Covering the right wrong

“Journalists can’t be so cavalier as to assume that ‘shedding light’ on antisemitism, transphobia, homophobia, xenophobia, and racism is always either harmless or beneficial.”

I’ve got good news and bad news.

The good news is 2023 will be the year that journalists finally learn how not to cover right-wing extremism in the United States. The bad news? They’ll learn by unwittingly bolstering its return to power in 2024.

This past year has produced countless examples to fuel my pessimism. In the face of a coordinated right-wing assault on the rights and lives of LGBTQ people, epitomized by Florida governor Ron DeSantis’s infamous “Don’t Say Gay” law, mainstream publications, most notably The New York Times, have repeatedly questioned the growing medical and psychological consensus regarding the just and equitable treatment of transgender children — helping the right by spreading and validating transphobic ideas among moderates and liberals.

These same publications, not to mention major television outlets like CNN and NBC, have largely championed DeSantis for his political savvy — practically begging the GOP to replace Trump with him as its standard bearer. In four short years, DeSantis has made Florida unlivable for many queer people, shamelessly used refugees and immigrants for political stunts, and gerrymandered Florida to undermine the rights and political representation of Black voters. These facts are glossed over, if engaged with at all, in the breathless horserace coverage of his brilliant campaign and media tactics. In NBC News’s live election night coverage, Chuck Todd called DeSantis the “hero of the night.”

Mainstream political reporters spent the second half of October, in the run-up to the midterm elections, amplifying right-wing predictions of an imminent “red wave” of Republican victories. This predicative narrative of a Democratic bloodbath at the polls had no material basis. Late-cycle polls showed a close race nationally, which is to be expected in an election cycle that historically breaks for the party that lost the prior one. When the wave failed to materialize, it launched dozens of think pieces explaining why the Democrats held the Senate and only narrowly lost the House.

This postmortem narrative, that Republicans “underperformed,” is itself based on a faulty and right-wing premise — that the Republican Party has a coherent governing philosophy with widespread popular appeal. As I’ve argued recently, this has rarely been the case. Furthermore, it’s clear to anyone paying attention that a Republican Party still steadfastly disputing the results of the 2020 presidential election advanced the “red wave” narrative as a hedge against losing. Doing so plays into right-wing concerns about election fraud based on outcomes differing from the expectations of political conventional wisdom. In anticipating a “red wave,” mainstream political reporters were complicit in undermining Republican confidence in the 2022 election results.

We should, and must, expect more thoughtful analysis and news judgment from a mainstream political press that claims to lament the ongoing erosion of democratic norms and institutions.

Instead, the weeks following the midterms have seen an absurd media obsession with every antisemitic utterance of rapper-turned-fashion-designer-turned-failed-social-media-mogul Kanye West. Following a disturbing (and exhaustively covered) appearance on Tucker Carlson’s primetime Fox News show in October, Ye has been goose-stepping across the right-wing media sphere — extolling Nazis and engaging in increasingly erratic behavior seemingly designed to keep political reporters transfixed.

Ye’s recent appearance on Alex Jones’ InfoWars, where he engaged in antisemitic puppetry and defended Hitler while wearing a ski mask and holding a bottle of Yoo-hoo, was covered widely by mainstream outlets ranging from local television news affiliates and newspapers to NPR to USA Today to The Atlantic. Jones, who seemed discomfited by Ye’s antics, clearly invited him on to attract attention and new followers to his bankrupt platform and to make Jones seem reasonable by comparison. Mainstream journalists across the country took the bait.

Last year, I called on journalists to stop covering the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). I faced pushback from journalists and colleagues who argue that CPAC is newsworthy, and that coverage is not tantamount to support.

But in our current political environment, characterized by a resurgent right-wing movement bolstered by its own extensive media apparatus, journalists can’t be so cavalier as to assume that “shedding light” on antisemitism, transphobia, homophobia, xenophobia, and racism is always either harmless or beneficial. Too many journalists seem to think that covering racism is the same thing as critiquing it. This is based on the false assumption that racists (homophobes, xenophobes, etc.) experience shame or feel somehow discredited when non-racists see them as racist.

But racists don’t feel shame. They want you to cover their racism to help them win adherents.

Similarly, mainstream journalists often cover and amplify the reporting of right-wing outlets (e.g., “red wave”), as if doing so doesn’t amplify those ideas beyond the boundaries of the right-wing media ecosystem. These journalists often presume that their readers are as high-information as they are. But they aren’t. Covering Ye on InfoWars, for example, introduces Alex Jones to audiences who may have never heard of him before. and who may now be inclined to seek him out. That’s a problem.

Don’t take my word for it. My guidance here is consistent with the findings of Whitney Phillips, whose 2018 Data & Society report “The Oxygen of Amplification” should be required reading for every practicing journalist in the United States right now. In it, she offers reporters tips for “establishing newsworthiness,” for “reporting on objectively false information,” for “reporting on specific harassment campaigns or other coordinated manipulation attacks,” and for “reporting on specific manipulators, bigots, and abusers.”

I also highly recommend Kathleen Belew and Ramón Gutiérrez’s 2021 A Field Guide to White Supremacy, which includes an important revision to the AP Stylebook to help reporters adequately and accurately report on right-wing extremism without advancing its aims.

If every U.S. reporter covering the right read these two works and applied their lessons, my prediction above would not come to pass. But if not, prepare yourself for a bleak 2023 and a downright terrifying 2024.

A.J. Bauer is an assistant professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.

I’ve got good news and bad news.

The good news is 2023 will be the year that journalists finally learn how not to cover right-wing extremism in the United States. The bad news? They’ll learn by unwittingly bolstering its return to power in 2024.

This past year has produced countless examples to fuel my pessimism. In the face of a coordinated right-wing assault on the rights and lives of LGBTQ people, epitomized by Florida governor Ron DeSantis’s infamous “Don’t Say Gay” law, mainstream publications, most notably The New York Times, have repeatedly questioned the growing medical and psychological consensus regarding the just and equitable treatment of transgender children — helping the right by spreading and validating transphobic ideas among moderates and liberals.

These same publications, not to mention major television outlets like CNN and NBC, have largely championed DeSantis for his political savvy — practically begging the GOP to replace Trump with him as its standard bearer. In four short years, DeSantis has made Florida unlivable for many queer people, shamelessly used refugees and immigrants for political stunts, and gerrymandered Florida to undermine the rights and political representation of Black voters. These facts are glossed over, if engaged with at all, in the breathless horserace coverage of his brilliant campaign and media tactics. In NBC News’s live election night coverage, Chuck Todd called DeSantis the “hero of the night.”

Mainstream political reporters spent the second half of October, in the run-up to the midterm elections, amplifying right-wing predictions of an imminent “red wave” of Republican victories. This predicative narrative of a Democratic bloodbath at the polls had no material basis. Late-cycle polls showed a close race nationally, which is to be expected in an election cycle that historically breaks for the party that lost the prior one. When the wave failed to materialize, it launched dozens of think pieces explaining why the Democrats held the Senate and only narrowly lost the House.

This postmortem narrative, that Republicans “underperformed,” is itself based on a faulty and right-wing premise — that the Republican Party has a coherent governing philosophy with widespread popular appeal. As I’ve argued recently, this has rarely been the case. Furthermore, it’s clear to anyone paying attention that a Republican Party still steadfastly disputing the results of the 2020 presidential election advanced the “red wave” narrative as a hedge against losing. Doing so plays into right-wing concerns about election fraud based on outcomes differing from the expectations of political conventional wisdom. In anticipating a “red wave,” mainstream political reporters were complicit in undermining Republican confidence in the 2022 election results.

We should, and must, expect more thoughtful analysis and news judgment from a mainstream political press that claims to lament the ongoing erosion of democratic norms and institutions.

Instead, the weeks following the midterms have seen an absurd media obsession with every antisemitic utterance of rapper-turned-fashion-designer-turned-failed-social-media-mogul Kanye West. Following a disturbing (and exhaustively covered) appearance on Tucker Carlson’s primetime Fox News show in October, Ye has been goose-stepping across the right-wing media sphere — extolling Nazis and engaging in increasingly erratic behavior seemingly designed to keep political reporters transfixed.

Ye’s recent appearance on Alex Jones’ InfoWars, where he engaged in antisemitic puppetry and defended Hitler while wearing a ski mask and holding a bottle of Yoo-hoo, was covered widely by mainstream outlets ranging from local television news affiliates and newspapers to NPR to USA Today to The Atlantic. Jones, who seemed discomfited by Ye’s antics, clearly invited him on to attract attention and new followers to his bankrupt platform and to make Jones seem reasonable by comparison. Mainstream journalists across the country took the bait.

Last year, I called on journalists to stop covering the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). I faced pushback from journalists and colleagues who argue that CPAC is newsworthy, and that coverage is not tantamount to support.

But in our current political environment, characterized by a resurgent right-wing movement bolstered by its own extensive media apparatus, journalists can’t be so cavalier as to assume that “shedding light” on antisemitism, transphobia, homophobia, xenophobia, and racism is always either harmless or beneficial. Too many journalists seem to think that covering racism is the same thing as critiquing it. This is based on the false assumption that racists (homophobes, xenophobes, etc.) experience shame or feel somehow discredited when non-racists see them as racist.

But racists don’t feel shame. They want you to cover their racism to help them win adherents.

Similarly, mainstream journalists often cover and amplify the reporting of right-wing outlets (e.g., “red wave”), as if doing so doesn’t amplify those ideas beyond the boundaries of the right-wing media ecosystem. These journalists often presume that their readers are as high-information as they are. But they aren’t. Covering Ye on InfoWars, for example, introduces Alex Jones to audiences who may have never heard of him before. and who may now be inclined to seek him out. That’s a problem.

Don’t take my word for it. My guidance here is consistent with the findings of Whitney Phillips, whose 2018 Data & Society report “The Oxygen of Amplification” should be required reading for every practicing journalist in the United States right now. In it, she offers reporters tips for “establishing newsworthiness,” for “reporting on objectively false information,” for “reporting on specific harassment campaigns or other coordinated manipulation attacks,” and for “reporting on specific manipulators, bigots, and abusers.”

I also highly recommend Kathleen Belew and Ramón Gutiérrez’s 2021 A Field Guide to White Supremacy, which includes an important revision to the AP Stylebook to help reporters adequately and accurately report on right-wing extremism without advancing its aims.

If every U.S. reporter covering the right read these two works and applied their lessons, my prediction above would not come to pass. But if not, prepare yourself for a bleak 2023 and a downright terrifying 2024.

A.J. Bauer is an assistant professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism