The debate over the use of AI technology in journalism is heating up again after the release of the revolutionary ChatGPT Assistant, currently in its research preview phase.
If you haven’t had a chance to mess around with ChatGPT yet, I highly recommend it — you know, for science. Personally, I’m intrigued by its ability to generate documentation and planning materials. Things like workshop agendas, project outlines, and discussion overviews. The kind of stuff that, in most cases, nobody really puts a byline on or attributes to any specific individual.
But that really only scratches the surface of what this tool (and its inevitable successors and imitators) will be able to do in the future. For journalists and news organizations, this kind of leap in technological capacity presents almost as many ethical quandaries and questions (if not more) as it does possibilities and opportunities. And this one feels like a big leap.
I won’t get into the ethics here, since there are many people who are vastly more qualified than me to have that conversation. In fact, this is probably at least the fourth or fifth Nieman Lab prediction you’ve seen that focuses on this topic or some aspect of it.
Instead, I’ll talk about how I think this kind of tech could hypothetically impact small- and medium-sized local news organizations — particularly those with less than five full-time people on staff.
The ability to quickly generate documents, instructions, guides, and various elements of internal infrastructure could save independent and hyperlocal news publishers an incredible amount of time and effort.
Instantly generating summaries of public meetings and documents, creating tweets and social posts from news stories, drafting scripts for news broadcasts, even suggesting different headline variations — all at the click of a button — would be a game-changer for news organizations that are already strapped for people and resources. The same thing goes for generating invoices, public records requests, and even basic outreach emails.
That’s more time that could (and should) be spent reporting or engaging with community members. It could also help make local news content more accessible to people with disabilities, people who speak English as a second language, and people who might not usually come across local news stories in their current format.
Not to mention the implications of ChatGPT’s ability to generate code using natural-language inputs. Ask it to make something and it will (maybe) make it for you.
What’s wild is that all of those benefits and more don’t include what will happen when you pair ChatGPT with other tools and services, like Zapier or Notion.
The potential drawbacks and ethical concerns are equally obvious and perhaps more consequential, but many of them are ultimately tied to the way capitalism and the profit motive operate within and in opposition to public-service journalism. (Another topic that I’m more than happy to discuss at length, but won’t get into here.)
Regardless, this is a thing now. And the optimistic possibilities — along with their pessimistic and dystopian counterparts — are likely going to play a huge role in the future of journalism.
(Also, no, ChatGPT did not help me write this post — though I was very tempted.)
Joe Amditis is assistant director of products and events at the Center for Cooperative Media at Montclair State University.
The debate over the use of AI technology in journalism is heating up again after the release of the revolutionary ChatGPT Assistant, currently in its research preview phase.
If you haven’t had a chance to mess around with ChatGPT yet, I highly recommend it — you know, for science. Personally, I’m intrigued by its ability to generate documentation and planning materials. Things like workshop agendas, project outlines, and discussion overviews. The kind of stuff that, in most cases, nobody really puts a byline on or attributes to any specific individual.
But that really only scratches the surface of what this tool (and its inevitable successors and imitators) will be able to do in the future. For journalists and news organizations, this kind of leap in technological capacity presents almost as many ethical quandaries and questions (if not more) as it does possibilities and opportunities. And this one feels like a big leap.
I won’t get into the ethics here, since there are many people who are vastly more qualified than me to have that conversation. In fact, this is probably at least the fourth or fifth Nieman Lab prediction you’ve seen that focuses on this topic or some aspect of it.
Instead, I’ll talk about how I think this kind of tech could hypothetically impact small- and medium-sized local news organizations — particularly those with less than five full-time people on staff.
The ability to quickly generate documents, instructions, guides, and various elements of internal infrastructure could save independent and hyperlocal news publishers an incredible amount of time and effort.
Instantly generating summaries of public meetings and documents, creating tweets and social posts from news stories, drafting scripts for news broadcasts, even suggesting different headline variations — all at the click of a button — would be a game-changer for news organizations that are already strapped for people and resources. The same thing goes for generating invoices, public records requests, and even basic outreach emails.
That’s more time that could (and should) be spent reporting or engaging with community members. It could also help make local news content more accessible to people with disabilities, people who speak English as a second language, and people who might not usually come across local news stories in their current format.
Not to mention the implications of ChatGPT’s ability to generate code using natural-language inputs. Ask it to make something and it will (maybe) make it for you.
What’s wild is that all of those benefits and more don’t include what will happen when you pair ChatGPT with other tools and services, like Zapier or Notion.
The potential drawbacks and ethical concerns are equally obvious and perhaps more consequential, but many of them are ultimately tied to the way capitalism and the profit motive operate within and in opposition to public-service journalism. (Another topic that I’m more than happy to discuss at length, but won’t get into here.)
Regardless, this is a thing now. And the optimistic possibilities — along with their pessimistic and dystopian counterparts — are likely going to play a huge role in the future of journalism.
(Also, no, ChatGPT did not help me write this post — though I was very tempted.)
Joe Amditis is assistant director of products and events at the Center for Cooperative Media at Montclair State University.
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting