Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

“As newsroom leaders address equity, fairness, and labor concerns, they should extend their consideration to prospective hires as well as to employees.”

I still remember an email I got 20 years ago, from a prominent editor at a well-known magazine, asking me if I had a minute to talk about a potential job. We hopped on the phone and he described a dream: working on features, maybe front-of-the-book too, bringing in new writers, etc. I was a junior editor on the books section of The Nation. This was a big deal!

The next step was: Write a memo. But not just a memo: a front-to-back critique of the magazine, in addition to 10 story ideas with freelance writers attached and 10 story ideas for specific staff writers.

Reader: This memo took more than two full weekends to put together. I took time off work. And you know what? Not only did I not hear from the person who requested this work from me for six months — there wasn’t even an actual job, which I only learned after badgering! It was a fishing expedition. Perhaps I’d have been reeled in if my memo and ideas had been better. But perhaps not!

The dumbest thing is when they approached me again six years later, I did it all over again. For the second time, it was not a job that was ever actually filled, to my knowledge.

More recently, I know of a search for a top job where after a single conversation, 10 (ten!) people were asked to do a memo, answering a series of questions provided by the publication. That’s 10 people doing a lot of work they aren’t being compensated for!

As you can tell, I’m against both of these things: the overly long job memo, wherein candidates are asked to spend countless hours sharing analysis and ideas, as well as the wide-casting of questions to a large group just to see what comes back.

I declare: These practices must die in 2023.

Let me be clear: It’s not that the memo as a whole should go away. Memos can be incredibly useful for the hiring manager and the potential hire to ensure there’s alignment over the expectations of the role, whether to get a sense of ideas, of editing taste and skill, or quick thoughts about coverage.

At Slate, the leadership has focused on streamlining what we ask for and from how many people. While our requests look slightly different depending on the role, we have landed on the following guidelines:

  • Only ask 2 or 3 finalists for a memo. Meaning: The memo should inform the decision, not be an early-stage blanket ask of a wide range of folks to see what “hits.”
  • No broad critiques. During the interview process, we cover a lot of ground about Slate, candidates’ familiarity with the magazine, and what they think of it. We do not ask for broad critiques or “thoughts” about Slate generally to be written down.
  • Memo questions should be practical. Memo prompts should be deeply relevant to the job (i.e., pitch three ideas in a few sentences, what story would you have skipped this week, etc.) and standardized across similar roles as much as possible.

We acknowledge that memos are labor, but for many roles, there’s value in asking for written work to help make a decision. (I can’t imagine hiring a copy editor without administering an editing test, for example.)

But as a whole, as newsroom leaders address equity, fairness, and labor concerns, they should extend their consideration to prospective hires as well as to employees. Our asks for special work to land a role should be useful and limited, and something we look forward to receiving to make our best hire — not to peruse at our leisure, or just in case.

Hillary Frey is editor-in-chief of Slate.

I still remember an email I got 20 years ago, from a prominent editor at a well-known magazine, asking me if I had a minute to talk about a potential job. We hopped on the phone and he described a dream: working on features, maybe front-of-the-book too, bringing in new writers, etc. I was a junior editor on the books section of The Nation. This was a big deal!

The next step was: Write a memo. But not just a memo: a front-to-back critique of the magazine, in addition to 10 story ideas with freelance writers attached and 10 story ideas for specific staff writers.

Reader: This memo took more than two full weekends to put together. I took time off work. And you know what? Not only did I not hear from the person who requested this work from me for six months — there wasn’t even an actual job, which I only learned after badgering! It was a fishing expedition. Perhaps I’d have been reeled in if my memo and ideas had been better. But perhaps not!

The dumbest thing is when they approached me again six years later, I did it all over again. For the second time, it was not a job that was ever actually filled, to my knowledge.

More recently, I know of a search for a top job where after a single conversation, 10 (ten!) people were asked to do a memo, answering a series of questions provided by the publication. That’s 10 people doing a lot of work they aren’t being compensated for!

As you can tell, I’m against both of these things: the overly long job memo, wherein candidates are asked to spend countless hours sharing analysis and ideas, as well as the wide-casting of questions to a large group just to see what comes back.

I declare: These practices must die in 2023.

Let me be clear: It’s not that the memo as a whole should go away. Memos can be incredibly useful for the hiring manager and the potential hire to ensure there’s alignment over the expectations of the role, whether to get a sense of ideas, of editing taste and skill, or quick thoughts about coverage.

At Slate, the leadership has focused on streamlining what we ask for and from how many people. While our requests look slightly different depending on the role, we have landed on the following guidelines:

  • Only ask 2 or 3 finalists for a memo. Meaning: The memo should inform the decision, not be an early-stage blanket ask of a wide range of folks to see what “hits.”
  • No broad critiques. During the interview process, we cover a lot of ground about Slate, candidates’ familiarity with the magazine, and what they think of it. We do not ask for broad critiques or “thoughts” about Slate generally to be written down.
  • Memo questions should be practical. Memo prompts should be deeply relevant to the job (i.e., pitch three ideas in a few sentences, what story would you have skipped this week, etc.) and standardized across similar roles as much as possible.

We acknowledge that memos are labor, but for many roles, there’s value in asking for written work to help make a decision. (I can’t imagine hiring a copy editor without administering an editing test, for example.)

But as a whole, as newsroom leaders address equity, fairness, and labor concerns, they should extend their consideration to prospective hires as well as to employees. Our asks for special work to land a role should be useful and limited, and something we look forward to receiving to make our best hire — not to peruse at our leisure, or just in case.

Hillary Frey is editor-in-chief of Slate.

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due