When Joshua Benton solicits these annual Nieman Lab predictions, he graciously reassures, “For the record, we don’t go back later and try to judge whose predictions were the most accurate.” Despite my prediction last year being wrong, I predict this is the year when I will finally be right.
Last year, I confidently predicted that during 2022 big brands would stop their advertising from unintentionally funding misinformation on the internet. Most digital advertising these days is delivered programmatically, meaning through an algorithm so opaque that brand managers and advertising agency executives don’t know where the ads run.
I thought I knew advertisers well enough to predict they would all react immediately as soon as they learned where their ads are running: I spent almost 30 years at The Wall Street Journal, and as its publisher I oversaw billions of dollars in advertising. I was sure CEOs and CMOs would quickly stop their ads supporting misinformation once they saw the kinds of websites their ads fund.
I was wrong.
NewsGuard analysts have found ads for thousands of brands — virtually every blue-chip company, large hospital system, university, and government agency — routinely appearing on misinformation websites and apps. We inform marketers, including by sharing screenshots of their ads on these websites. Marketers are almost always surprised to learn where their ads are running. Some top brands have taken steps to get their ads off websites that NewsGuard analysts have rated as untrustworthy, including for spreading healthcare hoaxes, false narratives about elections and Russian disinformation about Ukraine.
To my surprise, however, most brand managers shrug when they learn where their ads are running. They may figure that, with so many brands advertising on so many misinformation sites, no one brand will get blamed for the group problem.
The result of thousands of brands continuing to run ads — again, unintentionally — on misinformation sites is that an estimate of $2.6 billion a year in ad revenue funds these sites. This goldmine explains how thousands of misinformation websites stay in business. The more outlandish claims they publish, the more traffic they generate and the more advertising revenue they get. For example, NewsGuard analysts have identified 309 sites publishing disinformation about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, including false narratives that Nazis rule Ukraine and that the U.S. operates bioweapons labs there. Many of these sites are funded by advertising from Western companies. This means companies claiming they no longer do business in Russia are funding Russian information operations targeting citizens in the West.
A good example is the website that spread the false claim that the man who attacked Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, was a gay prostitute. NewsGuard analysts found ads from dozens of name brands on the website of the Santa Monica Observer, including alongside its baseless Pelosi story. These included ads for a large American bank, the top children’s entertainment brand, a telecom conglomerate, global car-rental company, online travel site, grocery chain, and major nonprofits. This website has been on the NewsGuard advertising exclusion list for years, having previously published whoppers such as that Hillary Clinton used a body double to debate Donald Trump.
When my colleagues at NewsGuard inform brands where their ads run, some marketers do start using exclusion lists, protecting their brand safety as they remove support for misinformation. Case studies show that brands also do well by doing good: When brands stop advertising on misinformation sites and instead advertise on quality news sites, their CPM price for ads goes down and engagement with their ads goes up. The NewsGuard inclusion lists brings blue-chip advertising for the first time to many news sites serving local, Black, Hispanic, Asian and LGBTQ+ communities.
But most brands still have not taken effective steps to keep their ads off misinformation sites. Next time you see an outlandish story on a site like the Santa Monica Observer, look at whose ads are appearing on the story. You’ll likely see the most popular name brands, including those that otherwise claim to take social responsibility seriously.
NewsGuard will continue in 2023 to monitor which brands are doing their part to reduce the $2.6 billion going to misinformation sources. With 91% of Americans in a recent survey saying they worry about misinformation, it’s unsustainable that the brands targeting them as consumers will continue to be the ones funding misinformation with their advertising dollars.
Gordon Crovitz, a former publisher of The Wall Street Journal, is co-CEO of NewsGuard.
When Joshua Benton solicits these annual Nieman Lab predictions, he graciously reassures, “For the record, we don’t go back later and try to judge whose predictions were the most accurate.” Despite my prediction last year being wrong, I predict this is the year when I will finally be right.
Last year, I confidently predicted that during 2022 big brands would stop their advertising from unintentionally funding misinformation on the internet. Most digital advertising these days is delivered programmatically, meaning through an algorithm so opaque that brand managers and advertising agency executives don’t know where the ads run.
I thought I knew advertisers well enough to predict they would all react immediately as soon as they learned where their ads are running: I spent almost 30 years at The Wall Street Journal, and as its publisher I oversaw billions of dollars in advertising. I was sure CEOs and CMOs would quickly stop their ads supporting misinformation once they saw the kinds of websites their ads fund.
I was wrong.
NewsGuard analysts have found ads for thousands of brands — virtually every blue-chip company, large hospital system, university, and government agency — routinely appearing on misinformation websites and apps. We inform marketers, including by sharing screenshots of their ads on these websites. Marketers are almost always surprised to learn where their ads are running. Some top brands have taken steps to get their ads off websites that NewsGuard analysts have rated as untrustworthy, including for spreading healthcare hoaxes, false narratives about elections and Russian disinformation about Ukraine.
To my surprise, however, most brand managers shrug when they learn where their ads are running. They may figure that, with so many brands advertising on so many misinformation sites, no one brand will get blamed for the group problem.
The result of thousands of brands continuing to run ads — again, unintentionally — on misinformation sites is that an estimate of $2.6 billion a year in ad revenue funds these sites. This goldmine explains how thousands of misinformation websites stay in business. The more outlandish claims they publish, the more traffic they generate and the more advertising revenue they get. For example, NewsGuard analysts have identified 309 sites publishing disinformation about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, including false narratives that Nazis rule Ukraine and that the U.S. operates bioweapons labs there. Many of these sites are funded by advertising from Western companies. This means companies claiming they no longer do business in Russia are funding Russian information operations targeting citizens in the West.
A good example is the website that spread the false claim that the man who attacked Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, was a gay prostitute. NewsGuard analysts found ads from dozens of name brands on the website of the Santa Monica Observer, including alongside its baseless Pelosi story. These included ads for a large American bank, the top children’s entertainment brand, a telecom conglomerate, global car-rental company, online travel site, grocery chain, and major nonprofits. This website has been on the NewsGuard advertising exclusion list for years, having previously published whoppers such as that Hillary Clinton used a body double to debate Donald Trump.
When my colleagues at NewsGuard inform brands where their ads run, some marketers do start using exclusion lists, protecting their brand safety as they remove support for misinformation. Case studies show that brands also do well by doing good: When brands stop advertising on misinformation sites and instead advertise on quality news sites, their CPM price for ads goes down and engagement with their ads goes up. The NewsGuard inclusion lists brings blue-chip advertising for the first time to many news sites serving local, Black, Hispanic, Asian and LGBTQ+ communities.
But most brands still have not taken effective steps to keep their ads off misinformation sites. Next time you see an outlandish story on a site like the Santa Monica Observer, look at whose ads are appearing on the story. You’ll likely see the most popular name brands, including those that otherwise claim to take social responsibility seriously.
NewsGuard will continue in 2023 to monitor which brands are doing their part to reduce the $2.6 billion going to misinformation sources. With 91% of Americans in a recent survey saying they worry about misinformation, it’s unsustainable that the brands targeting them as consumers will continue to be the ones funding misinformation with their advertising dollars.
Gordon Crovitz, a former publisher of The Wall Street Journal, is co-CEO of NewsGuard.
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
An Xiao Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns