After the Electoral College voted this week, finally ending the uncertainty about whether unsubstantiated claims of rampant voter fraud would upset the electoral process, a client asked me a hope-laced question during our weekly check-in call:
Now that the results are final, will we start to see less partisan misinformation? Will the news finally get back to normal?
It was a reasonable, if optimistic, question. The client works for a large programmatic advertising company that processes billions of dollars in ad revenue each year. His company had hired our company, NewsGuard, to provide trust ratings for thousands of news sites to help them place their ads on trustworthy news sites while avoiding misinformation publishers. For most of the year, their team had been on high alert from all the misinformation surrounding COVID-19 and the U.S. elections.
But despite his optimism, the answer to my client’s question is, unfortunately, an emphatic no. The plague of misinformation is not going to end on its own.
In fact, if we learned one thing from monitoring false news in 2020, it’s that misinformation publishers are amazingly resilient and adaptable. If users tire of one conspiracy theory or false claim, these operations will simply pivot to a new, more interesting topic. When a conspiracy theory or hoax is proven wrong, they’ll simply adapt the claim, even if the new claim contradicts previous ones. And when audiences turn their focus to a specific news topic, like a global pandemic, misinformation publishers follow the clicks.
For example, of the 371 sites the NewsGuard team has so far identified publishing COVID-19 falsehoods in our Coronavirus Misinformation Tracking Center, more than 80 percent had previously been flagged by our team for publishing misinformation about other topics unrelated to the pandemic. The publishers who claim that 5G cell phone technology causes COVID-19 or that garlic infusions can cure it were the same bad actors that previously claimed that 5G causes cancer and that apricot seeds can cure it.
The tactics weren’t new. The falsehoods themselves were barely new. The only thing that had changed was the topic.
As readers became less interested in COVID-19 conspiracies, many of the same sites pivoted to election-related misinformation. More than 60 percent of the sites we found publishing voting and election falsehoods had published COVID-19 falsehoods earlier this year. And as vaccinations begin, many of those sites will soon pivot toward anti-vaccine misinformation. Even the QAnon conspiracy theory, which revolved around U.S. government agencies, spread to Europe this year, morphing to fit the local political and cultural landscape in different countries.
Put simply, we can’t expect the end of COVID-19 or the election season to put an end to misinformation. Instead, combating it will require a concerted effort from a wide range of stakeholders in this coming year.
First, it will require advertisers, ad exchanges, and agencies to take action. We know that most misinformation publishers generate revenue through programmatic advertising, including ads from large, trusted brands. For example, Geico, PayPal, and Best Buy were among the brands that sent an estimated $5 million in advertising revenue to Russian propaganda sites over a six-month period earlier this year.
NewsGuard has been working with the advertising industry to make our apolitical, transparent trust ratings for news sites available to advertisers on large ad exchanges like MediaMath, Amobee, Basis by Centro, and Appnexus, as well as through major agencies like IPG Mediabrands. If more brands, agencies, and ad exchanges begin to prioritize misinformation as an element of advertising brand safety, it will shift the unit economics of digital content away from sensational false stories designed to draw clicks, eroding one of the biggest incentives for publishing misinformation.
This would have the important side effect of supporting credible news sources with more ad revenue. One of the clients we work with, a large brand that spends hundreds of millions on advertising each year, expanded the list of domains it advertises on by using our trust ratings, adding 1,267 credible news publishers to its list of allowed domains. These were highly credible sites with engaged local and national audiences — but the advertiser was missing out on them for fear of ending up on misinformation.
Second, combating misinformation will require the platforms to take more responsibility — and provide more transparency — around their efforts to combat misinformation. Despite their many public announcements about efforts to combat misinformation this year, platforms like Facebook continue to fall short. After Facebook said it would place fact-checker warnings on COVID-19 misinformation, our analysts checked and found misinformation “Super-Spreader” accounts with millions of followers spreading myths about the pandemic — and 63 percent of the false posts we found had no fact-check or warning attached, even weeks after publication. If platforms don’t take responsibility on their own, governments may need to compel them to do so.
Finally, making any kind of dent in the spread of misinformation will require all of us — from journalists to technologists to average news consumers to parents, teachers, and students — to develop strong digital news and media literacy skills. Before the internet, it was easy to tell which stories to trust; a piece in The Philadelphia Inquirer was easy to distinguish from one in the National Enquirer. In social media feeds, headlines look the same no matter which source they come from, and it requires additional judgment to be able to distinguish between credible and unreliable sources.
At NewsGuard, we’re doing our part to help by providing our browser extension users with detailed trust ratings and warning labels next to links in their social media and search feeds — and by partnering with over 750 libraries worldwide and with education companies like Turnitin to ensure educators and students can use our tools to build digital news literacy skills. In 2021, we hope to see many others join us in these efforts.
We can win the fight against misinformation. In 2021, let’s begin to take the necessary steps — together.
Matt Skibinski is general manager of NewsGuard and reader revenue advisor for the Lenfest Institute.
After the Electoral College voted this week, finally ending the uncertainty about whether unsubstantiated claims of rampant voter fraud would upset the electoral process, a client asked me a hope-laced question during our weekly check-in call:
Now that the results are final, will we start to see less partisan misinformation? Will the news finally get back to normal?
It was a reasonable, if optimistic, question. The client works for a large programmatic advertising company that processes billions of dollars in ad revenue each year. His company had hired our company, NewsGuard, to provide trust ratings for thousands of news sites to help them place their ads on trustworthy news sites while avoiding misinformation publishers. For most of the year, their team had been on high alert from all the misinformation surrounding COVID-19 and the U.S. elections.
But despite his optimism, the answer to my client’s question is, unfortunately, an emphatic no. The plague of misinformation is not going to end on its own.
In fact, if we learned one thing from monitoring false news in 2020, it’s that misinformation publishers are amazingly resilient and adaptable. If users tire of one conspiracy theory or false claim, these operations will simply pivot to a new, more interesting topic. When a conspiracy theory or hoax is proven wrong, they’ll simply adapt the claim, even if the new claim contradicts previous ones. And when audiences turn their focus to a specific news topic, like a global pandemic, misinformation publishers follow the clicks.
For example, of the 371 sites the NewsGuard team has so far identified publishing COVID-19 falsehoods in our Coronavirus Misinformation Tracking Center, more than 80 percent had previously been flagged by our team for publishing misinformation about other topics unrelated to the pandemic. The publishers who claim that 5G cell phone technology causes COVID-19 or that garlic infusions can cure it were the same bad actors that previously claimed that 5G causes cancer and that apricot seeds can cure it.
The tactics weren’t new. The falsehoods themselves were barely new. The only thing that had changed was the topic.
As readers became less interested in COVID-19 conspiracies, many of the same sites pivoted to election-related misinformation. More than 60 percent of the sites we found publishing voting and election falsehoods had published COVID-19 falsehoods earlier this year. And as vaccinations begin, many of those sites will soon pivot toward anti-vaccine misinformation. Even the QAnon conspiracy theory, which revolved around U.S. government agencies, spread to Europe this year, morphing to fit the local political and cultural landscape in different countries.
Put simply, we can’t expect the end of COVID-19 or the election season to put an end to misinformation. Instead, combating it will require a concerted effort from a wide range of stakeholders in this coming year.
First, it will require advertisers, ad exchanges, and agencies to take action. We know that most misinformation publishers generate revenue through programmatic advertising, including ads from large, trusted brands. For example, Geico, PayPal, and Best Buy were among the brands that sent an estimated $5 million in advertising revenue to Russian propaganda sites over a six-month period earlier this year.
NewsGuard has been working with the advertising industry to make our apolitical, transparent trust ratings for news sites available to advertisers on large ad exchanges like MediaMath, Amobee, Basis by Centro, and Appnexus, as well as through major agencies like IPG Mediabrands. If more brands, agencies, and ad exchanges begin to prioritize misinformation as an element of advertising brand safety, it will shift the unit economics of digital content away from sensational false stories designed to draw clicks, eroding one of the biggest incentives for publishing misinformation.
This would have the important side effect of supporting credible news sources with more ad revenue. One of the clients we work with, a large brand that spends hundreds of millions on advertising each year, expanded the list of domains it advertises on by using our trust ratings, adding 1,267 credible news publishers to its list of allowed domains. These were highly credible sites with engaged local and national audiences — but the advertiser was missing out on them for fear of ending up on misinformation.
Second, combating misinformation will require the platforms to take more responsibility — and provide more transparency — around their efforts to combat misinformation. Despite their many public announcements about efforts to combat misinformation this year, platforms like Facebook continue to fall short. After Facebook said it would place fact-checker warnings on COVID-19 misinformation, our analysts checked and found misinformation “Super-Spreader” accounts with millions of followers spreading myths about the pandemic — and 63 percent of the false posts we found had no fact-check or warning attached, even weeks after publication. If platforms don’t take responsibility on their own, governments may need to compel them to do so.
Finally, making any kind of dent in the spread of misinformation will require all of us — from journalists to technologists to average news consumers to parents, teachers, and students — to develop strong digital news and media literacy skills. Before the internet, it was easy to tell which stories to trust; a piece in The Philadelphia Inquirer was easy to distinguish from one in the National Enquirer. In social media feeds, headlines look the same no matter which source they come from, and it requires additional judgment to be able to distinguish between credible and unreliable sources.
At NewsGuard, we’re doing our part to help by providing our browser extension users with detailed trust ratings and warning labels next to links in their social media and search feeds — and by partnering with over 750 libraries worldwide and with education companies like Turnitin to ensure educators and students can use our tools to build digital news literacy skills. In 2021, we hope to see many others join us in these efforts.
We can win the fight against misinformation. In 2021, let’s begin to take the necessary steps — together.
Matt Skibinski is general manager of NewsGuard and reader revenue advisor for the Lenfest Institute.
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
AX Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)