ChatGPT and the future of trust 

“We will see ChatGPT and tools like it used in adversarial ways that are intended to undermine trust in information environments, pushing people away from public discourse to increasingly homogenous communities.”

This month, OpenAI announced that its new chatbot, Chat GPT, reached one million users in five days, inspiring feverish social media chatter about interactions where users asked it to respond to a wide range of amusing and/or unsettling prompts. The tool is indeed impressive, with implications for everything from education and classassignments to journalism and marketing. But while its output is entertaining, sometimes funny, and fluent — convincingly so — it is also unreliable, generating responses that can be spectacularly wrong. In an information environment in which trust is extremely low and mis- and disinformation are rampant, ChatGPT’s parlor trick of human mimicry pours gas on an already flaming dumpster fire.

We know from years of research that people will always use technologies in ways that their creators did not intend. In other sectors and industries, governments and governance bodies create rules, laws, and regulations to constrain and limit malicious or dangerous uses of potentially harmful products. But advances in artificial intelligence and algorithmic, data-centric technologies have slipped the leash and operate largely outside of those kinds of assessments and controls. With the United States finally beginning to take steps toward putting regulations in place (as other jurisdictions, like the EU, have already moved to do), it’s time to accelerate that work.

With that in mind, I have three predictions. The first is that we will see ChatGPT and tools like it used in adversarial ways that are intended to undermine trust in information environments, pushing people away from public discourse to increasingly homogenous communities. Second, I predict that we’ll see a range of fascinating on-the-ground experiments and research emerging around how we as a society adapt to image and text generation tools like ChatGPT and Dall-E, to use these incredible advances in ways that truly benefit society while limiting harms, particularly to the most vulnerable. Finally, I predict — and hope — we will see growing attention at the federal level to build meaningful guardrails around the development and deployment of these and other AI systems — ones that account for their costs to society and put the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms over pure technical innovation.

Janet Haven is executive director of Data & Society.

This month, OpenAI announced that its new chatbot, Chat GPT, reached one million users in five days, inspiring feverish social media chatter about interactions where users asked it to respond to a wide range of amusing and/or unsettling prompts. The tool is indeed impressive, with implications for everything from education and classassignments to journalism and marketing. But while its output is entertaining, sometimes funny, and fluent — convincingly so — it is also unreliable, generating responses that can be spectacularly wrong. In an information environment in which trust is extremely low and mis- and disinformation are rampant, ChatGPT’s parlor trick of human mimicry pours gas on an already flaming dumpster fire.

We know from years of research that people will always use technologies in ways that their creators did not intend. In other sectors and industries, governments and governance bodies create rules, laws, and regulations to constrain and limit malicious or dangerous uses of potentially harmful products. But advances in artificial intelligence and algorithmic, data-centric technologies have slipped the leash and operate largely outside of those kinds of assessments and controls. With the United States finally beginning to take steps toward putting regulations in place (as other jurisdictions, like the EU, have already moved to do), it’s time to accelerate that work.

With that in mind, I have three predictions. The first is that we will see ChatGPT and tools like it used in adversarial ways that are intended to undermine trust in information environments, pushing people away from public discourse to increasingly homogenous communities. Second, I predict that we’ll see a range of fascinating on-the-ground experiments and research emerging around how we as a society adapt to image and text generation tools like ChatGPT and Dall-E, to use these incredible advances in ways that truly benefit society while limiting harms, particularly to the most vulnerable. Finally, I predict — and hope — we will see growing attention at the federal level to build meaningful guardrails around the development and deployment of these and other AI systems — ones that account for their costs to society and put the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms over pure technical innovation.

Janet Haven is executive director of Data & Society.

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you