Platforms are over

“Why stay? Does the economic benefit really outweigh the reputational cost? The time seems opportune to leave and make a statement in so doing.”

Platforms are on life support. Alternative AI interfaces are on the rise. Meta is shifting emphasis away from Facebook to AR- and VR-enabled portals for interaction. Mastodon is emerging as a friendlier, smaller-scale (for now) antidote to the mass interaction most platforms foster. Twitter has transitioned from serving as the PR instrument of President Trump to the pet project of a billionaire. People have begun to exit platforms en masse, leaving behind zombie accounts with many followers and no activity. They download content and lock up accounts. It almost feels like they’re locking up house and leaving hostile territory, hoping possibly to return when things are normal again, whatever that may mean. The people are leaving; the bots keep gaining ground.

Where does that leave journalism?

It’s time for journalists to rethink their relationships to platforms. Platforms are not neutral; they never were. They are technology, and per Kranzberg’s famous first law, technology is neither good nor bad, nor is it neutral. Platforms are human-made and reflect the biases of their makers — in particular, of their owners. If journalists want to maintain their commitment to democracy, they must rethink their relationship to platforms that do little to strengthen democracy.

I’m not suggesting that journalists abandon platforms as a site of research and inquiry. However, if news institutions want to rebuild public trust around their mission, they’ll have to think critically about the places they take their business, and their readers, through.

News organizations rely on platforms to distribute content and drive back clicks to their sites. Leaving platforms is a complex decision for them. It’s a decision with economic repercussions. Staying on certain platforms, however, also has democratic consequences. Is it ethical for organizations that carry the crux of democracy to maintain an affiliation with platforms that don’t?

Community, trust, and authenticity do not scale up easily, if at all. As platforms expand, they lose the authenticity that rendered them unique. This isn’t inevitable: Responsible scaling can help platforms grow up and larger in a manner that preserves the affect that originally drew people to that platform. Contextual curation, consistent moderation, socialization to a platform, and etiquette are some practices that can help maintain the original atmosphere of interaction that a platform afforded. They can help preserve the sense of place, what Joshua Meyrowitz presciently described as the right balance between public and private that draws people in and fosters community and trust. But then again, community and trust aren’t things we create instantaneously or share in volume. We don’t trust everyone. We don’t feel close to everyone. We create our own places within larger spaces and thus render the closeness that hopefully will foster community.

As platforms continue to scale up, people’s connections to them will continue to thin out. Platforms will instead offer a Rolodex of contacts; an entry account to other spaces; a zombie account that collects dust like an abandoned house. They will become more vulnerable to content manipulation, engineered to support the whims of venture capital and stock market shorting. At present, the world watches as Elon Musk tweets content that seems tailor-made to test its effect on stock valuation. Musk follows a strategy that creates noise, estimating that this will maintain or increase perceptions of the value of the platform. And he further mocks news organizations for criticizing his practices yet remaining on his platform.

Why stay? Does the economic benefit really outweigh the reputational cost? The time seems opportune to leave and make a statement in so doing. What might shock the system more than all news institutions joining forces and leaving a platform like Twitter together?

If that seems like a lot, I’ll offer an alternative proposal.

In writing this piece, I asked ChatGPT to write me a manifesto for journalism. It offered a formulaic yet accurate treatise on fairness, objectivity, and democracy. The intelligence we create is tuned up to give us the responses we trained it to; does the world we live in fit that description? No. But what if news organizations trained their own conversational agents to engage in different modalities of news storytelling, ones that build on slower forms of news storytelling, like podcasts, that hold promise for building trust? I’m not suggesting that ChatGPT is not susceptible to manipulation, nor that we substitute conversational models for human interaction. I recommend that we optimize language models, like ChatGPT, to complement and augment our abilities instead of substituting; to help news institutions become more engaged in building platforms that are used to share the news, with a long-term investment in rebuilding trust, rather than a short-term interest in profit. Journalists can work together with social scientists and engineers to give these infrastructures the right architecture; the kind that turns a space into a place; the form that fosters trust, community, and accuracy. It’s not a prediction, but it is a challenge and an opportunity for the coming year.

Zizi Papacharissi is a professor of communication and political science at the University of Illinois Chicago).

Platforms are on life support. Alternative AI interfaces are on the rise. Meta is shifting emphasis away from Facebook to AR- and VR-enabled portals for interaction. Mastodon is emerging as a friendlier, smaller-scale (for now) antidote to the mass interaction most platforms foster. Twitter has transitioned from serving as the PR instrument of President Trump to the pet project of a billionaire. People have begun to exit platforms en masse, leaving behind zombie accounts with many followers and no activity. They download content and lock up accounts. It almost feels like they’re locking up house and leaving hostile territory, hoping possibly to return when things are normal again, whatever that may mean. The people are leaving; the bots keep gaining ground.

Where does that leave journalism?

It’s time for journalists to rethink their relationships to platforms. Platforms are not neutral; they never were. They are technology, and per Kranzberg’s famous first law, technology is neither good nor bad, nor is it neutral. Platforms are human-made and reflect the biases of their makers — in particular, of their owners. If journalists want to maintain their commitment to democracy, they must rethink their relationship to platforms that do little to strengthen democracy.

I’m not suggesting that journalists abandon platforms as a site of research and inquiry. However, if news institutions want to rebuild public trust around their mission, they’ll have to think critically about the places they take their business, and their readers, through.

News organizations rely on platforms to distribute content and drive back clicks to their sites. Leaving platforms is a complex decision for them. It’s a decision with economic repercussions. Staying on certain platforms, however, also has democratic consequences. Is it ethical for organizations that carry the crux of democracy to maintain an affiliation with platforms that don’t?

Community, trust, and authenticity do not scale up easily, if at all. As platforms expand, they lose the authenticity that rendered them unique. This isn’t inevitable: Responsible scaling can help platforms grow up and larger in a manner that preserves the affect that originally drew people to that platform. Contextual curation, consistent moderation, socialization to a platform, and etiquette are some practices that can help maintain the original atmosphere of interaction that a platform afforded. They can help preserve the sense of place, what Joshua Meyrowitz presciently described as the right balance between public and private that draws people in and fosters community and trust. But then again, community and trust aren’t things we create instantaneously or share in volume. We don’t trust everyone. We don’t feel close to everyone. We create our own places within larger spaces and thus render the closeness that hopefully will foster community.

As platforms continue to scale up, people’s connections to them will continue to thin out. Platforms will instead offer a Rolodex of contacts; an entry account to other spaces; a zombie account that collects dust like an abandoned house. They will become more vulnerable to content manipulation, engineered to support the whims of venture capital and stock market shorting. At present, the world watches as Elon Musk tweets content that seems tailor-made to test its effect on stock valuation. Musk follows a strategy that creates noise, estimating that this will maintain or increase perceptions of the value of the platform. And he further mocks news organizations for criticizing his practices yet remaining on his platform.

Why stay? Does the economic benefit really outweigh the reputational cost? The time seems opportune to leave and make a statement in so doing. What might shock the system more than all news institutions joining forces and leaving a platform like Twitter together?

If that seems like a lot, I’ll offer an alternative proposal.

In writing this piece, I asked ChatGPT to write me a manifesto for journalism. It offered a formulaic yet accurate treatise on fairness, objectivity, and democracy. The intelligence we create is tuned up to give us the responses we trained it to; does the world we live in fit that description? No. But what if news organizations trained their own conversational agents to engage in different modalities of news storytelling, ones that build on slower forms of news storytelling, like podcasts, that hold promise for building trust? I’m not suggesting that ChatGPT is not susceptible to manipulation, nor that we substitute conversational models for human interaction. I recommend that we optimize language models, like ChatGPT, to complement and augment our abilities instead of substituting; to help news institutions become more engaged in building platforms that are used to share the news, with a long-term investment in rebuilding trust, rather than a short-term interest in profit. Journalists can work together with social scientists and engineers to give these infrastructures the right architecture; the kind that turns a space into a place; the form that fosters trust, community, and accuracy. It’s not a prediction, but it is a challenge and an opportunity for the coming year.

Zizi Papacharissi is a professor of communication and political science at the University of Illinois Chicago).

Francesco Zaffarano   There is no end of “social media”

Kerri Hoffman   Podcasting goes local

Tre'vell Anderson   Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns

Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper   Mission-driven metrics become our North Star

Gordon Crovitz   The year advertisers stop funding misinformation

Simon Galperin   Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media

Christina Shih   Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials

Hillary Frey   Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires

S. Mitra Kalita   “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”

Pia Frey   Publishers start polling their users at scale

Basile Simon   Towards supporting criminal accountability

Peter Sterne   AI enters the newsroom

Khushbu Shah   Global reporting will suffer

Janet Haven   ChatGPT and the future of trust 

Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau   More of the same

Joni Deutsch   Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence

Cassandra Etienne   Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities

Nicholas Jackson   There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work

Alexandra Borchardt   The year of the climate journalism strategy

Burt Herman   The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning

Anita Varma   Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival

Sarah Marshall   A web channel strategy won’t be enough

Karina Montoya   More reporters on the antitrust beat

Anthony Nadler   Confronting media gerrymandering

Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson   Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs

Sam Guzik   AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.

Brian Stelter   Finding new ways to reach news avoiders

Stefanie Murray   The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy

Eric Holthaus   As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power

Don Day   The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.

Ståle Grut   Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too

Alex Sujong Laughlin   Credit where it’s due

Kirstin McCudden   We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering

Barbara Raab   More journalism funders will take more risks

Amy Schmitz Weiss   Journalism education faces a crossroads

Dana Lacey   Tech will screw publishers over

Sarah Alvarez   Dream bigger or lose out

Josh Schwartz   The AI spammers are coming

Victor Pickard   The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce

Ryan Nave   Citizen journalism, but make it equitable

Walter Frick   Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets

Mario García   More newsrooms go mobile-first

Emily Nonko   Incarcerated reporters get more bylines

Shanté Cosme   The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy

Taylor Lorenz   The “creator economy” will be astroturfed

Elite Truong   In platform collapse, an opportunity for community

Parker Molloy   We’ll reach new heights of moral panic

Eric Nuzum   A focus on people instead of power

Andrew Donohue   We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy

Nicholas Thompson   The year AI actually changes the media business

Mauricio Cabrera   It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities

Jody Brannon   We’ll embrace policy remedies

Joe Amditis   AI throws a lifeline to local publishers

Sue Cross   Thinking and acting collectively to save the news

Ariel Zirulnick   Journalism doubles down on user needs

Jennifer Brandel   AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more. 

Moreno Cruz Osório   Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action

John Davidow   A year of intergenerational learning

Rachel Glickhouse   Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor

Jessica Clark   Open discourse retrenches

Mael Vallejo   More threats to press freedom across the Americas

Sarah Stonbely   Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels

Matt Rasnic   More newsroom workers turn to organized labor

Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni   The future of journalism is not you

Alex Perry   New paths to transparency without Twitter

Juleyka Lantigua   Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine

Laxmi Parthasarathy   Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism

Susan Chira   Equipping local journalism

David Skok   Renewed interest in human-powered reporting

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism

Dannagal G. Young   Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat

Bill Grueskin   Local news will come to rely on AI

Laura E. Davis   The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves

Andrew Losowsky   Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Journalists productively harness generative AI tools

Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski   News organizations step up their support for caregivers

Sam Gregory   Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made

Errin Haines   Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public

Doris Truong   Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth

Anika Anand   Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures

Amethyst J. Davis   The slight of the great contraction

Kathy Lu   We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders

Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson   News product goes from trend to standard

Ayala Panievsky   It’s time for PR for journalism

Johannes Klingebiel   The innovation team, R.I.P.

Michael Schudson   Journalism gets more and more difficult

Janelle Salanga   Journalists work from a place of harm reduction

J. Siguru Wahutu   American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies

Sarabeth Berman   Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale

Raney Aronson-Rath   Journalists will band together to fight intimidation

Eric Ulken   Generative AI brings wrongness at scale

Ben Werdmuller   The internet is up for grabs again

Jenna Weiss-Berman   The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)

Snigdha Sur   Newsrooms get nimble in a recession

Wilson Liévano   Diaspora journalism takes the next step

Nikki Usher   This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)

Cindy Royal   Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…

Jim Friedlich   Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage

Sue Robinson   Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality

Brian Moritz   Rebuilding the news bundle

Al Lucca   Digital news design gets interesting again

David Cohn   AI made this prediction

Joshua P. Darr   Local to live, wire to wither

A.J. Bauer   Covering the right wrong

Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles   DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse

Julia Angwin   Democracies will get serious about saving journalism

Cory Bergman   The AI content flood

Tamar Charney   Flux is the new stability

Anna Nirmala   News organizations get new structures

Kaitlyn Wells   We’ll prioritize media literacy for children

Daniel Trielli   Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.

Emma Carew Grovum   The year to resist forgetting about diversity

Rodney Gibbs   Recalibrating how we work apart

Gabe Schneider   Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay

Sumi Aggarwal   Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development

Esther Kezia Thorpe   Subscription pressures force product innovation

Jesse Holcomb   Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled

Michael W. Wagner   The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming

Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven   Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism

Leezel Tanglao   Community partnerships drive better reporting

Richard Tofel   The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates

AX Mina   Journalism in a time of permacrisis

Paul Cheung   More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs

Alexandra Svokos   Working harder to reach audiences where they are

Kaitlin C. Miller   Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly

Julia Beizer   News fatigue shows us a clear path forward

Jessica Maddox   Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture

Jaden Amos   TikTok personality journalists continue to rise

Gina Chua   The traditional story structure gets deconstructed

Dominic-Madori Davis   Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting

Christoph Mergerson   The rot at the core of the news business

Jakob Moll   Journalism startups will think beyond English

Surya Mattu   Data journalists learn from photojournalists

Alan Henry   A reckoning with why trust in news is so low

Ryan Gantz   “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”

Lisa Heyamoto   The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability

Jarrad Henderson   Video editing will help people understand the media they consume

Larry Ryckman   We’ll work together with our competitors

Mar Cabra   The inevitable mental health revolution

Peter Bale   Rising costs force more digital innovation

Priyanjana Bengani   Partisan local news networks will collaborate

Jonas Kaiser   Rejecting the “free speech” frame

Ryan Kellett   Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers

Zizi Papacharissi   Platforms are over

Bill Adair   The year of the fact-check (no, really!)

Martina Efeyini   Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.

Jim VandeHei   There is no “peak newsletter”

Tim Carmody   Newsletter writers need a new ethics

Joanne McNeil   Facebook and the media kiss and make up

Masuma Ahuja   Journalism starts working for and with its communities

Kavya Sukumar   Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale

Mariana Moura Santos   A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world

Eric Thurm   Journalists think of themselves as workers

Delano Massey   The industry shakes its imposter syndrome

Upasna Gautam   Technology that performs at the speed of news

Jacob L. Nelson   Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists

Sue Schardt   Toward a new poetics of journalism