The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

“Individual checks are now more important than the organizations that produce them.”

In the early days of the fact-checking movement, we had a running joke in the PolitiFact office: “This is the year of the fact-checker!” It didn’t matter the year or the circumstance. The joke was that our movement had such momentum that every year was our year!

(The Washington Post and The New York Times quoted me saying this about 2012. Brian Stelter later said it about 2016.)

My prediction for 2023 sounds similar, but I’ve got reasons to back it up. I think it will be the Year of the Fact-Check.

Individual checks are now more important than the organizations that produce them. That reflects a steady increase in the use of fact-checks by tech companies and social media platforms.

Over the past few years, Facebook, Google, and YouTube have been using or highlighting them in helpful ways. (Disclosure: Google and Facebook have supported the work of the Duke Reporters’ Lab, which I direct.) Also, TikTok hires fact-checkers to provide services that help the app company make decisions about deleting false content.

The companies have come to an important realization, that fact-checks are more than just articles declaring whether a politician’s statement was true or false. Those articles are also data that can help the companies make smarter decisions about promoting accurate content or demoting falsehoods and identifying the users that spread misinformation.

Our work at Duke has helped that effort because we partnered with Google and Jigsaw to develop ClaimReview, a public tagging system that summarizes fact-checks and reduces the amount of guessing the tech companies have to do about their contents. We also created MediaReview, a new tagging system used for fact-checks about fake videos and manipulated images.

When fact-checks are labeled with ClaimReview (more than half are), the tech companies’ algorithms don’t have to make guesses about the content of an article. ClaimReview shows who is being checked, what they said, and whether the statement was rated true, false, or something else. That enables the algorithms to be more precise and, in turn, elevate or demote an article in search results or a news feed.

The problem, though, is that there simply aren’t enough fact-checks to address all the questionable content. We need more — lots more.

Last month, Google and YouTube took a big step in that direction when they announced a $13.2 million grant to the International Fact-Checking Network to pay fact-checkers. The IFCN hasn’t determined how it will distribute the money, but it’s likely it will lead to more fact-checks. In the coming year, I’m hopeful that other companies and foundations will also be inspired to pay for more fact-checks (and that Meta will continue with its Third-Party Fact-Checking Program).

A larger number of fact-checks will not only help the consumers who visit sites such as FactCheck.org and PolitiFact; it also will help researchers and app builders who are increasingly using the individual fact-checks as data. (Sometime next year, we will be posting the ClaimReview and MediaReview datasets so they are easier to use.)

If other tech companies will pitch in, we can dramatically increase the number of fact-checks. That will benefit all the companies by providing them with a broader dataset to make decisions about misinformation. That will make it the Year of the Fact-Check.

Bill Adair is founder of PolitiFact and the Knight Professor of the Practice of Journalism and Public Policy at Duke University.

In the early days of the fact-checking movement, we had a running joke in the PolitiFact office: “This is the year of the fact-checker!” It didn’t matter the year or the circumstance. The joke was that our movement had such momentum that every year was our year!

(The Washington Post and The New York Times quoted me saying this about 2012. Brian Stelter later said it about 2016.)

My prediction for 2023 sounds similar, but I’ve got reasons to back it up. I think it will be the Year of the Fact-Check.

Individual checks are now more important than the organizations that produce them. That reflects a steady increase in the use of fact-checks by tech companies and social media platforms.

Over the past few years, Facebook, Google, and YouTube have been using or highlighting them in helpful ways. (Disclosure: Google and Facebook have supported the work of the Duke Reporters’ Lab, which I direct.) Also, TikTok hires fact-checkers to provide services that help the app company make decisions about deleting false content.

The companies have come to an important realization, that fact-checks are more than just articles declaring whether a politician’s statement was true or false. Those articles are also data that can help the companies make smarter decisions about promoting accurate content or demoting falsehoods and identifying the users that spread misinformation.

Our work at Duke has helped that effort because we partnered with Google and Jigsaw to develop ClaimReview, a public tagging system that summarizes fact-checks and reduces the amount of guessing the tech companies have to do about their contents. We also created MediaReview, a new tagging system used for fact-checks about fake videos and manipulated images.

When fact-checks are labeled with ClaimReview (more than half are), the tech companies’ algorithms don’t have to make guesses about the content of an article. ClaimReview shows who is being checked, what they said, and whether the statement was rated true, false, or something else. That enables the algorithms to be more precise and, in turn, elevate or demote an article in search results or a news feed.

The problem, though, is that there simply aren’t enough fact-checks to address all the questionable content. We need more — lots more.

Last month, Google and YouTube took a big step in that direction when they announced a $13.2 million grant to the International Fact-Checking Network to pay fact-checkers. The IFCN hasn’t determined how it will distribute the money, but it’s likely it will lead to more fact-checks. In the coming year, I’m hopeful that other companies and foundations will also be inspired to pay for more fact-checks (and that Meta will continue with its Third-Party Fact-Checking Program).

A larger number of fact-checks will not only help the consumers who visit sites such as FactCheck.org and PolitiFact; it also will help researchers and app builders who are increasingly using the individual fact-checks as data. (Sometime next year, we will be posting the ClaimReview and MediaReview datasets so they are easier to use.)

If other tech companies will pitch in, we can dramatically increase the number of fact-checks. That will benefit all the companies by providing them with a broader dataset to make decisions about misinformation. That will make it the Year of the Fact-Check.

Bill Adair is founder of PolitiFact and the Knight Professor of the Practice of Journalism and Public Policy at Duke University.

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy