Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

“The ‘Trump bump’ is already waning. The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?”

American journalists have navigated the last four years by reacting and surviving from one frantic news cycle to the next. Barely capable of reflection, we’ve grown used to operating under the constant rush of adrenaline provided by a president extremely effective at hijacking our attention.

With most people experiencing news fatigue, 2021 will force newsrooms to leave behind this frenetic grind of constant reaction. We will need to relearn how to engage with readers in a meaningful way, reevaluating our priorities, diversifying our editorial offering beyond politics and hard news and providing value to our audiences (plural).

We’ll be forced to do so, because we’ll see a dip in readership.

Trump is an extremely polarizing figure and his actions have consistently triggered in readers the basic emotions humans are programmed to react to: hate (for some), love (for others), outrage, surprise. These attributes tend to activate readers or, as we would have said a few years ago, help stories “go viral.”

For organizations that rely on scale, the president, with his late-night tweets and his Friday night news drops, helped to create a traffic bubble that contributed to meeting goals. Of course, the future won’t be any less complex after he’s gone, and we still face colossal challenges that require journalistic scrutiny and that will attract readers (hello, climate change, systematic racism, global pandemic). But that baseline of readers addicted to Trump’s show may soon be gone.

For newsrooms with subscriber or membership models, things might look a little different. The president declared the press “the enemy of the people,” and troves of readers came to the rescue, believing that they should support the media’s role as a watchdog. The “Trump bump” is already waning.

The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?

If/when numbers go down, panic will surely follow. There’ll be meetings and brainstorms about “counterprogramming.” This will be a good thing: It’ll force our newsrooms to diversify, reevaluate their ethos, and interrogate themselves about their specific mission and value proposition for the public and the communities they serve.

Audience teams will be particularly well equipped to undertake this transformative effort, as they operate on the frontlines of the relationship with readers. These editors and reporters will borrow product design methodologies (user research, prototyping, testing, data analysis) and apply them to come up with well-informed editorial strategies that don’t rely solely on instinct and whim.

They will also continue to interpret audience data about readers’ behavior and translate it into products, innovative storytelling formats, and new areas of coverage that provide value or meet their needs, in whatever form it is: liveblogs to follow complex breaking news, explanatory story types that provide context and service-oriented information, interactives and visual pieces that delight and surprise, intimate pop-up newsletters around seasonal topics or news events.

None of this will be possible without a humbling and radical exercise of empathy towards readers. Going back to pet projects that we deem to be the only True Journalism That Matters probably won’t be enough. We’ll need to incorporate the act of listening to audiences to our workflows and assignment processes.

This will take a number of forms: conducting surveys, analyzing traffic data, paying attention to Google Trends, incorporating user-research methodologies, keeping our quintessential personas in mind when assigning and writing stories. Sometimes the listening will become quite literal — forms and other audience engagement initiatives that allow us to communicate directly with readers, learn what they want, and determine how we can serve them.

Open your Chartbeat: They’re already letting you know.

María Sánchez Díez is an operations editor at The Washington Post.

American journalists have navigated the last four years by reacting and surviving from one frantic news cycle to the next. Barely capable of reflection, we’ve grown used to operating under the constant rush of adrenaline provided by a president extremely effective at hijacking our attention.

With most people experiencing news fatigue, 2021 will force newsrooms to leave behind this frenetic grind of constant reaction. We will need to relearn how to engage with readers in a meaningful way, reevaluating our priorities, diversifying our editorial offering beyond politics and hard news and providing value to our audiences (plural).

We’ll be forced to do so, because we’ll see a dip in readership.

Trump is an extremely polarizing figure and his actions have consistently triggered in readers the basic emotions humans are programmed to react to: hate (for some), love (for others), outrage, surprise. These attributes tend to activate readers or, as we would have said a few years ago, help stories “go viral.”

For organizations that rely on scale, the president, with his late-night tweets and his Friday night news drops, helped to create a traffic bubble that contributed to meeting goals. Of course, the future won’t be any less complex after he’s gone, and we still face colossal challenges that require journalistic scrutiny and that will attract readers (hello, climate change, systematic racism, global pandemic). But that baseline of readers addicted to Trump’s show may soon be gone.

For newsrooms with subscriber or membership models, things might look a little different. The president declared the press “the enemy of the people,” and troves of readers came to the rescue, believing that they should support the media’s role as a watchdog. The “Trump bump” is already waning.

The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?

If/when numbers go down, panic will surely follow. There’ll be meetings and brainstorms about “counterprogramming.” This will be a good thing: It’ll force our newsrooms to diversify, reevaluate their ethos, and interrogate themselves about their specific mission and value proposition for the public and the communities they serve.

Audience teams will be particularly well equipped to undertake this transformative effort, as they operate on the frontlines of the relationship with readers. These editors and reporters will borrow product design methodologies (user research, prototyping, testing, data analysis) and apply them to come up with well-informed editorial strategies that don’t rely solely on instinct and whim.

They will also continue to interpret audience data about readers’ behavior and translate it into products, innovative storytelling formats, and new areas of coverage that provide value or meet their needs, in whatever form it is: liveblogs to follow complex breaking news, explanatory story types that provide context and service-oriented information, interactives and visual pieces that delight and surprise, intimate pop-up newsletters around seasonal topics or news events.

None of this will be possible without a humbling and radical exercise of empathy towards readers. Going back to pet projects that we deem to be the only True Journalism That Matters probably won’t be enough. We’ll need to incorporate the act of listening to audiences to our workflows and assignment processes.

This will take a number of forms: conducting surveys, analyzing traffic data, paying attention to Google Trends, incorporating user-research methodologies, keeping our quintessential personas in mind when assigning and writing stories. Sometimes the listening will become quite literal — forms and other audience engagement initiatives that allow us to communicate directly with readers, learn what they want, and determine how we can serve them.

Open your Chartbeat: They’re already letting you know.

María Sánchez Díez is an operations editor at The Washington Post.

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Cory Haik   Be essential

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections