If there is one truth about political journalism, it is that the game frame dominates. Politics is covered as a competition between left versus right, Democrat versus Republican; a battle of individuals and political factions, rather than a debate over governing philosophies and policies. For years, political scientists have warned that the practice of covering politics as a strategic game erodes public faith in governmental institutions. And now, with notable brazenness, political elites are exploiting this frame to achieve their own political goals. The loser in this equation is the American public.
In an analysis of election coverage of the 2016 presidential primaries, Harvard’s Shorenstein Center found that 56 percent of election news was dedicated to stories of the competitive game, 33 percent to stories about the campaign process, and only 11 percent to substantive policy-based concerns.
11 percent.
What started almost three decades ago as an observation about how elections are covered as if they were games has become the dominant story of how news covers just about everything. Americans in 2017 are instructed to think of all aspects of political life as a game: presidential elections, congressional elections, debates around tax reform, health care, foreign policy, national security, and climate change.
So prevalent is the language of competition and partisan strategy, in fact, that it has even come to dominate how journalists report on our least partisan institutions, the courts. Soon-to-be-published research by Matthew Hitt and Kathleen Searles shows that news increasingly uses the game frame as the orienting narrative that guides reporting of Supreme Court decisions. (The “5-4 Bush v. Gore” story was just the beginning).
Concerns about the game frame are old news. Harvard’s Tom Patterson was fretting about this 25 years ago in 1992’s Out of Order. In it, he wrote, “the dominant schema for the reporter is structured around the notion that politics is a strategic game.”
Journalists cover politics this way in part because it’s how they think about politics — as strategy and competition between individuals and opposing factions. But talking about politics as a game is also a way for journalists to pull back the curtain to show (or should I say construct) the behind-the-scenes machinery of politics. Game frames purport to give “the inside scoop” while playing into journalism’s perceived need for the dramatic and personalized (à la Lance Bennett).
As BuzzFeed’s Eve Fairbanks writes in her scathing critique of this politics-as-game genre pushed and perfected by Mark Halperin, the now-disgraced former political reporter, “the point at which politics becomes hard to understand is the point at which it is no longer politics but just competitive play, a Risk-style board game. Once there is only a handful of self-qualified players, we no longer qualify as a democracy, or perhaps even a polity.” To cover political life as a game played between elites tells citizens that politics is a spectacle to be watched, not an activity to be participated in. Such coverage creates what scholar Bob Entman refers to as a “democracy without citizens.”
In Spiral of Cynicism, Joseph Cappella and Kathleen Hall Jamieson document the extensive effects of game-framing on political cynicism. They explain how the game narrative actually restructures our cognitive schemas related to politics such that our interpretation of subsequent political information occurs through this lens as well. This explains the devastating findings of the aforementioned study by Hitt and Searles. Not only does their work reveal that journalists are increasingly framing SCOTUS rulings as a game — it also shows that exposure to game frames reduces support for individual SCOTUS decisions, and the increase in game frames over time has harmed public support for the court as an institution.
The game frame and the party cues that accompany it also matter in terms of shaping how able and motivated our citizens are to think critically about policies that actually affect them. Work by Bert Bakker and Yphtach Lelkes shows that when information is simply embedded with partisan cues — “Republicans support this, Democrats support that,” even our most thoughtful partisans rely on these party cues to make their decisions, instead of on the quality of the arguments presented.
Neither this journalistic practice nor its cognitive implications are new. What is new, perhaps, is the extent to which politicians, interest groups, and political parties are actively capitalizing on the game frame that they know dominates how news stories will be told. In a deliberate attempt to activate tribal identities and mobilize their bases (and to keep details of domestic and foreign policy in the shadows), political leaders — President Trump chief among them — work to inject news coverage with “us versus them” signals to guarantee the story will be told their way.
Put simply, journalists’ reliance on this practice is allowing elites to further divide the country, avoid scrutiny, and distract citizens away from thoughtful policy debate on issues that carry real-life consequences.
It’s time for the game frame to die.
The challenge, of course, is in envisioning and articulating an alternative news frame that is not preoccupied with stories of warring ideological factions.
Assuming news narratives need protagonists, who will become the protagonist if the stories are not told in terms of Democrats versus Republicans, or Trump versus Clinton?
I am reminded of Kathleen Hall Jamieson’s response on CBS news with Dan Rather in 1996, following a particularly substantive presidential debate between Bill Clinton and Bob Dole.
Rather, entrenched in the game-frame, asked Jamieson, “Who won tonight?”
Jamieson replied, “The American people.”
Maybe “the American people” can finally become the protagonist in 2018.
Dannagal G. Young is an associate professor of communication at the University of Delaware.
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
An Xiao Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives