Journalism startups will think beyond English

“There is much we can learn from our American colleagues. But there is as least as much we can’t.”

Those of us who try to pursue paths forward for journalism face a peculiar obstacle. I’m not talking about the speed by which media consumption evolves, or the inscrutable media habits of the teenagers that dwell in my house. No. I’m talking about the language I’m writing in.

The international debate on the future of the media business has a bias toward English. This is less trivial than it might seem. Our most important hubs of information — Nieman Lab, CJR, Poynter, others — are based in the U.S., as are the companies that drive many of the changes in technology. Almost invisibly, the conversation is framed in the context of the American news consumer: On a national level, endless options for quality journalism, much of it free — and for publishers, the theoretical possible of reaching a vast audience if you succeed, even with a niche operation.

Crisis can help us see things more clearly, and I hope the ones we are in now will do exactly that. Hopefully this will propel us toward ambitious journalism startups across Europe, Asia, Africa and South America. My prediction for 2023 is that those of us working in small and small-ish languages will begin to grasp the opportunities we have for creating original journalism products tailored to our national context. That we understand that the best solutions are more likely to hide two countries over, than in the English-speaking world.

The problem with our collective focus on the English language is often a question of math. The Guardian’s much lauded (and rightly so) yellow-box-please-support-us model is brilliant, exactly because it draws on the immense reach of theguardian.com’s most powerful articles. Conversion rates can be a fraction of a percent and still cover the costs of running a newsroom the size of The Guardian’s.

The scale of The New York Times gives it similar gravity-defying powers. The price of a Times digital subscription can be next to nothing, essentially placing it in a category of one: the news product where I must ask myself if I can afford not paying two dollars a month for the most well-resourced news app in the world.

Niches hardly even exist in English, at least not the way we define niches in smaller countries around the world.  A history enthusiast with a podcast, a newsletter, and a YouTube channel can make a decent living publishing in English — but it’s a mathematical impossibility in my native language, Danish, and in most other languages in the world.

I’ve often heard colleagues around the world agonize over this lack of opportunity.

This is a fundamental mistake.

The English language creates what can be compared to the biotope of the jungle. There is an abundance of activity, the forest reaches the horizon, but someone is poised to eat you at all hours of the day. Competition is fierce. The media landscapes in most countries in Europe are more like meadows or a lowland shrub in comparison: Plenty of space and very little competition. If you look hard, you are almost certain to find audiences with unfulfilled needs. In many smaller countries, a few legacy organizations dominate journalism, and it is safe to say that most of them have a firmer grasp on the past than on the future.

I co-founded the membership-driven digital newspaper Zetland in Denmark following this logic. We knew that we would need to make people pay a lot of money for our product (unlike The New York Times). We knew that to survive, we needed high conversion rates at every touch point with potential members (unlike The Guardian). We had to make our newsroom exactly large enough to deliver on our promises — and laser-focus our resources on what we could do better than old media in Denmark.

We came to understand that whatever we came up with, our only path to success was to pick up on even the slightest signal that could help our product evolve. We cultivated trust and a meaningful relationship with our members. We made it.

I spent most of the past year in the U.S. trying to come up with even more radical paths for sustaining the journalism the world needs most. There is much we can learn from our American colleagues. But there is as least as much we can’t.

So, who do we turn to for inspiration? To the people succeeding with business models and products tailored to the confines and peculiarities of their local meadow. And if anyone out there sees an opportunity in a non-English setting, we at Zetland are standing by to help you do something about it.

Jakob Moll is a co-founder and head of development at Zetland, a trailbrazing membership-driven digital newspaper in Denmark.

Those of us who try to pursue paths forward for journalism face a peculiar obstacle. I’m not talking about the speed by which media consumption evolves, or the inscrutable media habits of the teenagers that dwell in my house. No. I’m talking about the language I’m writing in.

The international debate on the future of the media business has a bias toward English. This is less trivial than it might seem. Our most important hubs of information — Nieman Lab, CJR, Poynter, others — are based in the U.S., as are the companies that drive many of the changes in technology. Almost invisibly, the conversation is framed in the context of the American news consumer: On a national level, endless options for quality journalism, much of it free — and for publishers, the theoretical possible of reaching a vast audience if you succeed, even with a niche operation.

Crisis can help us see things more clearly, and I hope the ones we are in now will do exactly that. Hopefully this will propel us toward ambitious journalism startups across Europe, Asia, Africa and South America. My prediction for 2023 is that those of us working in small and small-ish languages will begin to grasp the opportunities we have for creating original journalism products tailored to our national context. That we understand that the best solutions are more likely to hide two countries over, than in the English-speaking world.

The problem with our collective focus on the English language is often a question of math. The Guardian’s much lauded (and rightly so) yellow-box-please-support-us model is brilliant, exactly because it draws on the immense reach of theguardian.com’s most powerful articles. Conversion rates can be a fraction of a percent and still cover the costs of running a newsroom the size of The Guardian’s.

The scale of The New York Times gives it similar gravity-defying powers. The price of a Times digital subscription can be next to nothing, essentially placing it in a category of one: the news product where I must ask myself if I can afford not paying two dollars a month for the most well-resourced news app in the world.

Niches hardly even exist in English, at least not the way we define niches in smaller countries around the world.  A history enthusiast with a podcast, a newsletter, and a YouTube channel can make a decent living publishing in English — but it’s a mathematical impossibility in my native language, Danish, and in most other languages in the world.

I’ve often heard colleagues around the world agonize over this lack of opportunity.

This is a fundamental mistake.

The English language creates what can be compared to the biotope of the jungle. There is an abundance of activity, the forest reaches the horizon, but someone is poised to eat you at all hours of the day. Competition is fierce. The media landscapes in most countries in Europe are more like meadows or a lowland shrub in comparison: Plenty of space and very little competition. If you look hard, you are almost certain to find audiences with unfulfilled needs. In many smaller countries, a few legacy organizations dominate journalism, and it is safe to say that most of them have a firmer grasp on the past than on the future.

I co-founded the membership-driven digital newspaper Zetland in Denmark following this logic. We knew that we would need to make people pay a lot of money for our product (unlike The New York Times). We knew that to survive, we needed high conversion rates at every touch point with potential members (unlike The Guardian). We had to make our newsroom exactly large enough to deliver on our promises — and laser-focus our resources on what we could do better than old media in Denmark.

We came to understand that whatever we came up with, our only path to success was to pick up on even the slightest signal that could help our product evolve. We cultivated trust and a meaningful relationship with our members. We made it.

I spent most of the past year in the U.S. trying to come up with even more radical paths for sustaining the journalism the world needs most. There is much we can learn from our American colleagues. But there is as least as much we can’t.

So, who do we turn to for inspiration? To the people succeeding with business models and products tailored to the confines and peculiarities of their local meadow. And if anyone out there sees an opportunity in a non-English setting, we at Zetland are standing by to help you do something about it.

Jakob Moll is a co-founder and head of development at Zetland, a trailbrazing membership-driven digital newspaper in Denmark.

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

AX Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Nik Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

James Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy