Algorithmic fact checking will go mainstream in 2023.
Teams of computer scientists around the globe have already developed AI systems designed to detect manipulated media, misinformation or fake news.
Some types of verification are well-suited to a high-tech approach: A team from Drexel Univeristy recently published a new approach for detecting forged and manipulated videos. Their system combines forensic analysis with deep learning to detect fake videos that would slip past human reviewers or existing systems.
But fact-checking isn’t usually so straightforward. A quote might be accurate, but misleading. Every news story is built on a subjective frame of what’s included — or excluded. That nuance, however, is lost when researchers test a new AI model against benchmark datasets that catalog posts as true or false.
The researchers who are developing cutting edge AI fact-checking systems today measure their accuracy to the hundredth of a percent against benchmark datasets of social media posts and articles. That’s the standard way for artificial intelligence researchers to test and share their results, but it’s not well-suited to supporting journalists on deadline or platforms that need to make moderation decisions at scale.
The teams building these tools are well-intentioned, but their work risks being a high-tech Maginot Line: A defense against misleading COVID tweets from 2020 that can’t anticipate — or respond to — the next iteration of information warfare.
The challenge for journalists, however, will be if these tools are widely adopted by social media platforms, ISPs, or content-managment systems. Fake and misleading stories might still circulate because bad actors would have the resources to engineer ways around the automated tools. Reporters, on the other hand, might find their work blocked as investigations and enterprise reporting lack the precedent in the AI’s model to appear “true.”
But it doesn’t need to be that way.
Journalists can engage with the technologists who are working in this space to improve — and direct — their work. As an industry we can wrestle with the ethics of letting machines audit and improve our reporting. We can be open to the disruptive power of artificial intelligence at all points in our value chain, instead of closing ourselves off and assuming the future will look just like today.
If we spend 2023 waiting for the killer AI app that will save journalism, we won’t like the results. We’ll wind up playing catch-up, as we have with each wave of technological disruption for the last two decades.
But if we use the coming year to act — by tracking the technologies that will shape our industry, by building partnerships that equip our organizations to grow, by taking stock of the skills we need in the newsroom — we can have agency over our future.
We can create a future where AI is a tool for making journalism more sustainable instead of inhabiting a future created by others
Sam Guzik leads product strategy for WNYC and is a foresight expert advisor at the Future Today Institute.
Algorithmic fact checking will go mainstream in 2023.
Teams of computer scientists around the globe have already developed AI systems designed to detect manipulated media, misinformation or fake news.
Some types of verification are well-suited to a high-tech approach: A team from Drexel Univeristy recently published a new approach for detecting forged and manipulated videos. Their system combines forensic analysis with deep learning to detect fake videos that would slip past human reviewers or existing systems.
But fact-checking isn’t usually so straightforward. A quote might be accurate, but misleading. Every news story is built on a subjective frame of what’s included — or excluded. That nuance, however, is lost when researchers test a new AI model against benchmark datasets that catalog posts as true or false.
The researchers who are developing cutting edge AI fact-checking systems today measure their accuracy to the hundredth of a percent against benchmark datasets of social media posts and articles. That’s the standard way for artificial intelligence researchers to test and share their results, but it’s not well-suited to supporting journalists on deadline or platforms that need to make moderation decisions at scale.
The teams building these tools are well-intentioned, but their work risks being a high-tech Maginot Line: A defense against misleading COVID tweets from 2020 that can’t anticipate — or respond to — the next iteration of information warfare.
The challenge for journalists, however, will be if these tools are widely adopted by social media platforms, ISPs, or content-managment systems. Fake and misleading stories might still circulate because bad actors would have the resources to engineer ways around the automated tools. Reporters, on the other hand, might find their work blocked as investigations and enterprise reporting lack the precedent in the AI’s model to appear “true.”
But it doesn’t need to be that way.
Journalists can engage with the technologists who are working in this space to improve — and direct — their work. As an industry we can wrestle with the ethics of letting machines audit and improve our reporting. We can be open to the disruptive power of artificial intelligence at all points in our value chain, instead of closing ourselves off and assuming the future will look just like today.
If we spend 2023 waiting for the killer AI app that will save journalism, we won’t like the results. We’ll wind up playing catch-up, as we have with each wave of technological disruption for the last two decades.
But if we use the coming year to act — by tracking the technologies that will shape our industry, by building partnerships that equip our organizations to grow, by taking stock of the skills we need in the newsroom — we can have agency over our future.
We can create a future where AI is a tool for making journalism more sustainable instead of inhabiting a future created by others
Sam Guzik leads product strategy for WNYC and is a foresight expert advisor at the Future Today Institute.
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
James Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism