Will Twitter survive Elon Musk? Readers are Googling this question and reporters and columnists are working hard to provide an answer. But journalists are neglecting one of the most promising sources for answering it: prediction markets and forecasting platforms.
Prediction markets have been around in one form or another for decades and have already made inroads into journalism during elections. 2023 will be the year they become a source for other types of stories, simply because there’s now too much activity in the crowd forecasting world to ignore. For almost any question you can think of, there are online crowds making predictions. And if journalists do think of a question that isn’t yet being forecasted, there are platforms where they can pose it themselves.
For example, here are a few forecasts available as of this writing that speak to Twitter’s future:
These figures are aggregations of lots of individual amateur predictions. Why trust them?
First, the theory: as the economists Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz explain, prediction markets work because they provide: “1) incentives to seek information; 2) incentives for truthful information revelation; and 3) an algorithm for aggregating diverse opinions.”
They also have a strong track record. Research has shown that prediction markets predict election results better than Gallup polls, for example. They’ve accurately predicted movies’ box office performances, matched the accuracy of professional economic forecasters, and even done a better job than analysts or oil markets in predicting the U.S. invasion of Iraq. (“Prediction polls,” which also ask participants to make forecasts but don’t use a market, have a similarly strong track record.)
Prediction markets aren’t perfect. They’re only as good as the wisdom of their participants and the information those participants have access to. And, like any market, they can be vulnerable to manipulation without oversight.
Nonetheless, they’re a valuable tool for journalists and a complement to other sources. Reporters can use them the way financial journalists use other markets: They can be a source of news as well as one source among many explaining what’s going on.
The Economist has shown what this can look like by asking seasoned forecasters at Good Judgment Inc. to make predictions for its annual “The World Ahead” edition. The issue still includes the magazine’s traditional reporting as well as forecasts from the Economist Intelligence Unit, the company’s research arm, and predictions from big names in politics and business. The inclusion of Good Judgment’s “superforecasters” — who were selected based on their accuracy forecasting on open platforms — is an addition, not a substitute for traditional journalistic sources.
“The bigger picture here is that data-driven approaches are becoming popular in all kinds of journalism, and predictive/forward-looking journalism should follow suit,” said Tom Standage, a deputy editor at The Economist who edits The World Ahead. “That is why we partner with Good Judgment, and also why The Economist builds its own predictive models for elections, and why we often cite prediction markets too.”
Here’s a quick tour of the crowd forecasting landscape:
The big difference between these platforms and a publication like FiveThirtyEight, which also makes predictions and also has a strong track record, is that they depend on the collective judgment of their users rather than on statistical modeling. That allows them to make forecasts on topics where there’s less data — like the fate of Twitter.
Citing these platforms in stories is a good first step for journalists. The next step is for publications to ask their readers to participate. That’s what I’ve been doing with my newsletter: Each week I write about an economic or business story and ask readers to make a forecast. Over time readers see how their forecasts turn out, learn from each other, and hopefully improve their thinking. This process formalizes something most journalists already recognize: Your audience collectively knows much more than you do.
Walter Frick is the founder of Nonrival and a contributing editor at Harvard Business Review. He was previously an executive editor at Quartz and a Knight visiting fellow at the Nieman Foundation.
Will Twitter survive Elon Musk? Readers are Googling this question and reporters and columnists are working hard to provide an answer. But journalists are neglecting one of the most promising sources for answering it: prediction markets and forecasting platforms.
Prediction markets have been around in one form or another for decades and have already made inroads into journalism during elections. 2023 will be the year they become a source for other types of stories, simply because there’s now too much activity in the crowd forecasting world to ignore. For almost any question you can think of, there are online crowds making predictions. And if journalists do think of a question that isn’t yet being forecasted, there are platforms where they can pose it themselves.
For example, here are a few forecasts available as of this writing that speak to Twitter’s future:
These figures are aggregations of lots of individual amateur predictions. Why trust them?
First, the theory: as the economists Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz explain, prediction markets work because they provide: “1) incentives to seek information; 2) incentives for truthful information revelation; and 3) an algorithm for aggregating diverse opinions.”
They also have a strong track record. Research has shown that prediction markets predict election results better than Gallup polls, for example. They’ve accurately predicted movies’ box office performances, matched the accuracy of professional economic forecasters, and even done a better job than analysts or oil markets in predicting the U.S. invasion of Iraq. (“Prediction polls,” which also ask participants to make forecasts but don’t use a market, have a similarly strong track record.)
Prediction markets aren’t perfect. They’re only as good as the wisdom of their participants and the information those participants have access to. And, like any market, they can be vulnerable to manipulation without oversight.
Nonetheless, they’re a valuable tool for journalists and a complement to other sources. Reporters can use them the way financial journalists use other markets: They can be a source of news as well as one source among many explaining what’s going on.
The Economist has shown what this can look like by asking seasoned forecasters at Good Judgment Inc. to make predictions for its annual “The World Ahead” edition. The issue still includes the magazine’s traditional reporting as well as forecasts from the Economist Intelligence Unit, the company’s research arm, and predictions from big names in politics and business. The inclusion of Good Judgment’s “superforecasters” — who were selected based on their accuracy forecasting on open platforms — is an addition, not a substitute for traditional journalistic sources.
“The bigger picture here is that data-driven approaches are becoming popular in all kinds of journalism, and predictive/forward-looking journalism should follow suit,” said Tom Standage, a deputy editor at The Economist who edits The World Ahead. “That is why we partner with Good Judgment, and also why The Economist builds its own predictive models for elections, and why we often cite prediction markets too.”
Here’s a quick tour of the crowd forecasting landscape:
The big difference between these platforms and a publication like FiveThirtyEight, which also makes predictions and also has a strong track record, is that they depend on the collective judgment of their users rather than on statistical modeling. That allows them to make forecasts on topics where there’s less data — like the fate of Twitter.
Citing these platforms in stories is a good first step for journalists. The next step is for publications to ask their readers to participate. That’s what I’ve been doing with my newsletter: Each week I write about an economic or business story and ask readers to make a forecast. Over time readers see how their forecasts turn out, learn from each other, and hopefully improve their thinking. This process formalizes something most journalists already recognize: Your audience collectively knows much more than you do.
Walter Frick is the founder of Nonrival and a contributing editor at Harvard Business Review. He was previously an executive editor at Quartz and a Knight visiting fellow at the Nieman Foundation.
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
An Xiao Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse