Mass personalization of truth

“When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes.”

A market of one used to be the dream of marketers around the world. Digital platforms made it come true through what is now known as mass personalization: the automated process of hyper-fragmenting consumers and predicting their needs or desires based on massive data surveillance and classification technologies. Businesses report a significant increase in sales when they use personalized marketing technologies, and political campaigners seem happy to spend money on targeted advertising.

Mass personalized consumption of goods, services, and messages has now become a reality. However, policymakers around the world have had a more radical dream: a society of one.

Such a dream requires a much deeper kind of mass personalization, beyond messages, goods, and services. A society of one means the mass personalization of truth.

There is a reason I’m using the word “truth” instead of “reality.” Truth, in this sense, is a reality that is not just cognitive or private, but also sensory or material, as well as public or shared, and thereby social. Our realities deal with what we eat or read or watch, but our truths deal with our gut feelings about how we and things are or should be. If reality is about cognitive experiences, truth is about affective meanings.

The filter bubble is a now discredited theory on mass personalization of reality which claims that digital platforms enclose us in cognitive cocoons. But evidence shows that people’s beliefs have little to do with their level of exposure to difference or dissent. Quite the opposite: People don’t just expose themselves to very different ideas and messages, perhaps out of curiosity, but are much more open to some of them than we assume.

Mass personalization of truth is where both our bodies and minds are affected by automated technologies of prediction and fragmentation. It is not just about listening to your weekly Spotify-curated playlist, but about listening to it through earbuds which in effect privatize our sensory and bodily experience, even in public spaces such as public transit. It’s not only about where Google Maps suggests we get a coffee, but also the route we should take to get there; it’s not only about showing you anti-smoking ads on Facebook, it’s about raising your private health insurance premium.

The implications of the mass personalization of truth are immense. It affects notions of trust, justice, and autonomy. When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes. When there is no public space for shared truths to emerge, how do we even know whether we are treated fairly by police, courts, or our employers? Moreover, when social systems can ever more accurately anticipate our life expectancy, health costs, level of education, or economic productivity, why would states or corporations abide by any universal allocation of resources, equal rights, or ethics of care? And how can any notion of democracy be imagined without autonomous citizens?

A society of one may, in 2021, sound like an impossible dream (or nightmare, depending on who you are) — but so was a market of one before the emergence of giant digital platforms. The real threat of mass personalization is not to our minds, but to our embodied truths.

Hossein Derakhshan is a London-based media researcher and former research fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center.

A market of one used to be the dream of marketers around the world. Digital platforms made it come true through what is now known as mass personalization: the automated process of hyper-fragmenting consumers and predicting their needs or desires based on massive data surveillance and classification technologies. Businesses report a significant increase in sales when they use personalized marketing technologies, and political campaigners seem happy to spend money on targeted advertising.

Mass personalized consumption of goods, services, and messages has now become a reality. However, policymakers around the world have had a more radical dream: a society of one.

Such a dream requires a much deeper kind of mass personalization, beyond messages, goods, and services. A society of one means the mass personalization of truth.

There is a reason I’m using the word “truth” instead of “reality.” Truth, in this sense, is a reality that is not just cognitive or private, but also sensory or material, as well as public or shared, and thereby social. Our realities deal with what we eat or read or watch, but our truths deal with our gut feelings about how we and things are or should be. If reality is about cognitive experiences, truth is about affective meanings.

The filter bubble is a now discredited theory on mass personalization of reality which claims that digital platforms enclose us in cognitive cocoons. But evidence shows that people’s beliefs have little to do with their level of exposure to difference or dissent. Quite the opposite: People don’t just expose themselves to very different ideas and messages, perhaps out of curiosity, but are much more open to some of them than we assume.

Mass personalization of truth is where both our bodies and minds are affected by automated technologies of prediction and fragmentation. It is not just about listening to your weekly Spotify-curated playlist, but about listening to it through earbuds which in effect privatize our sensory and bodily experience, even in public spaces such as public transit. It’s not only about where Google Maps suggests we get a coffee, but also the route we should take to get there; it’s not only about showing you anti-smoking ads on Facebook, it’s about raising your private health insurance premium.

The implications of the mass personalization of truth are immense. It affects notions of trust, justice, and autonomy. When we live by personalized truths, our shared trust in social institutions such as science, education, or law erodes. When there is no public space for shared truths to emerge, how do we even know whether we are treated fairly by police, courts, or our employers? Moreover, when social systems can ever more accurately anticipate our life expectancy, health costs, level of education, or economic productivity, why would states or corporations abide by any universal allocation of resources, equal rights, or ethics of care? And how can any notion of democracy be imagined without autonomous citizens?

A society of one may, in 2021, sound like an impossible dream (or nightmare, depending on who you are) — but so was a market of one before the emergence of giant digital platforms. The real threat of mass personalization is not to our minds, but to our embodied truths.

Hossein Derakhshan is a London-based media researcher and former research fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center.

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Cory Haik   Be essential

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat