2
0
1
9

Unlocking the commons

“The most powerful and interesting media model will remain raising money from members who don’t just permit but insist that the product be given away for free.”

For the last year, I’ve written a newsletter for Kottke.org, one of the last of the independent blogs still going. It’s funded by site memberships that support the main site and all of its subprojects, and by my personal Patreon. There is no paywall. Everything at Kottke.org is free for members and non-members alike.

Here’s the picture as generally agreed upon: Ads are still alive and well, but the collapse and consolidation of the ad market means ads alone can’t support media companies anymore, whether they’re big like The New York Times or small like Kottke.org.

There’s a puritanical argument that says ads have failed media — they bring out media’s worse impulses and might be inherently bad. The only way to break with the ad model is to break with it completely and sell media like a product. Make readers pay for content. If they don’t pay for it, don’t give it to them. Only when media companies are wholly accountable to their subscribers can you fix what’s wrong with media. Big companies need paywalls; little ones need exclusive subscribers.

Kottke.org, obviously, does not work this way. It has ads, although those are a very small part of the site and a shrinking part of the revenue. It has members, but very, very little is directed only to them; right now, they get some behind-the-scenes stuff and a few early previews and experiments. Stuff that only real fans even want. The site, the tweets, the RSS feed, and everything else the site’s produced or ever will produce is available to everyone whether they’re a member or not.

I call this “unlocking the commons,” and it’s the same approach I’ve taken with my Patreon and newsletter. Fans support the person and the work. But it’s not a transaction, a fee for service. It’s a contribution that benefits everyone. Free-riders aren’t just welcome; free-riding is the point. This, I think, is key to understanding the psychology of patronage.

Let’s say you’re buying a book. Books aren’t perfect commodities, but they’re still commodities. As a shopper, you’re trying to get as much value for your book as you can for your money. If I can get the book cheaper and faster from retailer A(mazon) than retailer B(arnes & Noble), most of the time, that’s what I’m going to do.

If I’m skeptical of A, and prefer to support B or C(ity bookstore of my choice), I’m not strictly speaking in a purchasing relationship anymore, but something closer to a patronage one. I don’t just want my money to buy an object; I want it to support institutions and individuals I like, and I want it to support the common good.

This is one of the weird things about patronage. As a consumer, your first thought is to your own benefit. As a patron, it’s to the good of your beneficiary. Likewise, as an artisan supported by patronage, you tend to think more about what’s best for your patrons and audience than you do yourself.

For instance, when Patreon changed its fee structure in 2017, I thought about it on two levels. First, it seemed really bad for patrons, slightly less bad for beneficiaries, and clearly helped out Patreon more than either group. As a customer of Patreon — they’re the ones I give my money to — I felt like I was being ripped off. I was being asked for more money without getting more in return. But as a patron, my first thought was: Does this help the people I pledge money to each month? And as a beneficiary, I thought: How does this affect the people who pledge money to me?

In both cases, I wanted what was best for that other person. I wanted them to be getting the full value of the transaction. The only time it was about me was when I thought about my relationship with Patreon — which is completely different.

Please note that this is not fuzzy-headed idealism or just sentiment: This is as concrete and comprehensive as it gets. It’s economic thinking that recognizes that goods don’t just exist to be used up, but are objects of labor produced by and for members of a commonwealth. The truth of the transaction is in the whole.

The most economically powerful thing you can do is to buy something for your own enjoyment that also improves the world. This has always been the value proposition of journalism and art. It’s a nonexclusive good that’s best enjoyed nonexclusively.

Anyways. This is a prediction for 2019 and beyond: The most powerful and interesting media model will remain raising money from members who don’t just permit but insist that the product be given away for free. The value comes not just what they’re buying, but who they’re buying it from and who gets to enjoy it.

The bigger those two pools get — the bigger the membership, and the bigger the audience — the better it gets for everyone. This is why we need more tools, so more people can try to do it. PBS as a service.

Now, I’m not so sure how this works when applied to enormous venture-funded or shareholder-governed sites like BuzzFeed or The Guardian. Those ventures have inherently different dynamics at play and different stakeholders to answer to. But for independent sites like ours, I think it’s the only model that makes sense — that goes with the grain of the web, rather than fighting it by trying to lock everything down in a ransom model or bet on some third-party savior to come through with funding. Readers and writers, working together at personal scale: That’s the only way this all makes sense.

It’s not quite socialized art. Mutualist art, maybe. Proudhon probably would have thought it was pretty cool. So would the Florentines, arch-capitalists as they were. And it might not work. But so far, it’s the only model I’ve found worth trying.

Tim Carmody writes the weekly newsletter Noticing on Kottke.org, where an earlier version of this prediction appeared.

Julia Rubin   Meeting people where they are

Renée Kaplan   Our future could lie within our own organizations

Kelsey Proud   Journalism becomes the escape

Andrew Ramsammy   The great re-pivot to audio

Kainaz Amaria   We consider who’s behind the camera

Claire Wardle   Forget deepfakes: Misinformation is showing up in our most personal online spaces

Geetika Rudra   The year of actionable (local) journalism

Tushar Banerjee   Interactive ads will be the new face of display advertising

Peter Cunliffe-Jones   The focus of misinformation debates shifts south

Masuma Ahuja   Make foreign coverage less foreign

Jenée Desmond-Harris   It finally sinks in that some people aren’t white

Manoush Zomorodi   Tech will do for information overload what it did for mindfulness

Meredith Artley   Huge demand for…anything but politics

Kevin Douglas Grant   A year to embrace journalism as public service

Mandy Velez   Putting the social back in social media

Eric Nuzum   The year of the DIY podcast network

Angilee Shah   The year news orgs say “yes” to real leaders

Mike Isaac   The old exit doors for digital media companies are closing

Libby Bawcombe   Haikus of the news

Heba Aly   The rise of international nonprofit news

Rachel Davis Mersey   Local news goes minimalist

Stefanie Murray   Local news wakes up and starts collaborating

Celeste LeCompte   Local news needs local conversation to survive

Mario García   The rise of content “pilots”

Ben Werdmuller   The platform tide is turning

Bill Grueskin   Toward a symphony model for local news

Reyhan Harmanci   Selling more stories to Hollywood

Justin Kosslyn   Text hits a tipping point

Jared Newman   AI-generated fakes launch a software arms race

Hearken   Pivot to people

Monique Judge   Committing to the truth, calling out lies

Jake Shapiro   Podcasting is media’s slow food movement

Robert Hernandez   Racists and sexists get replaced

Nikki Usher   Three ways national media will further undermine trust

Jim Friedlich   Meet Citizen Kane 2.0

Shannon McGregor   More bogus embedded tweets in our stories

Victor Pickard   We will finally confront systemic market failure

Zizi Papacharissi   Old interface, say hello to the new interface

Becca Aaronson   From bridge roles to product thinkers

Glyn Mottershead and Martin Chorley   When a tech company pulls the plug on your story

Shalabh Upadhyay   A culture clash on India’s growing Internet

P. Kim Bui   The misfits become the bosses

Logan Molyneux   Seeing social media for what it is

Joshua Darr   The nationalization of political news will accelerate

Colleen Shalby   Representation becomes more than a talking point

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   The most beautiful sentence in 2019 is “No.”

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   A more sincere definition of “community”

Matt Waite   “I went to Node.js because I wished to live deliberately”

Emma Carew Grovum   The year of the loyal reader

Don Day   Timewalls and other reader revenue experiments

Johannes Klingebiel   We all grow hooves

Kyra Darnton   A shift to depth in video

Mat Yurow   Content competition from the tech companies

Jesse Brown   Canada’s subsidy for news backfires

Sue Robinson   Reporters go on the offensive

Jonathan Stray   More algorithmic accountability reporting, and a lot of it will be meh

Christa Scharfenberg and Vickie Baranetsky   The year of the lawsuit

Ben Smith   The pendulum starts to swing back

Talia Stroud   Engaging people across lines of difference

Errin Haines   Say it with me: Racism

Candis Callison   Learn from Indigenous journalists on covering climate change

Alexis Lloyd & Matt Boggie   The year product leads media

Taylor Lorenz   Personal branding is more powerful than ever

Sue Cross   Return of the water cooler

Eric Ulken   The year you actually start to like your CMS

Josh Schwartz   A pullback from platforms and a focus on product

Jeff Chin   We detox from Chartbeat

Cristi Hegranes   A year to invest in the security of local journalists

Kate Myers   Journalism continues to be bad for democracy

Borja Bergareche Sainz de los Terreros   Entering a more balanced era

Mike Caulfield   Ditch the media literacy cynicism and get to work

Rubina Madan Fillion   Fighting the reality of deepfakes

Catalina Albeanu   Being responsible for what we don’t know

Linda Solomon Wood   The year of the climate reporter

Sarah Stonbely   Mapping the local news ecosystem — with scale but detail

Salem Solomon   Correcting our corrections

Kawandeep Virdee   Media wants to take care of you

Joel Konopo   Influencers become the new liberated power in Africa

Umbreen Bhatti   The story doesn’t end for the people we quote

Charo Henríquez   Pivot to journalism

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   Podcasting battles East Coast bias

Jean Friedman Rudovsky   Cross-newsroom collaborations strengthen communities

Alexandra Svokos   Good luck convincing us millennials to pay

Pia Frey   You can’t solve a crisis without treating it as a crisis

Marie Shanahan   Newsrooms take the comments sections back from platforms

Andrea Faye Hart   Doing less harm, not just more good

Soo Oh   Just showing our work isn’t enough

LaToya Drake   Listen up: New stories, new storytellers

Sarah Marshall   A return to destination journalism

Jennifer Dargan   You don’t build diversity through one-off training sessions

Rebecca Searles   From silos to Swiss Army knife teams

Ole Reißmann   The rise of vertical storytelling

Simon Galperin   After capitalism’s fire, journalism’s secondary succession

Francesco Zaffarano   Towards a rethinking of journalism on social media

Chase Davis   We can acknowledge what we don’t know

Michael Grant   More newsrooms experiment their way to success

Heather Bryant   We are responsible for how we use our power

Dheerja Kaur   A focus on problems, not platforms

Elva Ramirez   News — but make it cinematic

Elisabeth Goodridge   Yes, they signed up — but our job’s not over

Michael Rain   The year of the culturally relevant curator

Winny de Jong   Data journalism goes undercover

Elite Truong   What do we owe the next generation?

Brian Moritz   The subscription-pocalypse is about to hit

Lauren Katz   Community becomes a core newsroom value

Jesse Holcomb   We’ll get better at making the case for local journalism

Steve Grove   A reckoning for tech’s work with news

Adam Smith   Platforms will have to help rebuild trust in news

Alexandra Borchardt   Newsrooms need to build trust with their journalists, not just the audience

Mandy Jenkins   Fight the urge to run away from social media

Francesco Marconi   The year of iterative journalism

M. Scott Havens   Time to swing for the fences

Nico Gendron   Reaching Generation Z beyond the coasts

Seth C. Lewis   The gap between journalism and research is too wide

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   A long, slow slog, with no one coming to the rescue

Heather Chaplin   Agree we’re partisan — for the democratic system

Matt Skibinski   Quality and reliability are the new currencies for publishers

Mike Rispoli and Craig Aaron   Government funds local news — and that’s a good thing

Matt Karolian   Publishers come to terms with being Facebook’s enablers

Andrew Donohue   Voting rights becomes the new climate change

Nathalie Malinarich   Video — yes, video

Almar Latour   Reported facts, weaponized in service of action

Adam B. Ellick   Video forensic reporting goes mainstream — and local

Greg Emerson   Power to the user

Ariel Zirulnick   Participation gets professional

Rick Berke   The year of loyalty

Tshepo Tshabalala   Ahead of African elections, unlock partnerships with fact-checkers

Joanne McNeil   Building a digital hospice

Carolina Guerrero   Spanish-language audio blows up

Zuzanna Ziomecka   News leadership gets an overdue upgrade

Stephanie Edgerly   It’s time to understand the un-audience

Zainab Khan   Publishers whose products can stand up to social media giants will win

Moreno Cruz Osório   Damaged credibility and a new threat in Brazil

Tamar Charney   Seriously: What do you do for people?

Renan Borelli   Developing loyalty means developing your talent

Gabriel Snyder   Journalism doesn’t fit well in a funnel

Elizabeth Dunbar   Local reporters reflect on what’s not important

Elizabeth Jensen   Going where the Acela can’t take you

Kristen Muller   Local news fails — in a good way

Cherian George   Fake news wins in Asia

Dave Burdick   Seeing our blind spots

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Local news isn’t where you thought it was

Kjerstin Thorson   Time to get mad about information inequality (again)

Rebecca Lee Sanchez   We are all actors in the running rampant of political theater

Knight Foundation   A year of local collaboration

Craig Newmark   The end of “loudspeakers for liars”

Steve Henn   Smart speakers get smarter

Nicholas Jackson   More transparency around newsroom decisions

Simon Rogers   Data journalism becomes a global field

Peter Bale   Venture capital runs out of patience

Axie Navas   The traffic hunt, CMS battle, and magazine identity crises loom

Sarah Alvarez   Simplify and redistribute

A.J. Bauer   The coming splintering of conservative media

John Biewen   Podcasts keep getting better

Frank Chimero   Leave the phone at home and put news on your wrist

Gideon Lichfield   Goodbye attention economy, we’ll miss you

Thomas Hanitzsch   The rise of tribal journalism

Raney Aronson-Rath   We learn “digital” doesn’t have to mean “short”

Rachel Glickhouse   Newsrooms will prioritize audience needs

Darryl Holliday   Let’s talk about power (yours)

Carl Bialik   Fatigued news consumers will pay more for less news

Tyler Fisher   This is journalism’s do-or-die moment

Whitney Phillips   Our information systems aren’t broken — they’re working as intended

Amy King   We should listen to the kids (especially on Instagram)

John Garrett   You can’t raise prices forever

Rishad Patel   A design system for responsible publishing

Pablo Boczkowski   Reimagining the media for post-institutional times

Robin Kwong   Tech shouldn’t be the only field pollinating “news nerds”

Seema Yasmin   We will create our own spaces

Jack Riley   Facebook refugees, from ad revenue to news habits

Steve Myers   From trying to cover it all to covering what matters

Hossein Derakhshan   The news is dying, but journalism will not — and should not

Jonas Kaiser   Catching up with “Neuland”

Frank Mungeam   Tonight at 11: News, sports, and climate change

Adam Thomas   In Europe, foundations invest in news

Laura E. Davis   More access, but not that kind

Bill Adair   Another year fighting Trump’s falsehoods

Mariana Moura Santos   From pageviews to impact

Alberto Cairo   A year of uncertainty and confidence

Joe Amditis   Give the audience a seat at the table

An Xiao Mina   The death of consensus, not the death of truth

Patrick Butler   Measuring impact will increase audience trust

Efrat Nechushtai   Journalism wants to be your friend, not your teacher

Jeremy Gilbert   AI finally becomes helpful

Carrie Brown-Smith   Advocating a healthy civic life is no journalistic crime

Julie Posetti   The year of the fight back

Callie Schweitzer   The rise of the conveners

Tim Carmody   Unlocking the commons

Angèle Christin   Algorithms and the reflexive turn

Rodney Gibbs   A bright — and young — year for audio

Ruth Palmer and Benjamin Toff   From news fatigue to news avoidance

Matthew Pressman   The battle over objectivity intensifies

John Saroff   The pivot to reader revenue’s unintended consequences

Cory Bergman   Journalism as a technology service

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Readers are only getting started

Annie Rudd   A more intimate aesthetic of politics — on Insta

Cindy Royal   For journalism curriculum to change, its faculty needs disruption

james Wahutu   Think 2018 was bad? Wait until you see 2019

Alyssa Zeisler   We expand what (and how and who) we serve

Nisha Chittal   The homepage makes a comeback

Millie Tran   There is no magic — you’ve got this

Ståle Grut   A new dawn for 3D tech in journalism

Ernie Smith   The year we step back from the platform

Jonathan Gill   Publishers build a common tech platform together

Dan Shanoff   Bet on sports gambling