The death of consensus, not the death of truth

“We need a vision for a new journalism, and a clear path to supporting and sustaining it in a world where consensus can no longer be taken for granted.”

At misinformation-related conferences this past year, I heard a common refrain: The larger, meta risk of our current misinformation crisis isn’t the individual bits of confusion. It’s that, over time, people will start doubting everything, and nothing will be true anymore. In other words, like the story of the boy who cried wolf one too many times, the public at large will no longer believe anything when a real story comes along.

This line of thought needs complicating, and here’s why: People need to believe in something in order to move about the world. While I recognize the rhetorical strategy of saying “people won’t believe anything anymore,” the better question is this: When and how do people believe things? And how can journalists work with a change in the dynamics of trust?

This is a question that will require significantly more research, but the throughlines are clear: The U.S. and other Western countries are shifting into low-trust societies. The concept of a low-trust society has a long history, starting with Francis Fukuyama’s book, Trust, and it’s been studied and critiqued by many scholars. But the basic idea is this: “trust arises when a community shares a set of moral values in such a way as to create expectations of regular and honest behaviour.” In other words, trust is built from a certain level of societal consensus.

The world as a whole and the West in particular is moving from a world of broadcast-based consensus to what scholar Penny Andrews has called digital dissensus: “We had the post-war consensus, then the (neo)liberal consensus, and now we are somewhere else entirely — what I call a digital dissensus, quick to jump to outrage and fragmented into echo chambers. People don’t necessarily vote based on their class, their employment or other traditional factors. A lot of people don’t vote at all.”

More broadly, as media scholar Ethan Zuckerman has observed, people are trusting traditional institutions less and less, a phenomenon that’s been occurring long before the current election cycle and even before the rise of the internet. He points to three major trends:

  • The decline of trust in journalism is part of a larger collapse of trust in institutions of all kinds
  • Low trust in institutions creates a crisis for civics, leaving citizens looking for new ways to be effective in influencing political and social processes
  • The search for efficacy is leading citizens into polarized media spaces that have so little overlap that shared consensus on basic civic facts is difficult to achieve
  • A vividly-reported 2012 article in The Atlantic by Ron Fournier and Sophie Quinton is instructive here. It points to the town of Muncie, Indiana, devastated by the economic crisis:

    Muncie is a microcosm of a nation whose motto could be, “In Nothing We Trust.” Seven in 10 Americans believe that the country is on the wrong track; eight in 10 are dissatisfied with the way the nation is being governed. Only 23 percent have confidence in banks, and just 19 percent have confidence in big business. Less than half the population expresses “a great deal” of confidence in the public-school system or organized religion.

    “We have lost our gods,” says Laura Hansen, an assistant professor of sociology at Western New England University in Springfield, Mass. “We lost [faith] in the media: Remember Walter Cronkite? We lost it in our culture: You can’t point to a movie star who might inspire us, because we know too much about them. We lost it in politics, because we know too much about politicians’ lives. We’ve lost it — that basic sense of trust and confidence — in everything.”

    Traditional institutions, which are accustomed to something close to ex cathedra trust and influence, are not adapting for our current information landscape. Rather than trust in sources of authority (institutions in power as such), people today are more likely to put their trust in networks of affiliation (those in your circle, however you define that). In this context, people are more likely to trust what they see around them, people and things that directly impact them, and people in their social networks. There’s some trust in small institutions, but distrust in larger and more traditional institutions is growing. Some of the most powerful misinformation circulates in exactly this way, i.e., through networks of trust built on friends and family, hobbyist networks, fandom cultures, online personalities, and media influencers.

    In 2019, let the idea that we’re seeing the death of truth die. What looks like the death of truth is actually the death of consensus, and a broader transition to a world of dissensus nudged along by a wide variety of media outlets online, on television and radio, and in other forms of media. Misinformation spreads most effectively in this environment because someone, somewhere will find information that fits an existing worldview, and it’s that deeper worldview that’s much harder to change.

    What does this mean for journalists?

    Understand how authenticity works and why networks of affiliation resonate today.

    Trust in the federal government is at a historic low, but, amongst their supporters, both Donald Trump and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez command high trust. It’s not a coincidence that one comes from the world of tabloid magazines and reality television, where his omnipresent brand and personality have engendered familiarity and trust over the decades; while another uses social media like a true millennial, livestreaming her efforts to make ramen in an Instant Pot and sending out zingers on Twitter that resonate with her followers. At a talk I gave at the recent Newsgeist, I pointed out that reality television techniques are adaptive for a multimedia, multi-option world.

    In this environment, authenticity might matter more than traditional markers of trust. Authenticity is a difficult word to define, but like art, it’s a “know it when I see it” phenomenon. I think of it as the perception that one is not performing a self. Indeed, the ability to project authenticity matters in a social media context, and I think reality television stars, microinfluencers, affiliate marketers, and digital propagandists understand this better than most: In a digitally networked environment, trust requires multiple touch points, multiple media outlets, expressions of individual selves, and genuine interactions with a community — or, at least, the appearance of being genuine.

    Speak to why trust in institutions is low, rather than simply doubling down on those institutions.

    People distrust institutions because institutions fail them. It’s not enough to point out that trust in institutions is low without looking at what’s valid about specific critiques. As journalist and author Anand Giridharadas recently pointed out in relation to Macron’s silence at the yellow vest proposals:

    So much of the press covers this, Brexit, trade and much else as being about who’s right. But democracy is about a collision of feelings, and these many forms of global unrest are stepsiblings, fueled by a common sense that the ruling elite doesn’t know people and doesn’t care.

    And they’re right about that, at least.

    I found some wisdom in a 2007 Pew Research Center report on trust in the United States. They observed a specific pattern about trust:

    On the easier-to-explain front, the findings about the lower levels of trust among minorities and low income groups are in sync with a pattern that scholars have long observed – people who feel vulnerable or disadvantaged, for whatever reason, tend to find it riskier to trust because they’re less well-fortified to deal with the consequences of misplaced trust. In line with this formulation, the Pew survey also finds that college graduates are more trusting than those with less education; and that professionals are more trusting than those in the working class.

    Democracies require consensus and trust to operate effectively, and loss of trust in institutions can create a dangerous situation. On the other hand, loss of trust can be a signal that something is awry and needs fixing. We have to figure out better ways to talk about this and directly address the core of social problems and possible ways forward.

    Reimagine journalism for an environment of dissensus.

    We are living in a time of tremendous social change and contention. Within the West, power is being negotiated around issues of climate change, migration, race and ethnicity, and gender and gender identity, amongst many other issues. At a geopolitical level, traditional alliances are beginning to realign and change in unexpected ways, and we should expect the EU and China’s visions of the internet in particular to have a stronger hold on global discourse about internet governance. It’s not enough to adapt for a digital environment; we have to understand the politics and societal dynamics behind these changes.

    I go back to the story of Muncie. Here’s what Fournier and Quinton wrote:

    Nearly nine decades ago, sociologists Robert and Helen Lynd moved here to document the transition away from an agrarian economy. Americans were battered by unbridled commercialism, stymied by an incompetent government beholden to special interests, and flustered by new technologies and new media. The Lynds found a loss of faith in social institutions.

    But, somehow, institutions adapted or gave way to vibrant new ones. The Catholic Church took on poverty, illness, and illiteracy. The Progressive movement, embodied by Theodore Roosevelt, grappled with the social costs of modernization and equipped the government to offset them. Labor unions reined in the corporate excesses of the new economy. Fraternal organizations, a new concept, gave people a sense of community that was lost when knitting circles and barn-raisings died out.

    The question I leave for you today is this: What are the new institutions of journalism, and how are they adapting for the actual dynamics of the networked world, where communities of affiliation are not simply separating into echo chambers but actively acting in contention with each other? How will we in journalism operate in an environment of dissensus? What can we do to shape our media environments of today?

    What journalism needs most is to move from a defensive crouch and into a more adaptive one. We need a vision for a new journalism, and a clear path to supporting and sustaining it in a world where consensus can no longer be taken for granted. I have no answers for the shifting nature of how truth is defined and how trust is built, but in 2019, we need to start asking more productive questions.

    An Xiao Mina is author of Memes to Movements and director of product at Meedan.

    Patrick Butler   Measuring impact will increase audience trust

    Lauren Katz   Community becomes a core newsroom value

    Chase Davis   We can acknowledge what we don’t know

    John Biewen   Podcasts keep getting better

    Renée Kaplan   Our future could lie within our own organizations

    Matt Waite   “I went to Node.js because I wished to live deliberately”

    Nico Gendron   Reaching Generation Z beyond the coasts

    Shannon McGregor   More bogus embedded tweets in our stories

    Michael Rain   The year of the culturally relevant curator

    Elizabeth Dunbar   Local reporters reflect on what’s not important

    John Saroff   The pivot to reader revenue’s unintended consequences

    Nisha Chittal   The homepage makes a comeback

    Adam Thomas   In Europe, foundations invest in news

    Jared Newman   AI-generated fakes launch a software arms race

    Adam B. Ellick   Video forensic reporting goes mainstream — and local

    Jonathan Stray   More algorithmic accountability reporting, and a lot of it will be meh

    Jim Friedlich   Meet Citizen Kane 2.0

    Robin Kwong   Tech shouldn’t be the only field pollinating “news nerds”

    Simon Galperin   After capitalism’s fire, journalism’s secondary succession

    Mike Isaac   The old exit doors for digital media companies are closing

    Sue Cross   Return of the water cooler

    Andrew Donohue   Voting rights becomes the new climate change

    Colleen Shalby   Representation becomes more than a talking point

    Mario García   The rise of content “pilots”

    Joanne McNeil   Building a digital hospice

    A.J. Bauer   The coming splintering of conservative media

    Candis Callison   Learn from Indigenous journalists on covering climate change

    Jonas Kaiser   Catching up with “Neuland”

    J. Siguru Wahutu   Think 2018 was bad? Wait until you see 2019

    Josh Schwartz   A pullback from platforms and a focus on product

    Joshua P. Darr   The nationalization of political news will accelerate

    Becca Aaronson   From bridge roles to product thinkers

    Simon Rogers   Data journalism becomes a global field

    Tyler Fisher   This is journalism’s do-or-die moment

    Matthew Pressman   The battle over objectivity intensifies

    Rachel Glickhouse   Newsrooms will prioritize audience needs

    Andrew Ramsammy   The great re-pivot to audio

    Julia Rubin   Meeting people where they are

    Nikki Usher   Three ways national media will further undermine trust

    Joel Konopo   Influencers become the new liberated power in Africa

    Cory Bergman   Journalism as a technology service

    Kjerstin Thorson   Time to get mad about information inequality (again)

    Ruth Palmer and Benjamin Toff   From news fatigue to news avoidance

    Victor Pickard   We will finally confront systemic market failure

    Jesse Brown   Canada’s subsidy for news backfires

    Heather Chaplin   Agree we’re partisan — for the democratic system

    Mike Caulfield   Ditch the media literacy cynicism and get to work

    Marie Shanahan   Newsrooms take the comments sections back from platforms

    Don Day   Timewalls and other reader revenue experiments

    Rebecca Searles   From silos to Swiss Army knife teams

    Jean Friedman Rudovsky   Cross-newsroom collaborations strengthen communities

    Moreno Cruz Osório   Damaged credibility and a new threat in Brazil

    Kelsey Proud   Journalism becomes the escape

    Elva Ramirez   News — but make it cinematic

    Peter Cunliffe-Jones   The focus of misinformation debates shifts south

    Hearken   Pivot to people

    Julie Posetti   The year of the fight back

    Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Readers are only getting started

    Soo Oh   Just showing our work isn’t enough

    Taylor Lorenz   Personal branding is more powerful than ever

    Jeremy Gilbert   AI finally becomes helpful

    Seema Yasmin   We will create our own spaces

    Amy King   We should listen to the kids (especially on Instagram)

    Matt Skibinski   Quality and reliability are the new currencies for publishers

    Catalina Albeanu   Being responsible for what we don’t know

    Angilee Shah   The year news orgs say “yes” to real leaders

    Francesco Marconi   The year of iterative journalism

    Nathalie Malinarich   Video — yes, video

    Juleyka Lantigua   Podcasting battles East Coast bias

    Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   A more sincere definition of “community”

    Elisabeth Goodridge   Yes, they signed up — but our job’s not over

    Tushar Banerjee   Interactive ads will be the new face of display advertising

    Raney Aronson-Rath   We learn “digital” doesn’t have to mean “short”

    Reyhan Harmanci   Selling more stories to Hollywood

    Bill Grueskin   Toward a symphony model for local news

    Logan Molyneux   Seeing social media for what it is

    Mariana Moura Santos   From pageviews to impact

    Errin Haines   Say it with me: Racism

    Alyssa Zeisler   We expand what (and how and who) we serve

    Carrie Brown-Smith   Advocating a healthy civic life is no journalistic crime

    Joe Amditis   Give the audience a seat at the table

    Zuzanna Ziomecka   News leadership gets an overdue upgrade

    Christa Scharfenberg and Vickie Baranetsky   The year of the lawsuit

    Cherian George   Fake news wins in Asia

    Jesse Holcomb   We’ll get better at making the case for local journalism

    Robert Hernandez   Racists and sexists get replaced

    Kainaz Amaria   We consider who’s behind the camera

    Annie Rudd   A more intimate aesthetic of politics — on Insta

    Brian Moritz   The subscription-pocalypse is about to hit

    Celeste LeCompte   Local news needs local conversation to survive

    Millie Tran   There is no magic — you’ve got this

    Ernie Smith   The year we step back from the platform

    Rodney Gibbs   A bright — and young — year for audio

    Knight Foundation   A year of local collaboration

    Sarah Marshall   A return to destination journalism

    Mat Yurow   Content competition from the tech companies

    Almar Latour   Reported facts, weaponized in service of action

    Darryl Holliday   Let’s talk about power (yours)

    Monique Judge   Committing to the truth, calling out lies

    Hossein Derakhshan   The news is dying, but journalism will not — and should not

    Carolina Guerrero   Spanish-language audio blows up

    Adam Smith   Platforms will have to help rebuild trust in news

    Masuma Ahuja   Make foreign coverage less foreign

    Eric Nuzum   The year of the DIY podcast network

    Alberto Cairo   A year of uncertainty and confidence

    Mike Rispoli and Craig Aaron   Government funds local news — and that’s a good thing

    Frank Mungeam   Tonight at 11: News, sports, and climate change

    Mandy Velez   Putting the social back in social media

    Elite Truong   What do we owe the next generation?

    Matt Karolian   Publishers come to terms with being Facebook’s enablers

    Gabriel Snyder   Journalism doesn’t fit well in a funnel

    Axie Navas   The traffic hunt, CMS battle, and magazine identity crises loom

    Kawandeep Virdee   Media wants to take care of you

    Cristi Hegranes   A year to invest in the security of local journalists

    Meredith Artley   Huge demand for…anything but politics

    Emma Carew Grovum   The year of the loyal reader

    Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   The most beautiful sentence in 2019 is “No.”

    Kristen Muller   Local news fails — in a good way

    Pia Frey   You can’t solve a crisis without treating it as a crisis

    Jenée Desmond-Harris   It finally sinks in that some people aren’t white

    Angèle Christin   Algorithms and the reflexive turn

    Amy Schmitz Weiss   Local news isn’t where you thought it was

    Rubina Madan Fillion   Fighting the reality of deepfakes

    LaToya Drake   Listen up: New stories, new storytellers

    Jennifer Dargan   You don’t build diversity through one-off training sessions

    Carl Bialik   Fatigued news consumers will pay more for less news

    M. Scott Havens   Time to swing for the fences

    Heba Aly   The rise of international nonprofit news

    Tim Carmody   Unlocking the commons

    Alexandra Borchardt   Newsrooms need to build trust with their journalists, not just the audience

    Andrea Faye Hart   Doing less harm, not just more good

    Nicholas Jackson   More transparency around newsroom decisions

    Heather Bryant   We are responsible for how we use our power

    Rishad Patel   A design system for responsible publishing

    Kevin D. Grant   A year to embrace journalism as public service

    Michael Grant   More newsrooms experiment their way to success

    Jeff Chin   We detox from Chartbeat

    Alexandra Svokos   Good luck convincing us millennials to pay

    Callie Schweitzer   The rise of the conveners

    Umbreen Bhatti   The story doesn’t end for the people we quote

    Renan Borelli   Developing loyalty means developing your talent

    Johannes Klingebiel   We all grow hooves

    Cindy Royal   For journalism curriculum to change, its faculty needs disruption

    Steve Myers   From trying to cover it all to covering what matters

    Kyra Darnton   A shift to depth in video

    Tshepo Tshabalala   Ahead of African elections, unlock partnerships with fact-checkers

    Talia Stroud   Engaging people across lines of difference

    P. Kim Bui   The misfits become the bosses

    Shalabh Upadhyay   A culture clash on India’s growing Internet

    Claire Wardle   Forget deepfakes: Misinformation is showing up in our most personal online spaces

    Sue Robinson   Reporters go on the offensive

    Stephanie Edgerly   It’s time to understand the un-audience

    Dave Burdick   Seeing our blind spots

    Craig Newmark   The end of “loudspeakers for liars”

    Ben Werdmuller   The platform tide is turning

    Steve Henn   Smart speakers get smarter

    Eric Ulken   The year you actually start to like your CMS

    Sarah Stonbely   Mapping the local news ecosystem — with scale but detail

    Pablo Boczkowski   Reimagining the media for post-institutional times

    Winny de Jong   Data journalism goes undercover

    Manoush Zomorodi   Tech will do for information overload what it did for mindfulness

    Charo Henríquez   Pivot to journalism

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   A long, slow slog, with no one coming to the rescue

    Peter Bale   Venture capital runs out of patience

    Ariel Zirulnick   Participation gets professional

    Rick Berke   The year of loyalty

    Elizabeth Jensen   Going where the Acela can’t take you

    Zainab Khan   Publishers whose products can stand up to social media giants will win

    Jack Riley   Facebook refugees, from ad revenue to news habits

    Thomas Hanitzsch   The rise of tribal journalism

    Greg Emerson   Power to the user

    Jake Shapiro   Podcasting is media’s slow food movement

    Ståle Grut   A new dawn for 3D tech in journalism

    Jonathan Gill   Publishers build a common tech platform together

    Tamar Charney   Seriously: What do you do for people?

    Mandy Jenkins   Fight the urge to run away from social media

    Libby Bawcombe   Haikus of the news

    Dan Shanoff   Bet on sports gambling

    Bill Adair   Another year fighting Trump’s falsehoods

    Ole Reißmann   The rise of vertical storytelling

    Glyn Mottershead and Martin Chorley   When a tech company pulls the plug on your story

    Kate Myers   Journalism continues to be bad for democracy

    Seth C. Lewis   The gap between journalism and research is too wide

    Stefanie Murray   Local news wakes up and starts collaborating

    Rebecca Lee Sanchez   We are all actors in the running rampant of political theater

    Justin Kosslyn   Text hits a tipping point

    Linda Solomon Wood   The year of the climate reporter

    Ben Smith   The pendulum starts to swing back

    Laura E. Davis   More access, but not that kind

    Steve Grove   A reckoning for tech’s work with news

    Zizi Papacharissi   Old interface, say hello to the new interface

    Efrat Nechushtai   Journalism wants to be your friend, not your teacher

    Salem Solomon   Correcting our corrections

    Borja Bergareche Sainz de los Terreros   Entering a more balanced era

    Whitney Phillips   Our information systems aren’t broken — they’re working as intended

    AX Mina   The death of consensus, not the death of truth

    Gideon Lichfield   Goodbye attention economy, we’ll miss you

    Dheerja Kaur   A focus on problems, not platforms

    John Garrett   You can’t raise prices forever

    Rachel Davis Mersey   Local news goes minimalist

    Alexis Lloyd & Matt Boggie   The year product leads media

    Geetika Rudra   The year of actionable (local) journalism

    Francesco Zaffarano   Towards a rethinking of journalism on social media

    Sarah Alvarez   Simplify and redistribute

    Frank Chimero   Leave the phone at home and put news on your wrist