Local newsrooms question their paywalls

“What they lose in potential subscription dollars, they’ll make up in underwriting, donations, and sponsorships — community thanks for becoming a part of the solution.”

In 2021, after publishing their coronavirus coverage outside their paywalls for more than a year, legacy local newsrooms will begin to question both the ethics and the efficacy of having paywalls at all.

The conversation will begin in summer 2021. With most Americans vaccinated, the sense of urgency will decline. Because newsrooms missed the opportunity to expand their relationship with coronavirus-driven readers, cancellations will mount. Newsroom leaders will decide to put all their coverage back behind a paywall, because the emergency is over and doing so might slow the subscription decline.

But this time, some reporters and editors will push back. They got closer to their communities during the pandemic and the 2020 election, and they’re reluctant to wall themselves off once again. They’ll point to successful donation drives at the beginning of the pandemic and the record-breaking reach of their non-paywalled service journalism as evidence that there’s another path to sustainability and impact: one not based on producing journalism for a small segment of the local community and requiring payment to access it.

They’ll highlight the hypocrisy of inviting audience participation in their reporting when so little of the community can actually access their journalism and share it with others.

They’ll raise deep community divisions and the rise of misinformation as evidence that an all-encompassing paywall is no longer a responsible choice for a newsroom that wants to be a part of a healthy community. (Many Americans agree. In the 2020 Digital News Report, 24 percent of Americans expressed concern about the lack of quality information available for free.)

And they’ll point to the success of membership at born-digital local news sites like Berkeleyside and the Richland Source — and members’ “I pay to keep news free for everyone” ethos — as evidence that something else can work.

But the journalists will quickly realize that asking for community-wide support requires a different strategy than selling a product to a narrow audience, and that they need to hear from people other than the local power brokers they’re used to interviewing.

So they’ll convene a new set of local representatives, ones who have long been chipping away at community-level change: small business owners, grassroots organizers, social service providers, restaurateurs, movement lawyers, museum directors, religious leaders, artists, neighborhood association members, music venue owners, and parent-teacher association members. The journalists will ask what their newsroom can do to accelerate the change they’re already working toward.

These community members will describe an alternative future for the city and what stands in the way of that better tomorrow: zoning that creates unaffordable housing, convoluted policies that leave public school students behind, and car-centric planning that thwarts casual interactions between locals with different life experiences.

The community members will share that they fight for the city because they love it and share what made them fall in love with it: the farmer’s market with buskers and local produce, the generations of family members who live a few minutes away, the annual summer block party, the vibrant murals they pass on their way to work.

And as the journalists listen, they’ll process something critical: Most local change happens in inches, not miles. It doesn’t begin when someone decides to run for local office. It begins when someone patronizes a local business instead of Amazon, tends the neighborhood garden, attends a community event on a busy weeknight, or offers their building’s spare wall for a community mural.

The journalists will realize that each time a person chooses community over convenience, it’s a tiny act of civic participation — and that they can design their journalism to help more people take those first steps.

They will establish a new goalpost: connecting locals to one another and equipping them to make their cities places where they can thrive.

They will begin to focus on serving the whole civic space. The lines between “hard news” and “soft news” will fade as they use their voter-guide framework to highlight the arts community and model policy events after neighborhood tours. They’ll do journalism that is useful to swathes of the community who previously found their work irrelevant, and they will help locals find things in the community that bring them joy. They will strengthen their local community by connecting residents with each other and causes they care about.

Much of this community-building work and service journalism will happen in person and through other channels that can’t be paywalled. But what they lose in potential subscription dollars, they’ll make up in underwriting, donations, and sponsorships — community thanks for becoming a part of the solution.

Some newsrooms will go the membership route, inviting community members to co-create with them through financial and non-monetary contributions to their journalism. Some will double down on donations, producing impact reports that highlight their success at activating new civic participants. Others will stick with subscriptions but make major changes to their paywall; a state of emergency will no longer be the only reason that their reporting is made available to all. Editors will be guided by additional questions: Does this help people make better decisions about life here? Does this give locals greater agency?

Journalists will finally understand what Jay Rosen meant when he wrote in 1999 that “empty streets are bad for editors,” because as they help to fill the streets, public meeting rooms, art galleries, and parks, their newsrooms will see a level of public enthusiasm and support they’ve never experienced before.

Ariel Zirulnick is fund director at Membership Puzzle Project and managing editor of the Membership Guide.

In 2021, after publishing their coronavirus coverage outside their paywalls for more than a year, legacy local newsrooms will begin to question both the ethics and the efficacy of having paywalls at all.

The conversation will begin in summer 2021. With most Americans vaccinated, the sense of urgency will decline. Because newsrooms missed the opportunity to expand their relationship with coronavirus-driven readers, cancellations will mount. Newsroom leaders will decide to put all their coverage back behind a paywall, because the emergency is over and doing so might slow the subscription decline.

But this time, some reporters and editors will push back. They got closer to their communities during the pandemic and the 2020 election, and they’re reluctant to wall themselves off once again. They’ll point to successful donation drives at the beginning of the pandemic and the record-breaking reach of their non-paywalled service journalism as evidence that there’s another path to sustainability and impact: one not based on producing journalism for a small segment of the local community and requiring payment to access it.

They’ll highlight the hypocrisy of inviting audience participation in their reporting when so little of the community can actually access their journalism and share it with others.

They’ll raise deep community divisions and the rise of misinformation as evidence that an all-encompassing paywall is no longer a responsible choice for a newsroom that wants to be a part of a healthy community. (Many Americans agree. In the 2020 Digital News Report, 24 percent of Americans expressed concern about the lack of quality information available for free.)

And they’ll point to the success of membership at born-digital local news sites like Berkeleyside and the Richland Source — and members’ “I pay to keep news free for everyone” ethos — as evidence that something else can work.

But the journalists will quickly realize that asking for community-wide support requires a different strategy than selling a product to a narrow audience, and that they need to hear from people other than the local power brokers they’re used to interviewing.

So they’ll convene a new set of local representatives, ones who have long been chipping away at community-level change: small business owners, grassroots organizers, social service providers, restaurateurs, movement lawyers, museum directors, religious leaders, artists, neighborhood association members, music venue owners, and parent-teacher association members. The journalists will ask what their newsroom can do to accelerate the change they’re already working toward.

These community members will describe an alternative future for the city and what stands in the way of that better tomorrow: zoning that creates unaffordable housing, convoluted policies that leave public school students behind, and car-centric planning that thwarts casual interactions between locals with different life experiences.

The community members will share that they fight for the city because they love it and share what made them fall in love with it: the farmer’s market with buskers and local produce, the generations of family members who live a few minutes away, the annual summer block party, the vibrant murals they pass on their way to work.

And as the journalists listen, they’ll process something critical: Most local change happens in inches, not miles. It doesn’t begin when someone decides to run for local office. It begins when someone patronizes a local business instead of Amazon, tends the neighborhood garden, attends a community event on a busy weeknight, or offers their building’s spare wall for a community mural.

The journalists will realize that each time a person chooses community over convenience, it’s a tiny act of civic participation — and that they can design their journalism to help more people take those first steps.

They will establish a new goalpost: connecting locals to one another and equipping them to make their cities places where they can thrive.

They will begin to focus on serving the whole civic space. The lines between “hard news” and “soft news” will fade as they use their voter-guide framework to highlight the arts community and model policy events after neighborhood tours. They’ll do journalism that is useful to swathes of the community who previously found their work irrelevant, and they will help locals find things in the community that bring them joy. They will strengthen their local community by connecting residents with each other and causes they care about.

Much of this community-building work and service journalism will happen in person and through other channels that can’t be paywalled. But what they lose in potential subscription dollars, they’ll make up in underwriting, donations, and sponsorships — community thanks for becoming a part of the solution.

Some newsrooms will go the membership route, inviting community members to co-create with them through financial and non-monetary contributions to their journalism. Some will double down on donations, producing impact reports that highlight their success at activating new civic participants. Others will stick with subscriptions but make major changes to their paywall; a state of emergency will no longer be the only reason that their reporting is made available to all. Editors will be guided by additional questions: Does this help people make better decisions about life here? Does this give locals greater agency?

Journalists will finally understand what Jay Rosen meant when he wrote in 1999 that “empty streets are bad for editors,” because as they help to fill the streets, public meeting rooms, art galleries, and parks, their newsrooms will see a level of public enthusiasm and support they’ve never experienced before.

Ariel Zirulnick is fund director at Membership Puzzle Project and managing editor of the Membership Guide.

Marissa Evans   Putting community trauma into context

Tamar Charney   Public radio has a midlife crisis

Mariano Blejman   It’s time to challenge autocompleted journalism

Parker Molloy   The press will risk elevating a Shadow President Trump

David Skok   A pandemic-prompted wave of consolidation

Taylor Lorenz   Journalists will learn influencing isn’t easy

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   The download, podcasting’s metric king, gets dethroned

Colleen Shalby   The definition of good journalism shifts

Rachel Glickhouse   Journalists will be kinder to each other — and to themselves

John Saroff   Covid sparks the growth of independent local news sites

Anthony Nadler   Journalism struggles to find a new model of legitimacy

Pia Frey   Building growth through tastemakers and their communities

Julia Angwin   Show your (computational) work

Sarah Stonbely   Videoconferencing brings more geographic diversity

Tim Carmody   Spotify will make big waves in video

Francesca Tripodi   Don’t expect breaking up Google and Facebook to solve our information woes

Janet Haven and Sam Hinds   Is this an AI newsroom?

Benjamin Toff   Beltway reporting gets normal again, for better and for worse

Catalina Albeanu   Publish less, listen more

Loretta Chao   Open up the profession

Alyssa Zeisler   Holistic medicine for journalism

Edward Roussel   Tech companies get aggressive in local

Sumi Aggarwal   News literacy programs aren’t child’s play

Matt DeRienzo   Citizen truth brigades steer us back toward reality

Sue Cross   A global consensus around the kind of news we need to save

Masuma Ahuja   We’ll remember how interconnected our world is

Garance Franke-Ruta   Rebundling content, rebuilding connections

Victor Pickard   The commercial era for local journalism is over

Kerri Hoffman   Protecting podcasting’s open ecosystem

Jean Friedman-Rudovsky and Cassie Haynes   A shift from conversation to action

Rick Berke   Virtual events are here to stay

Steve Henn   Has independent podcasting peaked?

Linda Solomon Wood   Canada steps up for journalism

Nisha Chittal   The year we stop pivoting

Francesco Zaffarano   The year we ask the audience what it needs

Ariel Zirulnick   Local newsrooms question their paywalls

Burt Herman   Journalists build post-Facebook digital communities

Natalie Meade   Journalism enters rehab

Chase Davis   The year we look beyond The Story

Cory Bergman   The year after a thousand earthquakes

Jeremy Gilbert   Human-centered journalism

Tanya Cordrey   Declining trust forces publishers to claim (or disclaim) values

Ben Collins   We need to learn how to talk to (and about) accidental conspiracists

Bo Hee Kim   Newsrooms create an intentional and collaborative culture

Alfred Hermida and Oscar Westlund   The virus ups data journalism’s game

Stefanie Murray and Anthony Advincula   Expect to see more translations and non-English content

Robert Hernandez   Data and shame

Ryan Kellett   The bundle gets bundled

Ben Werdmuller   The web blooms again

Whitney Phillips   Facts are an insufficient response to falsehoods

Hossein Derakhshan   Mass personalization of truth

Chicas Poderosas   More voices mean better information

Tshepo Tshabalala   Go niche

Charo Henríquez   A new path to leadership

C.W. Anderson   Journalism changed under Trump — will it keep changing under Biden?

Amara Aguilar   Journalism schools emphasize listening

John Ketchum   More journalists of color become newsroom founders

Kate Myers   My son will join every Zoom call in our industry

Moreno Cruz Osório   In Brazil, a push for pluralism

james Wahutu   Journalists still wrongly think the U.S. is different

Sonali Prasad   Making disaster journalism that cuts through the noise

Nicholas Jackson   Blogging is back, but better

Marie Shanahan   Journalism schools stop perpetuating the status quo

Christoph Mergerson   Black Americans will demand more from journalism

Kevin D. Grant   Parachute journalism goes away for good

Jim Friedlich   A newspaper renaissance reached by stopping the presses

Kawandeep Virdee   Goodbye, doomscroll

L. Gordon Crovitz   Common law will finally apply to the Internet

Jonas Kaiser   Toward a wehrhafte journalism

Jessica Clark   News becomes plural

Bill Adair   The future of fact-checking is all about structured data

Michael W. Wagner   Fractured democracy, fractured journalism

Brian Moritz   The year sports journalism changes for good

Cory Haik   Be essential

Zizi Papacharissi   The year we rebuild the infrastructure of truth

Mark S. Luckie   Newsrooms and streaming services get cozy

John Davidow   Reflect and repent

Julia B. Chan and Kim Bui   Millennials are ready to run things

Errin Haines   Let’s normalize women’s leadership

Mandy Jenkins   You build trust by helping your readers

Talmon Joseph Smith   The media rejects deficit hawkery

Tonya Mosley   True equity means ownership

Jesse Holcomb   Genre erosion in nonprofit journalism

Sara M. Watson   Return of the RSS reader

Jody Brannon   People won’t renew

Celeste Headlee   The rise of radical newsroom transparency

Heidi Tworek   A year of news mocktails

Laura E. Davis   The focus turns to newsroom leaders for lasting change

Sam Ford   We’ll find better ways to archive our work

José Zamora   Walking the talk on diversity

John Garrett   A surprisingly good year

M. Scott Havens   Traditional pay TV will embrace the disruption

Renée Kaplan   Falling in love with your subscription

Logan Jaffe   History as a reporting tool

Jennifer Brandel   A sneak peak at power mapping, 2073’s top innovation

Ståle Grut   Network analysis enters the journalism toolbox

Rishad Patel   From direct-to-consumer to direct-to-believers

Nonny de la Pena   News reaches the third dimension

Raney Aronson-Rath   To get past information divides, we need to understand them first

Nikki Usher   Don’t expect an antitrust dividend for the media

Samantha Ragland   The year of journalists taking initiative

Danielle C. Belton   A decimated media rededicates itself to truth

Candis Callison   Calling it a crisis isn’t enough (if it ever was)

Ernie Smith   Entrepreneurship on rails

Alicia Bell and Simon Galperin   Media reparations now

Imaeyen Ibanga   Journalism gets unmasked

Joanne McNeil   Newsrooms push back against Ivy League cronyism

A.J. Bauer   The year of MAGAcal thinking

Patrick Butler   Covid-19 reporting has prepared us for cross-border collaboration

Ashton Lattimore   Remote work helps level the playing field in an insular industry

Zainab Khan   From understanding to feeling

Matt Skibinski   Misinformation won’t stop unless we stop it

Delia Cai   Subscriptions start working for the middle

Gabe Schneider   Another year of empty promises on diversity

Andrew Donohue   The rise of the democracy beat

Meredith D. Clark   The year journalism starts paying reparations

Megan McCarthy   Readers embrace a low-information diet

Annie Rudd   Newsrooms grow less comfortable with the “view from above”

Ray Soto   The news gets spatial

Sarah Marshall   The year audiences need extra cheer

Rachel Schallom   The rise of nonprofit journalism continues

Beena Raghavendran   Journalism gets fused with art

Jer Thorp   Fewer pixels, more cardboard

Cindy Royal   J-school grads maintain their optimism and adaptability

Jennifer Choi   What have we done for you lately?

Richard J. Tofel   Less on politics, more on how government works (or doesn’t)

Nabiha Syed   Newsrooms quit their toxic relationships

Don Day   Business first, journalism second

Mike Ananny   Toward better tech journalism

María Sánchez Díez   Traffic will plummet — and it’ll be ok

Eric Nuzum   Podcasting dodged a bullet in 2020, but 2021 will be harder

Marcus Mabry   News orgs adapt to a post-Trump world (with Trump still in it)

Basile Simon   Graphics, unite

Ariane Bernard   Going solo is still only a path for the few

Tauhid Chappell and Mike Rispoli   Defund the crime beat

Mark Stenberg   The rise of the journalist-influencer

Mike Caulfield   2021’s misinformation will look a lot like 2020’s (and 2019’s, and…)

Rodney Gibbs   Zooming beyond talking heads

Gonzalo del Peon   Collaborations expand from newsrooms to the business side

Nico Gendron   Ask your readers to help build your products

Astead W. Herndon   The Trump-sized window of the media caring about race closes again

Brandy Zadrozny   Misinformation fatigue sets in

Aaron Foley   Diversity gains haven’t shown up in local news

An Xiao Mina   2020 isn’t a black swan — it’s a yellow canary

Anna Nirmala   Local news orgs grasp the urgency of community roots

David Chavern   Local video finally gets momentum

Hadjar Benmiloud   Get representative, or die trying

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   Stop pretending publishers are a united front

Andrew Ramsammy   Stop being polite and start getting real

Shaydanay Urbani and Nancy Watzman   Local collaboration is key to slowing misinformation

Doris Truong   Indigenous issues get long-overdue mainstream coverage

Kristen Muller   Engaged journalism scales

Joshua Darr   Legislatures will tackle the local news crisis

Jacqué Palmer   The rise of the plain-text email newsletter

Cherian George   Enter the lamb warriors

Joni Deutsch   Local arts and music make journalism more joyous

Pablo Boczkowski   Audiences have revolted. Will newsrooms adapt?