Open discourse retrenches

“The ‘Substackization’ of celebrity journalists removes these voices from the larger conversation and makes them more narrowly available to a paying audience made up of superfans.”

As 2022 draws to a close, it feels like we’ve been here before. Not so much in the specifics of Elon’s exploits — which are truly hair-raising — but the feeling of displacement, dispersal, retreat. 2023 looks to be another season of scrambling, where reporters and audiences alike struggle to identify where the news lives and who they can trust.

Twitter’s implosion has underscored a persistent pattern in journalism, in which periods of consolidation and aggregation of content and eyeballs alternate with explosive experimentation on new platforms. This dynamic tends to drive traffic to celebrity journalists and blue-chip brands while torpedoing the time and energy of everyone else who’s just attempting to report the news.

For journalists, attempts to move to Mastodon mirror the rise of other small-group discussion platforms such as Discord, which put conversations that might have taken place across broadly public platforms behind closed walls. This has real consequences for the ways we talk to one another, how and where new ideas circulate, the ways we follow movements and debates, and the ways we connect with sources.

Musk’s purchase matters because over the years, Twitter emerged as the go-to network for journalists. The hashtag and the blue checkmark may have been weak forms of organization and verification when compared to the rigorous fact-checking of prestige publications, but they were fast and relatively transparent. Of course, Twitter enabled flotillas of hate speech, and a lazy strand of “s/he said” reporting that parroted ramblings of political and cultural influencers. At the same time, though, it enabled powerfully transparent new forms of crowdsourced reporting, accountability, and public assembly.

As MSNBC’s Chris Hayes writes, “Twitter is a place where all kinds of perspectives and obscure expertise are instantly accessible and overlapping. This can be dangerous, sure. But if you find the right people, you can be instantly brought up to speed on everything from the fluctuations in lumber prices to the maintenance problems in the Russian tank fleet to the scouting report on the Welsh goalie. For someone in my line of work, it’s indispensable.”

Of course, Twitter was never the public square of our dreams — unlike the airwaves, it has always been commercial. Given the precipitous dismantling of protections, it’s not surprising that reporters are contemplating jumping ship. But the fragmentation into many smaller conversations taking place in walled-off chats and behind publication firewalls augers a retrenchment in open discourse — particularly dangerous as we continue to be rocked by global public health and climate crises.

Similarly, the “Substackization” of celebrity journalists removes these voices from the larger conversation and makes them more narrowly available to a paying audience made up of superfans. Nice for them, but this does little to support the day-to-day work of gathering and sharing the news.

In the process, once again we see a degradation of a shared public sphere, especially given the range of shifting media habits across generations. This happened with the rise of cable news, talk radio, the blogosphere, podcasting, and on and on. Each time, new generations of aggregators, critics, curators, and tastemakers have risen up to make sense of the cacophony, sniff out fresh forms of reporting, and puzzle through new business models to gather the best-of-breed — often short-changing reporters in the process.

While this may be great for creativity and innovation, it’s proved less helpful for democracy. Our policies and platforms for keeping citizens informed and hosting civil dialogue have lagged many years behind the pace of communications innovations. Plus, it leads to newsroom attrition. Journalists are forced to learn new tech and production skills every few years — to the detriment of actually honing their craft — only to have those skills become moot when a major platform makes a pivot.

This may not sound much like a prediction — but along with annual trend-spotting, another key tool for futurists is pattern recognition. Let’s take a step back for the long view: Amid the frothy hyperbole about the virtues of decentralization, what can we learn from previous moments when our centralized hubs for civic discourse lost salience? And what new forms of aggregation are in the offing that might serve us better than a commercial platform owned by an imperious tyrant?

Jessica Clark is the executive director of Dot Connector Studio, the futurist in residence at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the publisher of Immerse.news.

As 2022 draws to a close, it feels like we’ve been here before. Not so much in the specifics of Elon’s exploits — which are truly hair-raising — but the feeling of displacement, dispersal, retreat. 2023 looks to be another season of scrambling, where reporters and audiences alike struggle to identify where the news lives and who they can trust.

Twitter’s implosion has underscored a persistent pattern in journalism, in which periods of consolidation and aggregation of content and eyeballs alternate with explosive experimentation on new platforms. This dynamic tends to drive traffic to celebrity journalists and blue-chip brands while torpedoing the time and energy of everyone else who’s just attempting to report the news.

For journalists, attempts to move to Mastodon mirror the rise of other small-group discussion platforms such as Discord, which put conversations that might have taken place across broadly public platforms behind closed walls. This has real consequences for the ways we talk to one another, how and where new ideas circulate, the ways we follow movements and debates, and the ways we connect with sources.

Musk’s purchase matters because over the years, Twitter emerged as the go-to network for journalists. The hashtag and the blue checkmark may have been weak forms of organization and verification when compared to the rigorous fact-checking of prestige publications, but they were fast and relatively transparent. Of course, Twitter enabled flotillas of hate speech, and a lazy strand of “s/he said” reporting that parroted ramblings of political and cultural influencers. At the same time, though, it enabled powerfully transparent new forms of crowdsourced reporting, accountability, and public assembly.

As MSNBC’s Chris Hayes writes, “Twitter is a place where all kinds of perspectives and obscure expertise are instantly accessible and overlapping. This can be dangerous, sure. But if you find the right people, you can be instantly brought up to speed on everything from the fluctuations in lumber prices to the maintenance problems in the Russian tank fleet to the scouting report on the Welsh goalie. For someone in my line of work, it’s indispensable.”

Of course, Twitter was never the public square of our dreams — unlike the airwaves, it has always been commercial. Given the precipitous dismantling of protections, it’s not surprising that reporters are contemplating jumping ship. But the fragmentation into many smaller conversations taking place in walled-off chats and behind publication firewalls augers a retrenchment in open discourse — particularly dangerous as we continue to be rocked by global public health and climate crises.

Similarly, the “Substackization” of celebrity journalists removes these voices from the larger conversation and makes them more narrowly available to a paying audience made up of superfans. Nice for them, but this does little to support the day-to-day work of gathering and sharing the news.

In the process, once again we see a degradation of a shared public sphere, especially given the range of shifting media habits across generations. This happened with the rise of cable news, talk radio, the blogosphere, podcasting, and on and on. Each time, new generations of aggregators, critics, curators, and tastemakers have risen up to make sense of the cacophony, sniff out fresh forms of reporting, and puzzle through new business models to gather the best-of-breed — often short-changing reporters in the process.

While this may be great for creativity and innovation, it’s proved less helpful for democracy. Our policies and platforms for keeping citizens informed and hosting civil dialogue have lagged many years behind the pace of communications innovations. Plus, it leads to newsroom attrition. Journalists are forced to learn new tech and production skills every few years — to the detriment of actually honing their craft — only to have those skills become moot when a major platform makes a pivot.

This may not sound much like a prediction — but along with annual trend-spotting, another key tool for futurists is pattern recognition. Let’s take a step back for the long view: Amid the frothy hyperbole about the virtues of decentralization, what can we learn from previous moments when our centralized hubs for civic discourse lost salience? And what new forms of aggregation are in the offing that might serve us better than a commercial platform owned by an imperious tyrant?

Jessica Clark is the executive director of Dot Connector Studio, the futurist in residence at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the publisher of Immerse.news.

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first