Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

“Your audience collectively knows much more than you do.”

Will Twitter survive Elon Musk? Readers are Googling this question and reporters and columnists are working hard to provide an answer. But journalists are neglecting one of the most promising sources for answering it: prediction markets and forecasting platforms.

Prediction markets have been around in one form or another for decades and have already made inroads into journalism during elections. 2023 will be the year they become a source for other types of stories, simply because there’s now too much activity in the crowd forecasting world to ignore. For almost any question you can think of, there are online crowds making predictions. And if journalists do think of a question that isn’t yet being forecasted, there are platforms where they can pose it themselves.

For example, here are a few forecasts available as of this writing that speak to Twitter’s future:

These figures are aggregations of lots of individual amateur predictions. Why trust them?

First, the theory: as the economists Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz explain, prediction markets work because they provide: “1) incentives to seek information; 2) incentives for truthful information revelation; and 3) an algorithm for aggregating diverse opinions.”

They also have a strong track record. Research has shown that prediction markets predict election results better than Gallup polls, for example. They’ve accurately predicted movies’ box office performances, matched the accuracy of professional economic forecasters, and even done a better job than analysts or oil markets in predicting the U.S. invasion of Iraq. (“Prediction polls,” which also ask participants to make forecasts but don’t use a market, have a similarly strong track record.)

Prediction markets aren’t perfect. They’re only as good as the wisdom of their participants and the information those participants have access to. And, like any market, they can be vulnerable to manipulation without oversight.

Nonetheless, they’re a valuable tool for journalists and a complement to other sources. Reporters can use them the way financial journalists use other markets: They can be a source of news as well as one source among many explaining what’s going on.

The Economist has shown what this can look like by asking seasoned forecasters at Good Judgment Inc. to make predictions for its annual “The World Ahead” edition. The issue still includes the magazine’s traditional reporting as well as forecasts from the Economist Intelligence Unit, the company’s research arm, and predictions from big names in politics and business. The inclusion of Good Judgment’s “superforecasters” — who were selected based on their accuracy forecasting on open platforms — is an addition, not a substitute for traditional journalistic sources.

“The bigger picture here is that data-driven approaches are becoming popular in all kinds of journalism, and predictive/forward-looking journalism should follow suit,” said Tom Standage, a deputy editor at The Economist who edits The World Ahead. “That is why we partner with Good Judgment, and also why The Economist builds its own predictive models for elections, and why we often cite prediction markets too.”

Here’s a quick tour of the crowd forecasting landscape:

The big difference between these platforms and a publication like FiveThirtyEight, which also makes predictions and also has a strong track record, is that they depend on the collective judgment of their users rather than on statistical modeling. That allows them to make forecasts on topics where there’s less data — like the fate of Twitter.

Citing these platforms in stories is a good first step for journalists. The next step is for publications to ask their readers to participate. That’s what I’ve been doing with my newsletter: Each week I write about an economic or business story and ask readers to make a forecast. Over time readers see how their forecasts turn out, learn from each other, and hopefully improve their thinking. This process formalizes something most journalists already recognize: Your audience collectively knows much more than you do.

Walter Frick is the founder of Nonrival and a contributing editor at Harvard Business Review. He was previously an executive editor at Quartz and a Knight visiting fellow at the Nieman Foundation.

Will Twitter survive Elon Musk? Readers are Googling this question and reporters and columnists are working hard to provide an answer. But journalists are neglecting one of the most promising sources for answering it: prediction markets and forecasting platforms.

Prediction markets have been around in one form or another for decades and have already made inroads into journalism during elections. 2023 will be the year they become a source for other types of stories, simply because there’s now too much activity in the crowd forecasting world to ignore. For almost any question you can think of, there are online crowds making predictions. And if journalists do think of a question that isn’t yet being forecasted, there are platforms where they can pose it themselves.

For example, here are a few forecasts available as of this writing that speak to Twitter’s future:

These figures are aggregations of lots of individual amateur predictions. Why trust them?

First, the theory: as the economists Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz explain, prediction markets work because they provide: “1) incentives to seek information; 2) incentives for truthful information revelation; and 3) an algorithm for aggregating diverse opinions.”

They also have a strong track record. Research has shown that prediction markets predict election results better than Gallup polls, for example. They’ve accurately predicted movies’ box office performances, matched the accuracy of professional economic forecasters, and even done a better job than analysts or oil markets in predicting the U.S. invasion of Iraq. (“Prediction polls,” which also ask participants to make forecasts but don’t use a market, have a similarly strong track record.)

Prediction markets aren’t perfect. They’re only as good as the wisdom of their participants and the information those participants have access to. And, like any market, they can be vulnerable to manipulation without oversight.

Nonetheless, they’re a valuable tool for journalists and a complement to other sources. Reporters can use them the way financial journalists use other markets: They can be a source of news as well as one source among many explaining what’s going on.

The Economist has shown what this can look like by asking seasoned forecasters at Good Judgment Inc. to make predictions for its annual “The World Ahead” edition. The issue still includes the magazine’s traditional reporting as well as forecasts from the Economist Intelligence Unit, the company’s research arm, and predictions from big names in politics and business. The inclusion of Good Judgment’s “superforecasters” — who were selected based on their accuracy forecasting on open platforms — is an addition, not a substitute for traditional journalistic sources.

“The bigger picture here is that data-driven approaches are becoming popular in all kinds of journalism, and predictive/forward-looking journalism should follow suit,” said Tom Standage, a deputy editor at The Economist who edits The World Ahead. “That is why we partner with Good Judgment, and also why The Economist builds its own predictive models for elections, and why we often cite prediction markets too.”

Here’s a quick tour of the crowd forecasting landscape:

The big difference between these platforms and a publication like FiveThirtyEight, which also makes predictions and also has a strong track record, is that they depend on the collective judgment of their users rather than on statistical modeling. That allows them to make forecasts on topics where there’s less data — like the fate of Twitter.

Citing these platforms in stories is a good first step for journalists. The next step is for publications to ask their readers to participate. That’s what I’ve been doing with my newsletter: Each week I write about an economic or business story and ask readers to make a forecast. Over time readers see how their forecasts turn out, learn from each other, and hopefully improve their thinking. This process formalizes something most journalists already recognize: Your audience collectively knows much more than you do.

Walter Frick is the founder of Nonrival and a contributing editor at Harvard Business Review. He was previously an executive editor at Quartz and a Knight visiting fellow at the Nieman Foundation.

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse