Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

“The ‘Trump bump’ is already waning. The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?”

American journalists have navigated the last four years by reacting and surviving from one frantic news cycle to the next. Barely capable of reflection, we’ve grown used to operating under the constant rush of adrenaline provided by a president extremely effective at hijacking our attention.

With most people experiencing news fatigue, 2021 will force newsrooms to leave behind this frenetic grind of constant reaction. We will need to relearn how to engage with readers in a meaningful way, reevaluating our priorities, diversifying our editorial offering beyond politics and hard news and providing value to our audiences (plural).

We’ll be forced to do so, because we’ll see a dip in readership.

Trump is an extremely polarizing figure and his actions have consistently triggered in readers the basic emotions humans are programmed to react to: hate (for some), love (for others), outrage, surprise. These attributes tend to activate readers or, as we would have said a few years ago, help stories “go viral.”

For organizations that rely on scale, the president, with his late-night tweets and his Friday night news drops, helped to create a traffic bubble that contributed to meeting goals. Of course, the future won’t be any less complex after he’s gone, and we still face colossal challenges that require journalistic scrutiny and that will attract readers (hello, climate change, systematic racism, global pandemic). But that baseline of readers addicted to Trump’s show may soon be gone.

For newsrooms with subscriber or membership models, things might look a little different. The president declared the press “the enemy of the people,” and troves of readers came to the rescue, believing that they should support the media’s role as a watchdog. The “Trump bump” is already waning.

The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?

If/when numbers go down, panic will surely follow. There’ll be meetings and brainstorms about “counterprogramming.” This will be a good thing: It’ll force our newsrooms to diversify, reevaluate their ethos, and interrogate themselves about their specific mission and value proposition for the public and the communities they serve.

Audience teams will be particularly well equipped to undertake this transformative effort, as they operate on the frontlines of the relationship with readers. These editors and reporters will borrow product design methodologies (user research, prototyping, testing, data analysis) and apply them to come up with well-informed editorial strategies that don’t rely solely on instinct and whim.

They will also continue to interpret audience data about readers’ behavior and translate it into products, innovative storytelling formats, and new areas of coverage that provide value or meet their needs, in whatever form it is: liveblogs to follow complex breaking news, explanatory story types that provide context and service-oriented information, interactives and visual pieces that delight and surprise, intimate pop-up newsletters around seasonal topics or news events.

None of this will be possible without a humbling and radical exercise of empathy towards readers. Going back to pet projects that we deem to be the only True Journalism That Matters probably won’t be enough. We’ll need to incorporate the act of listening to audiences to our workflows and assignment processes.

This will take a number of forms: conducting surveys, analyzing traffic data, paying attention to Google Trends, incorporating user-research methodologies, keeping our quintessential personas in mind when assigning and writing stories. Sometimes the listening will become quite literal — forms and other audience engagement initiatives that allow us to communicate directly with readers, learn what they want, and determine how we can serve them.

Open your Chartbeat: They’re already letting you know.

María Sánchez Díez is an operations editor at The Washington Post.

American journalists have navigated the last four years by reacting and surviving from one frantic news cycle to the next. Barely capable of reflection, we’ve grown used to operating under the constant rush of adrenaline provided by a president extremely effective at hijacking our attention.

With most people experiencing news fatigue, 2021 will force newsrooms to leave behind this frenetic grind of constant reaction. We will need to relearn how to engage with readers in a meaningful way, reevaluating our priorities, diversifying our editorial offering beyond politics and hard news and providing value to our audiences (plural).

We’ll be forced to do so, because we’ll see a dip in readership.

Trump is an extremely polarizing figure and his actions have consistently triggered in readers the basic emotions humans are programmed to react to: hate (for some), love (for others), outrage, surprise. These attributes tend to activate readers or, as we would have said a few years ago, help stories “go viral.”

For organizations that rely on scale, the president, with his late-night tweets and his Friday night news drops, helped to create a traffic bubble that contributed to meeting goals. Of course, the future won’t be any less complex after he’s gone, and we still face colossal challenges that require journalistic scrutiny and that will attract readers (hello, climate change, systematic racism, global pandemic). But that baseline of readers addicted to Trump’s show may soon be gone.

For newsrooms with subscriber or membership models, things might look a little different. The president declared the press “the enemy of the people,” and troves of readers came to the rescue, believing that they should support the media’s role as a watchdog. The “Trump bump” is already waning.

The question now is: How many of those readers will remain loyal and enter their credit card info again once the sense of alarm that moved them in the first place dissipates?

If/when numbers go down, panic will surely follow. There’ll be meetings and brainstorms about “counterprogramming.” This will be a good thing: It’ll force our newsrooms to diversify, reevaluate their ethos, and interrogate themselves about their specific mission and value proposition for the public and the communities they serve.

Audience teams will be particularly well equipped to undertake this transformative effort, as they operate on the frontlines of the relationship with readers. These editors and reporters will borrow product design methodologies (user research, prototyping, testing, data analysis) and apply them to come up with well-informed editorial strategies that don’t rely solely on instinct and whim.

They will also continue to interpret audience data about readers’ behavior and translate it into products, innovative storytelling formats, and new areas of coverage that provide value or meet their needs, in whatever form it is: liveblogs to follow complex breaking news, explanatory story types that provide context and service-oriented information, interactives and visual pieces that delight and surprise, intimate pop-up newsletters around seasonal topics or news events.

None of this will be possible without a humbling and radical exercise of empathy towards readers. Going back to pet projects that we deem to be the only True Journalism That Matters probably won’t be enough. We’ll need to incorporate the act of listening to audiences to our workflows and assignment processes.

This will take a number of forms: conducting surveys, analyzing traffic data, paying attention to Google Trends, incorporating user-research methodologies, keeping our quintessential personas in mind when assigning and writing stories. Sometimes the listening will become quite literal — forms and other audience engagement initiatives that allow us to communicate directly with readers, learn what they want, and determine how we can serve them.

Open your Chartbeat: They’re already letting you know.

María Sánchez Díez is an operations editor at The Washington Post.

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

J. Siguru Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Cory Haik   Be essential

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Joshua P. Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Richard Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Juleyka Lantigua   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads