Newsletter writers need a new ethics

“Outside the framework of established institutions and expectations for how writers interact with the people funding their work, these writers are usually left on their own to sort out any ethical conundrums that might arise.”

In the past five years, independent newsletters have exploded, as journalists and other writers look for new ways to monetize their work in the face of layoffs and shrinking outlets for reporting and critical or personal essays. Some of these newsletters are 100 percent reader supported, while others monetize through ads and sponsorships, and still others recoup revenue through consulting or speaking work. But outside the framework of established institutions and expectations for how writers interact with the people funding their work, these writers are usually left on their own to sort out any ethical conundrums that might arise.

What do you do when the newsletter platform you use also supports people whose positions you fundamentally disagree with? What if the person you fundamentally disagree with now owns that newsletter platform? How do you handle the perception — and arguably, the reality — that these platforms in general are power plays less interested in fostering journalistic, critical, and creative work than advancing their own financial and ideological agendas and circumscribing the public sphere? It’s all the issues we’ve faced with social media, crowdfunding platforms, and big publishers and their corporate owners, but somehow (like the new journalism models it fosters), more concentrated and more direct.

What do you do when your readers — now your direct patrons — are also part of a community that you have to moderate? What do you do when they demand a particular style of writing or a particular slant to your coverage (usually more positive, more critical, or maybe more relevant to their own interests)? Now, suppose that patron is an advertiser or sponsor — one whose products or services might be covered in your newsletter or who competes with those who are. What lines do you draw and how do you stick with them? Suppose an independent newsletter owner employs another journalist to act as an editor, fact-checker, community moderator, podcast producer, etc. How do they relate to that employee (typically also an independent contractor) without exploiting them as much or more than a larger organization would?

This doesn’t even touch on some of the murkiest ethical issues affecting independent journalists. Here’s a lightly redacted anecdote. For four years, I’ve written a newsletter about Amazon and the media, tech, and commerce industries. I consider myself a fair critic of Amazon, but definitely more of a critic and user than a booster or a take-no-sides reporter.

Last year, I was approached by a firm representing an unnamed client who was offering a large sum of money to support my newsletter, under the understanding that I continue to write stories critical of Amazon. Nothing proposed was anything other than factual, and not significantly different from the writing I was doing, but they had specific requests for areas I could focus on. They’d found an ideologically aligned writer with a reputation as an independent voice, and wanted to underwrite that work. But I could not disclose the sponsorship or even be told the identity of who the ultimate client was. I did not take this assignment, but I had to wonder who else was being made an offer like this, and who would ultimately accept.

This is not a scenario that a reporter in a traditional newsroom is permitted to consider, at least without violating many standards of professional ethics. But for a single newsletter writer, this can be an offer too good to refuse. I would also say it bleeds uncomfortably into the already accepted domains of patronage and disclosed sponsorship that already fund many independent newsletters. I would say in fact that independent newsletters are ripe ground for this kind of astroturfed activism, and there are many actors in many industries who know it.

For these reasons and more, I think a discussion about ethical guidelines for independent newsletters is far overdue. We have to talk about standards of who we work for, who we work with, and how we get our work done. It is not nearly so simple as saying that a direct financial relationship with your readers solves all your problems. It just poses new ones. In 2023 and beyond, we have to do better at recognizing and grappling with these problems before we’re overrun by them.

Tim Carmody writes about media, technology, art, and culture.

In the past five years, independent newsletters have exploded, as journalists and other writers look for new ways to monetize their work in the face of layoffs and shrinking outlets for reporting and critical or personal essays. Some of these newsletters are 100 percent reader supported, while others monetize through ads and sponsorships, and still others recoup revenue through consulting or speaking work. But outside the framework of established institutions and expectations for how writers interact with the people funding their work, these writers are usually left on their own to sort out any ethical conundrums that might arise.

What do you do when the newsletter platform you use also supports people whose positions you fundamentally disagree with? What if the person you fundamentally disagree with now owns that newsletter platform? How do you handle the perception — and arguably, the reality — that these platforms in general are power plays less interested in fostering journalistic, critical, and creative work than advancing their own financial and ideological agendas and circumscribing the public sphere? It’s all the issues we’ve faced with social media, crowdfunding platforms, and big publishers and their corporate owners, but somehow (like the new journalism models it fosters), more concentrated and more direct.

What do you do when your readers — now your direct patrons — are also part of a community that you have to moderate? What do you do when they demand a particular style of writing or a particular slant to your coverage (usually more positive, more critical, or maybe more relevant to their own interests)? Now, suppose that patron is an advertiser or sponsor — one whose products or services might be covered in your newsletter or who competes with those who are. What lines do you draw and how do you stick with them? Suppose an independent newsletter owner employs another journalist to act as an editor, fact-checker, community moderator, podcast producer, etc. How do they relate to that employee (typically also an independent contractor) without exploiting them as much or more than a larger organization would?

This doesn’t even touch on some of the murkiest ethical issues affecting independent journalists. Here’s a lightly redacted anecdote. For four years, I’ve written a newsletter about Amazon and the media, tech, and commerce industries. I consider myself a fair critic of Amazon, but definitely more of a critic and user than a booster or a take-no-sides reporter.

Last year, I was approached by a firm representing an unnamed client who was offering a large sum of money to support my newsletter, under the understanding that I continue to write stories critical of Amazon. Nothing proposed was anything other than factual, and not significantly different from the writing I was doing, but they had specific requests for areas I could focus on. They’d found an ideologically aligned writer with a reputation as an independent voice, and wanted to underwrite that work. But I could not disclose the sponsorship or even be told the identity of who the ultimate client was. I did not take this assignment, but I had to wonder who else was being made an offer like this, and who would ultimately accept.

This is not a scenario that a reporter in a traditional newsroom is permitted to consider, at least without violating many standards of professional ethics. But for a single newsletter writer, this can be an offer too good to refuse. I would also say it bleeds uncomfortably into the already accepted domains of patronage and disclosed sponsorship that already fund many independent newsletters. I would say in fact that independent newsletters are ripe ground for this kind of astroturfed activism, and there are many actors in many industries who know it.

For these reasons and more, I think a discussion about ethical guidelines for independent newsletters is far overdue. We have to talk about standards of who we work for, who we work with, and how we get our work done. It is not nearly so simple as saying that a direct financial relationship with your readers solves all your problems. It just poses new ones. In 2023 and beyond, we have to do better at recognizing and grappling with these problems before we’re overrun by them.

Tim Carmody writes about media, technology, art, and culture.

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution