Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

“Imagine how different our campaign coverage would be if we treated the entire cycle like one big debate, focused on the priorities we poll people about, but rarely follow up on.”

Next year, the 2024 presidential election season begins in earnest, and with it, our profession’s attempt to make sense of who and where we are as a country. I’ve gotten way into meditating during the pandemic, and so I offer this mantra on repeat to my colleagues to help guide our reporting over the next two years: Vox populi, vox dei, which is Latin, not Sanskrit, for “The voice of the people is the voice of God.”

I’m intentionally reclaiming this phrase from Elon Musk because part of what is broken about politics and journalism (aside from Twitter) is our broken faith with voters. My prediction and prayer for 2023 is that we look to mend that trust.

We launched The 19th almost three years ago at the start of the 2020 primary season, determined to tell a different story about our politics, one that more fully reflects our democracy. Shifting that narrative means shifting who we center in our political journalism. Candidates matter, but by focusing on voters and the issues that matter to them, we are able to tell a story that gets away from horse race coverage, polls obsessed with who’s up or who’s down, or what the day’s turn-of-the-screw development means for one party or politician.

Our logo includes an asterisk that serves as a type of editorial North Star, a daily reminder of whose lives remain unseen and unheard in our country. Aiming to better understand what motivates people to participate — or not — in our politics is how we get past seeing our fellow citizens as “single-issue voters.”

Imagine how different our campaign coverage would be if we treated the entire cycle like one big debate, focused on the priorities we poll people about, but rarely follow up on. What does it mean for someone to say they feel the country is “headed in the wrong direction”? When someone says their “top issue” is the economy, or healthcare, or racism, we should circle back and ask them to elaborate — and to tell us what else could influence their behavior at the ballot box.

The 2024 election is also a new opportunity to challenge conventional editorial decisions about who voters are, what they look like, and what matters to them, their families and their communities. For too long, our default setting as journalists for those who have power (and this includes voters) has been white, cisgender, and male. Nearly 60 years after the passage of the Voting Rights Act, there is still much progress to be made to make real the promise of “one person, one vote” in our democracy.

The folks on the bus will be focused on our next president and don’t always have time to talk to voters who aren’t on rope lines or in diners, so why shouldn’t the rest of us get out there, meet some Americans and ask them what they care about?

Elections surprise us when we fail to get to know the electorate. Starting on New Year’s Day, we will have 674 days to meet them, and to execute journalism that meets the moment. Let us resolve to tell their stories, so that we may leave behind a more honest and accurate record of our collective story up to and on Election Day.

Errin Haines is the editor at large of The 19th.

Next year, the 2024 presidential election season begins in earnest, and with it, our profession’s attempt to make sense of who and where we are as a country. I’ve gotten way into meditating during the pandemic, and so I offer this mantra on repeat to my colleagues to help guide our reporting over the next two years: Vox populi, vox dei, which is Latin, not Sanskrit, for “The voice of the people is the voice of God.”

I’m intentionally reclaiming this phrase from Elon Musk because part of what is broken about politics and journalism (aside from Twitter) is our broken faith with voters. My prediction and prayer for 2023 is that we look to mend that trust.

We launched The 19th almost three years ago at the start of the 2020 primary season, determined to tell a different story about our politics, one that more fully reflects our democracy. Shifting that narrative means shifting who we center in our political journalism. Candidates matter, but by focusing on voters and the issues that matter to them, we are able to tell a story that gets away from horse race coverage, polls obsessed with who’s up or who’s down, or what the day’s turn-of-the-screw development means for one party or politician.

Our logo includes an asterisk that serves as a type of editorial North Star, a daily reminder of whose lives remain unseen and unheard in our country. Aiming to better understand what motivates people to participate — or not — in our politics is how we get past seeing our fellow citizens as “single-issue voters.”

Imagine how different our campaign coverage would be if we treated the entire cycle like one big debate, focused on the priorities we poll people about, but rarely follow up on. What does it mean for someone to say they feel the country is “headed in the wrong direction”? When someone says their “top issue” is the economy, or healthcare, or racism, we should circle back and ask them to elaborate — and to tell us what else could influence their behavior at the ballot box.

The 2024 election is also a new opportunity to challenge conventional editorial decisions about who voters are, what they look like, and what matters to them, their families and their communities. For too long, our default setting as journalists for those who have power (and this includes voters) has been white, cisgender, and male. Nearly 60 years after the passage of the Voting Rights Act, there is still much progress to be made to make real the promise of “one person, one vote” in our democracy.

The folks on the bus will be focused on our next president and don’t always have time to talk to voters who aren’t on rope lines or in diners, so why shouldn’t the rest of us get out there, meet some Americans and ask them what they care about?

Elections surprise us when we fail to get to know the electorate. Starting on New Year’s Day, we will have 674 days to meet them, and to execute journalism that meets the moment. Let us resolve to tell their stories, so that we may leave behind a more honest and accurate record of our collective story up to and on Election Day.

Errin Haines is the editor at large of The 19th.

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

AX Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

James Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat