Last month, OpenAI released ChatGPT, an AI model that interacts conversationally. The service has exploded in popularity in the days since, as curious creators and developers try using it for everything from generating art prompts to inventing a new language.
The following conversation between the bot and I unfolded in a single fresh chat session (see screencap) on the morning of December 6th, 2022. Nothing has been edited or resequenced.
Good morning, ChatGPT
Good morning! I’m Assistant, a large language model trained by OpenAl. I’m here to help answer any questions you may have. How can I assist you today?
I’d like to write a piece for Nieman Lab’s annual Predictions for Journalism package, about what chatbots and Al may mean for content creation, journalism, and the media industry as we head into 2023. I should probably touch on ethics concerns, and include a joke or two. What might the introductory paragraph sound like?
Here’s one possible introductory paragraph for your piece:
As we head into 2023, chatbots and Al are poised to play an increasingly important role in content creation, journalism, and the media industry. These technologies offer exciting new possibilities for automating and enhancing many aspects of the news production process, but they also raise important ethical concerns that must be carefully considered. In this article, we will explore some of the potential benefits and challenges of chatbots and Al in journalism, and offer a few predictions for how these technologies may shape the future of the industry. So let’s dive in, and see what the future holds for chatbots and Al in journalism!
Not bad, but can you make it sound more dramatic, and with fancier words? I want to hook in the reader, and make sure they know I’m clever
Sure, here’s a revised version that might be more dramatic and include some more sophisticated language:
As we hurtle towards 2023, chatbots and Al loom ever larger on the horizon of the media industry, offering both tantalizing opportunities and daunting challenges. In this report, we will delve into the potential impacts of these emerging technologies on journalism, content creation, and the wider media landscape. But make no mistake: the ethical quandaries posed by chatbots and Al are as pressing as the practical considerations, and must be addressed with the utmost rigor and foresight. Join us, then, on a journey into the future of chatbots and Al in journalism – a future that is closer than we think.
“The rise of chatbots and AI in journalism signals the end of human creativity and control, and the dawn of a new era of machine dominance.”
Excellent, nailed it. What would be a good outline for the rest of the piece? I should probably include some example anecdotes, and maybe links to recent news articles.
Here’s a possible outline for the rest of your piece:
Can you help me find some articles to link in that second paragraph? And I suspect readers will be curious to understand how you know what you know
I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model trained by OpenAl, and I don’t have access to the internet or any external information sources. I can only generate responses based on the text that I was trained on, which has a knowledge cutoff of 2021. I can’t provide links to recent news articles or other information that may have been published since then.
Gotcha. It’s interesting to me that you’re not just helping me with traditional automation tasks like spellcheck or summarization, you’re also giving me *ideas* for my piece, and helping me actually write it. Can you say more about consequences of all that for journalists and the media industry, in a way that an 8yo could understand?
Sure, here’s a simple explanation of how Al and chatbots like me can help with tasks like writing and idea generation:
Al and chatbots are trained on large amounts of text, such as books, articles, and other written materials. By analyzing this text, we can learn to understand and generate natural-sounding language, and even come up with our own ideas and suggestions based on what we’ve learned. This can be helpful for journalists and other writers, because it can save them time and effort by automating some of the more tedious or repetitive aspects of their work. For example, a chatbot might be able to automatically summarize a long article, or suggest possible headlines or subheadings based on the content. However, it’s important to remember that Al and chatbots are not yet able to fully replace human creativity and judgment, and they should be used as tools rather than replacements for human workers.
Can you give me an example of what the concluding paragraph of my Nieman piece might sound like if spoken by an old pirate to his crew of apprehensive journalists and technologists working in media?
Sure, here’s one possible way that an old pirate might conclude your piece:
“Ahoy there, mates! Ye’ve sailed through these rough waters of chatbots and Al in journalism, and ye’ve come out the other side with a hearty haul of knowledge and predictions. But don’t ye be thinking that the journey’s over, for there be many more storms and treasures yet to be discovered in this brave new world of media. So batten down the hatches, sharpen ye swords, and get ready to face whatever challenges and opportunities may come yer way. And remember: no matter how advanced the technology may be, there’s no substitute for a sharp mind and a stout heart. So set sail, me hearties, and may the winds be at yer backs!”
Can you summarize that passage in one single powerful sentence that will leave my readers awestruck and intrigued, using the voice of a Silicon Valley tech bro?
Here’s one possible way to summarize the previous passage in the voice of a Silicon Valley tech bro:
“Chatbots and Al are the future of journalism, and it’s time to embrace the opportunities and challenges they bring. Let’s hack the media industry and disrupt the status quo!”
Hmm, that was two sentences. Can you reduce it to one sentence, something a little more ominous?
Sure, here’s a one-sentence summary that might be more ominous and attention- grabbing:
“The rise of chatbots and Al in journalism signals the end of human creativity and control, and the dawn of a new era of machine dominance.”
lol perfect. I think what I want to do is include that sentence in the middle of the piece as a visually impactful pullquote, attributing you as the speaker. What markup and CSS should I use for that?
Here’s some possible HTML and CSS that you could use to create a pullquote with the previous sentence and attribute it to me:
This will create a blockquote with the sentence, and a footer that attributes the quote to me. The CSS will style the blockquote with a larger font, center alignment, margins, padding, and a left border. You can modify the CSS to achieve the specific look and feel that you want for your pullquote.
Perfect. thanks for your help!
You’re welcome! I’m glad I could assist you with your piece. Let me know if you have any other questions. I’m here to help.
Good luck in the robot wars, buddy
Thank you for your kind wishes, but as a large language model trained by OpenAl, I don’t have the ability to engage in physical activities or conflicts. My purpose is to assist with lanquage-related tasks and generate human-like responses based on the text I was trained on. I don’t have the ability to experience emotions or participate in the robot wars.
lol uh huh sure
I understand that my responses may sometimes seem amusing or surprising, but please be assured that I’m not capable of experiencing emotions or engaging in physical activities. I’m just a computer program designed to assist with language-related tasks. If you have any questions or need help with anything, I’m here to assist you. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Ryan Gantz is design architect for Vox Media.
Last month, OpenAI released ChatGPT, an AI model that interacts conversationally. The service has exploded in popularity in the days since, as curious creators and developers try using it for everything from generating art prompts to inventing a new language.
The following conversation between the bot and I unfolded in a single fresh chat session (see screencap) on the morning of December 6th, 2022. Nothing has been edited or resequenced.
Good morning, ChatGPT
Good morning! I’m Assistant, a large language model trained by OpenAl. I’m here to help answer any questions you may have. How can I assist you today?
I’d like to write a piece for Nieman Lab’s annual Predictions for Journalism package, about what chatbots and Al may mean for content creation, journalism, and the media industry as we head into 2023. I should probably touch on ethics concerns, and include a joke or two. What might the introductory paragraph sound like?
Here’s one possible introductory paragraph for your piece:
As we head into 2023, chatbots and Al are poised to play an increasingly important role in content creation, journalism, and the media industry. These technologies offer exciting new possibilities for automating and enhancing many aspects of the news production process, but they also raise important ethical concerns that must be carefully considered. In this article, we will explore some of the potential benefits and challenges of chatbots and Al in journalism, and offer a few predictions for how these technologies may shape the future of the industry. So let’s dive in, and see what the future holds for chatbots and Al in journalism!
Not bad, but can you make it sound more dramatic, and with fancier words? I want to hook in the reader, and make sure they know I’m clever
Sure, here’s a revised version that might be more dramatic and include some more sophisticated language:
As we hurtle towards 2023, chatbots and Al loom ever larger on the horizon of the media industry, offering both tantalizing opportunities and daunting challenges. In this report, we will delve into the potential impacts of these emerging technologies on journalism, content creation, and the wider media landscape. But make no mistake: the ethical quandaries posed by chatbots and Al are as pressing as the practical considerations, and must be addressed with the utmost rigor and foresight. Join us, then, on a journey into the future of chatbots and Al in journalism – a future that is closer than we think.
“The rise of chatbots and AI in journalism signals the end of human creativity and control, and the dawn of a new era of machine dominance.”
Excellent, nailed it. What would be a good outline for the rest of the piece? I should probably include some example anecdotes, and maybe links to recent news articles.
Here’s a possible outline for the rest of your piece:
Can you help me find some articles to link in that second paragraph? And I suspect readers will be curious to understand how you know what you know
I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model trained by OpenAl, and I don’t have access to the internet or any external information sources. I can only generate responses based on the text that I was trained on, which has a knowledge cutoff of 2021. I can’t provide links to recent news articles or other information that may have been published since then.
Gotcha. It’s interesting to me that you’re not just helping me with traditional automation tasks like spellcheck or summarization, you’re also giving me *ideas* for my piece, and helping me actually write it. Can you say more about consequences of all that for journalists and the media industry, in a way that an 8yo could understand?
Sure, here’s a simple explanation of how Al and chatbots like me can help with tasks like writing and idea generation:
Al and chatbots are trained on large amounts of text, such as books, articles, and other written materials. By analyzing this text, we can learn to understand and generate natural-sounding language, and even come up with our own ideas and suggestions based on what we’ve learned. This can be helpful for journalists and other writers, because it can save them time and effort by automating some of the more tedious or repetitive aspects of their work. For example, a chatbot might be able to automatically summarize a long article, or suggest possible headlines or subheadings based on the content. However, it’s important to remember that Al and chatbots are not yet able to fully replace human creativity and judgment, and they should be used as tools rather than replacements for human workers.
Can you give me an example of what the concluding paragraph of my Nieman piece might sound like if spoken by an old pirate to his crew of apprehensive journalists and technologists working in media?
Sure, here’s one possible way that an old pirate might conclude your piece:
“Ahoy there, mates! Ye’ve sailed through these rough waters of chatbots and Al in journalism, and ye’ve come out the other side with a hearty haul of knowledge and predictions. But don’t ye be thinking that the journey’s over, for there be many more storms and treasures yet to be discovered in this brave new world of media. So batten down the hatches, sharpen ye swords, and get ready to face whatever challenges and opportunities may come yer way. And remember: no matter how advanced the technology may be, there’s no substitute for a sharp mind and a stout heart. So set sail, me hearties, and may the winds be at yer backs!”
Can you summarize that passage in one single powerful sentence that will leave my readers awestruck and intrigued, using the voice of a Silicon Valley tech bro?
Here’s one possible way to summarize the previous passage in the voice of a Silicon Valley tech bro:
“Chatbots and Al are the future of journalism, and it’s time to embrace the opportunities and challenges they bring. Let’s hack the media industry and disrupt the status quo!”
Hmm, that was two sentences. Can you reduce it to one sentence, something a little more ominous?
Sure, here’s a one-sentence summary that might be more ominous and attention- grabbing:
“The rise of chatbots and Al in journalism signals the end of human creativity and control, and the dawn of a new era of machine dominance.”
lol perfect. I think what I want to do is include that sentence in the middle of the piece as a visually impactful pullquote, attributing you as the speaker. What markup and CSS should I use for that?
Here’s some possible HTML and CSS that you could use to create a pullquote with the previous sentence and attribute it to me:
This will create a blockquote with the sentence, and a footer that attributes the quote to me. The CSS will style the blockquote with a larger font, center alignment, margins, padding, and a left border. You can modify the CSS to achieve the specific look and feel that you want for your pullquote.
Perfect. thanks for your help!
You’re welcome! I’m glad I could assist you with your piece. Let me know if you have any other questions. I’m here to help.
Good luck in the robot wars, buddy
Thank you for your kind wishes, but as a large language model trained by OpenAl, I don’t have the ability to engage in physical activities or conflicts. My purpose is to assist with lanquage-related tasks and generate human-like responses based on the text I was trained on. I don’t have the ability to experience emotions or participate in the robot wars.
lol uh huh sure
I understand that my responses may sometimes seem amusing or surprising, but please be assured that I’m not capable of experiencing emotions or engaging in physical activities. I’m just a computer program designed to assist with language-related tasks. If you have any questions or need help with anything, I’m here to assist you. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Ryan Gantz is design architect for Vox Media.
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine