Despite most 2020 election deniers losing their bids for statewide public office in 2022, more than 100 were elected in U.S. House and state legislative races. Many news outlets covered the 2022 elections from a pro-democracy point of view — highlighting facts about electoral results from prior elections, previewing the multiple safeguards in place to protect the integrity of the 2022 elections, and either minimizing attention to false claims of fraud or reporting the claims with clear declarations of the verifiable truth about previous elections results. Though imperfect and less robust than many might prefer, election journalism improved in 2022.
This progress is in danger.
While democracy is still in crisis in the United States, the advances many scholars and journalists have made to cast a revealing light on anti-democratic behaviors will face considerable headwinds in 2023.
In October 2020, I helped organize a group of six dozen political communication scholars who asked journalists to take a “stand for truth over partisan equivocation” and provided a set of strategies that could shape a democracy-worthy approach to election coverage.
In light of those recommendations, I predicted the following in this space in 2020: “Some journalism will exacerbate political schisms in destructive ways while other journalism will play critical roles in helping to re-knit the civic fabric.” In 2021, I chronicled evidence supporting and opposing my 2020 prognostication and predicted that too many mainstream outlets would “avoid a pro-democracy ethos,” repeating the problems of the past in an environment where the stakes could not be higher.
I got some of it right and some of it wrong. Again, many mainstream outlets not only framed stories from a pro-democracy point of view, but wrote transparently, fairly, and accurately while reporting news that was objectively better for one side than the other in American party politics. The good reporting was wonderful to see, though there was plenty of evidence to support my prediction as well.
In 2023, I predict that a backlash is coming — we will be increasingly likely to hear that pro-democracy reporting is biased, dangerous, and un-American.
Some of the backlash will come from folks favoring a more traditional journalism model, arguing that journalists cede objectivity, fairness, and balance when they approach reporting from a pro-democracy perspective.
Some of the backlash will come from far-right sources who argue that pro-democracy is just a fancy way of saying pro-Democrat.
Both of these perspectives will continue to miss a fundamental truth: Democracy cannot thrive or survive without a media ecosystem willing to report verifiable truths about the core tenets of democracy — even if those truths currently favor one major political party over another.
It is not that it should not be impermissible to take a side — it is that the taking of a side needs to be transparently and robustly hewed to the verifiable truth and that pro-democracy reporting aggressively pursues anti-democracy behaviors from all who conduct them.
Democracies depend upon providing citizens accurate information to make reasoned choices and to vote out leaders who repeatedly tell us things that are plainly not true. Without a robust defense of democracy-oriented reporting from experts and journalists alike, the recent improvements society has benefitted from in election journalism are in danger of disappearing.
Michael W. Wagner is a professor of journalism and mass communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Despite most 2020 election deniers losing their bids for statewide public office in 2022, more than 100 were elected in U.S. House and state legislative races. Many news outlets covered the 2022 elections from a pro-democracy point of view — highlighting facts about electoral results from prior elections, previewing the multiple safeguards in place to protect the integrity of the 2022 elections, and either minimizing attention to false claims of fraud or reporting the claims with clear declarations of the verifiable truth about previous elections results. Though imperfect and less robust than many might prefer, election journalism improved in 2022.
This progress is in danger.
While democracy is still in crisis in the United States, the advances many scholars and journalists have made to cast a revealing light on anti-democratic behaviors will face considerable headwinds in 2023.
In October 2020, I helped organize a group of six dozen political communication scholars who asked journalists to take a “stand for truth over partisan equivocation” and provided a set of strategies that could shape a democracy-worthy approach to election coverage.
In light of those recommendations, I predicted the following in this space in 2020: “Some journalism will exacerbate political schisms in destructive ways while other journalism will play critical roles in helping to re-knit the civic fabric.” In 2021, I chronicled evidence supporting and opposing my 2020 prognostication and predicted that too many mainstream outlets would “avoid a pro-democracy ethos,” repeating the problems of the past in an environment where the stakes could not be higher.
I got some of it right and some of it wrong. Again, many mainstream outlets not only framed stories from a pro-democracy point of view, but wrote transparently, fairly, and accurately while reporting news that was objectively better for one side than the other in American party politics. The good reporting was wonderful to see, though there was plenty of evidence to support my prediction as well.
In 2023, I predict that a backlash is coming — we will be increasingly likely to hear that pro-democracy reporting is biased, dangerous, and un-American.
Some of the backlash will come from folks favoring a more traditional journalism model, arguing that journalists cede objectivity, fairness, and balance when they approach reporting from a pro-democracy perspective.
Some of the backlash will come from far-right sources who argue that pro-democracy is just a fancy way of saying pro-Democrat.
Both of these perspectives will continue to miss a fundamental truth: Democracy cannot thrive or survive without a media ecosystem willing to report verifiable truths about the core tenets of democracy — even if those truths currently favor one major political party over another.
It is not that it should not be impermissible to take a side — it is that the taking of a side needs to be transparently and robustly hewed to the verifiable truth and that pro-democracy reporting aggressively pursues anti-democracy behaviors from all who conduct them.
Democracies depend upon providing citizens accurate information to make reasoned choices and to vote out leaders who repeatedly tell us things that are plainly not true. Without a robust defense of democracy-oriented reporting from experts and journalists alike, the recent improvements society has benefitted from in election journalism are in danger of disappearing.
Michael W. Wagner is a professor of journalism and mass communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.