I’ve got good news and bad news.
The good news is 2023 will be the year that journalists finally learn how not to cover right-wing extremism in the United States. The bad news? They’ll learn by unwittingly bolstering its return to power in 2024.
This past year has produced countless examples to fuel my pessimism. In the face of a coordinated right-wing assault on the rights and lives of LGBTQ people, epitomized by Florida governor Ron DeSantis’s infamous “Don’t Say Gay” law, mainstream publications, most notably The New York Times, have repeatedly questioned the growing medical and psychological consensus regarding the just and equitable treatment of transgender children — helping the right by spreading and validating transphobic ideas among moderates and liberals.
These same publications, not to mention major television outlets like CNN and NBC, have largely championed DeSantis for his political savvy — practically begging the GOP to replace Trump with him as its standard bearer. In four short years, DeSantis has made Florida unlivable for many queer people, shamelessly used refugees and immigrants for political stunts, and gerrymandered Florida to undermine the rights and political representation of Black voters. These facts are glossed over, if engaged with at all, in the breathless horserace coverage of his brilliant campaign and media tactics. In NBC News’s live election night coverage, Chuck Todd called DeSantis the “hero of the night.”
Mainstream political reporters spent the second half of October, in the run-up to the midterm elections, amplifying right-wing predictions of an imminent “red wave” of Republican victories. This predicative narrative of a Democratic bloodbath at the polls had no material basis. Late-cycle polls showed a close race nationally, which is to be expected in an election cycle that historically breaks for the party that lost the prior one. When the wave failed to materialize, it launched dozens of think pieces explaining why the Democrats held the Senate and only narrowly lost the House.
This postmortem narrative, that Republicans “underperformed,” is itself based on a faulty and right-wing premise — that the Republican Party has a coherent governing philosophy with widespread popular appeal. As I’ve argued recently, this has rarely been the case. Furthermore, it’s clear to anyone paying attention that a Republican Party still steadfastly disputing the results of the 2020 presidential election advanced the “red wave” narrative as a hedge against losing. Doing so plays into right-wing concerns about election fraud based on outcomes differing from the expectations of political conventional wisdom. In anticipating a “red wave,” mainstream political reporters were complicit in undermining Republican confidence in the 2022 election results.
We should, and must, expect more thoughtful analysis and news judgment from a mainstream political press that claims to lament the ongoing erosion of democratic norms and institutions.
Instead, the weeks following the midterms have seen an absurd media obsession with every antisemitic utterance of rapper-turned-fashion-designer-turned-failed-social-media-mogul Kanye West. Following a disturbing (and exhaustively covered) appearance on Tucker Carlson’s primetime Fox News show in October, Ye has been goose-stepping across the right-wing media sphere — extolling Nazis and engaging in increasingly erratic behavior seemingly designed to keep political reporters transfixed.
Ye’s recent appearance on Alex Jones’ InfoWars, where he engaged in antisemitic puppetry and defended Hitler while wearing a ski mask and holding a bottle of Yoo-hoo, was covered widely by mainstream outlets ranging from local television news affiliates and newspapers to NPR to USA Today to The Atlantic. Jones, who seemed discomfited by Ye’s antics, clearly invited him on to attract attention and new followers to his bankrupt platform and to make Jones seem reasonable by comparison. Mainstream journalists across the country took the bait.
Last year, I called on journalists to stop covering the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). I faced pushback from journalists and colleagues who argue that CPAC is newsworthy, and that coverage is not tantamount to support.
But in our current political environment, characterized by a resurgent right-wing movement bolstered by its own extensive media apparatus, journalists can’t be so cavalier as to assume that “shedding light” on antisemitism, transphobia, homophobia, xenophobia, and racism is always either harmless or beneficial. Too many journalists seem to think that covering racism is the same thing as critiquing it. This is based on the false assumption that racists (homophobes, xenophobes, etc.) experience shame or feel somehow discredited when non-racists see them as racist.
But racists don’t feel shame. They want you to cover their racism to help them win adherents.
Similarly, mainstream journalists often cover and amplify the reporting of right-wing outlets (e.g., “red wave”), as if doing so doesn’t amplify those ideas beyond the boundaries of the right-wing media ecosystem. These journalists often presume that their readers are as high-information as they are. But they aren’t. Covering Ye on InfoWars, for example, introduces Alex Jones to audiences who may have never heard of him before. and who may now be inclined to seek him out. That’s a problem.
Don’t take my word for it. My guidance here is consistent with the findings of Whitney Phillips, whose 2018 Data & Society report “The Oxygen of Amplification” should be required reading for every practicing journalist in the United States right now. In it, she offers reporters tips for “establishing newsworthiness,” for “reporting on objectively false information,” for “reporting on specific harassment campaigns or other coordinated manipulation attacks,” and for “reporting on specific manipulators, bigots, and abusers.”
I also highly recommend Kathleen Belew and Ramón Gutiérrez’s 2021 A Field Guide to White Supremacy, which includes an important revision to the AP Stylebook to help reporters adequately and accurately report on right-wing extremism without advancing its aims.
If every U.S. reporter covering the right read these two works and applied their lessons, my prediction above would not come to pass. But if not, prepare yourself for a bleak 2023 and a downright terrifying 2024.
A.J. Bauer is an assistant professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.
I’ve got good news and bad news.
The good news is 2023 will be the year that journalists finally learn how not to cover right-wing extremism in the United States. The bad news? They’ll learn by unwittingly bolstering its return to power in 2024.
This past year has produced countless examples to fuel my pessimism. In the face of a coordinated right-wing assault on the rights and lives of LGBTQ people, epitomized by Florida governor Ron DeSantis’s infamous “Don’t Say Gay” law, mainstream publications, most notably The New York Times, have repeatedly questioned the growing medical and psychological consensus regarding the just and equitable treatment of transgender children — helping the right by spreading and validating transphobic ideas among moderates and liberals.
These same publications, not to mention major television outlets like CNN and NBC, have largely championed DeSantis for his political savvy — practically begging the GOP to replace Trump with him as its standard bearer. In four short years, DeSantis has made Florida unlivable for many queer people, shamelessly used refugees and immigrants for political stunts, and gerrymandered Florida to undermine the rights and political representation of Black voters. These facts are glossed over, if engaged with at all, in the breathless horserace coverage of his brilliant campaign and media tactics. In NBC News’s live election night coverage, Chuck Todd called DeSantis the “hero of the night.”
Mainstream political reporters spent the second half of October, in the run-up to the midterm elections, amplifying right-wing predictions of an imminent “red wave” of Republican victories. This predicative narrative of a Democratic bloodbath at the polls had no material basis. Late-cycle polls showed a close race nationally, which is to be expected in an election cycle that historically breaks for the party that lost the prior one. When the wave failed to materialize, it launched dozens of think pieces explaining why the Democrats held the Senate and only narrowly lost the House.
This postmortem narrative, that Republicans “underperformed,” is itself based on a faulty and right-wing premise — that the Republican Party has a coherent governing philosophy with widespread popular appeal. As I’ve argued recently, this has rarely been the case. Furthermore, it’s clear to anyone paying attention that a Republican Party still steadfastly disputing the results of the 2020 presidential election advanced the “red wave” narrative as a hedge against losing. Doing so plays into right-wing concerns about election fraud based on outcomes differing from the expectations of political conventional wisdom. In anticipating a “red wave,” mainstream political reporters were complicit in undermining Republican confidence in the 2022 election results.
We should, and must, expect more thoughtful analysis and news judgment from a mainstream political press that claims to lament the ongoing erosion of democratic norms and institutions.
Instead, the weeks following the midterms have seen an absurd media obsession with every antisemitic utterance of rapper-turned-fashion-designer-turned-failed-social-media-mogul Kanye West. Following a disturbing (and exhaustively covered) appearance on Tucker Carlson’s primetime Fox News show in October, Ye has been goose-stepping across the right-wing media sphere — extolling Nazis and engaging in increasingly erratic behavior seemingly designed to keep political reporters transfixed.
Ye’s recent appearance on Alex Jones’ InfoWars, where he engaged in antisemitic puppetry and defended Hitler while wearing a ski mask and holding a bottle of Yoo-hoo, was covered widely by mainstream outlets ranging from local television news affiliates and newspapers to NPR to USA Today to The Atlantic. Jones, who seemed discomfited by Ye’s antics, clearly invited him on to attract attention and new followers to his bankrupt platform and to make Jones seem reasonable by comparison. Mainstream journalists across the country took the bait.
Last year, I called on journalists to stop covering the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). I faced pushback from journalists and colleagues who argue that CPAC is newsworthy, and that coverage is not tantamount to support.
But in our current political environment, characterized by a resurgent right-wing movement bolstered by its own extensive media apparatus, journalists can’t be so cavalier as to assume that “shedding light” on antisemitism, transphobia, homophobia, xenophobia, and racism is always either harmless or beneficial. Too many journalists seem to think that covering racism is the same thing as critiquing it. This is based on the false assumption that racists (homophobes, xenophobes, etc.) experience shame or feel somehow discredited when non-racists see them as racist.
But racists don’t feel shame. They want you to cover their racism to help them win adherents.
Similarly, mainstream journalists often cover and amplify the reporting of right-wing outlets (e.g., “red wave”), as if doing so doesn’t amplify those ideas beyond the boundaries of the right-wing media ecosystem. These journalists often presume that their readers are as high-information as they are. But they aren’t. Covering Ye on InfoWars, for example, introduces Alex Jones to audiences who may have never heard of him before. and who may now be inclined to seek him out. That’s a problem.
Don’t take my word for it. My guidance here is consistent with the findings of Whitney Phillips, whose 2018 Data & Society report “The Oxygen of Amplification” should be required reading for every practicing journalist in the United States right now. In it, she offers reporters tips for “establishing newsworthiness,” for “reporting on objectively false information,” for “reporting on specific harassment campaigns or other coordinated manipulation attacks,” and for “reporting on specific manipulators, bigots, and abusers.”
I also highly recommend Kathleen Belew and Ramón Gutiérrez’s 2021 A Field Guide to White Supremacy, which includes an important revision to the AP Stylebook to help reporters adequately and accurately report on right-wing extremism without advancing its aims.
If every U.S. reporter covering the right read these two works and applied their lessons, my prediction above would not come to pass. But if not, prepare yourself for a bleak 2023 and a downright terrifying 2024.
A.J. Bauer is an assistant professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Nik Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels