ve recently experienced with police violence is what Black and brown communities experience on a daily basis.

These steps, while important, are the low-hanging fruit. The whole process of how the criminal–legal system is covered needs to be reexamined — from who sets the news agenda, to who determines what’s newsworthy, to whose voices are centered in coverage and which relationships are prioritized. We need beats that focus on communities impacted by systemic marginalization and keep people safe and healthy. And we need beats that help people navigate the criminal-legal system, access important social services, and better understand their rights.

Here in Philadelphia, Free Press, the Media, Inequality and Change Center, Movement Alliance Project, and many other community groups have launched the Shift the Narrative Project. We’re working with residents and journalists to build power within communities to transform whose stories are told in local media.

The sooner journalists acknowledge that the crime beat needs to go, the sooner we can acknowledge and repair past harms, reimagine how newsrooms approach their coverage of the criminal-legal and carceral systems, and move in solidarity with communities whose perspectives and experiences have been excluded from local news.

Tauhid Chappell is Free Press’s News Voices: Philadelphia program manager. Mike Rispoli is the director of News Voices.

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Cory Haik   Be essential

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption