Next year, the 2024 presidential election season begins in earnest, and with it, our profession’s attempt to make sense of who and where we are as a country. I’ve gotten way into meditating during the pandemic, and so I offer this mantra on repeat to my colleagues to help guide our reporting over the next two years: Vox populi, vox dei, which is Latin, not Sanskrit, for “The voice of the people is the voice of God.”
I’m intentionally reclaiming this phrase from Elon Musk because part of what is broken about politics and journalism (aside from Twitter) is our broken faith with voters. My prediction and prayer for 2023 is that we look to mend that trust.
We launched The 19th almost three years ago at the start of the 2020 primary season, determined to tell a different story about our politics, one that more fully reflects our democracy. Shifting that narrative means shifting who we center in our political journalism. Candidates matter, but by focusing on voters and the issues that matter to them, we are able to tell a story that gets away from horse race coverage, polls obsessed with who’s up or who’s down, or what the day’s turn-of-the-screw development means for one party or politician.
Our logo includes an asterisk that serves as a type of editorial North Star, a daily reminder of whose lives remain unseen and unheard in our country. Aiming to better understand what motivates people to participate — or not — in our politics is how we get past seeing our fellow citizens as “single-issue voters.”
Imagine how different our campaign coverage would be if we treated the entire cycle like one big debate, focused on the priorities we poll people about, but rarely follow up on. What does it mean for someone to say they feel the country is “headed in the wrong direction”? When someone says their “top issue” is the economy, or healthcare, or racism, we should circle back and ask them to elaborate — and to tell us what else could influence their behavior at the ballot box.
The 2024 election is also a new opportunity to challenge conventional editorial decisions about who voters are, what they look like, and what matters to them, their families and their communities. For too long, our default setting as journalists for those who have power (and this includes voters) has been white, cisgender, and male. Nearly 60 years after the passage of the Voting Rights Act, there is still much progress to be made to make real the promise of “one person, one vote” in our democracy.
The folks on the bus will be focused on our next president and don’t always have time to talk to voters who aren’t on rope lines or in diners, so why shouldn’t the rest of us get out there, meet some Americans and ask them what they care about?
Elections surprise us when we fail to get to know the electorate. Starting on New Year’s Day, we will have 674 days to meet them, and to execute journalism that meets the moment. Let us resolve to tell their stories, so that we may leave behind a more honest and accurate record of our collective story up to and on Election Day.
Errin Haines is the editor at large of The 19th.
Next year, the 2024 presidential election season begins in earnest, and with it, our profession’s attempt to make sense of who and where we are as a country. I’ve gotten way into meditating during the pandemic, and so I offer this mantra on repeat to my colleagues to help guide our reporting over the next two years: Vox populi, vox dei, which is Latin, not Sanskrit, for “The voice of the people is the voice of God.”
I’m intentionally reclaiming this phrase from Elon Musk because part of what is broken about politics and journalism (aside from Twitter) is our broken faith with voters. My prediction and prayer for 2023 is that we look to mend that trust.
We launched The 19th almost three years ago at the start of the 2020 primary season, determined to tell a different story about our politics, one that more fully reflects our democracy. Shifting that narrative means shifting who we center in our political journalism. Candidates matter, but by focusing on voters and the issues that matter to them, we are able to tell a story that gets away from horse race coverage, polls obsessed with who’s up or who’s down, or what the day’s turn-of-the-screw development means for one party or politician.
Our logo includes an asterisk that serves as a type of editorial North Star, a daily reminder of whose lives remain unseen and unheard in our country. Aiming to better understand what motivates people to participate — or not — in our politics is how we get past seeing our fellow citizens as “single-issue voters.”
Imagine how different our campaign coverage would be if we treated the entire cycle like one big debate, focused on the priorities we poll people about, but rarely follow up on. What does it mean for someone to say they feel the country is “headed in the wrong direction”? When someone says their “top issue” is the economy, or healthcare, or racism, we should circle back and ask them to elaborate — and to tell us what else could influence their behavior at the ballot box.
The 2024 election is also a new opportunity to challenge conventional editorial decisions about who voters are, what they look like, and what matters to them, their families and their communities. For too long, our default setting as journalists for those who have power (and this includes voters) has been white, cisgender, and male. Nearly 60 years after the passage of the Voting Rights Act, there is still much progress to be made to make real the promise of “one person, one vote” in our democracy.
The folks on the bus will be focused on our next president and don’t always have time to talk to voters who aren’t on rope lines or in diners, so why shouldn’t the rest of us get out there, meet some Americans and ask them what they care about?
Elections surprise us when we fail to get to know the electorate. Starting on New Year’s Day, we will have 674 days to meet them, and to execute journalism that meets the moment. Let us resolve to tell their stories, so that we may leave behind a more honest and accurate record of our collective story up to and on Election Day.
Errin Haines is the editor at large of The 19th.
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Nik Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools