Data and shame

“Raise awareness of our shortcomings via data. And shame leadership if they don’t do something about it.”

It was a different time, the early 2000s. Among the largest and most influential media companies was Knight Ridder — a company many journalists today either don’t know or barely remember.

But some things remain the same. The lack of diversity in newsrooms was a huge, shameful problem — same as today.

Sure, Knight Ridder was famous as a digital innovator — for having the San Jose Mercury News be among the first papers to go online, even launching Mercury Center on AOL back in 1993. But for me one of their biggest innovations was toward the end of its corporate life: a program developed in partnership with the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.

(NAHJ has always been an innovator, too. They were the first ones to create student newsrooms at annual conferences and now leads a freelance-based publication to pay its members to produce journalism, palabra. Not only getting a seat at the table, but building their own table.)

The program I’m talking about debuted in 2003 and I want to see it return. The Parity Project was an investment and a commitment by participating newspapers to strive for a diverse newsroom that reflected the audience it was aiming to serve. It had other elements, like a community-based advisory board, but it was the commitment to diversity based on population data that was key for me.

The Parity Project was based on two things that were around back then and are even more influential now: data and shame. Those are the two things I predict 2021 will bring.

Yes, of course, news orgs that claim a commitment to diversity will continue to publish questionable pieces encouraging military responses to protestors or attacking women for wanting to be called “Doctor”; they’ll continue to hire White males for leadership positions rather than taking the opportunity to hire a qualified candidate of color; they’ll create fellowships that put journalists of color on limited contracts, while outright hiring others with the same experience at entry-level positions; they’ll continue to avoid dealing with their problematic staffer who writes racist, sexist, homophobic, ignorant columns or tweets. (Maybe they’re waiting the staffer to jump to Substack.) I could go on — and that would be the safest prediction to make (though, of course, I’d love to be proved wrong).

But unlike the past, 2021 will also bring a new level of appreciation for data and shame.

At great risk to their careers, we’ve seen journalists rise up and speak out to hold their employer accountable. That’s not new, per se — but to do it on social media, creating shame at an industry level and even building a national awareness is new.

Here at USC, there is an Instagram account called black_at_usc. It’s been a minute since it published, but the collection of anonymous stories amplifying the everyday racism — whether microaggressions or larger issues — offered data and shame. And it was effective. Deans and the university president noticed the account and were forced to address it, prompting changes.

This will happen more. It should happen more. And it will happen across many industries. There is plenty of data, and plenty of shame.

As in the past, leadership will make promises about how this time, this reckoning, is different. And yeah, like you, I have my doubts.

That’s where data and shame come in. Not only do we need to harness data and shame to hold newly elected politicians or those involved in the vaccine deployment accountable — we need to use it to hold ourselves accountable.

Here is what you can do now: Measure the demographics of the audience your organization is aiming to serve and put them up against the demographics of your newsroom. Print it out and hang it up through the newsroom — hell, use it as your Zoom background.

Raise awareness of our shortcomings via data. And shame leadership if they don’t do something about it. And hold leadership accountable when they promise to do something about it, but don’t. Data and shame.

Let’s take a moment to acknowledge that there is a portion of the population that will ignore the data and apparently has no shame. They are a loud and troublesome portion — but they are, in fact, the minority. Chances are your colleagues, your bosses, and your employers aren’t among that fringe group.

But if they are, you know what to do: data and shame.

Robert Hernandez is a professor of professional practice at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.

It was a different time, the early 2000s. Among the largest and most influential media companies was Knight Ridder — a company many journalists today either don’t know or barely remember.

But some things remain the same. The lack of diversity in newsrooms was a huge, shameful problem — same as today.

Sure, Knight Ridder was famous as a digital innovator — for having the San Jose Mercury News be among the first papers to go online, even launching Mercury Center on AOL back in 1993. But for me one of their biggest innovations was toward the end of its corporate life: a program developed in partnership with the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.

(NAHJ has always been an innovator, too. They were the first ones to create student newsrooms at annual conferences and now leads a freelance-based publication to pay its members to produce journalism, palabra. Not only getting a seat at the table, but building their own table.)

The program I’m talking about debuted in 2003 and I want to see it return. The Parity Project was an investment and a commitment by participating newspapers to strive for a diverse newsroom that reflected the audience it was aiming to serve. It had other elements, like a community-based advisory board, but it was the commitment to diversity based on population data that was key for me.

The Parity Project was based on two things that were around back then and are even more influential now: data and shame. Those are the two things I predict 2021 will bring.

Yes, of course, news orgs that claim a commitment to diversity will continue to publish questionable pieces encouraging military responses to protestors or attacking women for wanting to be called “Doctor”; they’ll continue to hire White males for leadership positions rather than taking the opportunity to hire a qualified candidate of color; they’ll create fellowships that put journalists of color on limited contracts, while outright hiring others with the same experience at entry-level positions; they’ll continue to avoid dealing with their problematic staffer who writes racist, sexist, homophobic, ignorant columns or tweets. (Maybe they’re waiting the staffer to jump to Substack.) I could go on — and that would be the safest prediction to make (though, of course, I’d love to be proved wrong).

But unlike the past, 2021 will also bring a new level of appreciation for data and shame.

At great risk to their careers, we’ve seen journalists rise up and speak out to hold their employer accountable. That’s not new, per se — but to do it on social media, creating shame at an industry level and even building a national awareness is new.

Here at USC, there is an Instagram account called black_at_usc. It’s been a minute since it published, but the collection of anonymous stories amplifying the everyday racism — whether microaggressions or larger issues — offered data and shame. And it was effective. Deans and the university president noticed the account and were forced to address it, prompting changes.

This will happen more. It should happen more. And it will happen across many industries. There is plenty of data, and plenty of shame.

As in the past, leadership will make promises about how this time, this reckoning, is different. And yeah, like you, I have my doubts.

That’s where data and shame come in. Not only do we need to harness data and shame to hold newly elected politicians or those involved in the vaccine deployment accountable — we need to use it to hold ourselves accountable.

Here is what you can do now: Measure the demographics of the audience your organization is aiming to serve and put them up against the demographics of your newsroom. Print it out and hang it up through the newsroom — hell, use it as your Zoom background.

Raise awareness of our shortcomings via data. And shame leadership if they don’t do something about it. And hold leadership accountable when they promise to do something about it, but don’t. Data and shame.

Let’s take a moment to acknowledge that there is a portion of the population that will ignore the data and apparently has no shame. They are a loud and troublesome portion — but they are, in fact, the minority. Chances are your colleagues, your bosses, and your employers aren’t among that fringe group.

But if they are, you know what to do: data and shame.

Robert Hernandez is a professor of professional practice at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Cory Haik   Be essential

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better