The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

“We will be increasingly likely to hear that pro-democracy reporting is biased, dangerous, and un-American.”

Despite most 2020 election deniers losing their bids for statewide public office in 2022, more than 100 were elected in U.S. House and state legislative races. Many news outlets covered the 2022 elections from a pro-democracy point of view — highlighting facts about electoral results from prior elections, previewing the multiple safeguards in place to protect the integrity of the 2022 elections, and either minimizing attention to false claims of fraud or reporting the claims with clear declarations of the verifiable truth about previous elections results. Though imperfect and less robust than many might prefer, election journalism improved in 2022.

This progress is in danger.

While democracy is still in crisis in the United States, the advances many scholars and journalists have made to cast a revealing light on anti-democratic behaviors will face considerable headwinds in 2023.

In October 2020, I helped organize a group of six dozen political communication scholars who asked journalists to take a “stand for truth over partisan equivocation” and provided a set of strategies that could shape a democracy-worthy approach to election coverage.

In light of those recommendations, I predicted the following in this space in 2020: “Some journalism will exacerbate political schisms in destructive ways while other journalism will play critical roles in helping to re-knit the civic fabric.” In 2021, I chronicled evidence supporting and opposing my 2020 prognostication and predicted that too many mainstream outlets would “avoid a pro-democracy ethos,” repeating the problems of the past in an environment where the stakes could not be higher.

I got some of it right and some of it wrong. Again, many mainstream outlets not only framed stories from a pro-democracy point of view, but wrote transparently, fairly, and accurately while reporting news that was objectively better for one side than the other in American party politics. The good reporting was wonderful to see, though there was plenty of evidence to support my prediction as well.

In 2023, I predict that a backlash is coming — we will be increasingly likely to hear that pro-democracy reporting is biased, dangerous, and un-American.

Some of the backlash will come from folks favoring a more traditional journalism model, arguing that journalists cede objectivity, fairness, and balance when they approach reporting from a pro-democracy perspective.

Some of the backlash will come from far-right sources who argue that pro-democracy is just a fancy way of saying pro-Democrat.

Both of these perspectives will continue to miss a fundamental truth: Democracy cannot thrive or survive without a media ecosystem willing to report verifiable truths about the core tenets of democracy — even if those truths currently favor one major political party over another.

It is not that it should not be impermissible to take a side — it is that the taking of a side needs to be transparently and robustly hewed to the verifiable truth and that pro-democracy reporting aggressively pursues anti-democracy behaviors from all who conduct them.

Democracies depend upon providing citizens accurate information to make reasoned choices and to vote out leaders who repeatedly tell us things that are plainly not true. Without a robust defense of democracy-oriented reporting from experts and journalists alike, the recent improvements society has benefitted from in election journalism are in danger of disappearing.

Michael W. Wagner is a professor of journalism and mass communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Despite most 2020 election deniers losing their bids for statewide public office in 2022, more than 100 were elected in U.S. House and state legislative races. Many news outlets covered the 2022 elections from a pro-democracy point of view — highlighting facts about electoral results from prior elections, previewing the multiple safeguards in place to protect the integrity of the 2022 elections, and either minimizing attention to false claims of fraud or reporting the claims with clear declarations of the verifiable truth about previous elections results. Though imperfect and less robust than many might prefer, election journalism improved in 2022.

This progress is in danger.

While democracy is still in crisis in the United States, the advances many scholars and journalists have made to cast a revealing light on anti-democratic behaviors will face considerable headwinds in 2023.

In October 2020, I helped organize a group of six dozen political communication scholars who asked journalists to take a “stand for truth over partisan equivocation” and provided a set of strategies that could shape a democracy-worthy approach to election coverage.

In light of those recommendations, I predicted the following in this space in 2020: “Some journalism will exacerbate political schisms in destructive ways while other journalism will play critical roles in helping to re-knit the civic fabric.” In 2021, I chronicled evidence supporting and opposing my 2020 prognostication and predicted that too many mainstream outlets would “avoid a pro-democracy ethos,” repeating the problems of the past in an environment where the stakes could not be higher.

I got some of it right and some of it wrong. Again, many mainstream outlets not only framed stories from a pro-democracy point of view, but wrote transparently, fairly, and accurately while reporting news that was objectively better for one side than the other in American party politics. The good reporting was wonderful to see, though there was plenty of evidence to support my prediction as well.

In 2023, I predict that a backlash is coming — we will be increasingly likely to hear that pro-democracy reporting is biased, dangerous, and un-American.

Some of the backlash will come from folks favoring a more traditional journalism model, arguing that journalists cede objectivity, fairness, and balance when they approach reporting from a pro-democracy perspective.

Some of the backlash will come from far-right sources who argue that pro-democracy is just a fancy way of saying pro-Democrat.

Both of these perspectives will continue to miss a fundamental truth: Democracy cannot thrive or survive without a media ecosystem willing to report verifiable truths about the core tenets of democracy — even if those truths currently favor one major political party over another.

It is not that it should not be impermissible to take a side — it is that the taking of a side needs to be transparently and robustly hewed to the verifiable truth and that pro-democracy reporting aggressively pursues anti-democracy behaviors from all who conduct them.

Democracies depend upon providing citizens accurate information to make reasoned choices and to vote out leaders who repeatedly tell us things that are plainly not true. Without a robust defense of democracy-oriented reporting from experts and journalists alike, the recent improvements society has benefitted from in election journalism are in danger of disappearing.

Michael W. Wagner is a professor of journalism and mass communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same