2
0
1
9

More transparency around newsroom decisions

“Readers are paying attention — that’s what you want, isn’t it? — and they now have the tools to push back and to challenge our decisions.”

We’re constantly reminded that audiences are increasingly distrustful of news — who’s producing it, how it could have been influenced, whether it’s “fair and balanced” — and they’re asking questions of us that they haven’t always in the past. The latest Pew survey says this, the president says that. And just forget about the comment sections.

Folks in many of the newsrooms I’m aware of are thinking through ways to combat this distrust and position their outlets as consistently reliable. The results of those brainstorming sessions are starting to make their way to the public, but I anticipate we’ll see a lot more experimentation around opening up the editorial process to regular, and even occasional, readers in 2019.

In an age where most publications are reduced to their smallest individual unit — the single article — we’ve seen the spread of story-level mastheads. Consider HuffPost’s Highline, which consistently closes a feature with a list of credits, covering everything from design to development. This is a signal to readers that a lot of effort, from a lot of people, went into getting this particular story just right — and it’s a signal that travels with the piece, whether you come to it through Highline’s homepage as a regular visitor who already knows to trust the brand or you come to it through a Facebook post from the aunt you only see on holidays (and let’s keep it that way).

We’re also seeing more pieces that break down exactly how a reporter came to a particular story and what sources they turned to in seeing it through. The San Francisco Chronicle’s effortto break down its four-part series about the devastating Tubbs Fire immediately comes to mind. But that paper isn’t alone. The Cincinnati Enquirer is doing it. As are The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, The Seattle Times, the Star Tribune, and a bunch of others.

At Pacific Standard, the newsroom I run based out of California, we’ve started a seriesthat looks specifically at how our research and fact-checking process works and what decisions we’ve made when faced with challenging circumstances. What secondary sourcesshould you trust? What do you do when your facts have expiration dates? And what about when facts impose their own bias? As editors, we all think through these questions every day. Now we’re doing it out in the open.

None of this is all that new. You learn in middle school algebra the importance of showing your work so that someone else can replicate it and understand how you landed where you did. But I do think we’re seeing more consistent and widespread use of these easy ways to give readers a look behind the curtain, to see how the sausage is made.

When the New York Times eliminated its public editor position in 2017, then-publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. wrote in a staff-wide memo that “today, our followers on social media and our readers across the Internet have come together to collectively serve as a modern watchdog, more vigilant and forceful than one person could ever be.” This decision was widely criticized at the time — and occasionally still is — and there are plenty of things a public editor working inside the newsroom can do that the public can’t. But Sulzberger was only saying what many of us already knew: Readers are paying attention — that’s what you want, isn’t it? — and they now have the tools to push back and to challenge our decisions.

What the Times hasn’t done particularly well over the last couple of years is deliver on Sulzberger’s second point: “Our responsibility is to empower all of those watchdogs, and to listen to them, rather than to channel their voice through a single office.” But that’s okay. They’re learning; we’re all learning. And now they can look to what other newsrooms have started to do to let readers in, because many have started to do just that — and we’ll only see more of it going forward.

Nicholas Jackson is the editor-in-chief of Pacific Standard.

Matthew Pressman   The battle over objectivity intensifies

Joanne McNeil   Building a digital hospice

Rachel Davis Mersey   Local news goes minimalist

Colleen Shalby   Representation becomes more than a talking point

Andrew Ramsammy   The great re-pivot to audio

LaToya Drake   Listen up: New stories, new storytellers

Gideon Lichfield   Goodbye attention economy, we’ll miss you

Reyhan Harmanci   Selling more stories to Hollywood

Mario García   The rise of content “pilots”

Angèle Christin   Algorithms and the reflexive turn

Dan Shanoff   Bet on sports gambling

Emma Carew Grovum   The year of the loyal reader

Kevin D. Grant   A year to embrace journalism as public service

Kristen Muller   Local news fails — in a good way

Adam B. Ellick   Video forensic reporting goes mainstream — and local

Alexis Lloyd & Matt Boggie   The year product leads media

Matt Skibinski   Quality and reliability are the new currencies for publishers

Darryl Holliday   Let’s talk about power (yours)

Laura E. Davis   More access, but not that kind

Nikki Usher   Three ways national media will further undermine trust

Jack Riley   Facebook refugees, from ad revenue to news habits

Cherian George   Fake news wins in Asia

Nicholas Jackson   More transparency around newsroom decisions

J. Siguru Wahutu   Think 2018 was bad? Wait until you see 2019

Celeste LeCompte   Local news needs local conversation to survive

Amy King   We should listen to the kids (especially on Instagram)

Hearken   Pivot to people

Alberto Cairo   A year of uncertainty and confidence

Elizabeth Jensen   Going where the Acela can’t take you

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Local news isn’t where you thought it was

Nathalie Malinarich   Video — yes, video

Axie Navas   The traffic hunt, CMS battle, and magazine identity crises loom

Mike Isaac   The old exit doors for digital media companies are closing

Jesse Holcomb   We’ll get better at making the case for local journalism

Becca Aaronson   From bridge roles to product thinkers

Peter Bale   Venture capital runs out of patience

Jeff Chin   We detox from Chartbeat

Jim Friedlich   Meet Citizen Kane 2.0

Logan Molyneux   Seeing social media for what it is

Rodney Gibbs   A bright — and young — year for audio

Rubina Madan Fillion   Fighting the reality of deepfakes

Ole Reißmann   The rise of vertical storytelling

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   A long, slow slog, with no one coming to the rescue

Adam Smith   Platforms will have to help rebuild trust in news

Tim Carmody   Unlocking the commons

Jonathan Gill   Publishers build a common tech platform together

Errin Haines   Say it with me: Racism

Renan Borelli   Developing loyalty means developing your talent

Jared Newman   AI-generated fakes launch a software arms race

Ståle Grut   A new dawn for 3D tech in journalism

Annie Rudd   A more intimate aesthetic of politics — on Insta

Seema Yasmin   We will create our own spaces

Francesco Marconi   The year of iterative journalism

Frank Chimero   Leave the phone at home and put news on your wrist

Robert Hernandez   Racists and sexists get replaced

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   The most beautiful sentence in 2019 is “No.”

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting is media’s slow food movement

Mariana Moura Santos   From pageviews to impact

Umbreen Bhatti   The story doesn’t end for the people we quote

Elisabeth Goodridge   Yes, they signed up — but our job’s not over

Winny de Jong   Data journalism goes undercover

Sue Cross   Return of the water cooler

Hossein Derakhshan   The news is dying, but journalism will not — and should not

Mandy Jenkins   Fight the urge to run away from social media

Christa Scharfenberg and Vickie Baranetsky   The year of the lawsuit

John Garrett   You can’t raise prices forever

Joel Konopo   Influencers become the new liberated power in Africa

Eric Nuzum   The year of the DIY podcast network

Kjerstin Thorson   Time to get mad about information inequality (again)

Charo Henríquez   Pivot to journalism

Rebecca Searles   From silos to Swiss Army knife teams

Chase Davis   We can acknowledge what we don’t know

Shalabh Upadhyay   A culture clash on India’s growing Internet

Michael Rain   The year of the culturally relevant curator

Mat Yurow   Content competition from the tech companies

Steve Henn   Smart speakers get smarter

Zizi Papacharissi   Old interface, say hello to the new interface

Rishad Patel   A design system for responsible publishing

Simon Rogers   Data journalism becomes a global field

Almar Latour   Reported facts, weaponized in service of action

P. Kim Bui   The misfits become the bosses

Matt Karolian   Publishers come to terms with being Facebook’s enablers

Tushar Banerjee   Interactive ads will be the new face of display advertising

Marie Shanahan   Newsrooms take the comments sections back from platforms

Adam Thomas   In Europe, foundations invest in news

Zainab Khan   Publishers whose products can stand up to social media giants will win

Shannon McGregor   More bogus embedded tweets in our stories

Matt Waite   “I went to Node.js because I wished to live deliberately”

Jonas Kaiser   Catching up with “Neuland”

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   A more sincere definition of “community”

Masuma Ahuja   Make foreign coverage less foreign

Carl Bialik   Fatigued news consumers will pay more for less news

Zuzanna Ziomecka   News leadership gets an overdue upgrade

A.J. Bauer   The coming splintering of conservative media

Jean Friedman Rudovsky   Cross-newsroom collaborations strengthen communities

Ariel Zirulnick   Participation gets professional

Callie Schweitzer   The rise of the conveners

Carrie Brown-Smith   Advocating a healthy civic life is no journalistic crime

Steve Grove   A reckoning for tech’s work with news

Mike Caulfield   Ditch the media literacy cynicism and get to work

Frank Mungeam   Tonight at 11: News, sports, and climate change

Peter Cunliffe-Jones   The focus of misinformation debates shifts south

Whitney Phillips   Our information systems aren’t broken — they’re working as intended

Jesse Brown   Canada’s subsidy for news backfires

Knight Foundation   A year of local collaboration

Andrea Faye Hart   Doing less harm, not just more good

Kate Myers   Journalism continues to be bad for democracy

Millie Tran   There is no magic — you’ve got this

Sue Robinson   Reporters go on the offensive

Alexandra Svokos   Good luck convincing us millennials to pay

Cristi Hegranes   A year to invest in the security of local journalists

Dave Burdick   Seeing our blind spots

Pablo Boczkowski   Reimagining the media for post-institutional times

Gabriel Snyder   Journalism doesn’t fit well in a funnel

Kelsey Proud   Journalism becomes the escape

Nico Gendron   Reaching Generation Z beyond the coasts

Alyssa Zeisler   We expand what (and how and who) we serve

Nisha Chittal   The homepage makes a comeback

Jenée Desmond-Harris   It finally sinks in that some people aren’t white

Dheerja Kaur   A focus on problems, not platforms

Seth C. Lewis   The gap between journalism and research is too wide

Michael Grant   More newsrooms experiment their way to success

Stefanie Murray   Local news wakes up and starts collaborating

Ernie Smith   The year we step back from the platform

Catalina Albeanu   Being responsible for what we don’t know

Moreno Cruz Osório   Damaged credibility and a new threat in Brazil

Jonathan Stray   More algorithmic accountability reporting, and a lot of it will be meh

Mandy Velez   Putting the social back in social media

Heba Aly   The rise of international nonprofit news

Brian Moritz   The subscription-pocalypse is about to hit

Rick Berke   The year of loyalty

Robin Kwong   Tech shouldn’t be the only field pollinating “news nerds”

Johannes Klingebiel   We all grow hooves

Borja Bergareche Sainz de los Terreros   Entering a more balanced era

Greg Emerson   Power to the user

Ben Smith   The pendulum starts to swing back

Talia Stroud   Engaging people across lines of difference

Tyler Fisher   This is journalism’s do-or-die moment

Efrat Nechushtai   Journalism wants to be your friend, not your teacher

Craig Newmark   The end of “loudspeakers for liars”

Geetika Rudra   The year of actionable (local) journalism

Elizabeth Dunbar   Local reporters reflect on what’s not important

John Biewen   Podcasts keep getting better

Ben Werdmuller   The platform tide is turning

Tamar Charney   Seriously: What do you do for people?

Claire Wardle   Forget deepfakes: Misinformation is showing up in our most personal online spaces

Victor Pickard   We will finally confront systemic market failure

Stephanie Edgerly   It’s time to understand the un-audience

Renée Kaplan   Our future could lie within our own organizations

Raney Aronson-Rath   We learn “digital” doesn’t have to mean “short”

Joe Amditis   Give the audience a seat at the table

Salem Solomon   Correcting our corrections

Kainaz Amaria   We consider who’s behind the camera

Tshepo Tshabalala   Ahead of African elections, unlock partnerships with fact-checkers

Eric Ulken   The year you actually start to like your CMS

Elva Ramirez   News — but make it cinematic

Kawandeep Virdee   Media wants to take care of you

Cory Bergman   Journalism as a technology service

Sarah Alvarez   Simplify and redistribute

Don Day   Timewalls and other reader revenue experiments

Sarah Marshall   A return to destination journalism

Angilee Shah   The year news orgs say “yes” to real leaders

M. Scott Havens   Time to swing for the fences

Ruth Palmer and Benjamin Toff   From news fatigue to news avoidance

Libby Bawcombe   Haikus of the news

Meredith Artley   Huge demand for…anything but politics

Simon Galperin   After capitalism’s fire, journalism’s secondary succession

Joshua P. Darr   The nationalization of political news will accelerate

Monique Judge   Committing to the truth, calling out lies

Rachel Glickhouse   Newsrooms will prioritize audience needs

Julia Rubin   Meeting people where they are

Sarah Stonbely   Mapping the local news ecosystem — with scale but detail

Jennifer Dargan   You don’t build diversity through one-off training sessions

Glyn Mottershead and Martin Chorley   When a tech company pulls the plug on your story

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Readers are only getting started

Steve Myers   From trying to cover it all to covering what matters

Taylor Lorenz   Personal branding is more powerful than ever

Andrew Donohue   Voting rights becomes the new climate change

Lauren Katz   Community becomes a core newsroom value

Kyra Darnton   A shift to depth in video

Thomas Hanitzsch   The rise of tribal journalism

Heather Chaplin   Agree we’re partisan — for the democratic system

Juleyka Lantigua   Podcasting battles East Coast bias

Carolina Guerrero   Spanish-language audio blows up

Heather Bryant   We are responsible for how we use our power

Manoush Zomorodi   Tech will do for information overload what it did for mindfulness

Jeremy Gilbert   AI finally becomes helpful

Bill Adair   Another year fighting Trump’s falsehoods

John Saroff   The pivot to reader revenue’s unintended consequences

Pia Frey   You can’t solve a crisis without treating it as a crisis

Francesco Zaffarano   Towards a rethinking of journalism on social media

Bill Grueskin   Toward a symphony model for local news

Candis Callison   Learn from Indigenous journalists on covering climate change

Soo Oh   Just showing our work isn’t enough

Julie Posetti   The year of the fight back

Justin Kosslyn   Text hits a tipping point

Patrick Butler   Measuring impact will increase audience trust

Mike Rispoli and Craig Aaron   Government funds local news — and that’s a good thing

Josh Schwartz   A pullback from platforms and a focus on product

An Xiao Mina   The death of consensus, not the death of truth

Elite Truong   What do we owe the next generation?

Linda Solomon Wood   The year of the climate reporter

Alexandra Borchardt   Newsrooms need to build trust with their journalists, not just the audience

Rebecca Lee Sanchez   We are all actors in the running rampant of political theater

Cindy Royal   For journalism curriculum to change, its faculty needs disruption