American journalists have navigated the last four years by reacting and surviving from one frantic news cycle to the next. Barely capable of reflection, we’ve grown used to operating under the constant rush of adrenaline provided by a president extremely effective at hijacking our attention.
I worry about people who are so used to the emotional intensity of the last four years, that even if/when they get the opportunity to regulate into a more sustainable rhythm, it will ~feel~ wrong, so they’ll look for or attempt to create that old chaos.
— Ashley C. Ford (@iSmashFizzle) November 10, 2020
With most people experiencing news fatigue, 2021 will force newsrooms to leave behind this frenetic grind of constant reaction. We will need to relearn how to engage with readers in a meaningful way, reevaluating our priorities, diversifying our editorial offering beyond politics and hard news and providing value to our audiences (plural).
We’ll be forced to do so, because we’ll see a dip in readership.
Trump is an extremely polarizing figure and his actions have consistently triggered in readers the basic emotions humans are programmed to react to: hate (for some), love (for others), outrage, surprise. These attributes tend to activate readers or, as we would have said a few years ago, help stories “go viral.”
For organizations that rely on scale, the president, with his late-night tweets and his Friday night news drops, helped to create a traffic bubble that contributed to meeting goals. Of course, the future won’t be any less complex after he’s gone, and we still face colossal challenges that require journalistic scrutiny and that will attract readers (hello, climate change, systematic racism, global pandemic). But that baseline of readers addicted to Trump’s show may soon be gone.
For newsrooms with subscriber or membership models, things might look a little different. The president declared the press “the enemy of the people,” and troves of readers came to the rescue, believing that they should support the media’s role as a watchdog. The “Trump bump” is already waning.
The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?
If/when numbers go down, panic will surely follow. There’ll be meetings and brainstorms about “counterprogramming.” This will be a good thing: It’ll force our newsrooms to diversify, reevaluate their ethos, and interrogate themselves about their specific mission and value proposition for the public and the communities they serve.
Audience teams will be particularly well equipped to undertake this transformative effort, as they operate on the frontlines of the relationship with readers. These editors and reporters will borrow product design methodologies (user research, prototyping, testing, data analysis) and apply them to come up with well-informed editorial strategies that don’t rely solely on instinct and whim.
They will also continue to interpret audience data about readers’ behavior and translate it into products, innovative storytelling formats, and new areas of coverage that provide value or meet their needs, in whatever form it is: liveblogs to follow complex breaking news, explanatory story types that provide context and service-oriented information, interactives and visual pieces that delight and surprise, intimate pop-up newsletters around seasonal topics or news events.
None of this will be possible without a humbling and radical exercise of empathy towards readers. Going back to pet projects that we deem to be the only True Journalism That Matters probably won’t be enough. We’ll need to incorporate the act of listening to audiences to our workflows and assignment processes.
This will take a number of forms: conducting surveys, analyzing traffic data, paying attention to Google Trends, incorporating user-research methodologies, keeping our quintessential personas in mind when assigning and writing stories. Sometimes the listening will become quite literal — forms and other audience engagement initiatives that allow us to communicate directly with readers, learn what they want, and determine how we can serve them.
Open your Chartbeat: They’re already letting you know.
María Sánchez Díez is an operations editor at The Washington Post.
American journalists have navigated the last four years by reacting and surviving from one frantic news cycle to the next. Barely capable of reflection, we’ve grown used to operating under the constant rush of adrenaline provided by a president extremely effective at hijacking our attention.
I worry about people who are so used to the emotional intensity of the last four years, that even if/when they get the opportunity to regulate into a more sustainable rhythm, it will ~feel~ wrong, so they’ll look for or attempt to create that old chaos.
— Ashley C. Ford (@iSmashFizzle) November 10, 2020
With most people experiencing news fatigue, 2021 will force newsrooms to leave behind this frenetic grind of constant reaction. We will need to relearn how to engage with readers in a meaningful way, reevaluating our priorities, diversifying our editorial offering beyond politics and hard news and providing value to our audiences (plural).
We’ll be forced to do so, because we’ll see a dip in readership.
Trump is an extremely polarizing figure and his actions have consistently triggered in readers the basic emotions humans are programmed to react to: hate (for some), love (for others), outrage, surprise. These attributes tend to activate readers or, as we would have said a few years ago, help stories “go viral.”
For organizations that rely on scale, the president, with his late-night tweets and his Friday night news drops, helped to create a traffic bubble that contributed to meeting goals. Of course, the future won’t be any less complex after he’s gone, and we still face colossal challenges that require journalistic scrutiny and that will attract readers (hello, climate change, systematic racism, global pandemic). But that baseline of readers addicted to Trump’s show may soon be gone.
For newsrooms with subscriber or membership models, things might look a little different. The president declared the press “the enemy of the people,” and troves of readers came to the rescue, believing that they should support the media’s role as a watchdog. The “Trump bump” is already waning.
The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?
If/when numbers go down, panic will surely follow. There’ll be meetings and brainstorms about “counterprogramming.” This will be a good thing: It’ll force our newsrooms to diversify, reevaluate their ethos, and interrogate themselves about their specific mission and value proposition for the public and the communities they serve.
Audience teams will be particularly well equipped to undertake this transformative effort, as they operate on the frontlines of the relationship with readers. These editors and reporters will borrow product design methodologies (user research, prototyping, testing, data analysis) and apply them to come up with well-informed editorial strategies that don’t rely solely on instinct and whim.
They will also continue to interpret audience data about readers’ behavior and translate it into products, innovative storytelling formats, and new areas of coverage that provide value or meet their needs, in whatever form it is: liveblogs to follow complex breaking news, explanatory story types that provide context and service-oriented information, interactives and visual pieces that delight and surprise, intimate pop-up newsletters around seasonal topics or news events.
None of this will be possible without a humbling and radical exercise of empathy towards readers. Going back to pet projects that we deem to be the only True Journalism That Matters probably won’t be enough. We’ll need to incorporate the act of listening to audiences to our workflows and assignment processes.
This will take a number of forms: conducting surveys, analyzing traffic data, paying attention to Google Trends, incorporating user-research methodologies, keeping our quintessential personas in mind when assigning and writing stories. Sometimes the listening will become quite literal — forms and other audience engagement initiatives that allow us to communicate directly with readers, learn what they want, and determine how we can serve them.
Open your Chartbeat: They’re already letting you know.
María Sánchez Díez is an operations editor at The Washington Post.
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Julia Angwin Show your (computational) work
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
AX Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes