The past few years have been tough for journalists. Trained to report objectively on the truth, they have been forced to also defend it.
Defending the truth has never been primarily the job of journalists. Every society has its own mechanisms for establishing, reproducing, and accepting its own truths. This is how societies form, organize, and co-exist — around shared understandings of what truth is. Truth is more than a collection of facts; it’s a mechanism for belonging.
We affirm our sense of belonging when the societies we live in reinforce our understanding of truth. We become polarized when this understanding of truth is not shared by all who make up a society. We then fall back into what social scientists call in and out groups to affirm our identity. In plain terms, we find comfort in “us vs. them” ways of understanding the world.
Science is equipped to find, understand, and defend the truth. Scientists are taught to check their own bias in researching the truth. When there are many different truths to be shared and researched, scientists have methods of identifying what they all mean. This is what science does. Science is trained to defend the truth.
Journalists, by contrast, are trained to find the truth. Scientists need the help of journalists to tell truths to the general public. When the link between journalism and science is broken, trust in a society’s truth-telling mechanisms is broken.
The past few years have put journalists in the awkward position of defending truths long articulated by science. It’s not a fair position to be in. But it’s also not an unusual position for journalists to be in. At least, it’s not as unusual as we may think.
In authoritarian regimes, leaders have a habit of distorting facts to support their regime. More importantly, autocratic figures have a tradition of using rhetoric to advance their narrative of power. Those of us who grew up in dictatorial regimes are familiar with this strategy. But personal experience isn’t the only qualifier for relating with these experiences. A cursory look at history is enough to let people familiarize themselves with these tendencies.
What do journalists do in these cases? They unite. They work together. They support each other. They organize into resistance cultures.
Did journalists in the U.S. do so in the past few years? To the extent that they could, they tried. Still, many editorial decisions are made at high levels of media organizations. Media conglomerates that thrive on the market logics of capitalism cannot change their tune that easily. Shifts in course must have a connection to profit-making mechanisms. If not, the power of the fourth estate crumbles. (Also, people don’t get paid.)
The next few years will undoubtedly be met with massive efforts to rebuild the infrastructure of truth in the U.S. This will happen; it is a natural and inevitable reaction. Fake news will not dominate our infoscapes forever. It won’t go away completely, but it will become more marginal, because there’s been a change in the leaders we have elected to power.
But a simple repair to the infrastructure of truth won’t be enough to do the trick. We must work together to make the infrastructure of truth less vulnerable. Here are some things we can do to create a sustainable infrastructure of truth:
Second, objectivity is about covering all important sides in order to tell the most accurate story. It’s about telling a story with the proper context. Some sides of a story may be biased; other sides may be inaccurate. And some may be true but still need to be processed from a certain point of view; we may need, for instance, to put ourselves in the other person’s shoes in order to understand their view on reality.
In science, we often assign weights to statistical analyses to attain objectivity. Objectivity is not about devoting equal time to all viewpoints. It is about studying the context to assign proper weight to each part of the story.
Think of truth as a puzzle. Not all pieces of the puzzle have equal size or occupy center stage, but somehow they all fit in. Some pieces don’t belong in the center, or as journalism professor Jay Rosen argues, if a narrative is false or inaccurate, it needs to be weighed differently or de-centered. That’s how the story comes together.
Five years ago, I embarked on a new project. I traveled the world and had conversations with random strangers about democracy and what might make it better. Rebuilding the infrastructure of truth is about better democracy, after all. This resulted in 100 interviews with citizens from 30 countries around the world, relayed in After Democracy: Imagining our Political Future.
As I debriefed my conversational companions post-interview, they all, without fail, asked: “What did other people say? Similar or different things from what I said?”
“They said the same things,” I’d respond, “but they used different words.”
I’m an optimist at heart and I do believe that we all share the same truth. We just use different words to articulate it, and words matter. Let’s build an infrastructure that is better at turning those words into the true stories that connect us.
Zizi Papacharissi is a professor of communication and political science at the University of Illinois–Chicago.
The past few years have been tough for journalists. Trained to report objectively on the truth, they have been forced to also defend it.
Defending the truth has never been primarily the job of journalists. Every society has its own mechanisms for establishing, reproducing, and accepting its own truths. This is how societies form, organize, and co-exist — around shared understandings of what truth is. Truth is more than a collection of facts; it’s a mechanism for belonging.
We affirm our sense of belonging when the societies we live in reinforce our understanding of truth. We become polarized when this understanding of truth is not shared by all who make up a society. We then fall back into what social scientists call in and out groups to affirm our identity. In plain terms, we find comfort in “us vs. them” ways of understanding the world.
Science is equipped to find, understand, and defend the truth. Scientists are taught to check their own bias in researching the truth. When there are many different truths to be shared and researched, scientists have methods of identifying what they all mean. This is what science does. Science is trained to defend the truth.
Journalists, by contrast, are trained to find the truth. Scientists need the help of journalists to tell truths to the general public. When the link between journalism and science is broken, trust in a society’s truth-telling mechanisms is broken.
The past few years have put journalists in the awkward position of defending truths long articulated by science. It’s not a fair position to be in. But it’s also not an unusual position for journalists to be in. At least, it’s not as unusual as we may think.
In authoritarian regimes, leaders have a habit of distorting facts to support their regime. More importantly, autocratic figures have a tradition of using rhetoric to advance their narrative of power. Those of us who grew up in dictatorial regimes are familiar with this strategy. But personal experience isn’t the only qualifier for relating with these experiences. A cursory look at history is enough to let people familiarize themselves with these tendencies.
What do journalists do in these cases? They unite. They work together. They support each other. They organize into resistance cultures.
Did journalists in the U.S. do so in the past few years? To the extent that they could, they tried. Still, many editorial decisions are made at high levels of media organizations. Media conglomerates that thrive on the market logics of capitalism cannot change their tune that easily. Shifts in course must have a connection to profit-making mechanisms. If not, the power of the fourth estate crumbles. (Also, people don’t get paid.)
The next few years will undoubtedly be met with massive efforts to rebuild the infrastructure of truth in the U.S. This will happen; it is a natural and inevitable reaction. Fake news will not dominate our infoscapes forever. It won’t go away completely, but it will become more marginal, because there’s been a change in the leaders we have elected to power.
But a simple repair to the infrastructure of truth won’t be enough to do the trick. We must work together to make the infrastructure of truth less vulnerable. Here are some things we can do to create a sustainable infrastructure of truth:
Second, objectivity is about covering all important sides in order to tell the most accurate story. It’s about telling a story with the proper context. Some sides of a story may be biased; other sides may be inaccurate. And some may be true but still need to be processed from a certain point of view; we may need, for instance, to put ourselves in the other person’s shoes in order to understand their view on reality.
In science, we often assign weights to statistical analyses to attain objectivity. Objectivity is not about devoting equal time to all viewpoints. It is about studying the context to assign proper weight to each part of the story.
Think of truth as a puzzle. Not all pieces of the puzzle have equal size or occupy center stage, but somehow they all fit in. Some pieces don’t belong in the center, or as journalism professor Jay Rosen argues, if a narrative is false or inaccurate, it needs to be weighed differently or de-centered. That’s how the story comes together.
Five years ago, I embarked on a new project. I traveled the world and had conversations with random strangers about democracy and what might make it better. Rebuilding the infrastructure of truth is about better democracy, after all. This resulted in 100 interviews with citizens from 30 countries around the world, relayed in After Democracy: Imagining our Political Future.
As I debriefed my conversational companions post-interview, they all, without fail, asked: “What did other people say? Similar or different things from what I said?”
“They said the same things,” I’d respond, “but they used different words.”
I’m an optimist at heart and I do believe that we all share the same truth. We just use different words to articulate it, and words matter. Let’s build an infrastructure that is better at turning those words into the true stories that connect us.
Zizi Papacharissi is a professor of communication and political science at the University of Illinois–Chicago.
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry