I heard this recently and can’t get it out of my head: “Although many of us may think of ourselves as thinking creatures that feel, biologically we are feeling creatures that think.”
It’s from Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, a neuroscientist who wrote My Stroke of Insight: A Brain Scientist’s Personal Journey.
It’s been stuck in my head because as someone who delivers diversity, equity, and inclusion training to news organizations and has been involved in a range of newsroom diversity initiatives, I think this is a missing piece of the puzzle.
Creating diverse, inclusive, welcoming workplaces is not about numbers; it’s about emotions. Namely: How we handle our own.
We have plenty of proof that it’s clearly not enough to just hire for diversity. Despite decades of talk and stop-and-go committees and studies, thousands of journalists say their newsrooms don’t have enough diversity in race and ethnicity. Newsrooms are quite resistant to even reporting their demographics, as the News Leaders Association encountered earlier this year.
Because once you hire that person for their perspectives and experiences, do you know how their ideas and authenticity will be received, emotionally?
For instance:
If the answer to any of the above is no, know that it is not about your new employee, but about a culture that diminishes feelings.
The key is to pause and examine that defensive reaction for what that feeling really is, instead of acting on it. We won’t succeed every time, but if we don’t even try, we are creating a toxic workplace.
According to an MIT Sloan Management Review study released this year, the top five toxic workplace traits are: “noninclusive,” “disrespectful,” “unethical,” “cutthroat,” and “abusive.”
When I see those words, I see a culture that has no empathy for the human experience.
While I am thankful I worked with supportive colleagues in non-toxic newsrooms, I needed more guidance around handling emotions and people’s reactions to them — I, who prided herself in being a not-too-emotional person.
I’ve had colleagues report other colleagues for being too emotional in the newsroom. I’ve managed reporters who told me they weren’t comfortable talking to previous bosses about their mental wellness. I’ve witnessed microaggressions and failed to know how to handle it well.
And this is not healthy — for anyone.
It contributes to a psychologically unsafe workplace. And good luck trying to retain a new employee in such a culture.
To be able to create the places of belonging I hear so many newsrooms striving for, we need to be there for one another emotionally. Part of being human is to feel, so asking people to be authentic means asking them to be emotional.
To create truly inclusive workplaces means you have to be able to confront your own reactions to emotions.
Because how can you navigate people through burnout, stress, covering trauma, systemic racism, and difficult change without reflecting on your emotional response?
Why does seeing someone cry make you uncomfortable? How often do you ask your colleague how they’re feeling, and are you prepared for the answer? Can you hold space for someone’s anger at work in a way that preserves safety for yourself and others?
This is why I predict in 2023, DEI training for newsrooms will also include reflections on our emotional agility. I believe newsrooms who succeed in hiring and retaining a diverse staff will also be places where people can be their emotional selves without fear.
And we need it now more than ever as we’re confronting a collision of challenges: working and living through a pandemic, waves of layoffs and cutbacks, a vein of public distrust of the media, a steady stream of coverage about suffering, pain and loss.
As psychologist Susan David notes in Brené Brown’s latest book Atlas of the Heart, emotions “can be beacons, not barriers, helping us identify what we most care about and motivating us to make positive changes.”
All the DEI mission statements and training launched in the past few years will not lead to positive changes unless we also recognize and hold space for the feelings within us. It requires us to admit that something makes us sad, scared, overwhelmed, or ashamed. And it is in working through these emotions that we can create truly inclusive places.
Kathy Lu is an adjunct at The Poynter Institute and founder of Audiencibility, a media consulting company.
I heard this recently and can’t get it out of my head: “Although many of us may think of ourselves as thinking creatures that feel, biologically we are feeling creatures that think.”
It’s from Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, a neuroscientist who wrote My Stroke of Insight: A Brain Scientist’s Personal Journey.
It’s been stuck in my head because as someone who delivers diversity, equity, and inclusion training to news organizations and has been involved in a range of newsroom diversity initiatives, I think this is a missing piece of the puzzle.
Creating diverse, inclusive, welcoming workplaces is not about numbers; it’s about emotions. Namely: How we handle our own.
We have plenty of proof that it’s clearly not enough to just hire for diversity. Despite decades of talk and stop-and-go committees and studies, thousands of journalists say their newsrooms don’t have enough diversity in race and ethnicity. Newsrooms are quite resistant to even reporting their demographics, as the News Leaders Association encountered earlier this year.
Because once you hire that person for their perspectives and experiences, do you know how their ideas and authenticity will be received, emotionally?
For instance:
If the answer to any of the above is no, know that it is not about your new employee, but about a culture that diminishes feelings.
The key is to pause and examine that defensive reaction for what that feeling really is, instead of acting on it. We won’t succeed every time, but if we don’t even try, we are creating a toxic workplace.
According to an MIT Sloan Management Review study released this year, the top five toxic workplace traits are: “noninclusive,” “disrespectful,” “unethical,” “cutthroat,” and “abusive.”
When I see those words, I see a culture that has no empathy for the human experience.
While I am thankful I worked with supportive colleagues in non-toxic newsrooms, I needed more guidance around handling emotions and people’s reactions to them — I, who prided herself in being a not-too-emotional person.
I’ve had colleagues report other colleagues for being too emotional in the newsroom. I’ve managed reporters who told me they weren’t comfortable talking to previous bosses about their mental wellness. I’ve witnessed microaggressions and failed to know how to handle it well.
And this is not healthy — for anyone.
It contributes to a psychologically unsafe workplace. And good luck trying to retain a new employee in such a culture.
To be able to create the places of belonging I hear so many newsrooms striving for, we need to be there for one another emotionally. Part of being human is to feel, so asking people to be authentic means asking them to be emotional.
To create truly inclusive workplaces means you have to be able to confront your own reactions to emotions.
Because how can you navigate people through burnout, stress, covering trauma, systemic racism, and difficult change without reflecting on your emotional response?
Why does seeing someone cry make you uncomfortable? How often do you ask your colleague how they’re feeling, and are you prepared for the answer? Can you hold space for someone’s anger at work in a way that preserves safety for yourself and others?
This is why I predict in 2023, DEI training for newsrooms will also include reflections on our emotional agility. I believe newsrooms who succeed in hiring and retaining a diverse staff will also be places where people can be their emotional selves without fear.
And we need it now more than ever as we’re confronting a collision of challenges: working and living through a pandemic, waves of layoffs and cutbacks, a vein of public distrust of the media, a steady stream of coverage about suffering, pain and loss.
As psychologist Susan David notes in Brené Brown’s latest book Atlas of the Heart, emotions “can be beacons, not barriers, helping us identify what we most care about and motivating us to make positive changes.”
All the DEI mission statements and training launched in the past few years will not lead to positive changes unless we also recognize and hold space for the feelings within us. It requires us to admit that something makes us sad, scared, overwhelmed, or ashamed. And it is in working through these emotions that we can create truly inclusive places.
Kathy Lu is an adjunct at The Poynter Institute and founder of Audiencibility, a media consulting company.
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Nik Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter