Mass personalization of truth

“When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes.”

A market of one used to be the dream of marketers around the world. Digital platforms made it come true through what is now known as mass personalization: the automated process of hyper-fragmenting consumers and predicting their needs or desires based on massive data surveillance and classification technologies. Businesses report a significant increase in sales when they use personalized marketing technologies, and political campaigners seem happy to spend money on targeted advertising.

Mass personalized consumption of goods, services, and messages has now become a reality. However, policymakers around the world have had a more radical dream: a society of one.

Such a dream requires a much deeper kind of mass personalization, beyond messages, goods, and services. A society of one means the mass personalization of truth.

There is a reason I’m using the word “truth” instead of “reality.” Truth, in this sense, is a reality that is not just cognitive or private, but also sensory or material, as well as public or shared, and thereby social. Our realities deal with what we eat or read or watch, but our truths deal with our gut feelings about how we and things are or should be. If reality is about cognitive experiences, truth is about affective meanings.

The filter bubble is a now discredited theory on mass personalization of reality which claims that digital platforms enclose us in cognitive cocoons. But evidence shows that people’s beliefs have little to do with their level of exposure to difference or dissent. Quite the opposite: People don’t just expose themselves to very different ideas and messages, perhaps out of curiosity, but are much more open to some of them than we assume.

Mass personalization of truth is where both our bodies and minds are affected by automated technologies of prediction and fragmentation. It is not just about listening to your weekly Spotify-curated playlist, but about listening to it through earbuds which in effect privatize our sensory and bodily experience, even in public spaces such as public transit. It’s not only about where Google Maps suggests we get a coffee, but also the route we should take to get there; it’s not only about showing you anti-smoking ads on Facebook, it’s about raising your private health insurance premium.

The implications of the mass personalization of truth are immense. It affects notions of trust, justice, and autonomy. When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes. When there is no public space for shared truths to emerge, how do we even know whether we are treated fairly by police, courts, or our employers? Moreover, when social systems can ever more accurately anticipate our life expectancy, health costs, level of education, or economic productivity, why would states or corporations abide by any universal allocation of resources, equal rights, or ethics of care? And how can any notion of democracy be imagined without autonomous citizens?

A society of one may, in 2021, sound like an impossible dream (or nightmare, depending on who you are) — but so was a market of one before the emergence of giant digital platforms. The real threat of mass personalization is not to our minds, but to our embodied truths.

Hossein Derakhshan is a London-based media researcher and former research fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center.

A market of one used to be the dream of marketers around the world. Digital platforms made it come true through what is now known as mass personalization: the automated process of hyper-fragmenting consumers and predicting their needs or desires based on massive data surveillance and classification technologies. Businesses report a significant increase in sales when they use personalized marketing technologies, and political campaigners seem happy to spend money on targeted advertising.

Mass personalized consumption of goods, services, and messages has now become a reality. However, policymakers around the world have had a more radical dream: a society of one.

Such a dream requires a much deeper kind of mass personalization, beyond messages, goods, and services. A society of one means the mass personalization of truth.

There is a reason I’m using the word “truth” instead of “reality.” Truth, in this sense, is a reality that is not just cognitive or private, but also sensory or material, as well as public or shared, and thereby social. Our realities deal with what we eat or read or watch, but our truths deal with our gut feelings about how we and things are or should be. If reality is about cognitive experiences, truth is about affective meanings.

The filter bubble is a now discredited theory on mass personalization of reality which claims that digital platforms enclose us in cognitive cocoons. But evidence shows that people’s beliefs have little to do with their level of exposure to difference or dissent. Quite the opposite: People don’t just expose themselves to very different ideas and messages, perhaps out of curiosity, but are much more open to some of them than we assume.

Mass personalization of truth is where both our bodies and minds are affected by automated technologies of prediction and fragmentation. It is not just about listening to your weekly Spotify-curated playlist, but about listening to it through earbuds which in effect privatize our sensory and bodily experience, even in public spaces such as public transit. It’s not only about where Google Maps suggests we get a coffee, but also the route we should take to get there; it’s not only about showing you anti-smoking ads on Facebook, it’s about raising your private health insurance premium.

The implications of the mass personalization of truth are immense. It affects notions of trust, justice, and autonomy. When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes. When there is no public space for shared truths to emerge, how do we even know whether we are treated fairly by police, courts, or our employers? Moreover, when social systems can ever more accurately anticipate our life expectancy, health costs, level of education, or economic productivity, why would states or corporations abide by any universal allocation of resources, equal rights, or ethics of care? And how can any notion of democracy be imagined without autonomous citizens?

A society of one may, in 2021, sound like an impossible dream (or nightmare, depending on who you are) — but so was a market of one before the emergence of giant digital platforms. The real threat of mass personalization is not to our minds, but to our embodied truths.

Hossein Derakhshan is a London-based media researcher and former research fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center.

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Cory Haik   Be essential

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities