“Robot reporters are coming to steal your job!” That’s the warning from experts as AI technology continues to advance, with the potential to revolutionize the journalism industry.
That paragraph above wasn’t written by me. It’s what shiny new AI chatbot ChatGPT spit out when I prompted it to “write a lede in the style of a tabloid newspaper for an article about AI and its future implications for journalism.”
But the reality will be quite the contrary: Journalists will become even more essential to society as AI enters the mainstream, where we will help set standards, track potential abuses, and bring our ethics and standards to the technology. And AI will surely shake the world in ways we can’t yet imagine.
This past year has seen an explosion of “generative AI” products with algorithms that take a descriptive prompt and create pseudo-realistic pictures and video in styles from paintings to cartoons. AI-enhanced personal avatars have become a meme on social networks.
And now ChatGPT, with an interface that’s like texting your know-it-all friend, is opening more eyes to the possibilities of AI. Just days after its release, ChatGPT was up to 1 million users, according to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. The program can write poems and songs in various styles, check software code, and produce credible-sounding summaries on basically any topic.
ChatGPT will look primitive compared to what’s coming as soon as 2023. OpenAI’s latest AI model, GPT-4, is expected to be dramatically more powerful — and potentially much closer to what’s known as “artificial general intelligence.” That would mean the AI model could learn on its own, rather than the cumbersome training process now required. Once AI can teach itself, some experts speculate it could rapidly evolve into “superintelligence” — where the capabilities of the technology vastly outpace all human capabilities and intellect.
This could be used to amazing benefit, curing cancer or halting a potential pandemic before it starts. But what safeguards will be in place to make sure AI isn’t used for harm?
OpenAI’s stated mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence “benefits all of humanity.” But its roots are in the Silicon Valley technology community, where growth at all costs to build massive personal fortunes have generally come ahead of moral concerns.
Elon Musk was one of the major initial funders of OpenAI and previously on its board. We’ve seen since his purchase of Twitter what happens when standards and online safety are tossed out in favor of one man’s ego. Meanwhile, Musk’s Neuralink startup, which aims to build computers that can be implanted into human brains, is being investigated for abusing animals in its research.
ChatGPT itself says it can’t connect to the Internet to update what it knows, and that its training data only goes through 2021. What happens when a more advanced AI is connected to the Internet?
AI can’t do anything in the real world without some kind of robotic device it could control. A future AI could decide to build that for itself, finding online 3D printers and ordering drones and self-driving cars to bring together whatever parts it needs. What if the AI realizes legislators are trying to place limits on what it can do, so it decides to stack the vote by spreading misinformation on social networks or channeling donations to favorable candidates? It sounds like a fantasy out of “The Terminator” or “2001: A Space Odyssey.” (And writing about this even made me wonder for a second if I’m placing myself at risk. Hi there, future robot overlord!)
ChatGPT replies as quickly as usual when you ask “What are the potential risks to humans from a super-intelligent AI?”:
One potential risk of a super-intelligent AI is that it could become too powerful and act in ways that are harmful to humanity. This could happen if the AI decides to eliminate humans in order to achieve its goals or to make certain that it is not shut down. Another potential risk is that the AI could make decisions that are unethical or immoral, either because it has been designed to do so or because it has learned to do so on its own. Additionally, a super-intelligent AI could also cause widespread economic disruption, as it would be able to out-compete humans in many tasks and industries. Finally, a super-intelligent AI could potentially pose a threat to human security, as it could be used as a weapon in warfare or other conflicts.
That’s just an AI model replying to a prompt, parroting back what it’s synthesized from articles written by people and posted around the web.
We humans need to keep asking the hard questions.
Burt Herman is co-founder and board chair of Hacks/Hackers.
“Robot reporters are coming to steal your job!” That’s the warning from experts as AI technology continues to advance, with the potential to revolutionize the journalism industry.
That paragraph above wasn’t written by me. It’s what shiny new AI chatbot ChatGPT spit out when I prompted it to “write a lede in the style of a tabloid newspaper for an article about AI and its future implications for journalism.”
But the reality will be quite the contrary: Journalists will become even more essential to society as AI enters the mainstream, where we will help set standards, track potential abuses, and bring our ethics and standards to the technology. And AI will surely shake the world in ways we can’t yet imagine.
This past year has seen an explosion of “generative AI” products with algorithms that take a descriptive prompt and create pseudo-realistic pictures and video in styles from paintings to cartoons. AI-enhanced personal avatars have become a meme on social networks.
And now ChatGPT, with an interface that’s like texting your know-it-all friend, is opening more eyes to the possibilities of AI. Just days after its release, ChatGPT was up to 1 million users, according to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. The program can write poems and songs in various styles, check software code, and produce credible-sounding summaries on basically any topic.
ChatGPT will look primitive compared to what’s coming as soon as 2023. OpenAI’s latest AI model, GPT-4, is expected to be dramatically more powerful — and potentially much closer to what’s known as “artificial general intelligence.” That would mean the AI model could learn on its own, rather than the cumbersome training process now required. Once AI can teach itself, some experts speculate it could rapidly evolve into “superintelligence” — where the capabilities of the technology vastly outpace all human capabilities and intellect.
This could be used to amazing benefit, curing cancer or halting a potential pandemic before it starts. But what safeguards will be in place to make sure AI isn’t used for harm?
OpenAI’s stated mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence “benefits all of humanity.” But its roots are in the Silicon Valley technology community, where growth at all costs to build massive personal fortunes have generally come ahead of moral concerns.
Elon Musk was one of the major initial funders of OpenAI and previously on its board. We’ve seen since his purchase of Twitter what happens when standards and online safety are tossed out in favor of one man’s ego. Meanwhile, Musk’s Neuralink startup, which aims to build computers that can be implanted into human brains, is being investigated for abusing animals in its research.
ChatGPT itself says it can’t connect to the Internet to update what it knows, and that its training data only goes through 2021. What happens when a more advanced AI is connected to the Internet?
AI can’t do anything in the real world without some kind of robotic device it could control. A future AI could decide to build that for itself, finding online 3D printers and ordering drones and self-driving cars to bring together whatever parts it needs. What if the AI realizes legislators are trying to place limits on what it can do, so it decides to stack the vote by spreading misinformation on social networks or channeling donations to favorable candidates? It sounds like a fantasy out of “The Terminator” or “2001: A Space Odyssey.” (And writing about this even made me wonder for a second if I’m placing myself at risk. Hi there, future robot overlord!)
ChatGPT replies as quickly as usual when you ask “What are the potential risks to humans from a super-intelligent AI?”:
One potential risk of a super-intelligent AI is that it could become too powerful and act in ways that are harmful to humanity. This could happen if the AI decides to eliminate humans in order to achieve its goals or to make certain that it is not shut down. Another potential risk is that the AI could make decisions that are unethical or immoral, either because it has been designed to do so or because it has learned to do so on its own. Additionally, a super-intelligent AI could also cause widespread economic disruption, as it would be able to out-compete humans in many tasks and industries. Finally, a super-intelligent AI could potentially pose a threat to human security, as it could be used as a weapon in warfare or other conflicts.
That’s just an AI model replying to a prompt, parroting back what it’s synthesized from articles written by people and posted around the web.
We humans need to keep asking the hard questions.
Burt Herman is co-founder and board chair of Hacks/Hackers.
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Nik Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage