AI enters the newsroom

“These tools could free reporters up to spend more time interviewing sources and digging up information and less time transcribing interviews and writing daily stories on deadline.”

The more I look at the latest machine learning models, the more convinced I am that these technologies are bound to make their way into newsrooms — sooner rather than later. I could be a bit biased, since I’m currently developing a transcription app for journalists called Stage Whisper, which uses the Whisper machine learning model to automatically transcribe interviews. But I believe the latest developments in generative artificial intelligence could revolutionize the way journalists do their jobs.

Powerful large language models like GPT-3 promise to give reporters the ability to partially automate the task of writing articles, while generative image models like DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion could deliver custom stock photos to newsrooms that cannot afford subscriptions to photo services. And of course, the latest automatic speech recognition models will allow reporters to easily and accurately transcribe their interviews for free.

Many journalists already upload their interviews to paid auto-transcription services like Otter and Trint, which rely on machine learning models to quickly produce fairly accurate transcriptions. The Whisper model, released by artificial intelligence company OpenAI in September, has some real advantages over the current services. It’s more accurate, doesn’t require an internet connection, and is completely free. But it’s also relatively slow, cannot distinguish between speakers, and requires a lot of technical know-how to set up. (Stage Whisper should at least solve that last issue.)

Even more promising are generative image models like OpenAI’s DALL-E 2 and Stability AI’s Stable Diffusion. These tools have allowed users to generate realistic images based solely on text prompts. Some technology-focused reporters have already begun using AI-generated images to illustrate their stories, more as a gimmick than anything else. But as these technologies continue to improve and enter the mainstream, they are likely to reshape newsroom debates over photo manipulation, photo illustrations, and misleading stock photos.

What about the dream (or nightmare) of an artificial intelligence that can write news articles? Wire services like the Associated Press and Reuters have previously experimented with automatic article-writing tools that can produce schematic news stories based on numerical data like earnings reports or sports scores. But the latest large language models can go well beyond that.

Large language models, such as GPT-3, have the potential to disrupt newsrooms by enabling journalists to use AI to write their stories. With these models, journalists can input a few key points and the AI can generate a complete article, saving time and potentially improving the quality of the writing. However, this raises ethical questions around authorship and plagiarism. If a journalist relies too heavily on AI to write their stories, who can be credited as the author? Additionally, there is the potential for the AI to inadvertently plagiarize other sources, raising questions about journalistic integrity and accuracy.

Another potential risk of relying on large language models to write news articles is the potential for the AI to insert fake quotes. Since the AI is not bound by the same ethical standards as a human journalist, it may include quotes from sources that do not actually exist, or even attribute fake quotes to real people. This could lead to false or misleading reporting, which could damage the credibility of the news organization. It will be important for journalists and newsrooms to carefully fact check any articles written with the help of AI, to ensure the accuracy and integrity of their reporting. [/END]

The previous two paragraphs were produced by ChatGPT, a OpenAI tool that allows users to interact with GPT-3, a large language model that responds to user’s prompts. ChatGPT can already produce fabricated news stories that sound remarkably real, complete with fake quotes. Given the proper inputs (accurate information, real quotes from sources), there’s no reason that the model and its successors couldn’t produce true and accurate news stories too.

AI-based tools will never replace human journalists. But much like previous technological advancements, these tools could change how reporters do their jobs — freeing them up to spend more time interviewing sources and digging up information and less time transcribing interviews and writing daily stories on deadline.

As these tools enter newsrooms, they will spark new questions about journalistic ethics: Is it wrong to train a generative AI model on thousands of artists’ images without their consent? Is it misleading to publish an image of something that does not actually exist or an event that never actually occurred? If a reporter uses a large language model to write an article, should that be considered plagiarism or even fabulism?

Let 2023 be the year we start figuring out some of the answers.

Peter Sterne is an independent journalist in New York.

The more I look at the latest machine learning models, the more convinced I am that these technologies are bound to make their way into newsrooms — sooner rather than later. I could be a bit biased, since I’m currently developing a transcription app for journalists called Stage Whisper, which uses the Whisper machine learning model to automatically transcribe interviews. But I believe the latest developments in generative artificial intelligence could revolutionize the way journalists do their jobs.

Powerful large language models like GPT-3 promise to give reporters the ability to partially automate the task of writing articles, while generative image models like DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion could deliver custom stock photos to newsrooms that cannot afford subscriptions to photo services. And of course, the latest automatic speech recognition models will allow reporters to easily and accurately transcribe their interviews for free.

Many journalists already upload their interviews to paid auto-transcription services like Otter and Trint, which rely on machine learning models to quickly produce fairly accurate transcriptions. The Whisper model, released by artificial intelligence company OpenAI in September, has some real advantages over the current services. It’s more accurate, doesn’t require an internet connection, and is completely free. But it’s also relatively slow, cannot distinguish between speakers, and requires a lot of technical know-how to set up. (Stage Whisper should at least solve that last issue.)

Even more promising are generative image models like OpenAI’s DALL-E 2 and Stability AI’s Stable Diffusion. These tools have allowed users to generate realistic images based solely on text prompts. Some technology-focused reporters have already begun using AI-generated images to illustrate their stories, more as a gimmick than anything else. But as these technologies continue to improve and enter the mainstream, they are likely to reshape newsroom debates over photo manipulation, photo illustrations, and misleading stock photos.

What about the dream (or nightmare) of an artificial intelligence that can write news articles? Wire services like the Associated Press and Reuters have previously experimented with automatic article-writing tools that can produce schematic news stories based on numerical data like earnings reports or sports scores. But the latest large language models can go well beyond that.

Large language models, such as GPT-3, have the potential to disrupt newsrooms by enabling journalists to use AI to write their stories. With these models, journalists can input a few key points and the AI can generate a complete article, saving time and potentially improving the quality of the writing. However, this raises ethical questions around authorship and plagiarism. If a journalist relies too heavily on AI to write their stories, who can be credited as the author? Additionally, there is the potential for the AI to inadvertently plagiarize other sources, raising questions about journalistic integrity and accuracy.

Another potential risk of relying on large language models to write news articles is the potential for the AI to insert fake quotes. Since the AI is not bound by the same ethical standards as a human journalist, it may include quotes from sources that do not actually exist, or even attribute fake quotes to real people. This could lead to false or misleading reporting, which could damage the credibility of the news organization. It will be important for journalists and newsrooms to carefully fact check any articles written with the help of AI, to ensure the accuracy and integrity of their reporting. [/END]

The previous two paragraphs were produced by ChatGPT, a OpenAI tool that allows users to interact with GPT-3, a large language model that responds to user’s prompts. ChatGPT can already produce fabricated news stories that sound remarkably real, complete with fake quotes. Given the proper inputs (accurate information, real quotes from sources), there’s no reason that the model and its successors couldn’t produce true and accurate news stories too.

AI-based tools will never replace human journalists. But much like previous technological advancements, these tools could change how reporters do their jobs — freeing them up to spend more time interviewing sources and digging up information and less time transcribing interviews and writing daily stories on deadline.

As these tools enter newsrooms, they will spark new questions about journalistic ethics: Is it wrong to train a generative AI model on thousands of artists’ images without their consent? Is it misleading to publish an image of something that does not actually exist or an event that never actually occurred? If a reporter uses a large language model to write an article, should that be considered plagiarism or even fabulism?

Let 2023 be the year we start figuring out some of the answers.

Peter Sterne is an independent journalist in New York.

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step