A responsible press criticism

“I know there is a difference between, let’s say, sound political economy scholarship that describes the structure of ownership of commercial mainstream media outlets and angry tweetstorms that denounce the corrupt MSM.”

For all the anxiety it brought, 2017 was a productive year for media and journalism scholars, journalism reviews, “future-of-the-news” experts, and everyone that is, in one way or another, taking part in media criticism writ large. The whole “fake news,” “post-truth” debacle has had at least one merit: bringing media criticism to the forefront, reinvigorating debates about the role of journalism in public life, galvanizing discussions about the failures, errors, glitches, and malfunctions — let’s be honest here, it’s rarely about the triumphs — of media in our democratic life.

As a media scholar, writing on a website that believes it needs to help journalism to figure it all out, I can only rejoice in the fact that our most important conversations are not (only) about the latest technological fads anymore, but about core issues such as media effects, democracy, power, or propaganda. Those questions matter; it’s nice to see them in the spotlight.

There is something unsettling, though, in this sudden renewed popularity of press criticism, as it reshuffles the cards in a weird way. With Donald Trump being one of the loudest megaphones of a certain press criticism — one that relentlessly attacks mainstream media as being corrupt, manipulated and manipulative — we find ourselves in a strange position when it comes to doing what we do, that is, dissecting how the news media works. There’s a fine line between efforts to describe, in realist terms, how the news industry operates (with its ideals never fully satisfied, its shortcomings and shortcuts, its influences and limitations, its ideological underpinnings and its power dynamics) and downright conspiracy theories fueled by populism and anger at the so-called media elites. I know there is a difference between, let’s say, sound political economy scholarship that describes the structure of ownership of commercial mainstream media outlets and angry tweetstorms that denounce the corrupt MSM. But that line is sometimes blurred, in the cacophony of outrage, moral panics and genuine concern that characterizes today’s press criticism.

So 2018 may be the time to figure out how to perform responsible press criticism. Press criticism that can speak to concerns about the role of media in public life, misinformation, and the interplay between media, politics, and business — but also understands that recrimination and denunciation are not enough. Press criticism that does not, however, respond to vicious attacks on press freedom by listening to the siren call of professional protectionism and self-righteousness. In other words, responsible press criticism that would try to hold the press accountable — just like any form of power — while being more than merely adversarial, vitriolic, or admonitory.

How can we achieve that? As it is often the case, we’re not starting with a blank slate. There’s more than a century of press criticism that we could draw inspiration from. One example among others is George Seldes (1890-1995), the famous American investigative journalist, press critic and editor of the weekly newsletter In Fact: An Antidote to Falsehoods in the Daily Press from 1940 to 1950. Seldes, a self-proclaimed liberal, lived and worked through troubled times — two world wars, the rise of fascism and Nazism, the Cold War, and McCarthyism. His exposés spared no one: media advertisers and press tycoons, censorship, distortion, and all kinds of attempts to mislead the public, but also Soviet communists, big tobacco companies, the whole American industrial system, and, of course, Nazis and fascists.

It’s not that his outrage was indiscriminate and all-encompassing, but the press criticism that was at the core of In Fact was part of a wider indignation that cannot be separated from issues that run deep into society: politics, social justice, or capitalism. Seldes was not ranting in the comfortable environment of a specialized conversation between media pundits and future-of-the-news experts; he wanted to pick up a fight with everything at the same time, in front of the public.

But the most impressive feat of Seldes’ career and long life is that he never turned into a cynic. He wasn’t criticizing the press out of sterile anger, populism, or the hope of commercial or political gain. He did so out of genuine belief that there’s something to be done about it, and with the old-fashioned certitude that a newspaper can move the world. His hopes about the role of journalism in society were modest, but firm: “to get the facts, and present them as truthfully as human frailty permits.”

Juliette De Maeyer is an assistant professor at Université de Montréal.

Imaeyen Ibanga   Longform video leads the way

Kyle Ellis   Let’s build our way out of this

Felix Salmon   Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin

Craig Newmark   Working together toward sustainable solutions

Zizi Papacharissi   Women come back

Will Sommer   The year local media gets conservative

P. Kim Bui   The reckoning is only beginning

Monique Judge   Letting black women tell their own stories

Amie Ferris-Rotman   More female reporters abroad (please)

Kristen Muller   The year of the voter

Dannagal G. Young   Stop covering politics as a game

Joanne McNeil   Gatekeeping the gatekeepers

Mike Caulfield   Refactoring media literacy for the networked age

Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy   Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism

Jim Brady   With the people, not just of the people

Hannah Cassius   The year of the echo-chamber escapists

Sue Schardt   Jump the niche

Tim Carmody   Watch out for Spotify

Rachel Davis Mersey   AI, with real smarts

Nikki Usher   The year of The Washington Post

Jennifer Choi   Standing up for us and for each other

Brian Lam   Sketchy ethics around product reviews

Almar Latour   Conquering calm

Alexios Mantzarlis   Moving fake news research out of the lab

Adam Thomas   Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor

Usha Sahay   Wallets get opened

Steve Grove   The midterms are an opportunity

Jessica Parker Gilbert   Design connects storytelling and strategy

Monika Bauerlein   The firehose of falsehood

Julia Beizer   A longer view on the pivot

Nancy Watzman   Know thy TV

Nathalie Malinarich   Peak push

Mario García   Storytelling finally adapts to mobile

John Keefe   Scooped by AI

Eric Nuzum   Beyond the narrative arc

Sara M. Watson   Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters

C.W. Anderson   The social media apocalypse

Andrew Ramsammy   The year ownership mattered

Mandy Velez   texting is lit rn, fam

Sam Sanders   Shine the light on ourselves

Manoush Zomorodi   Self-help as a publishing strategy

S. Mitra Kalita   The arc of news and audience

Frédéric Filloux   External forces

Feli Sánchez   The year for guerrilla user research

Pia Frey   Address users as individuals

Amy Webb   Listen to weak signals

Tanya Cordrey   Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention

Jennifer Coogan   The future is female

Neha Gandhi   Filler killers

Basile Simon   We need better career paths for news nerds

Rubina Madan Fillion   Unlocking the potential of AI

Susie Banikarim   R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)

Rick Berke   Value is the watchword

Michelle Garcia   Navigating journalistic transparency

Ray Soto   VR reaches the next level

Jake Levine   The return to now

Rodney Gibbs   Tech workers turn to journalism

Nicholas Quah   Stop talking trash about young people

Carrie Brown-Smith   Transparency finally takes off

Heather Bryant   Building the ecosystems for collaboration

Errin Haines Whack   At the ballot, it’s time to count black women

Juliette De Maeyer   A responsible press criticism

Valérie Bélair-Gagnon   Seeking trust in fragmented spaces

Matt Thompson   Here come the attention managers

Pablo Boczkowski   The rise of skeptical reading

Taylor Lorenz   Social and media will split

Bill Keller   A growing turn to philanthropy

Tracie Powell   The muting of underserved voices

Andrew Haeg   The year journalists become relationship builders

Joanne Lipman   Journalists inventing revenue streams

Sam Ford   The year of investing in processes

Corey Ford   The empire strikes back

Sarah Marshall   Loyalty as the key performance indicator

Andrew Losowsky   The year of resilience

Corey Johnson   The pro-fact resistance

Umbreen Bhatti   The trust problem isn’t new

Joyce Barnathan   It will be harder to bury the news

Francesco Marconi   The year of machine-to-machine journalism

Helen Havlak   Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds

Tanzina Vega   It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic

Kinsey Wilson   Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up

Cindy Royal   Your journalism curriculum is obsolete

Carlos Martínez de la Serna   The new journalism commons

Edward Roussel   Eyes, ears, and brains

Vivian Schiller   Pivot to tomorrow

Jamie Mottram   From pageviews to t-shirts

Pete Brown   Push alerts, personalized

Alan Soon   The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media

Jared Newman   Venture funding and digital news don’t mix

Cory Haik   Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact

Laura E. Davis   Writing answers before you know the question

Ståle Grut   Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks

Rodney Benson   Better, less read, and less trusted

Charo Henríquez   Training is an investment, not an expense

Miguel Castro   The arrival of the impact producer

Caitria O'Neill   The new court of public opinion

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen   The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms

Burt Herman   Things get real

Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán   The editorial meeting of the future

L. Gordon Crovitz   Serving readers over advertisers

Borja Echevarría   TV goes digital, digital goes TV

Alice Antheaume   Are you fluent in AI?

Kathleen McElroy   Building a news video experience native to mobile

Michael Kuntz   The only pivot that might work

Alfred Hermida   Going beyond mobile-first

Paul Ford   Go global

Dheerja Kaur   Fun with subscription products

Richard J. Tofel   The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention

Kelsey Proud   No, no, no

Niketa Patel   Live journalism comes of age

Caitlin Thompson   Podcasting models mature and diversify

Lucas Graves   From algorithms to institutions

Damon Krukowski   Reviving the alt-weekly soul

Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg   (Hint: It’s about your brand)

Matt Boggie   The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea

Julia B. Chan   Looking for loyalty in all the right places

Juleyka Lantigua-Williams   Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time

Sally Lehrman   Trust comes first

Nushin Rashidian   Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives

Luke O'Neil   The end is already here

Mary Walter-Brown   Show a little vulnerability

Jarrod Dicker   Honesty in advertising

Mariana Moura Santos   Think local, act global

Emily Goligoski   Looking beyond news for inspiration

Amy King   Let’s amplify visual voice

Emma Carew Grovum   Newsroom culture becomes a priority

Ariana Tobin   Too tired to tap

Elizabeth Jensen   Show your work

Dan Newman   A return to trust

Mariano Blejman   News games rule

Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer   Skepticism and narcissism

Debra Adams Simmons   And a woman shall lead them

Michelle Ferrier   The year of the great reckoning

Kim Fox   Audience teams diversify their approach

Daniel Trielli   The rich get richer, the poor scramble

Matt DeRienzo   A recession, then a collapse

Molly de Aguiar   Good journalism won’t be enough

Tamar Charney   We get serious about algorithms

Doris Truong   Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes

Jesse Holcomb   Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you

José Zamora   Revenue-first journalism

Aron Pilhofer   We can’t leave the business to the business side any more

Federica Cherubini   The rise of bridge roles in news organizations

David Skok   Finding an information-life balance

Dan Shanoff   You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)

Eric Ulken   The year local publishers get smart(er) about change

Marie Gilot   No assholes allowed

Ruth Palmer   Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities

Raju Narisetti   Mirror, mirror on the wall

Alastair Coote   The year of self-improvement

Evie Nagy   Pivot to mobile video frustration

Lam Thuy Vo   Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest

Mi-Ai Parrish   Blockchain and trust

Christopher Meighan   Passive partnership is in the rearview

Mira Lowe   The year of the local watchdog

Vanessa K. DeLuca   Women’s voices take center stage

Yvonne Leow   The rise of video messaging

Jim Moroney   Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for

Matt Carlson   Attacks on the press will get worse

Justin Kosslyn   The year journalists become digital security experts

Nicholas Diakopoulos   Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity

An Xiao Mina   Memes and visuals come to the fore

Ernst-Jan Pfauth   Publishing less to give readers more

Claire Wardle   Disinformation gets worse

Kawandeep Virdee   Zines had it right all along

Hossein Derakhshan   Television has won

Trushar Barot   The Jio-fication of India

Jacqui Cheng   Retailers move into content

Mary Meehan   Real lives are at stake in rural areas

Jassim Ahmad   Thriving on change

Sydette Harry   Listen to your corner and watch for the hook

Cristina Wilson   The year of the Instagram Story

Rachel Schallom   Better design helps differentiate opinion and news

Lanre Akinola   Making noise is not a strategy

Raney Aronson-Rath   Transparency is the antidote to fake news

Renée Kaplan   The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)