Earlier this month, a group of journalists at the independent Central American news outlet El Faro joined forces with the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University to file a lawsuit in U.S. federal court.
The subject of the suit: the Israeli company NSO Group, whose Pegasus spyware is sold to governments around the world and, the complaint alleges, was used in violation of U.S. law to penetrate the journalists’ iPhones and monitor their activities.
“These spyware attacks were an attempt to silence our sources and deter us from doing journalism,” Carlos Dada, co-founder and director of El Faro, said in the announcement of the lawsuit. “We are filing this lawsuit to defend our right to investigate and report, and to protect journalists around the world in their pursuit of the truth.”
Journalists like those at El Faro, who are doing investigative work that holds power to account and exposes corruption, are no strangers to threats, intimidation, incarceration and even violence. These are realities that we’ve chronicled extensively at Frontline: people and governments target accountability journalists in order to kill their stories and keep sources from speaking out. In recent years, though, the threat environment for journalists has intensified to include new and sophisticated challenges, like the powerful hacking tool, Pegasus.
In fact, after the journalism nonprofit Forbidden Stories received a leak of thousands of phone numbers it suspected had been selected for potential Pegasus targeting, and convened a consortium of 17 news outlets including Frontline to investigate with the technical support of Amnesty International Security Lab, our collaborative Pegasus Project reporting found that among the numbers on the list were those of journalists whose work exposed government corruption.
Forbidden Stories is dedicated to continuing the work of jailed, threatened or assassinated journalists. (Their official motto: “Killing the journalist won’t kill the story.”) To Forbidden Stories’ founder Laurent Richard, the invasive ways in which Pegasus could be used to put journalists and their sources at risk, coupled with the largely unregulated nature of the spyware industry, signaled a new era of threats to journalism.
“Pegasus is like a person over your shoulder — a person who will see what you are seeing, a person who would watch what you are watching, your emails, your encrypted communication, everything. So once you are infected, you’re trapped,” he says in our upcoming January documentary series on the Pegasus spyware scandal.
NSO Group, which has disputed some of the Pegasus Project’s reporting, has publicly insisted that it “has no insight” into how the governments it sells to use Pegasus spyware but says it investigates credible claims of misuse. The company says it sells Pegasus to governments for “the sole purpose of preventing and investigating terror and serious crime.” Yet our collaborative Pegasus Project investigation found that NSO sold Pegasus to governments who used the spyware to track dissidents, journalists and activists.
I believe that, unfortunately, in the year to come, threats to journalists — and to journalism itself — will continue to grow and evolve in troubling, technologically advanced, and at times undetectable ways.
But I also believe that journalists will keep doing their jobs, and that they will band together in new ways to meet the moment and fight back against intimidation — as El Faro and the Knight Institute are doing in this lawsuit; as Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Ressa is doing through coalition-building in the Philippines; and as Forbidden Stories and other news organizations are doing through the Pegasus Project.
Part of the fight back is to report unflinchingly on what happens when journalists come under attack — to seek and tell the unvarnished truth, in forensic detail. At Frontline, in the year ahead, that’s exactly what we’ll do. We’ve been filming with Dmitry Muratov, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning journalist in Russia who is in Moscow fighting authorities’ court cases against the independent newspaper he co-founded, Novaya Gazeta. We’re continuing to probe the assault on press freedom in the Philippines.
And next month, in our globe-spanning two-part docuseries with Forbidden Stories and Forbidden Films, we’ll chronicle how journalists uncovered the Pegasus spyware scandal, how they learned that other journalists had potentially been targeted, and how — in another example of journalism evolving to meet the moment — they fought tech with tech: joining forces with Amnesty International’s Security Lab, who performed forensic analysis on a number of phones to try to determine whether they had been targeted with and infected with Pegasus.
The threats journalism faces are profound and evolving. It’s a good thing that so, too, is our capacity to respond.
Raney Aronson-Rath is editor-in-chief and executive producer of Frontline.
Earlier this month, a group of journalists at the independent Central American news outlet El Faro joined forces with the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University to file a lawsuit in U.S. federal court.
The subject of the suit: the Israeli company NSO Group, whose Pegasus spyware is sold to governments around the world and, the complaint alleges, was used in violation of U.S. law to penetrate the journalists’ iPhones and monitor their activities.
“These spyware attacks were an attempt to silence our sources and deter us from doing journalism,” Carlos Dada, co-founder and director of El Faro, said in the announcement of the lawsuit. “We are filing this lawsuit to defend our right to investigate and report, and to protect journalists around the world in their pursuit of the truth.”
Journalists like those at El Faro, who are doing investigative work that holds power to account and exposes corruption, are no strangers to threats, intimidation, incarceration and even violence. These are realities that we’ve chronicled extensively at Frontline: people and governments target accountability journalists in order to kill their stories and keep sources from speaking out. In recent years, though, the threat environment for journalists has intensified to include new and sophisticated challenges, like the powerful hacking tool, Pegasus.
In fact, after the journalism nonprofit Forbidden Stories received a leak of thousands of phone numbers it suspected had been selected for potential Pegasus targeting, and convened a consortium of 17 news outlets including Frontline to investigate with the technical support of Amnesty International Security Lab, our collaborative Pegasus Project reporting found that among the numbers on the list were those of journalists whose work exposed government corruption.
Forbidden Stories is dedicated to continuing the work of jailed, threatened or assassinated journalists. (Their official motto: “Killing the journalist won’t kill the story.”) To Forbidden Stories’ founder Laurent Richard, the invasive ways in which Pegasus could be used to put journalists and their sources at risk, coupled with the largely unregulated nature of the spyware industry, signaled a new era of threats to journalism.
“Pegasus is like a person over your shoulder — a person who will see what you are seeing, a person who would watch what you are watching, your emails, your encrypted communication, everything. So once you are infected, you’re trapped,” he says in our upcoming January documentary series on the Pegasus spyware scandal.
NSO Group, which has disputed some of the Pegasus Project’s reporting, has publicly insisted that it “has no insight” into how the governments it sells to use Pegasus spyware but says it investigates credible claims of misuse. The company says it sells Pegasus to governments for “the sole purpose of preventing and investigating terror and serious crime.” Yet our collaborative Pegasus Project investigation found that NSO sold Pegasus to governments who used the spyware to track dissidents, journalists and activists.
I believe that, unfortunately, in the year to come, threats to journalists — and to journalism itself — will continue to grow and evolve in troubling, technologically advanced, and at times undetectable ways.
But I also believe that journalists will keep doing their jobs, and that they will band together in new ways to meet the moment and fight back against intimidation — as El Faro and the Knight Institute are doing in this lawsuit; as Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Ressa is doing through coalition-building in the Philippines; and as Forbidden Stories and other news organizations are doing through the Pegasus Project.
Part of the fight back is to report unflinchingly on what happens when journalists come under attack — to seek and tell the unvarnished truth, in forensic detail. At Frontline, in the year ahead, that’s exactly what we’ll do. We’ve been filming with Dmitry Muratov, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning journalist in Russia who is in Moscow fighting authorities’ court cases against the independent newspaper he co-founded, Novaya Gazeta. We’re continuing to probe the assault on press freedom in the Philippines.
And next month, in our globe-spanning two-part docuseries with Forbidden Stories and Forbidden Films, we’ll chronicle how journalists uncovered the Pegasus spyware scandal, how they learned that other journalists had potentially been targeted, and how — in another example of journalism evolving to meet the moment — they fought tech with tech: joining forces with Amnesty International’s Security Lab, who performed forensic analysis on a number of phones to try to determine whether they had been targeted with and infected with Pegasus.
The threats journalism faces are profound and evolving. It’s a good thing that so, too, is our capacity to respond.
Raney Aronson-Rath is editor-in-chief and executive producer of Frontline.
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
An Xiao Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves