The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

“It remains a sad episode that Secretary Clinton’s emails received more attention for the server on which they resided than for what they said about how she had done in her job.”

The presidential election will be held in 2024, but 2023 will be the year the leading candidates likely emerge, as the field — potentially an open one in both parties for the fourth time in the last seven campaigns — is winnowed. It will therefore also be the year in which we learn if the press has finally learned important lessons from its disastrous performance in the last campaign with two open nominations, the 2016 race.

It was in 2015, in the run-up to that contest, that political journalism managed to simultaneously treat Donald Trump’s bid for power as a Roman circus while obsessing over Hillary Clinton’s emails. I hope we can do better eight years later. How?

First is to do real reporting about who the candidates actually are. There is no other press vetting that can or should approximate that which eventually occurs for presidents. But it would be much better for the country if the vetting was done before candidates are nominated by a major party, much less before they take office. For instance, Maggie Haberman’s book Confidence Man is an illuminating look at Donald Trump, especially its first half on his pre-2015 business career — but we should collectively hang our heads in shame that so much of it feels fresh, particularly when contrasted to how little Trump’s carefully crafted entrepreneurial myth was exploded before he was elected.

The watchwords of the political press, for this purpose as so many others, might be what John Mitchell — Richard Nixon’s law partner, attorney general, campaign manager, and criminal co-conspirator — urged: “Watch what we do, not what we say.”

This is especially true of people who have had executive responsibility of any kind before seeking the presidency. What impact has Ron DeSantis really had on the lives of Floridians? What sort of governor was Mike Pence in Indiana? What difference has Kamala Harris made as vice president? (In each of these cases, how do these executive records contrast with their earlier votes as legislators?) How effective has Pete Buttigieg been as secretary of transportation? More on these questions and less on “messaging” and the early horse race could really make a difference for voters.

There’s a critical balance to be struck here. On the one hand, it is almost always a mistake to let candidates set the journalism agenda. Their incentives are to direct attention to easy questions (and easy promises) and away from harder questions and choices. On the other, in seizing on concerns we uncover, it’s critical to make sure they are important as well as merely novel. It remains a sad episode that Secretary Clinton’s emails received more attention for the server on which they resided than for what they said about how she had done in her job.

Let’s also try in the early campaign year ahead, as we always should, to weigh the motivations of our sources in evaluating stories to which we devote investigative resources. Those motivations are almost never a reason to forego publication, but they may help us better understand how important a story should be to voters, and thus how it should be framed. In short, “let’s be careful out there.”

Dick Tofel is the principal of Gallatin Advisory LLC and was founding general manager of ProPublica.

The presidential election will be held in 2024, but 2023 will be the year the leading candidates likely emerge, as the field — potentially an open one in both parties for the fourth time in the last seven campaigns — is winnowed. It will therefore also be the year in which we learn if the press has finally learned important lessons from its disastrous performance in the last campaign with two open nominations, the 2016 race.

It was in 2015, in the run-up to that contest, that political journalism managed to simultaneously treat Donald Trump’s bid for power as a Roman circus while obsessing over Hillary Clinton’s emails. I hope we can do better eight years later. How?

First is to do real reporting about who the candidates actually are. There is no other press vetting that can or should approximate that which eventually occurs for presidents. But it would be much better for the country if the vetting was done before candidates are nominated by a major party, much less before they take office. For instance, Maggie Haberman’s book Confidence Man is an illuminating look at Donald Trump, especially its first half on his pre-2015 business career — but we should collectively hang our heads in shame that so much of it feels fresh, particularly when contrasted to how little Trump’s carefully crafted entrepreneurial myth was exploded before he was elected.

The watchwords of the political press, for this purpose as so many others, might be what John Mitchell — Richard Nixon’s law partner, attorney general, campaign manager, and criminal co-conspirator — urged: “Watch what we do, not what we say.”

This is especially true of people who have had executive responsibility of any kind before seeking the presidency. What impact has Ron DeSantis really had on the lives of Floridians? What sort of governor was Mike Pence in Indiana? What difference has Kamala Harris made as vice president? (In each of these cases, how do these executive records contrast with their earlier votes as legislators?) How effective has Pete Buttigieg been as secretary of transportation? More on these questions and less on “messaging” and the early horse race could really make a difference for voters.

There’s a critical balance to be struck here. On the one hand, it is almost always a mistake to let candidates set the journalism agenda. Their incentives are to direct attention to easy questions (and easy promises) and away from harder questions and choices. On the other, in seizing on concerns we uncover, it’s critical to make sure they are important as well as merely novel. It remains a sad episode that Secretary Clinton’s emails received more attention for the server on which they resided than for what they said about how she had done in her job.

Let’s also try in the early campaign year ahead, as we always should, to weigh the motivations of our sources in evaluating stories to which we devote investigative resources. Those motivations are almost never a reason to forego publication, but they may help us better understand how important a story should be to voters, and thus how it should be framed. In short, “let’s be careful out there.”

Dick Tofel is the principal of Gallatin Advisory LLC and was founding general manager of ProPublica.

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

AX Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale