AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

“We can be open to the disruptive power of artificial intelligence at all points in our value chain, instead of closing ourselves off and assuming the future will look just like today.”

Algorithmic fact checking will go mainstream in 2023.

Teams of computer scientists around the globe have already developed AI systems designed to detect manipulated media, misinformation or fake news.

Some types of verification are well-suited to a high-tech approach: A team from Drexel Univeristy recently published a new approach for detecting forged and manipulated videos. Their system combines forensic analysis with deep learning to detect fake videos that would slip past human reviewers or existing systems.

But fact-checking isn’t usually so straightforward. A quote might be accurate, but misleading. Every news story is built on a subjective frame of what’s included — or excluded. That nuance, however, is lost when researchers test a new AI model against benchmark datasets that catalog posts as true or false.

The researchers who are developing cutting edge AI fact-checking systems today measure their accuracy to the hundredth of a percent against benchmark datasets of social media posts and articles. That’s the standard way for artificial intelligence researchers to test and share their results, but it’s not well-suited to supporting journalists on deadline or platforms that need to make moderation decisions at scale.

The teams building these tools are well-intentioned, but their work risks being a high-tech Maginot Line: A defense against misleading COVID tweets from 2020 that can’t anticipate — or respond to — the next iteration of information warfare.

The challenge for journalists, however, will be if these tools are widely adopted by social media platforms, ISPs, or content-managment systems. Fake and misleading stories might still circulate because bad actors would have the resources to engineer ways around the automated tools. Reporters, on the other hand, might find their work blocked as investigations and enterprise reporting lack the precedent in the AI’s model to appear “true.”

But it doesn’t need to be that way.

Journalists can engage with the technologists who are working in this space to improve — and direct — their work. As an industry we can wrestle with the ethics of letting machines audit and improve our reporting. We can be open to the disruptive power of artificial intelligence at all points in our value chain, instead of closing ourselves off and assuming the future will look just like today.

If we spend 2023 waiting for the killer AI app that will save journalism, we won’t like the results. We’ll wind up playing catch-up, as we have with each wave of technological disruption for the last two decades.

But if we use the coming year to act — by tracking the technologies that will shape our industry, by building partnerships that equip our organizations to grow, by taking stock of the skills we need in the newsroom — we can have agency over our future.

We can create a future where AI is a tool for making journalism more sustainable instead of inhabiting a future created by others

Sam Guzik leads product strategy for WNYC and is a foresight expert advisor at the Future Today Institute.

Algorithmic fact checking will go mainstream in 2023.

Teams of computer scientists around the globe have already developed AI systems designed to detect manipulated media, misinformation or fake news.

Some types of verification are well-suited to a high-tech approach: A team from Drexel Univeristy recently published a new approach for detecting forged and manipulated videos. Their system combines forensic analysis with deep learning to detect fake videos that would slip past human reviewers or existing systems.

But fact-checking isn’t usually so straightforward. A quote might be accurate, but misleading. Every news story is built on a subjective frame of what’s included — or excluded. That nuance, however, is lost when researchers test a new AI model against benchmark datasets that catalog posts as true or false.

The researchers who are developing cutting edge AI fact-checking systems today measure their accuracy to the hundredth of a percent against benchmark datasets of social media posts and articles. That’s the standard way for artificial intelligence researchers to test and share their results, but it’s not well-suited to supporting journalists on deadline or platforms that need to make moderation decisions at scale.

The teams building these tools are well-intentioned, but their work risks being a high-tech Maginot Line: A defense against misleading COVID tweets from 2020 that can’t anticipate — or respond to — the next iteration of information warfare.

The challenge for journalists, however, will be if these tools are widely adopted by social media platforms, ISPs, or content-managment systems. Fake and misleading stories might still circulate because bad actors would have the resources to engineer ways around the automated tools. Reporters, on the other hand, might find their work blocked as investigations and enterprise reporting lack the precedent in the AI’s model to appear “true.”

But it doesn’t need to be that way.

Journalists can engage with the technologists who are working in this space to improve — and direct — their work. As an industry we can wrestle with the ethics of letting machines audit and improve our reporting. We can be open to the disruptive power of artificial intelligence at all points in our value chain, instead of closing ourselves off and assuming the future will look just like today.

If we spend 2023 waiting for the killer AI app that will save journalism, we won’t like the results. We’ll wind up playing catch-up, as we have with each wave of technological disruption for the last two decades.

But if we use the coming year to act — by tracking the technologies that will shape our industry, by building partnerships that equip our organizations to grow, by taking stock of the skills we need in the newsroom — we can have agency over our future.

We can create a future where AI is a tool for making journalism more sustainable instead of inhabiting a future created by others

Sam Guzik leads product strategy for WNYC and is a foresight expert advisor at the Future Today Institute.

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

AX Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning