If there is one truth about political journalism, it is that the game frame dominates. Politics is covered as a competition between left versus right, Democrat versus Republican; a battle of individuals and political factions, rather than a debate over governing philosophies and policies. For years, political scientists have warned that the practice of covering politics as a strategic game erodes public faith in governmental institutions. And now, with notable brazenness, political elites are exploiting this frame to achieve their own political goals. The loser in this equation is the American public.
In an analysis of election coverage of the 2016 presidential primaries, Harvard’s Shorenstein Center found that 56 percent of election news was dedicated to stories of the competitive game, 33 percent to stories about the campaign process, and only 11 percent to substantive policy-based concerns.
11 percent.
What started almost three decades ago as an observation about how elections are covered as if they were games has become the dominant story of how news covers just about everything. Americans in 2017 are instructed to think of all aspects of political life as a game: presidential elections, congressional elections, debates around tax reform, health care, foreign policy, national security, and climate change.
So prevalent is the language of competition and partisan strategy, in fact, that it has even come to dominate how journalists report on our least partisan institutions, the courts. Soon-to-be-published research by Matthew Hitt and Kathleen Searles shows that news increasingly uses the game frame as the orienting narrative that guides reporting of Supreme Court decisions. (The “5-4 Bush v. Gore” story was just the beginning).
Concerns about the game frame are old news. Harvard’s Tom Patterson was fretting about this 25 years ago in 1992’s Out of Order. In it, he wrote, “the dominant schema for the reporter is structured around the notion that politics is a strategic game.”
Journalists cover politics this way in part because it’s how they think about politics — as strategy and competition between individuals and opposing factions. But talking about politics as a game is also a way for journalists to pull back the curtain to show (or should I say construct) the behind-the-scenes machinery of politics. Game frames purport to give “the inside scoop” while playing into journalism’s perceived need for the dramatic and personalized (à la Lance Bennett).
As BuzzFeed’s Eve Fairbanks writes in her scathing critique of this politics-as-game genre pushed and perfected by Mark Halperin, the now-disgraced former political reporter, “the point at which politics becomes hard to understand is the point at which it is no longer politics but just competitive play, a Risk-style board game. Once there is only a handful of self-qualified players, we no longer qualify as a democracy, or perhaps even a polity.” To cover political life as a game played between elites tells citizens that politics is a spectacle to be watched, not an activity to be participated in. Such coverage creates what scholar Bob Entman refers to as a “democracy without citizens.”
In Spiral of Cynicism, Joseph Cappella and Kathleen Hall Jamieson document the extensive effects of game-framing on political cynicism. They explain how the game narrative actually restructures our cognitive schemas related to politics such that our interpretation of subsequent political information occurs through this lens as well. This explains the devastating findings of the aforementioned study by Hitt and Searles. Not only does their work reveal that journalists are increasingly framing SCOTUS rulings as a game — it also shows that exposure to game frames reduces support for individual SCOTUS decisions, and the increase in game frames over time has harmed public support for the court as an institution.
The game frame and the party cues that accompany it also matter in terms of shaping how able and motivated our citizens are to think critically about policies that actually affect them. Work by Bert Bakker and Yphtach Lelkes shows that when information is simply embedded with partisan cues — “Republicans support this, Democrats support that,” even our most thoughtful partisans rely on these party cues to make their decisions, instead of on the quality of the arguments presented.
Neither this journalistic practice nor its cognitive implications are new. What is new, perhaps, is the extent to which politicians, interest groups, and political parties are actively capitalizing on the game frame that they know dominates how news stories will be told. In a deliberate attempt to activate tribal identities and mobilize their bases (and to keep details of domestic and foreign policy in the shadows), political leaders — President Trump chief among them — work to inject news coverage with “us versus them” signals to guarantee the story will be told their way.
Put simply, journalists’ reliance on this practice is allowing elites to further divide the country, avoid scrutiny, and distract citizens away from thoughtful policy debate on issues that carry real-life consequences.
It’s time for the game frame to die.
The challenge, of course, is in envisioning and articulating an alternative news frame that is not preoccupied with stories of warring ideological factions.
Assuming news narratives need protagonists, who will become the protagonist if the stories are not told in terms of Democrats versus Republicans, or Trump versus Clinton?
I am reminded of Kathleen Hall Jamieson’s response on CBS news with Dan Rather in 1996, following a particularly substantive presidential debate between Bill Clinton and Bob Dole.
Rather, entrenched in the game-frame, asked Jamieson, “Who won tonight?”
Jamieson replied, “The American people.”
Maybe “the American people” can finally become the protagonist in 2018.
Dannagal G. Young is an associate professor of communication at the University of Delaware.
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future