Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

“Content lives and dies by the number of people who engage with it. The press needs to stop giving attention away for free.”

In October 2021, I made this TikTok:

@drjess21

When the response is out of proportion to the actual threat offered…this internet researcher says you may be in the middle of a moral panic. #MakeADogsDay #myfinALLYmoment #mediastudies #internetstudies #socialmedia #professor #professorsoftiktok #academia #research #researchtok #phd #tenuretrack

♬ that is a scarecrow – ☕️ Mochadrift

Around that time, the conversations about “challenges” on TikTok were abundant. These are viral actions or dance moves made with the intention that others will participate and put their own spin on the content. At the time I made this TikTok, the challenges seemed to be out of control: “Slap a Teacher,” “Devious Licks,” “Hellmaxxing.”. The press, particularly local news organizations, ran wild with articles on these challenges.

I made that TikTok calling out the reactions to these challenges as moral panics because something seemed amiss. If you’re unfamiliar, a moral panic is when the response to something is out of all proportion to the actual threat. I’ve been an internet researcher for almost a decade, and I wasn’t finding any evidence that any of these challenges actually existed. There was plenty of evidence of people talking about the challenges, or showing their alleged aftermaths — but no evidence of the actual challenge.

Turns out, I was right.

This past March, The Washington Post learned that Facebook had hired a Republican consulting firm to orchestrate these fake challenges in a smear campaign against TikTok. Meta, Facebook’s parent company that also owns Instagram, has struggled to retain younger users. The strategy seemed to be that by smearing its competitor, Meta could brand TikTok as dangerous and get younger users off it, hopefully luring them back to Meta-owned apps.

The press got played. And it took barely six months before it happened again.

In September 2022, news reports across the United States reported on an allegedly new TikTok trend: people cooking chicken in the cold-and-flu medicine NyQuil. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a statement warning people not to do this, and press coverage exploded.

But there was never any conclusive evidence this trend was actually happening. The internet encyclopedia Know Your Meme dates the earliest mention of so-called “Sleepy Chicken” back to 2017, when it was first mentioned as a joke on the forum 4chan.

There’s a history here. Go back to the infamous Tide Pod debacle of 2018. An internet challenge of eating Tide Pod laundry detergent was allegedly spreading like wildfire. In reality, according to Consumer Reports, the bulk of calls to poison control centers were for children under five and elderly individuals with dementia. While isolated incidents did occur, there was very little evidence of widespread Tide Pod ingestion due to this challenge. Like “Slap a Teacher” and “Sleepy Chicken,” there were a plethora of videos talking about individuals doing it — but not a lot of video evidence.

The “Sleepy Chicken debacle” and Facebook’s TikTok smear campaign show us that, not only have media makers figured out how to manipulate the press on topics pertaining to internet culture, but the press keeps allowing itself to be manipulated. Many in the press and institutions like the FDA have done more harm than these supposed challenges do. Sleepy Chicken was an obscurity, relegated to the periphery of internet forums and culture. It was not even a “challenge,” just an obscure forum post meant to shock. It was only when the FDA issued its warning — and the press covered it in earnest — that the copycat nature of the “challenge” began and the harmful practice was given attention.

Online, attention is the most vital commodity we have to give. Content lives and dies by the number of people who engage with it. The press needs to stop giving attention away for free. While there are some internet reporters who do thorough and excellent coverage, many have a lot to learn to avoid being manipulated.

Social media platforms aren’t just spaces for interaction and content consumption. They are spaces where battles for power play out, whether that’s a platform trying to undermine their competitors (like Meta) or isolated individuals using shock tactics to build clout. Unless people in the press (and ancillary media systems, like the press offices of the FDA) retain internet experts, they’ll continue to do more harm than any internet challenge ever could.

Jessica Maddox is an assistant professor of digital media technology at the University of Alabama.

In October 2021, I made this TikTok:

@drjess21

When the response is out of proportion to the actual threat offered…this internet researcher says you may be in the middle of a moral panic. #MakeADogsDay #myfinALLYmoment #mediastudies #internetstudies #socialmedia #professor #professorsoftiktok #academia #research #researchtok #phd #tenuretrack

♬ that is a scarecrow – ☕️ Mochadrift

Around that time, the conversations about “challenges” on TikTok were abundant. These are viral actions or dance moves made with the intention that others will participate and put their own spin on the content. At the time I made this TikTok, the challenges seemed to be out of control: “Slap a Teacher,” “Devious Licks,” “Hellmaxxing.”. The press, particularly local news organizations, ran wild with articles on these challenges.

I made that TikTok calling out the reactions to these challenges as moral panics because something seemed amiss. If you’re unfamiliar, a moral panic is when the response to something is out of all proportion to the actual threat. I’ve been an internet researcher for almost a decade, and I wasn’t finding any evidence that any of these challenges actually existed. There was plenty of evidence of people talking about the challenges, or showing their alleged aftermaths — but no evidence of the actual challenge.

Turns out, I was right.

This past March, The Washington Post learned that Facebook had hired a Republican consulting firm to orchestrate these fake challenges in a smear campaign against TikTok. Meta, Facebook’s parent company that also owns Instagram, has struggled to retain younger users. The strategy seemed to be that by smearing its competitor, Meta could brand TikTok as dangerous and get younger users off it, hopefully luring them back to Meta-owned apps.

The press got played. And it took barely six months before it happened again.

In September 2022, news reports across the United States reported on an allegedly new TikTok trend: people cooking chicken in the cold-and-flu medicine NyQuil. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a statement warning people not to do this, and press coverage exploded.

But there was never any conclusive evidence this trend was actually happening. The internet encyclopedia Know Your Meme dates the earliest mention of so-called “Sleepy Chicken” back to 2017, when it was first mentioned as a joke on the forum 4chan.

There’s a history here. Go back to the infamous Tide Pod debacle of 2018. An internet challenge of eating Tide Pod laundry detergent was allegedly spreading like wildfire. In reality, according to Consumer Reports, the bulk of calls to poison control centers were for children under five and elderly individuals with dementia. While isolated incidents did occur, there was very little evidence of widespread Tide Pod ingestion due to this challenge. Like “Slap a Teacher” and “Sleepy Chicken,” there were a plethora of videos talking about individuals doing it — but not a lot of video evidence.

The “Sleepy Chicken debacle” and Facebook’s TikTok smear campaign show us that, not only have media makers figured out how to manipulate the press on topics pertaining to internet culture, but the press keeps allowing itself to be manipulated. Many in the press and institutions like the FDA have done more harm than these supposed challenges do. Sleepy Chicken was an obscurity, relegated to the periphery of internet forums and culture. It was not even a “challenge,” just an obscure forum post meant to shock. It was only when the FDA issued its warning — and the press covered it in earnest — that the copycat nature of the “challenge” began and the harmful practice was given attention.

Online, attention is the most vital commodity we have to give. Content lives and dies by the number of people who engage with it. The press needs to stop giving attention away for free. While there are some internet reporters who do thorough and excellent coverage, many have a lot to learn to avoid being manipulated.

Social media platforms aren’t just spaces for interaction and content consumption. They are spaces where battles for power play out, whether that’s a platform trying to undermine their competitors (like Meta) or isolated individuals using shock tactics to build clout. Unless people in the press (and ancillary media systems, like the press offices of the FDA) retain internet experts, they’ll continue to do more harm than any internet challenge ever could.

Jessica Maddox is an assistant professor of digital media technology at the University of Alabama.

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

An Xiao Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming