American journalists have navigated the last four years by reacting and surviving from one frantic news cycle to the next. Barely capable of reflection, we’ve grown used to operating under the constant rush of adrenaline provided by a president extremely effective at hijacking our attention.
I worry about people who are so used to the emotional intensity of the last four years, that even if/when they get the opportunity to regulate into a more sustainable rhythm, it will ~feel~ wrong, so they’ll look for or attempt to create that old chaos.
— Ashley C. Ford (@iSmashFizzle) November 10, 2020
With most people experiencing news fatigue, 2021 will force newsrooms to leave behind this frenetic grind of constant reaction. We will need to relearn how to engage with readers in a meaningful way, reevaluating our priorities, diversifying our editorial offering beyond politics and hard news and providing value to our audiences (plural).
We’ll be forced to do so, because we’ll see a dip in readership.
Trump is an extremely polarizing figure and his actions have consistently triggered in readers the basic emotions humans are programmed to react to: hate (for some), love (for others), outrage, surprise. These attributes tend to activate readers or, as we would have said a few years ago, help stories “go viral.”
For organizations that rely on scale, the president, with his late-night tweets and his Friday night news drops, helped to create a traffic bubble that contributed to meeting goals. Of course, the future won’t be any less complex after he’s gone, and we still face colossal challenges that require journalistic scrutiny and that will attract readers (hello, climate change, systematic racism, global pandemic). But that baseline of readers addicted to Trump’s show may soon be gone.
For newsrooms with subscriber or membership models, things might look a little different. The president declared the press “the enemy of the people,” and troves of readers came to the rescue, believing that they should support the media’s role as a watchdog. The “Trump bump” is already waning.
The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?
If/when numbers go down, panic will surely follow. There’ll be meetings and brainstorms about “counterprogramming.” This will be a good thing: It’ll force our newsrooms to diversify, reevaluate their ethos, and interrogate themselves about their specific mission and value proposition for the public and the communities they serve.
Audience teams will be particularly well equipped to undertake this transformative effort, as they operate on the frontlines of the relationship with readers. These editors and reporters will borrow product design methodologies (user research, prototyping, testing, data analysis) and apply them to come up with well-informed editorial strategies that don’t rely solely on instinct and whim.
They will also continue to interpret audience data about readers’ behavior and translate it into products, innovative storytelling formats, and new areas of coverage that provide value or meet their needs, in whatever form it is: liveblogs to follow complex breaking news, explanatory story types that provide context and service-oriented information, interactives and visual pieces that delight and surprise, intimate pop-up newsletters around seasonal topics or news events.
None of this will be possible without a humbling and radical exercise of empathy towards readers. Going back to pet projects that we deem to be the only True Journalism That Matters probably won’t be enough. We’ll need to incorporate the act of listening to audiences to our workflows and assignment processes.
This will take a number of forms: conducting surveys, analyzing traffic data, paying attention to Google Trends, incorporating user-research methodologies, keeping our quintessential personas in mind when assigning and writing stories. Sometimes the listening will become quite literal — forms and other audience engagement initiatives that allow us to communicate directly with readers, learn what they want, and determine how we can serve them.
Open your Chartbeat: They’re already letting you know.
María Sánchez Díez is an operations editor at The Washington Post.
American journalists have navigated the last four years by reacting and surviving from one frantic news cycle to the next. Barely capable of reflection, we’ve grown used to operating under the constant rush of adrenaline provided by a president extremely effective at hijacking our attention.
I worry about people who are so used to the emotional intensity of the last four years, that even if/when they get the opportunity to regulate into a more sustainable rhythm, it will ~feel~ wrong, so they’ll look for or attempt to create that old chaos.
— Ashley C. Ford (@iSmashFizzle) November 10, 2020
With most people experiencing news fatigue, 2021 will force newsrooms to leave behind this frenetic grind of constant reaction. We will need to relearn how to engage with readers in a meaningful way, reevaluating our priorities, diversifying our editorial offering beyond politics and hard news and providing value to our audiences (plural).
We’ll be forced to do so, because we’ll see a dip in readership.
Trump is an extremely polarizing figure and his actions have consistently triggered in readers the basic emotions humans are programmed to react to: hate (for some), love (for others), outrage, surprise. These attributes tend to activate readers or, as we would have said a few years ago, help stories “go viral.”
For organizations that rely on scale, the president, with his late-night tweets and his Friday night news drops, helped to create a traffic bubble that contributed to meeting goals. Of course, the future won’t be any less complex after he’s gone, and we still face colossal challenges that require journalistic scrutiny and that will attract readers (hello, climate change, systematic racism, global pandemic). But that baseline of readers addicted to Trump’s show may soon be gone.
For newsrooms with subscriber or membership models, things might look a little different. The president declared the press “the enemy of the people,” and troves of readers came to the rescue, believing that they should support the media’s role as a watchdog. The “Trump bump” is already waning.
The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?
If/when numbers go down, panic will surely follow. There’ll be meetings and brainstorms about “counterprogramming.” This will be a good thing: It’ll force our newsrooms to diversify, reevaluate their ethos, and interrogate themselves about their specific mission and value proposition for the public and the communities they serve.
Audience teams will be particularly well equipped to undertake this transformative effort, as they operate on the frontlines of the relationship with readers. These editors and reporters will borrow product design methodologies (user research, prototyping, testing, data analysis) and apply them to come up with well-informed editorial strategies that don’t rely solely on instinct and whim.
They will also continue to interpret audience data about readers’ behavior and translate it into products, innovative storytelling formats, and new areas of coverage that provide value or meet their needs, in whatever form it is: liveblogs to follow complex breaking news, explanatory story types that provide context and service-oriented information, interactives and visual pieces that delight and surprise, intimate pop-up newsletters around seasonal topics or news events.
None of this will be possible without a humbling and radical exercise of empathy towards readers. Going back to pet projects that we deem to be the only True Journalism That Matters probably won’t be enough. We’ll need to incorporate the act of listening to audiences to our workflows and assignment processes.
This will take a number of forms: conducting surveys, analyzing traffic data, paying attention to Google Trends, incorporating user-research methodologies, keeping our quintessential personas in mind when assigning and writing stories. Sometimes the listening will become quite literal — forms and other audience engagement initiatives that allow us to communicate directly with readers, learn what they want, and determine how we can serve them.
Open your Chartbeat: They’re already letting you know.
María Sánchez Díez is an operations editor at The Washington Post.
Tamar Charney Public radio has a midlife crisis
Victor Pickard The commercial era for local journalism is over
Kevin D. Grant Parachute journalism goes away for good
Bo Hee Kim Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture
Cherian George Enter the lamb warriors
Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula Expect to see more translations and non-English content
Natalie Meade Journalism enters rehab
Nikki Usher Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media
Anthony Nadler Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy
Mark Stenberg The rise of the journalist-influencer
Parker Molloy The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump
Candis Callison Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)
Mark S. Luckie Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy
Ryan Kellett The bundle gets bundled
Raney Aronson-Rath To get past information divides, we need to understand them first
Francesca Tripodi Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes
Rachel Glickhouse Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves
Don Day Business first, journalism second
Jennifer Choi What have we done for you lately?
Ariane Bernard Going solo is still only a path for the few
Pia Frey Building growth through tastemakers and their communities
Hadjar Benmiloud Get representative, or die trying
Sara M. Watson Return of the RSS reader
Benjamin Toff Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse
Samantha Ragland The year of journalists taking initiative
Ray Soto The news gets spatial
Ernie Smith Entrepreneurship on rails
Bill Adair The future of fact-checking is all about structured data
Sarah Stonbely Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity
Logan Jaffe History as a reporting tool
Nonny de la Pena News reaches the third dimension
Andrew Ramsammy Stop being polite and start getting real
Garance Franke-Ruta Rebundling content, rebuilding connections
Errin Haines Let’s normalize women’s leadership
Nisha Chittal The year we stop pivoting
Eric Nuzum Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder
Steve Henn Has independent podcasting peaked?
Jim Friedlich A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses
Michael W. Wagner Fractured democracy, fractured journalism
Zainab Khan From understanding to feeling
Loretta Chao Open up the profession
Tonya Mosley True equity means ownership
Matt Skibinski Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it
Aaron Foley Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news
Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui Millennials are ready to run things
Marcus Mabry News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)
Richard Tofel Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)
Matt DeRienzo Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality
Catalina Albeanu Publish less, listen more
Marissa Evans Putting community trauma into context
John Saroff Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites
Mike Ananny Toward better tech journalism
Jessica Clark News becomes plural
Mandy Jenkins You build trust by helping your readers
Nico Gendron Ask your readers to help build your products
Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli Defund the crime beat
Ben Werdmuller The web blooms again
An Xiao Mina 2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary
Patrick Butler Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration
Juleyka Lantigua The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned
Jacqué Palmer The rise of the plain-text email newsletter
John Ketchum More journalists of color become newsroom founders
David Chavern Local video finally gets momentum
A.J. Bauer The year of MAGAcal thinking
Gabe Schneider Another year of empty promises on diversity
Janet Haven and Sam Hinds Is this an AI newsroom?
M. Scott Havens Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption
Renée Kaplan Falling in love with your subscription
John Garrett A surprisingly good year
Astead W. Herndon The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again
Moreno Cruz Osório In Brazil, a push for pluralism
Ariel Zirulnick Local newsrooms question their paywalls
David Skok A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation
Amara Aguilar Journalism schools emphasize listening
Andrew Donohue The rise of the democracy beat
Tim Carmody Spotify will make big waves in video
Marie Shanahan Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo
Linda Solomon Wood Canada steps up for journalism
Christoph Mergerson Black Americans will demand more from journalism
Mike Caulfield 2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)
C.W. Anderson Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?
Jennifer Brandel A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation
Ashton Lattimore Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry
Gonzalo del Peon Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side
Sue Cross A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save
Imaeyen Ibanga Journalism gets unmasked
Anna Nirmala Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots
Delia Cai Subscriptions start working for the middle
Sonali Prasad Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise
Nicholas Jackson Blogging is back, but better
Jesse Holcomb Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism
Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation
Talmon Joseph Smith The media rejects deficit hawkery
Robert Hernandez Data and shame
Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes A shift from conversation to action
Cory Bergman The year after a thousand earthquakes
Colleen Shalby The definition of good journalism shifts
Joshua P. Darr Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis
Nabiha Syed Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships
Danielle C. Belton A decimated media rededicates itself to truth
Cindy Royal J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability
Brian Moritz The year sports journalism changes for good
Pablo Boczkowski Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?
Edward Roussel Tech companies get aggressive in local
Rishad Patel From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers
Chicas Poderosas More voices mean better information
Jody Brannon People won’t renew
Ben Collins We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists
Hossein Derakhshan Mass personalization of truth
Mariano Blejman It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism
Jonas Kaiser Toward a wehrhafte journalism
Heidi Tworek A year of news mocktails
Kawandeep Virdee Goodbye, doomscroll
Alyssa Zeisler Holistic medicine for journalism
Jeremy Gilbert Human-centered journalism
Sam Ford We’ll find better ways to archive our work
John Davidow Reflect and repent
Joni Deutsch Local arts and music make journalism more joyous
Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin Media reparations now
Kate Myers My son will join every Zoom call in our industry
Chase Davis The year we look beyond The Story
Beena Raghavendran Journalism gets fused with art
Rick Berke Virtual events are here to stay
Annie Rudd Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”
María Sánchez Díez Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok
Zizi Papacharissi The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth
Rachel Schallom The rise of nonprofit journalism continues
Joanne McNeil Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism
Celeste Headlee The rise of radical newsroom transparency
Ståle Grut Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Stop pretending publishers are a united front
Tanya Cordrey Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values
Megan McCarthy Readers embrace a low-information diet
Taylor Lorenz Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy
Kerri Hoffman Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem
Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund The virus ups data journalism’s game
Laura E. Davis The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change
Brandy Zadrozny Misinformation fatigue sets in
J. Siguru Wahutu Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different
Francesco Zaffarano The year we ask the audience what it needs
Rodney Gibbs Zooming beyond talking heads
Gordon Crovitz Common law will finally apply to the Internet
Doris Truong Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage
José Zamora Walking the talk on diversity
Masuma Ahuja We’ll remember how interconnected our world is
Charo Henríquez A new path to leadership
Kristen Muller Engaged journalism scales
Sumi Aggarwal News literacy programs aren’t child’s play
Jer Thorp Fewer pixels, more cardboard
Whitney Phillips Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods
Sarah Marshall The year audiences need extra cheer
Meredith D. Clark The year journalism starts paying reparations
Burt Herman Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities