Readers in the United States are bombarded with international news stories, of varying quality. Too often, they’re reported by parachute journalists with minimal familiarity or cultural context about the places to which they are deployed for just a few days. Stories can also be entirely based on secondhand research, products of “laptop journalism” from afar. As a result, U.S.-based audiences are fed a steady drip of stereotypical reporting that can perpetuate rote narratives of conflict, poverty, and disaster about communities around the world.
At Global Press, we invest in producing high-quality international coverage, employing local reporters across nearly forty news bureaus, from Mongolia to Zimbabwe. And now we can prove that readers of international news in the United States demand a higher standard of international journalism. In the new year, we’ll publish the results of our yearlong U.S. audience research study, conducted with our partners Goodwin Simon Strategic Research, an independent public opinion research firm, and Wonder: Strategies for Good, experts in analyzing public opinion research. But the results are so important that I’m going to share a sneak preview here before 2022 is out.
Our study demonstrates that there is a deep reservoir of untapped demand from readers in the United States, across a wide range of demographics, for international journalism that is local, precise, and representative. But U.S.-based readers aren’t typically aware that such journalism could exist. After just a small dose of exposure to media literacy materials, the preferences of the study’s participants shift dramatically.
For example, of the more than 1,200 adults that we surveyed, twice as many initially reported that they preferred to read global coverage written by reporters based in the United States rather than by local reporters who are from the communities they cover. But the result flips after participants are presented with media literacy materials describing the benefits of local reporting and limitations of parachute journalism. At that point, three times as many respondents express a preference for stories written by local reporters. This striking result is robust across reader demographics, spanning age, gender, ethnicity, political affiliation, and geography.
Not only do readers prefer local reporters, but they also strongly prefer when international reporting uses dignified and precise vocabulary to describe global events. Study participants overwhelmingly preferred more thorough descriptions to explain complex subjects without resorting to sloppy shorthand phrases such as “developing world” or “ethnic tensions.” At best, such phrases are imprecise, and at worst, they are used as sanitized synonyms for poverty or to emphasize the differences between readers in the United States and subjects of international stories. In addition, our study’s participants strongly preferred to read stories that avoid hewing to negative stereotypes about other nations. For example, most expressed a desire to read stories that focus on solutions to local challenges rather than underscore problems.
Beyond the quantitative survey across 1,200-plus respondents, we also conducted in-depth interviews and focus groups with a curated set of diverse participants. The qualitative feedback enriched the quantitative findings. For example, one participant shared that “reducing humans to labels such as immigrants, third-world people, refugees, and victims strips part of their humanity away from them in order to make them more palatable for readers. Forcing readers to stop and empathize with others’ situations, I think, would lead to more action and less complacency.” Moreover, the qualitative feedback revealed that many readers are from diaspora communities and are eager to read high-quality coverage about their ancestral communities, but aren’t satisfied with the choices on offer. Such audiences are underserved today and present important opportunities to boost readership and engagement.
The clear implication of our findings is that readers in the United States demand a higher standard of international journalism — and that demand is waiting to be unlocked. This presents a remarkable opportunity in 2023 for the media industry and media funders. It is critical to educate U.S.-based audiences about what is possible, such as through media literacy campaigns. And to deliver quality international journalism, media organizations can partner with outlets already operating in communities around the world and invest in an industry culture of valuing local contributions, precise and dignified language, and new narratives that move past stereotypes.
We’ll publish our full results in the coming weeks and delve deeply into the data. But there’s no time to waste. Readers in the United States demand better international journalism now. And it’s time for the industry to deliver.
Laxmi Parthasarathy is chief operating officer of Global Press.
Readers in the United States are bombarded with international news stories, of varying quality. Too often, they’re reported by parachute journalists with minimal familiarity or cultural context about the places to which they are deployed for just a few days. Stories can also be entirely based on secondhand research, products of “laptop journalism” from afar. As a result, U.S.-based audiences are fed a steady drip of stereotypical reporting that can perpetuate rote narratives of conflict, poverty, and disaster about communities around the world.
At Global Press, we invest in producing high-quality international coverage, employing local reporters across nearly forty news bureaus, from Mongolia to Zimbabwe. And now we can prove that readers of international news in the United States demand a higher standard of international journalism. In the new year, we’ll publish the results of our yearlong U.S. audience research study, conducted with our partners Goodwin Simon Strategic Research, an independent public opinion research firm, and Wonder: Strategies for Good, experts in analyzing public opinion research. But the results are so important that I’m going to share a sneak preview here before 2022 is out.
Our study demonstrates that there is a deep reservoir of untapped demand from readers in the United States, across a wide range of demographics, for international journalism that is local, precise, and representative. But U.S.-based readers aren’t typically aware that such journalism could exist. After just a small dose of exposure to media literacy materials, the preferences of the study’s participants shift dramatically.
For example, of the more than 1,200 adults that we surveyed, twice as many initially reported that they preferred to read global coverage written by reporters based in the United States rather than by local reporters who are from the communities they cover. But the result flips after participants are presented with media literacy materials describing the benefits of local reporting and limitations of parachute journalism. At that point, three times as many respondents express a preference for stories written by local reporters. This striking result is robust across reader demographics, spanning age, gender, ethnicity, political affiliation, and geography.
Not only do readers prefer local reporters, but they also strongly prefer when international reporting uses dignified and precise vocabulary to describe global events. Study participants overwhelmingly preferred more thorough descriptions to explain complex subjects without resorting to sloppy shorthand phrases such as “developing world” or “ethnic tensions.” At best, such phrases are imprecise, and at worst, they are used as sanitized synonyms for poverty or to emphasize the differences between readers in the United States and subjects of international stories. In addition, our study’s participants strongly preferred to read stories that avoid hewing to negative stereotypes about other nations. For example, most expressed a desire to read stories that focus on solutions to local challenges rather than underscore problems.
Beyond the quantitative survey across 1,200-plus respondents, we also conducted in-depth interviews and focus groups with a curated set of diverse participants. The qualitative feedback enriched the quantitative findings. For example, one participant shared that “reducing humans to labels such as immigrants, third-world people, refugees, and victims strips part of their humanity away from them in order to make them more palatable for readers. Forcing readers to stop and empathize with others’ situations, I think, would lead to more action and less complacency.” Moreover, the qualitative feedback revealed that many readers are from diaspora communities and are eager to read high-quality coverage about their ancestral communities, but aren’t satisfied with the choices on offer. Such audiences are underserved today and present important opportunities to boost readership and engagement.
The clear implication of our findings is that readers in the United States demand a higher standard of international journalism — and that demand is waiting to be unlocked. This presents a remarkable opportunity in 2023 for the media industry and media funders. It is critical to educate U.S.-based audiences about what is possible, such as through media literacy campaigns. And to deliver quality international journalism, media organizations can partner with outlets already operating in communities around the world and invest in an industry culture of valuing local contributions, precise and dignified language, and new narratives that move past stereotypes.
We’ll publish our full results in the coming weeks and delve deeply into the data. But there’s no time to waste. Readers in the United States demand better international journalism now. And it’s time for the industry to deliver.
Laxmi Parthasarathy is chief operating officer of Global Press.
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due