So you’ve been skeptical about deepfakes ever since you read a hyperbolic headline in 2018. And you’ve been right — sort of. Faceswap deepfakes haven’t rocked U.S. or European politics or permeated every social media ecosystem, and mis-contextualized shallowfake videos outnumber them thousands to one in misinformation and disinformation. But globally, false claims of deepfakery increasingly confound publics and journalists, and the underlying foundational problem of non-consensual sexual images targeting women and LGBTQI+ people festers without solutions.
2023 will be the year in which we take seriously the measures to prepare for, but not panic over, synthetic media and its big sibling, the broader phenomenon of “generative AI.” The rapacious pace and public visibility of developments in this space — including the accessibility of Stability AI, the picture-generating variety of DALL-E, the look to the future of text-to-video research like Imagen and Phenaki, as well as the recent popularization of consumer tools like Lensa — reflects an underlying swell of technological advances, as well as potential profits taking the driver seat over ethics. These tools are rife with potential for distributed creativity and journalistic storytelling. But making it easier to fake realistic scenes of real people doing things they never did, or sexualized images of women, or nonsensical floods of fake war crimes images are not to be laughed at.
What form is better preparation likely to take? Witness’s own global consultations in our Prepare, Don’t Panic initiative on synthetic media have raised a number of areas: equity in access to detection tools and capacities for journalists globally and in smaller organizations, efforts on the insidious power of deepfake claims around real footage, strong platform policies and legislative options. But here I’ll focus on authenticity and provenance infrastructure, which show the work of how media was made, where it came from and was edited, and how it was distributed.
Early efforts like Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) technical standards and Content Authenticity Initiative launched in 2022, and this space will be rife for innovation as long as we don’t default to just assuming it’s about tamper-proof immutability of origin images but understanding the nuance of how media is made. Authenticity and provenance efforts focus on layers of context about media integrity and origins available to everyone from a viewer who really wants to understand how a creative image was made, to a professional investigator or journalist. They are a proactive step to engage with a manipulated and synthetic media world. Witness focused within the C2PA coalition on the global, human rights ramifications of these types of standards, and how they can be done right and in a way that is user-centric, respects privacy, accounts for global journalistic contexts, and avoids legislative weaponization.
In 2023, we’ll see these expanding authenticity and provenance technology efforts intersect with the evolving TikTokification of media production, focused on remix, playful editing, and integrated AI effects. A labeling and disclosure mindset for creators and journalists alike will intermingle with the creative potential of showing how media is created and revealing the production process. We’ll start to extract ourselves from the current idea that disclosure and labeling are about singling out or discerning misinformation or malice. Want to see what this looks like in its baby steps? You can see the start of this process in your For You Page on TikTok, where you can see the audio a creator used or the effect they incorporated.
When it comes to generative AI systems, we’re likely to see efforts (and fight-back) to bake disclosure of how media is made into these models’ outputs, as well as the combinations of real and synthetic media that will become more commonplace. It’s not just soft norms pushing this way, like efforts on a Synthetic Media Code of Conduct, but also recent moves in Europe to mandate it within the draft EU AI Act.
These efforts will not sufficiently address non-consensual sexual images. These threats expand in scope with open image-generating systems which permit both real individuals and sexual imagery. The problem with these images is not one of “knowing it’s a deepfake”; even more acutely than in other scenarios, it’s the weaponization of lifelike images, irrespective of their perceived “reality.”
In 2023, as we start to separate the hype from the (un)reality with deepfakes, authenticity and provenance technologies will be one place we can look to help fortify the truth and pull-back the curtain on delightful creativity, by creating clear signals about how a piece of media has been created, generated, manipulated and edited.
Sam Gregory is director of programs, strategy, and innovation at Witness, the global human rights and civic journalism network.
So you’ve been skeptical about deepfakes ever since you read a hyperbolic headline in 2018. And you’ve been right — sort of. Faceswap deepfakes haven’t rocked U.S. or European politics or permeated every social media ecosystem, and mis-contextualized shallowfake videos outnumber them thousands to one in misinformation and disinformation. But globally, false claims of deepfakery increasingly confound publics and journalists, and the underlying foundational problem of non-consensual sexual images targeting women and LGBTQI+ people festers without solutions.
2023 will be the year in which we take seriously the measures to prepare for, but not panic over, synthetic media and its big sibling, the broader phenomenon of “generative AI.” The rapacious pace and public visibility of developments in this space — including the accessibility of Stability AI, the picture-generating variety of DALL-E, the look to the future of text-to-video research like Imagen and Phenaki, as well as the recent popularization of consumer tools like Lensa — reflects an underlying swell of technological advances, as well as potential profits taking the driver seat over ethics. These tools are rife with potential for distributed creativity and journalistic storytelling. But making it easier to fake realistic scenes of real people doing things they never did, or sexualized images of women, or nonsensical floods of fake war crimes images are not to be laughed at.
What form is better preparation likely to take? Witness’s own global consultations in our Prepare, Don’t Panic initiative on synthetic media have raised a number of areas: equity in access to detection tools and capacities for journalists globally and in smaller organizations, efforts on the insidious power of deepfake claims around real footage, strong platform policies and legislative options. But here I’ll focus on authenticity and provenance infrastructure, which show the work of how media was made, where it came from and was edited, and how it was distributed.
Early efforts like Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) technical standards and Content Authenticity Initiative launched in 2022, and this space will be rife for innovation as long as we don’t default to just assuming it’s about tamper-proof immutability of origin images but understanding the nuance of how media is made. Authenticity and provenance efforts focus on layers of context about media integrity and origins available to everyone from a viewer who really wants to understand how a creative image was made, to a professional investigator or journalist. They are a proactive step to engage with a manipulated and synthetic media world. Witness focused within the C2PA coalition on the global, human rights ramifications of these types of standards, and how they can be done right and in a way that is user-centric, respects privacy, accounts for global journalistic contexts, and avoids legislative weaponization.
In 2023, we’ll see these expanding authenticity and provenance technology efforts intersect with the evolving TikTokification of media production, focused on remix, playful editing, and integrated AI effects. A labeling and disclosure mindset for creators and journalists alike will intermingle with the creative potential of showing how media is created and revealing the production process. We’ll start to extract ourselves from the current idea that disclosure and labeling are about singling out or discerning misinformation or malice. Want to see what this looks like in its baby steps? You can see the start of this process in your For You Page on TikTok, where you can see the audio a creator used or the effect they incorporated.
When it comes to generative AI systems, we’re likely to see efforts (and fight-back) to bake disclosure of how media is made into these models’ outputs, as well as the combinations of real and synthetic media that will become more commonplace. It’s not just soft norms pushing this way, like efforts on a Synthetic Media Code of Conduct, but also recent moves in Europe to mandate it within the draft EU AI Act.
These efforts will not sufficiently address non-consensual sexual images. These threats expand in scope with open image-generating systems which permit both real individuals and sexual imagery. The problem with these images is not one of “knowing it’s a deepfake”; even more acutely than in other scenarios, it’s the weaponization of lifelike images, irrespective of their perceived “reality.”
In 2023, as we start to separate the hype from the (un)reality with deepfakes, authenticity and provenance technologies will be one place we can look to help fortify the truth and pull-back the curtain on delightful creativity, by creating clear signals about how a piece of media has been created, generated, manipulated and edited.
Sam Gregory is director of programs, strategy, and innovation at Witness, the global human rights and civic journalism network.
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering