Mass personalization of truth

“When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes.”

A market of one used to be the dream of marketers around the world. Digital platforms made it come true through what is now known as mass personalization: the automated process of hyper-fragmenting consumers and predicting their needs or desires based on massive data surveillance and classification technologies. Businesses report a significant increase in sales when they use personalized marketing technologies, and political campaigners seem happy to spend money on targeted advertising.

Mass personalized consumption of goods, services, and messages has now become a reality. However, policymakers around the world have had a more radical dream: a society of one.

Such a dream requires a much deeper kind of mass personalization, beyond messages, goods, and services. A society of one means the mass personalization of truth.

There is a reason I’m using the word “truth” instead of “reality.” Truth, in this sense, is a reality that is not just cognitive or private, but also sensory or material, as well as public or shared, and thereby social. Our realities deal with what we eat or read or watch, but our truths deal with our gut feelings about how we and things are or should be. If reality is about cognitive experiences, truth is about affective meanings.

The filter bubble is a now discredited theory on mass personalization of reality which claims that digital platforms enclose us in cognitive cocoons. But evidence shows that people’s beliefs have little to do with their level of exposure to difference or dissent. Quite the opposite: People don’t just expose themselves to very different ideas and messages, perhaps out of curiosity, but are much more open to some of them than we assume.

Mass personalization of truth is where both our bodies and minds are affected by automated technologies of prediction and fragmentation. It is not just about listening to your weekly Spotify-curated playlist, but about listening to it through earbuds which in effect privatize our sensory and bodily experience, even in public spaces such as public transit. It’s not only about where Google Maps suggests we get a coffee, but also the route we should take to get there; it’s not only about showing you anti-smoking ads on Facebook, it’s about raising your private health insurance premium.

The implications of the mass personalization of truth are immense. It affects notions of trust, justice, and autonomy. When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes. When there is no public space for shared truths to emerge, how do we even know whether we are treated fairly by police, courts, or our employers? Moreover, when social systems can ever more accurately anticipate our life expectancy, health costs, level of education, or economic productivity, why would states or corporations abide by any universal allocation of resources, equal rights, or ethics of care? And how can any notion of democracy be imagined without autonomous citizens?

A society of one may, in 2021, sound like an impossible dream (or nightmare, depending on who you are) — but so was a market of one before the emergence of giant digital platforms. The real threat of mass personalization is not to our minds, but to our embodied truths.

Hossein Derakhshan is a London-based media researcher and former research fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center.

A market of one used to be the dream of marketers around the world. Digital platforms made it come true through what is now known as mass personalization: the automated process of hyper-fragmenting consumers and predicting their needs or desires based on massive data surveillance and classification technologies. Businesses report a significant increase in sales when they use personalized marketing technologies, and political campaigners seem happy to spend money on targeted advertising.

Mass personalized consumption of goods, services, and messages has now become a reality. However, policymakers around the world have had a more radical dream: a society of one.

Such a dream requires a much deeper kind of mass personalization, beyond messages, goods, and services. A society of one means the mass personalization of truth.

There is a reason I’m using the word “truth” instead of “reality.” Truth, in this sense, is a reality that is not just cognitive or private, but also sensory or material, as well as public or shared, and thereby social. Our realities deal with what we eat or read or watch, but our truths deal with our gut feelings about how we and things are or should be. If reality is about cognitive experiences, truth is about affective meanings.

The filter bubble is a now discredited theory on mass personalization of reality which claims that digital platforms enclose us in cognitive cocoons. But evidence shows that people’s beliefs have little to do with their level of exposure to difference or dissent. Quite the opposite: People don’t just expose themselves to very different ideas and messages, perhaps out of curiosity, but are much more open to some of them than we assume.

Mass personalization of truth is where both our bodies and minds are affected by automated technologies of prediction and fragmentation. It is not just about listening to your weekly Spotify-curated playlist, but about listening to it through earbuds which in effect privatize our sensory and bodily experience, even in public spaces such as public transit. It’s not only about where Google Maps suggests we get a coffee, but also the route we should take to get there; it’s not only about showing you anti-smoking ads on Facebook, it’s about raising your private health insurance premium.

The implications of the mass personalization of truth are immense. It affects notions of trust, justice, and autonomy. When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes. When there is no public space for shared truths to emerge, how do we even know whether we are treated fairly by police, courts, or our employers? Moreover, when social systems can ever more accurately anticipate our life expectancy, health costs, level of education, or economic productivity, why would states or corporations abide by any universal allocation of resources, equal rights, or ethics of care? And how can any notion of democracy be imagined without autonomous citizens?

A society of one may, in 2021, sound like an impossible dream (or nightmare, depending on who you are) — but so was a market of one before the emergence of giant digital platforms. The real threat of mass personalization is not to our minds, but to our embodied truths.

Hossein Derakhshan is a London-based media researcher and former research fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center.

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Cory Haik   Be essential

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Joshua P. Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Juleyka Lantigua   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Richard Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

J. Siguru Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription