Artificial intelligence processes and augmented content have intervened in each part of the news generation processes, in increasingly surprising ways. I’m writing these paragraphs in Google Docs, where a natural language processing algorithm offers me a series of options for what I should next be writing (writing — the machine just suggested that work). Augmented journalism is making leaps in speed and quality. We’re not very far from having machines that can predict what we’re going to write, do it for ourselves (I added the word ourselves), publish it for ourselves (the machine, this time), and let our readers know about it.
If this improves the quality of information that audiences receive and empowers them to make better decisions (decisions was the machine’s choice, I was going to write choices), it could be something positive, even if to the detriment of business models that are headed for extinction (autocomplete suggested expansion).
This world of autocomplete is incredibly efficient, statistically relevant, remarkably innovative, and potentially dangerous. We’ve already seen what can happen when algorithms predict the information we most want to click on, no matter the impact on our democracies globally. They promoted divisions, social tension, and fake news.
Here’s the thing: Human beings are social animals of habit. The media works to generate patterns of behavior in search of audience fidelity; in recent years, those of us who work in the media have sought ways to get our readers comfortable staying with us in a universe of infinite alternatives. With so much dispersion of attention online, each time we find that something that seems to work, we respond by doing more of it.
Autocomplete is on its way toward standardizing our knowledge production and minimizing the effort required to think. At Página/12, where I work, we launched a membership program that today is the organization’s main source of private income. We don’t use social media comment systems, we got on the Coral Project’s Talk very early, and gave access only to our partners. We generate new consumption patterns; many readers arrive every day to read not just our news, but also the contributions of our members, which aren’t autocompleted.
I don’t think we have to worry about traditional media business models as much as about how societies are informed. And we can’t automate (the machine, I was going to write autocomplete) how societies think. In the end, I no longer know who or what is writing or thinking this text. I hope I’m a good statistical version of myself.
Los procesos de inteligencia artificial y contenido aumentado han intervenido en cada uno de los procesos de generación de noticias de forma cada vez más sorprendente, hasta el punto de que mientras escribo estos párrafos en Google Docs hay un proceso de análisis de procesamiento de lenguaje natural que toma una serie de opciones estadísticas y me devuelve una serie de opciones de formas de completar lo que estoy escribiendo (escribiendo, me lo puso la máquina) “sabiendo” lo que voy a escribir. El periodismo aumentado está dando un salto en velocidad y en calidad. No estamos muy lejos de lograr que las máquinas tengan la posibilidad de predecir el futuro de lo que vamos a escribir, lo hagan por nosotros mismos (me agregó la palabra mismos), lo publiquen por nosotros mismos (otra vez me agregó la palabra) y le avisen a nuestros lectores. Si esto mejora la calidad de la información que reciben las audiencias, y fortalece nuestras posibilidades de tomar mejores decisiones (decisiones lo puso la máquina, yo iba a poner elecciones) podría ser algo positivo aún en detrimento de los modelos de negocios que están en extinción (el autocompletar me puso expansión).
El mundo del autocompletar es increíblemente eficiente, estadísticamente relevante, notablemente innovador, y potencialmente peligroso. Ya vimos lo que pasó con las burbujas de los filtros y el impacto que tuvo en nuestras democracias a nivel global. Potenciaron divisiones, la crispación y las noticias falsas. El asunto es que los seres humanos somos animales de costumbres y también somos animales sociales. Los medios están aprendiendo a generar patrones de comportamiento en busca de fidelidad, y en los últimos años quienes trabajamos en medios de comunicación hemos buscado la forma de habituar a los lectores a que se queden con nosotros. Con tanta dispersión, y ofertas de atención, cada vez que encontramos que algo funciona y puede ser repetitivo intentamos fortalecerlo haciendo más de eso que funciona. El autocompletar va camino a convertir se en una forma de estandarizar nuestra producción de conocimiento y a minimizar nuestros esfuerzos por pensar. En Página/12, el medio periodístico en el cual llevo a cabo la reconversión digital, lanzamos un programa de membresías que hoy representa la principal fuente de ingresos privada de la organización. No usamos sistemas de comentarios de las redes sociales, nos subimos muy temprano a Talk, y le dimos acceso sólo a nuestros socios. Generamos patrones de consumo nuevos: muchos lectores y lectoras ingresan cada día para leer las noticias pero también las contribuciones de nuestros socios, que no son autocompletadas. No creo que tengamos que preocuparnos por los modelos de negocios de los medios tradicionales, sino por cómo se informan las sociedades. Y no podemos automatizar (yo iba a poner autocompletar) cómo piensan las sociedades. Al final, ya no sé quién está escribiendo o pensando este texto. Espero ser una buena versión estadística de mí mismo
Mariano Blejman is chief digital officer of Argentina’s Grupo Octubre and co-founder of Hacks/Hackers Buenos Aires.
Artificial intelligence processes and augmented content have intervened in each part of the news generation processes, in increasingly surprising ways. I’m writing these paragraphs in Google Docs, where a natural language processing algorithm offers me a series of options for what I should next be writing (writing — the machine just suggested that work). Augmented journalism is making leaps in speed and quality. We’re not very far from having machines that can predict what we’re going to write, do it for ourselves (I added the word ourselves), publish it for ourselves (the machine, this time), and let our readers know about it.
If this improves the quality of information that audiences receive and empowers them to make better decisions (decisions was the machine’s choice, I was going to write choices), it could be something positive, even if to the detriment of business models that are headed for extinction (autocomplete suggested expansion).
This world of autocomplete is incredibly efficient, statistically relevant, remarkably innovative, and potentially dangerous. We’ve already seen what can happen when algorithms predict the information we most want to click on, no matter the impact on our democracies globally. They promoted divisions, social tension, and fake news.
Here’s the thing: Human beings are social animals of habit. The media works to generate patterns of behavior in search of audience fidelity; in recent years, those of us who work in the media have sought ways to get our readers comfortable staying with us in a universe of infinite alternatives. With so much dispersion of attention online, each time we find that something that seems to work, we respond by doing more of it.
Autocomplete is on its way toward standardizing our knowledge production and minimizing the effort required to think. At Página/12, where I work, we launched a membership program that today is the organization’s main source of private income. We don’t use social media comment systems, we got on the Coral Project’s Talk very early, and gave access only to our partners. We generate new consumption patterns; many readers arrive every day to read not just our news, but also the contributions of our members, which aren’t autocompleted.
I don’t think we have to worry about traditional media business models as much as about how societies are informed. And we can’t automate (the machine, I was going to write autocomplete) how societies think. In the end, I no longer know who or what is writing or thinking this text. I hope I’m a good statistical version of myself.
Los procesos de inteligencia artificial y contenido aumentado han intervenido en cada uno de los procesos de generación de noticias de forma cada vez más sorprendente, hasta el punto de que mientras escribo estos párrafos en Google Docs hay un proceso de análisis de procesamiento de lenguaje natural que toma una serie de opciones estadísticas y me devuelve una serie de opciones de formas de completar lo que estoy escribiendo (escribiendo, me lo puso la máquina) “sabiendo” lo que voy a escribir. El periodismo aumentado está dando un salto en velocidad y en calidad. No estamos muy lejos de lograr que las máquinas tengan la posibilidad de predecir el futuro de lo que vamos a escribir, lo hagan por nosotros mismos (me agregó la palabra mismos), lo publiquen por nosotros mismos (otra vez me agregó la palabra) y le avisen a nuestros lectores. Si esto mejora la calidad de la información que reciben las audiencias, y fortalece nuestras posibilidades de tomar mejores decisiones (decisiones lo puso la máquina, yo iba a poner elecciones) podría ser algo positivo aún en detrimento de los modelos de negocios que están en extinción (el autocompletar me puso expansión).
El mundo del autocompletar es increíblemente eficiente, estadísticamente relevante, notablemente innovador, y potencialmente peligroso. Ya vimos lo que pasó con las burbujas de los filtros y el impacto que tuvo en nuestras democracias a nivel global. Potenciaron divisiones, la crispación y las noticias falsas. El asunto es que los seres humanos somos animales de costumbres y también somos animales sociales. Los medios están aprendiendo a generar patrones de comportamiento en busca de fidelidad, y en los últimos años quienes trabajamos en medios de comunicación hemos buscado la forma de habituar a los lectores a que se queden con nosotros. Con tanta dispersión, y ofertas de atención, cada vez que encontramos que algo funciona y puede ser repetitivo intentamos fortalecerlo haciendo más de eso que funciona. El autocompletar va camino a convertir se en una forma de estandarizar nuestra producción de conocimiento y a minimizar nuestros esfuerzos por pensar. En Página/12, el medio periodístico en el cual llevo a cabo la reconversión digital, lanzamos un programa de membresías que hoy representa la principal fuente de ingresos privada de la organización. No usamos sistemas de comentarios de las redes sociales, nos subimos muy temprano a Talk, y le dimos acceso sólo a nuestros socios. Generamos patrones de consumo nuevos: muchos lectores y lectoras ingresan cada día para leer las noticias pero también las contribuciones de nuestros socios, que no son autocompletadas. No creo que tengamos que preocuparnos por los modelos de negocios de los medios tradicionales, sino por cómo se informan las sociedades. Y no podemos automatizar (yo iba a poner autocompletar) cómo piensan las sociedades. Al final, ya no sé quién está escribiendo o pensando este texto. Espero ser una buena versión estadística de mí mismo
Mariano Blejman is chief digital officer of Argentina’s Grupo Octubre and co-founder of Hacks/Hackers Buenos Aires.
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
An Xiao Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front